Karakhan Manifesto

Last updated
Soviet diplomat Lev Karakhan (1889-1937) issued a manifesto in 1919 concerning relations with China. L Karahan.jpg
Soviet diplomat Lev Karakhan (1889–1937) issued a manifesto in 1919 concerning relations with China.

The Karakhan Manifesto was a statement of Soviet policy toward China dated 25 July 1919. It was issued by Lev Karakhan, deputy commissioner for foreign affairs for Soviet Russia. The manifesto offered to relinquish various rights Russia had obtained by treaty in China, including Chinese territories seized during Tsarism, extraterritoriality, economic concessions, and Russia's share of the Boxer indemnity. [1] These and similar treaties had been denounced by Chinese nationalists as "unequal." The manifesto created a favorable impression of Russia and Marxism among Chinese. It was often contrasted with the Treaty of Versailles (1919), which granted Shandong to Japan. [2]

The manifesto was prompted by the Bolshevik advance into Siberia, which created a need to establish a relationship with China. [3] The Bolsheviks saw the Chinese as one of "the oppressed peoples of the East" and therefore a potential ally against the imperialist powers. [3]

The manifesto is addressed to, "the Chinese people and the Governments of North and South China." [2] Because both Russia and China were in a state of civil war at this time, diplomatic exchanges were often delayed. Although the document was published in Moscow in August 1919, it was not formally presented to Chinese diplomats until February 1920. The version presented at this time includes the passage, "the Soviet Government returns to the Chinese people, without any compensation, the Chinese Eastern Railway." [4]

Six months later, Karakhan personally handed the Chinese a second version of the manifesto, one that did not include this remarkable offer. In fact, the Soviet authorities denied ever having made it. The railway offer had been included by "mistake," they explained. The Soviets may have hoped the offer of the railway would generate an enthusiastic response in Beijing, leading to a Sino-Soviet alliance against Japan. The warlords in Beijing, closely tied to Japan, responded hesitantly. When the hoped-for alliance proved unattainable, the Russians withdrew their offer. [2] In any event, traditional Russian interests and rights in China, including control of the Chinese Eastern Railway, were reaffirmed in a series of secret agreements made in 1924–1925. [5]

The manifesto came at a crucial time in the development of Chinese communism. It encouraged interest in Marxism and thus played a role in the founding of the Chinese Communist Party in 1921. [6]

Are the Karakhan Manifestos Still Valid?

First, let's cover a little prehistory. In 1858, the Governor-General of Siberia, Muraviev sailed down the Amur River with several gunboats. He demanded from the Qing government the land from the Stanavoi mountains to the Amur River. This is the land west of the Amur. The Qing who were preoccupied with other possible invasions (Britain, France) was in an indefensible position (with its army far away) and thus, conceded the land, signing the Treaty of Aigun on May 28, 1858. Muraviev repeated this maneuver just two years later (gunboats down the Amur) and forced the Qing to ratify the Treaty of Aigun and sign a new treaty the Treaty of Beijing (Nov. 14, 1860) ceding the land east of the Amur River until the Pacific Ocean. This land which was formerly northern Manchuria and now became the Priamur and the Primore of the Russian Far East (pp. 20-22). [7] See the improvised map of China and total territories lost to Russia/USSR from 1858 to 1921 (see map).

This is a map showing all of the territories that Russia and Soviet Russia took from China from 1858 to 1921 Territories taken by Russia from China, 1858-1921 (See Red Markings).jpg
This is a map showing all of the territories that Russia and Soviet Russia took from China from 1858 to 1921

Now, we return to the question, "Why were the Karakhan Manifestos (declarations) made to China?" The Soviets and their representative, Lev Karakhan, the Soviet Deputy-Minister of Foreign Affairs, offered China quite a bit without requiring China to give back anything in return. So, why were they made? From 1918 to October 1922, the Russian Civil War raged between the Bolsheviks (the Reds) and the White movement (the Whites). The Whites or White Guards were backed by the Allied Forces. The Allies in 1918 consisted of over 12 countries (Japan, Poland, China, the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Australia, India, South Africa and several others-- all of who sent troops, Japan sent the most, 73,000 soldiers.) who sought to remove the Bolsheviks and the ideology of communism from the former Russian Empire. These were heady and uncertain days for the Bolsheviks. At the time in Manchuria, there were over 150,000 former Russian (Tsarist) citizens most of whom were anti-Bolshevik. Thus, the Bolsheviks wanted to return the Chinese Eastern Railway and other territories to China to gain China's allegiance and to protect Russia from another Allied front based in Manchuria. [8]

Karakhan Manifesto I (signed July 25, 1919) courtesy of Allen S. Whiting's Soviet Policies in China, 1917-1924. The Karakhan Manifesto I of 1919.jpg
Karakhan Manifesto I (signed July 25, 1919) courtesy of Allen S. Whiting's Soviet Policies in China, 1917-1924.

The Karakhan Manifestos of July 25, 1919 and September 27, 1920 offer to return to China "everything that was taken by the Tsarist government independently or together with the Japanese and the Allies (p. 270)." [9] This is an offer to return northern Manchuria, that is, a large part of the Russian Far East to China in 1919 and 1920. The USSR made several claims to withdraw, retract or annul the two Karakhan Manifestos (declarations). But the declaration was signed by Lev Karakhan himself while he was in office as a Soviet diplomat. The first Karakhan Manifesto offered:

The Soviet Government has renounced the conquests made by the Tsarist Government which deprived China of Manchuria and other areas.... The Soviet Government returns to the Chinese people without compensation of any kind the Chinese Eastern Railway and all mining concessions, forestry, and gold mines which were seized from them by the government of the Tsars... (Whiting, Soviet Policies, p. 270).
The Karakhan Manifesto II of 1920 Karakhan Manifesto II of 1920-.jpg
The Karakhan Manifesto II of 1920

The second Karakhan Manifesto was written one year, two months later in September 27, 1920. It read:

The Government of the Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republics declares as void all the treaties concluded by the former Government of Russia with China, renounces all the annexations of Chinese territory, all the concessions in China, and returns to China free of charge, and forever, all that was ravenously taken from her by the Tsar's Government and by the Russian bourgeoisie (Whiting, Soviet Policies, p. 273).

However, Karakhan was the Soviet People's Deputy Minister (also called Commissar) of Foreign Affairs. He made a unilateral offer to China, signed only by himself and presented this signed declaration to the Chinese in 1919 and 1920. Therefore, only the Chinese have the legal right to accept or reject the offer. Thus, the answer to whether the Karakhan Manifestos are valid depends on the point of view. The current Russian Federation does not see them as valid and for good reason, it's territory they have held for over 150 years regardless of the documents. In contrast, Taiwan sees the "manifestos" as valid while China has yet to state an official position. China did however redraw its map of the Russian Far East in February of 2023 calling Vladivostok, "Haishenwai" and Khabarovsk, "Boli." [10] These were the old Chinese names for both settlements. The Russians consider that the Russia-Border Treaties of 1991 and 2004 have set the Russian-Chinese borders where they stand on the current map of 2024.

Nevertheless, the Karakhan Manifestos are unilateral, legally binding declarations. They are not treaties nor accords which need to be signed by both parties. Two American historians, Bruce A. Elleman and Jon K. Chang, believe that the Karakhan Manifestos are valid and still extant. [11] Chang and Elleman add a further article to emphasize their point. Lai's "challenge" was extraordinary, a blunt, straight-forward declaration for the Chinese (ROC and PRC) to Russia that they want the territories returned to PRC-China (the territories were taken from China and must return there, not ROC Taiwan). China at this moment (fall 2024) has unbelievable fortune and negotiating power with Russia. Does it begin negotiations now or do they wait until their negotiating power has fully dissipated? [12]

Furthermore, Elleman's Diplomacy and Deception provides an additional document, a secret protocol signed by Lev Karakhan, the Soviet deputy minister of Foreign Affairs and C.T. Wang, the Chinese representative in charge of negotiations with the USSR in 1924. This secret protocol according to Elleman simply ruled that the previous agreements (the manifestos) "were not abolished, they were simply not enforced." The decision to accept or annul the Karakhan Manifestos would depend on future conferences and negotiations (pp. 100-102). [13] There are those that disagree, namely Sergey Radchenko, a scholar in international relations. When President Lai of Taiwan made a quip (Sept. 2, 2024) about China invading Russia to take back the "lost territories," Radchenko said that Lai was "seriously misguided." Radchenko then spoke for China saying "China fully recognizes Russia's sovereignty over these territories." This might also be called "misguided" as he has never been a Chinese citizen, but rather a former Soviet and then Russian citizen (post-1991, per open sources). [14]

The next day, Sept. 3, 2024, TASS, the Russian state-run news agency issued an article entitled "Russia, China officially confirm renunciation of territorial claims, diplomat says." The article purported to cite Maria Zakharova, the spokeperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry. What Zakharova actually said was quite telling. She said, "We are confident that our friends in Beijing share the same position." This statement acknowledged some doubt as she was "confident," but not completely sure. Zakharova also threw in some disparaging comments about Lai (referring to him as a "fringe politician"). [15] Radchenko's earlier statements about the validity of China recovering its "lost territories" mirrors that of TASS.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Brest-Litovsk</span> 1918 treaty between Soviet Russia and the Central Powers

The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was a separate peace treaty signed on 3 March 1918 between Soviet Russia and the Central Powers, by which Russia withdrew from World War I. The treaty, which followed months of negotiations after the armistice on the Eastern Front in December 1917, was signed at Brest-Litovsk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Far East</span> Geographical region

The Russian Far East is a region in North Asia. It is the easternmost part of Russia and the Asian continent, and is coextensive with the Far Eastern Federal District, which encompasses the area between Lake Baikal and the Pacific Ocean. The area's largest city is Khabarovsk, followed by Vladivostok. The region shares land borders with the countries of Mongolia, China, and North Korea to its south, as well as maritime boundaries with Japan to its southeast, and with the United States along the Bering Strait to its northeast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Aigun</span> 1858 treaty between Russia and China

The Treaty of Aigun was an 1858 treaty between the Russian Empire and Yishan, official of the Qing dynasty of China. It established much of the modern border between the Russian Far East and China by ceding much of Manchuria, now known as Northeast China. Negotiations began after China was threatened with war on a second front by Governor-General of the Far East Nikolay Muraviev when China was suppressing the Taiping Rebellion. It reversed the Treaty of Nerchinsk (1689) by transferring the land between the Stanovoy Range and the Amur River from the Qing dynasty to the Russian Empire. Russia received over 600,000 square kilometers (231,660 sq mi) of what became known as Outer Manchuria. While the Qing government initially refused to recognize the validity of the treaty, the Russian gains under the Treaty of Aigun was affirmed as part of the 1860 Sino-Russian Convention of Peking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese Eastern Railway</span> Historical railroad system in northeast China

The Chinese Eastern Railway or CER, is the historical name for a railway system in Northeast China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outer Manchuria</span> Historical region in Northeast Asia

Outer Manchuria, sometimes called Russian Manchuria, refers to a region in Northeast Asia that is now part of the Russian Far East but historically formed part of Manchuria. While Manchuria now more normatively refers to Northeast China, it originally included areas consisting of Priamurye between the left bank of Amur River and the Stanovoy Range to the north, and Primorskaya which covered the area in the right bank of both Ussuri River and the lower Amur River to the Pacific Coast. The region was ruled by a series of Chinese dynasties and the Mongol Empire, but control of the area was ceded to the Russian Empire by Qing China during the Amur Annexation in the 1858 Treaty of Aigun and 1860 Treaty of Peking, with the terms "Outer Manchuria" and "Russian Manchuria" arising after the Russian annexation. The same general area became known as Green Ukraine after a large number of settlers from Ukraine came to the region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boxer Protocol</span> 1901 post-Boxer Rebellion peace treaty

The Boxer Protocol was a diplomatic protocol signed in China's capital Beijing on September 7, 1901, between the Qing Empire of China and the Eight-Nation Alliance that had provided military forces as well as Belgium, Spain, and the Netherlands, after China's defeat in the intervention to put down the Boxer Rebellion. The protocol is regarded as one of China's unequal treaties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nikolay Muravyov-Amursky</span> Russian general, statesman, and diplomat (1809–1881)

Count Nikolay Nikolayevich Muravyov-Amursky was a Russian general, statesman and diplomat, who played a major role in the expansion of the Russian Empire into the Amur River basin and to the shores of the Sea of Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japan–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between the Russian Federation and Japan are the continuation of the relationship of Japan with the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1991, and with the Russian Empire from 1855 to 1917. Historically, the two countries had cordial relations until a clash of territorial ambitions in the Manchuria region of northeastern China led to the Russo–Japanese War in 1904, ending in a Japanese victory which contributed to the weakening of the monarchy in Russia. Japan would later intervene in the Russian Civil War from 1918 until 1922, sending troops to the Russian Far East and Siberia. That was followed by border conflicts between the new Soviet Union and the Empire of Japan throughout the 1930s. The two countries signed a nonaggression pact in 1941, although the Soviet government declared war on Japan anyway in August 1945, invading the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo as well as seizing the Kuril chain of islands just north of Japan. The two countries ended their formal state of war with the Soviet–Japanese Joint Declaration of 1956, but as of 2022 have not resolved this territorial dispute over ownership of the Kurils. Due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, relations became very tense after Japan imposed sanctions against Russia. Russia placed Japan on a list of "unfriendly countries", along with South Korea, European Union members, NATO members, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Singapore, Taiwan, and Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Territorial evolution of Russia</span>

The borders of Russia changed through military conquests and by ideological and political unions from the 16th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Sino-Russian relations</span>

Prior to the 17th century, China and Russia were on opposite ends of Siberia, which was populated by independent nomads. By about 1640 Russian settlers had traversed most of Siberia and founded settlements in the Amur River basin. From 1652 to 1689, China's armies drove the Russian settlers out, but after 1689, China and Russia made peace and established trade agreements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Soviet conflict (1929)</span> 1929 border conflict between the Soviet Union and the Republic of China

The Sino-Soviet conflict of 1929 was an armed conflict between the Soviet Union and the Chinese warlord Zhang Xueliang of the Republic of China over the Chinese Eastern Railway.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lev Karakhan</span> Soviet diplomat (1889–1937)

Lev Mikhailovich Karakhan was a Russian revolutionary and a Soviet diplomat. A member of the RSDLP from 1904. At first a Menshevik, he joined the Bolsheviks in May 1917.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign concessions in China</span> European spheres of influence in China

Foreign concessions in China were a group of concessions that existed during the late Imperial China and the Republic of China, which were governed and occupied by foreign powers, and are frequently associated with colonialism and imperialism.

The Soviet–Japanese Basic Convention was a treaty normalizing relations between the Empire of Japan and the Soviet Union that was signed on 20 January 1925. Ratifications were exchanged in Beijing on February 26, 1925. The agreement was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on May 20, 1925.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet–Japanese border conflicts</span> Armed conflict in the 1930s between the Soviets, Mongolians, and Japanese

The Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, also known as the Soviet-Japanese Border War, the First Soviet-Japanese War, the Russo-Mongolian-Japanese Border Wars or the Soviet-Mongolian-Japanese Border Wars, were a series of minor and major conflicts fought between the Soviet Union, Mongolia and Japan in Northeast Asia from 1932 to 1939.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amur Annexation</span> Russian annexation of Outer Manchuria

Between 1858 and 1860, the Russian Empire annexed territories adjoining the Amur River belonging to the Chinese Qing dynasty through the imposition of unequal treaties. The 1858 Treaty of Aigun, signed by the general Nikolay Muravyov representing the Russian Empire and the official Yishan representing Qing China, ceded Priamurye—a territory stretching from the Amur River north to the Stanovoy Mountains, but the Qing government initially refused to recognize the treaty's validity. Two years later, the Second Opium War concluded with the Convention of Peking, which affirmed the previous treaty as well as an additional cession including the entire Pacific coast to the Korean border, as well as the island of Sakhalin to Russia. These two territories roughly correspond to modern-day Amur Oblast and Primorsky Krai, respectively. Collectively, they are often referred to as Outer Manchuria, part of the greater region of Manchuria.

Events from the year 1929 in China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armistice between Russia and the Central Powers</span> 1917 de facto exit from World War I by Russia

On 15 December [O.S. 2 December] 1917, an armistice was signed between the Russian Republic led by the Bolsheviks on the one side, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Kingdom of Bulgaria, the German Empire and the Ottoman Empire—the Central Powers—on the other. The armistice took effect two days later, on 17 December [O.S. 4 December]. By this agreement Russia de facto exited World War I, although fighting would briefly resume before the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed on 3 March 1918, and Russia made peace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongolia in World War II</span>

Outer Mongolia — officially the Mongolian People's Republic — was ruled by the communist government of Khorloogiin Choibalsan during the period of World War II and had close links with the Soviet Union. Most countries regarded Mongolia, with its fewer than a million inhabitants, as a breakaway province of the Republic of China. Throughout the 1941–1945 war between Germany and the Soviet Union, Mongolia provided the Soviets with economic support—such as livestock, raw materials, money, food and military clothing—violating Mongolian neutrality in favor of the Allies. Mongolia was one of two Soviet satellite states not generally recognised as sovereign states at the time, along with the Tuvan People's Republic; both of these republics participated in World War II.

The Japan–Russia Secret Agreements were a series of four secret treaties signed between the Japanese Empire and the Russian Empire after the Russo-Japanese War, in order to secure and recognize the rights of both sides in areas of the East Asia, specifically the Korean Peninsula, Manchuria, and Mongolia. They were signed four times between 30 July 1907 and around 3 July 1916, however they were abrogated by the Soviet government after the Russian Revolution in 1917.

References

  1. Gao, James, Z., Historical Dictionary of Modern China (1800–1949) . "Karakhan Manifesto". The Scarecrow Press, (2009).
  2. 1 2 3 M Sinha, "The Karakhan Manifesto," China Report, November 1972 vol. 8 no. 6 53.
  3. 1 2 Whiting, Allen S., "The Soviet Offer to China of 1919", The Journal of Asian Studies, August 1951, pp. 355–364, doi : 10.2307/2049007
  4. Uldricks, Teddy J. "Karakhan Declaration." Encyclopedia of Russian History. 2004. Encyclopedia.com.
  5. Elleman, Bruce, "The Soviet Union's Secret Diplomacy Concerning the Chinese Eastern Railway, 1924–1925," The Journal of Asian Studies, May 1994, pp. 459–486, doi : 10.2307/2059842
  6. Encyclopædia Britannica, "Karakhan Manifesto".
  7. Dallin, David J., The Rise of Russia in Asia (London: Hollis & Carter, 1950)
  8. Chang, Jon K. (2016). Burnt by the Sun: The Koreans of the Russian Far East. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN   9780824876746.
  9. Whiting, Allen S. (1953). Soviet Policies in China, 1917-1924. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN   9780804706124.
  10. Aleksandra G. Tirziu, "China's Maps Call Vladivostok 'Haishenwai'," The New York Sun, March 24, 2023 edition
  11. Jon K. Chang and Bruce A. Elleman, "Beijing's claims to Russian territory," Taipei Times, Sept. 11, 2024 edition
  12. Jon K. Chang and Bruce A. Elleman, "Russian far east belongs to China," Taipei Times, Sept. 18, 2024 edition
  13. Elleman, Bruce A. (1997). Diplomacy and Deception: The Secret History of Sino-Soviet Diplomatic Relations, 1917-1927. London: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN   9780765601421.
  14. Micah McCartney, "," Newsweek, Sept. 2, 2024 edition
  15. TASS, "Russia, China officially confirm renunciation of territorial claims," TASS, Sept. 3, 2024 edition