Limited Liability Act 1855

Last updated

Limited Liability Act 1855 [a]
Act of Parliament
Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (1837).svg
Long title An Act for limiting the Liability of Members of certain Joint Stock Companies.
Citation 18 & 19 Vict. c. 133
Territorial extent  [b]
Dates
Royal assent 14 August 1855
Commencement 14 August 1855 [c]
Repealed11 August 1875
Other legislation
Amended by Joint Stock Companies Act 1856
Repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1875
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Limited Liability Act 1855 (18 & 19 Vict. c. 133) was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that first expressly allowed limited liability for corporations that could be established by the general public in England and Wales as well as Ireland. [1] The Act did not apply to Scotland, [2] where the limited liability of shareholders for the debts company debts had been recognised since the mid-18th century with the decision in the case of Stevenson v McNair. [3] Although the validity of the decision in that case had come to be doubted by the mid-19th century, [4] the Joint Stock Companies Act 1856 (19 & 20 Vict. c. 47), which applied across the UK, put the matter beyond doubt by settling that Scottish 'companies' could be possessed of both separate legal personality and limited liability.

Contents

Overview

Under the Act, shareholders were still liable directly to creditors for the unpaid portion of their shares. The modern principle that shareholders are liable to the corporation was introduced by the Joint Stock Companies Act 1844(7 & 8 Vict. c. 110).

The act allowed limited liability to companies of more than 25 members (shareholders). Insurance companies were excluded from the act, though it was standard practice for insurance contracts to exclude action against individual members. Limited liability for insurance companies was allowed by the Companies Act 1862 (25 & 26 Vict. c. 89).

Debate

In the House of Lords, a considerable amount of opposition existed to the idea that companies should have the advantage of limited liability. Many peers objected to what appeared to them as the government rushing through the bill as if its urgency was connected to the effort in the Crimean War. Earl Grey was one of them: [5]

It proposes to depart from the old-established maxim that all the partners are individually liable for the whole of the debts of the concern.

Earl Granville replied to those concerns: [6]

it appears to me that a time of war is the very time which you ought to free commerce from restrictions, and, therefore that the reason he mentioned is an especial reason for pressing on the Bill instead of retarding it.

Repeal

The whole act was repealed by section 1 of, and the schedule to, the Statute Law Revision Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c 66).

See also

Notes

References

  1. Mayson, French and Ryan (2005) 55
  2. Limited Liability Act 1855, s.18
  3. [1757] 14667
  4. Kenneth G. C. Reid, 'Embalmed in Rettie: The City of Glasgow Bank and the Liability of Trustees' in Andrew Burrows, David Johnston and Reinhard Zimmermann (Eds.), [Judge and Jurist: Essays in Memory of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry], (Oxford University Press, 2013), at 492
  5. HL Debs, vol ? col 1904 (7 August 1855)
  6. HL Debs, vol ?, col 1903 (7 August 1855)

Bibliography