Lisa Baldez

Last updated

Lisa Baldez
Nationality American
Alma mater
Awards
Scientific career
Fields
Institutions

Lisa Baldez is an American political scientist and scholar of Latin American Studies. She is a professor of government and Latin American, Latino and Caribbean studies at Dartmouth College, where she was also Cheheyl Professor and director of the Dartmouth Center for the Advancement of Learning at Dartmouth College from 2015 until 2018. She studies the relationship between political institutions and gender equality, and has written about the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, women's protests in Chile, gender quota laws, and the Equal Rights Amendment.

Contents

Education and early work

Baldez attended Princeton University, where she earned a BA in Latin American studies in 1986. [1] She then completed an MA in political science at the University of California, San Diego in 1992, followed by a political science Ph.D. there in 1997. Her dissertation received an honorable mention for the 1998 Best Dissertation Prize from the Women and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association. [1]

In spring of 1997, Baldez worked as an adjunct professor at Rochester Institute of Technology, University of Rochester, and in 1997 she joined the political science faculty at Washington University in St. Louis. [1] From 1999 to 2002, Baldez was a Harbison Faculty Fellow at Washington University in St. Louis. [1] [2] In Spring 2003, she was a visiting professor at Harvard University. [1] In 2003, she became a professor of Government and Latin American, Latino and Caribbean Studies at Dartmouth College. [1]

Career

In 2002, Baldez published the book Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile, in which she studies what causes women to protest, and in what situations they make their gender identity salient as part of their protests. [3] Baldez focuses on the struggle for women's suffrage in Chile, [4] as well as on two major episodes of protests by women in Chile during the 1970s and 1980s: the protests against Salvador Allende and against Augusto Pinochet. [5] In both of these cases women's political mobilization was a major factor in undermining the legitimacy of a regime, even though these movements were in many ways ideologically opposite. [3] Baldez theorizes that women form major social movements when partisan realignment gives them the opportunity to do so, and they are able to frame their exclusion from public life as a reason to protest apart from partisan differences. [6] She tests this idea using archival material and research interviews with activists who were involved in the two movements. [7]

Baldez published a second book, Defying Convention: US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women's Rights, in 2014. In Defying Convention, Baldez studies why the United States was one of very few countries that had not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which pledges to put an end to war and establishes gender equality. [8] Baldez examines this decision in the context of the historical development of a global norm of women's rights, and attributes American non-ratification partly to division among women's groups domestically on how best to achieve gender equality, and partly to United States obstructionism at the UN towards any initiatives by the Soviet Union and its allies. [9] She also studies how the interpretation of the text of the treaty evolved in the years after its drafting, so that the effective meaning of ratifying the treaty might be understood to have changed over time, which complicates the study of why the United States did not ratify the text in different periods. [9] Baldez structures her discussion using historical process tracing, and compares the possibility of America ratifying the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women to its ratification of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination nearly 30 years after that convention's initial drafting. [10] Defying Convention won the 2015 Victoria Schuck Award from the American Political Science Association, which is given each year for "the best book published on women and politics" in the previous year. [11] It also won the 2015 Best Book Award from the Human Rights Section of the American Political Science Association. [12]

In addition to her articles in peer-reviewed academic journals and her chapters in edited books, Baldez was also an editor of the 2008 volume Political Women and American Democracy: Critical Perspectives on Women and Politics Research, together with Christina Wolbrecht and Karen Beckwith. [1] From 2015 until 2018, Baldez was Cheheyl Professor and director of the Dartmouth Center for the Advancement of Learning at Dartmouth College. [13]

Baldez was a founding co-editor of the journal Politics & Gender in 2004. [1] Her work has been cited, or she has been quoted, in news outlets like Vox , [14] KQED-FM, [15] and Bloomberg News . [16]

Selected works

Selected awards

Related Research Articles

International human rights instruments are the treaties and other international texts that serve as legal sources for international human rights law and the protection of human rights in general. There are many varying types, but most can be classified into two broad categories: declarations, adopted by bodies such as the United Nations General Assembly, which are by nature declaratory, so not legally-binding although they may be politically authoritative and very well-respected soft law;, and often express guiding principles; and conventions that are multi-party treaties that are designed to become legally binding, usually include prescriptive and very specific language, and usually are concluded by a long procedure that frequently requires ratification by each states' legislature. Lesser known are some "recommendations" which are similar to conventions in being multilaterally agreed, yet cannot be ratified, and serve to set common standards. There may also be administrative guidelines that are agreed multilaterally by states, as well as the statutes of tribunals or other institutions. A specific prescription or principle from any of these various international instruments can, over time, attain the status of customary international law whether it is specifically accepted by a state or not, just because it is well-recognized and followed over a sufficiently long time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women</span> International bill of rights for women

The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the United Nations General Assembly. Described as an international bill of rights for women, it was instituted on 3 September 1981 and has been ratified by 189 states. Over fifty countries that have ratified the Convention have done so subject to certain declarations, reservations, and objections, including 38 countries who rejected the enforcement article 29, which addresses means of settlement for disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the convention. Australia's declaration noted the limitations on central government power resulting from its federal constitutional system. The United States and Palau have signed, but not ratified the treaty. The Holy See, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Tonga are not signatories to CEDAW.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Commission on the Status of Women</span>

The Commission on the Status of Women is a functional commission of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), one of the main UN organs within the United Nations. CSW has been described as the UN organ promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women. Every year, representatives of Member States gather at United Nations Headquarters in New York to evaluate progress gender equality, identify challenges, set global standards and formulate concrete policies to promote gender equality and advancement of women worldwide. In April 2017, ECOSOC elected 13 new members to CSW for a four-year term 2018–2022. One of the new members is Saudi Arabia, which has been criticised for its treatment of women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Migrant Workers Convention</span>

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is a United Nations multilateral treaty governing the protection of migrant workers and families. Signed on 18 December 1990, it entered into force on 1 July 2003 after the threshold of 20 ratifying States was reached in March 2003. The Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW) monitors implementation of the convention, and is one of the seven UN-linked human rights treaty bodies. The convention applies as of October 2022 in 58 countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Switzerland</span> Overview of the observance of human rights in Switzerland

Human rights are largely respected in Switzerland, one of Europe's oldest democracies. Switzerland is often at or near the top in international rankings of civil liberties and political rights observance. Switzerland places human rights at the core of the nation's value system, as represented in its Federal Constitution. As described in its FDFA's Foreign Policy Strategy 2016-2019, the promotion of peace, mutual respect, equality and non-discrimination are central to the country's foreign relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Chile</span> Overview of the status of women in Chile

The lives, roles, and rights of women in Chile have gone through many changes over time. Chilean women's societal roles have historically been impacted by traditional gender roles and a patriarchal culture, but throughout the twentieth century, women increasingly involved themselves in politics and protest, resulting in provisions to the constitution to uphold equality between men and women and prohibit sex discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Istanbul Convention</span> 2011 Council of Europe convention

The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, better known as the Istanbul Convention, is a human rights treaty of the Council of Europe opposing violence against women and domestic violence which was opened for signature on 11 May 2011, in Istanbul, Turkey. The convention aims at prevention of violence, victim protection and to end the impunity of perpetrators.

The legal status of women in the United States is, in comparison to other countries, equal to that of men, and generally, women are viewed as having equal social standing to men as well. However, among other similar laws, the United States has never ratified the U.N's Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inter-American Commission of Women</span>

The Inter-American Commission of Women, abbreviated CIM, is an organization that falls within the Organization of American States. It was established in 1928 by the Sixth Pan-American Conference and is composed of one female representative from each Republic in the Union. In 1938, the CIM was made a permanent organization, with the goal of studying and addressing women's issues in the Americas.

Costa Rica is often considered one of the best countries in Latin America at upholding Human Rights. It has been involved in the creation of international rights standards. Costa Rica is signatory to, and has ratified, many international treaties regarding rights, including the 1948 United Nations Declaration on Human Rights (UNDHR). Costa Rica scored above the world mean for human rights, achieving top global rankings. Its poverty levels sit at 18.6%, one of the lowest in the Latin American regions. Human rights in Costa Rica predominantly stem from the UNDHR, the Costa Rican Constitution and the Inter-American Human Rights System.

The Victoria Schuck Award is an annual prize granted by the American Political Science Association to the author of the best book published in the previous year on the topic of women and politics. The award is named in honor of the political scientist Victoria Schuck. Although a number of area-specific sections of the American Political Science Association have dedicated book awards, the Schuck Award is one of only a few awards given directly by the Association rather than by a subsection of it.

S. Laurel Weldon is a Canadian and American political scientist, currently a Distinguished Professor of Political Science at Simon Fraser University. She is a democratic and feminist theorist, known for studies of the cross-national evolution of women's rights, policies on the prevention of violence against women, and the inclusion of women in political decision-making. Weldon's work has been noted for contributing to both substantive political theory and empirical methods.

Denise Walsh is an American political scientist, currently a professor of political science and women, gender and sexuality at the University of Virginia. She studies the relationship between women's rights and political inclusion and level of democracy, as well as women's advancement during periods of democratization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Belém do Pará Convention</span>

The Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence against Women, better known as the Belém do Pará Convention, is an international human rights instrument adopted by the Inter-American Commission of Women (CIM) of the Organization of American States (OAS) at a conference held in Belém do Pará, Brazil, on 9 June 1994. It is the first legally binding international treaty that criminalises all forms of violence against women, especially sexual violence. On 26 October 2004, the Follow-Up Mechanism (MESECVI) agency was established to ensure the State parties' compliance with the Convention.

The Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer, or the Women’s Study Circle, was a Chilean feminist organization that existed from 1979 to 1983. It was formed during the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile as a response to the regime’s oppressive actions against citizens and women. For the Círculo women, the struggle for democracy and for women’s rights went hand-in-hand, and they also aimed to reframe feminism by prioritizing women as individuals, rather than their maternal identities. The Círculo de Estudios de la Mujer was part of a larger women’s movement which worked towards the end of the dictatorship, but they disbanded and formed two splinter groups in 1983.

Mary Fainsod Katzenstein is an American political scientist. She is the Stephen and Evalyn Milman Professor of American Studies, Emerita at Cornell University. She specializes in prison reform in the United States, the history of American feminist activism, and the politics of India.

Louise A. Chappell is an Australian political scientist. She is a Scientia Professor at the University of New South Wales, where she is also the director of the Australian Human Rights Institute. She studies gender and politics, the politics of the International Criminal Court, and the politics of Australia in comparative perspective.

Shireen Hassim is a South African political scientist, historian, and scholar of gender studies and African studies. She is a Professor in the Department of Political Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand, where she is also affiliated with the Institute for Social and Economic Research. In 2019 she became a Canada 150 Research Chair in Gender and African Politics, beginning a seven-year term in the Institute for African Studies at Carleton University. Hassim was the first woman of colour full professor of political science in South Africa.

Kristin Bumiller is an American political scientist. She is the George Daniel Olds Professor in Economic and Social Institutions at Amherst College. She has published work on the structure of anti-discrimination law and the legal responses to rape and domestic violence.

Susan Franceschet is a Canadian political scientist. She is a professor of political science at The University of Calgary. She studies the representation of women both in legislatures and government cabinets, gender quotas for the minimum representation of women in government, and the interaction of gender and public policy. She has written about women's participation in the politics of Chile.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Lisa Baldez". Dartmouth College. October 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  2. ↑ "Carrie Chapman Catt Prize for Research on Women and Politics". Iowa State University. 2013. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  3. 1 2 Noonan, Rita K. (1 March 2004). "Review of Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile". Contemporary Sociology. 33 (2): 231–232. doi:10.1177/009430610403300260. S2CID   151951464.
  4. ↑ Unda, Victor P. (1 January 2005). "Review of Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile". Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature. 59 (2): 112–114. doi:10.2307/3655060. JSTOR   3655060.
  5. ↑ Tomic, Patricia (2003). "Review of Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile". Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies. 28 (55/56): 305–307.
  6. ↑ Friedman, Elisabeth Jay (1 October 2003). "Review of Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile". Political Science Quarterly. 118 (3): 531–532. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb01247.x.
  7. ↑ Haas, Liesl (1 December 2004). "Review of Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile". Perspectives on Politics. 1 (4): 799–800.
  8. ↑ Olcott, Jocelyn (November 2017). "Review of Defying Convention: US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women's Rights". Journal of American Studies. 51 (4): 1295–1297. doi:10.1017/S0021875817001098. S2CID   148648112.
  9. 1 2 Davis, Martha (1 October 2016). "Review of Defying Convention: US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women's Rights". Journal of Human Rights. 15 (4): 571–573. doi:10.1080/14754835.2016.1165089. S2CID   147741274.
  10. ↑ Obradovic, Lana (3 July 2015). "Review of Defying Convention: US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women's Rights". International Feminist Journal of Politics. 17 (3): 515–517. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1055140. S2CID   147070159.
  11. ↑ "Victoria Schuck Award". American Political Science Association. 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  12. ↑ "Best Book Award". American Political Science Association. 2015. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  13. ↑ "Cheheyl Professor History". Dartmouth College. 16 March 2016. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  14. ↑ Matthews, Dylan (18 May 2016). "Justin Trudeau isn't magic, liberals. Parliaments make it easier to pass laws". Vox. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  15. ↑ Leitsinger, Miranda (30 April 2019). "The Equal Rights Amendment: What You Need to Know". KQED. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  16. ↑ Bernstein, Jonathan (24 January 2020). "Democrats Try Flattery as Impeachment-Trial Tactic". Bloomberg. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.