List of proposed quantum registers

Last updated

A practical quantum computer must use a physical system as a programmable quantum register. [1] Researchers are exploring several technologies as candidates for reliable qubit implementations. [2]

Related Research Articles

This is a timeline of quantum computing.

In logic circuits, the Toffoli gate, invented by Tommaso Toffoli, is a universal reversible logic gate, which means that any classical reversible circuit can be constructed from Toffoli gates. It is also known as the "controlled-controlled-not" gate, which describes its action. It has 3-bit inputs and outputs; if the first two bits are both set to 1, it inverts the third bit, otherwise all bits stay the same.

A Bell test, also known as Bell inequality test or Bell experiment, is a real-world physics experiment designed to test the theory of quantum mechanics in relation to Albert Einstein's concept of local realism. Named for John Stewart Bell, the experiments test whether or not the real world satisfies local realism, which requires the presence of some additional local variables to explain the behavior of particles like photons and electrons. As of 2015, all Bell tests have found that the hypothesis of local hidden variables is inconsistent with the way that physical systems behave.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trapped-ion quantum computer</span> Proposed quantum computer implementation

A trapped-ion quantum computer is one proposed approach to a large-scale quantum computer. Ions, or charged atomic particles, can be confined and suspended in free space using electromagnetic fields. Qubits are stored in stable electronic states of each ion, and quantum information can be transferred through the collective quantized motion of the ions in a shared trap. Lasers are applied to induce coupling between the qubit states or coupling between the internal qubit states and the external motional states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer</span> Proposed spin-based quantum computer implementation

Nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computing (NMRQC) is one of the several proposed approaches for constructing a quantum computer, that uses the spin states of nuclei within molecules as qubits. The quantum states are probed through the nuclear magnetic resonances, allowing the system to be implemented as a variation of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR differs from other implementations of quantum computers in that it uses an ensemble of systems, in this case molecules, rather than a single pure state.

Quantum cloning is a process that takes an arbitrary, unknown quantum state and makes an exact copy without altering the original state in any way. Quantum cloning is forbidden by the laws of quantum mechanics as shown by the no cloning theorem, which states that there is no operation for cloning any arbitrary state perfectly. In Dirac notation, the process of quantum cloning is described by:

The spin qubit quantum computer is a quantum computer based on controlling the spin of charge carriers in semiconductor devices. The first spin qubit quantum computer was first proposed by Daniel Loss and David P. DiVincenzo in 1997, also known as the Loss–DiVincenzo quantum computer. The proposal was to use the intrinsic spin-½ degree of freedom of individual electrons confined in quantum dots as qubits. This should not be confused with other proposals that use the nuclear spin as qubit, like the Kane quantum computer or the nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer. Intel has developed quantum computers based on silicon spin qubits, also called hot qubits.

In quantum information and quantum computing, a cluster state is a type of highly entangled state of multiple qubits. Cluster states are generated in lattices of qubits with Ising type interactions. A cluster C is a connected subset of a d-dimensional lattice, and a cluster state is a pure state of the qubits located on C. They are different from other types of entangled states such as GHZ states or W states in that it is more difficult to eliminate quantum entanglement in the case of cluster states. Another way of thinking of cluster states is as a particular instance of graph states, where the underlying graph is a connected subset of a d-dimensional lattice. Cluster states are especially useful in the context of the one-way quantum computer. For a comprehensible introduction to the topic see.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nitrogen-vacancy center</span> Point defect in diamonds

The nitrogen-vacancy center is one of numerous photoluminescent point defects in diamond. Its most explored and useful properties include its spin-dependent photoluminescence, and its relatively long (millisecond) spin coherence at room temperature. The NV center energy levels are modified by magnetic fields, electric fields, temperature, and strain, which allow it to serve as a sensor of a variety of physical phenomena. Its atomic size and spin properties can form the basis for useful quantum sensors. It has also been explored for applications in quantum computing and spintronics.

Within quantum technology, a quantum sensor utilizes properties of quantum mechanics, such as quantum entanglement, quantum interference, and quantum state squeezing, which have optimized precision and beat current limits in sensor technology. The field of quantum sensing deals with the design and engineering of quantum sources and quantum measurements that are able to beat the performance of any classical strategy in a number of technological applications. This can be done with photonic systems or solid state systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yoshihisa Yamamoto (scientist)</span> Japanese applied physicist (born 1950)

Yoshihisa Yamamoto is the director of Physics & Informatics Laboratories, NTT Research, Inc. He is also Professor (Emeritus) at Stanford University and National Institute of Informatics (Tokyo).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum simulator</span> Simulators of quantum mechanical systems

Quantum simulators permit the study of a quantum system in a programmable fashion. In this instance, simulators are special purpose devices designed to provide insight about specific physics problems. Quantum simulators may be contrasted with generally programmable "digital" quantum computers, which would be capable of solving a wider class of quantum problems.

In quantum mechanics, the cat state, named after Schrödinger's cat, is a quantum state composed of two diametrically opposed conditions at the same time, such as the possibilities that a cat is alive and dead at the same time.

Dynamical decoupling (DD) is an open-loop quantum control technique employed in quantum computing to suppress decoherence by taking advantage of rapid, time-dependent control modulation. In its simplest form, DD is implemented by periodic sequences of instantaneous control pulses, whose net effect is to approximately average the unwanted system-environment coupling to zero. Different schemes exist for designing DD protocols that use realistic bounded-strength control pulses, as well as for achieving high-order error suppression, and for making DD compatible with quantum gates. In spin systems in particular, commonly used protocols for dynamical decoupling include the Carr-Purcell and the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill schemes. They are based on the Hahn spin echo technique of applying periodic pulses to enable refocusing and hence extend the coherence times of qubits.

In quantum computing, quantum supremacy or quantum advantage is the goal of demonstrating that a programmable quantum computer can solve a problem that no classical computer can solve in any feasible amount of time, irrespective of the usefulness of the problem. The term was coined by John Preskill in 2012, but the concept dates to Yuri Manin's 1980 and Richard Feynman's 1981 proposals of quantum computing.

Continuous-variable (CV) quantum information is the area of quantum information science that makes use of physical observables, like the strength of an electromagnetic field, whose numerical values belong to continuous intervals. One primary application is quantum computing. In a sense, continuous-variable quantum computation is "analog", while quantum computation using qubits is "digital." In more technical terms, the former makes use of Hilbert spaces that are infinite-dimensional, while the Hilbert spaces for systems comprising collections of qubits are finite-dimensional. One motivation for studying continuous-variable quantum computation is to understand what resources are necessary to make quantum computers more powerful than classical ones.

Spin squeezing is a quantum process that decreases the variance of one of the angular momentum components in an ensemble of particles with a spin. The quantum states obtained are called spin squeezed states. Such states have been proposed for quantum metrology, to allow a better precision for estimating a rotation angle than classical interferometers.

In quantum computing, a qubit is a unit of information analogous to a bit in classical computing, but it is affected by quantum mechanical properties such as superposition and entanglement which allow qubits to be in some ways more powerful than classical bits for some tasks. Qubits are used in quantum circuits and quantum algorithms composed of quantum logic gates to solve computational problems, where they are used for input/output and intermediate computations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electron-on-helium qubit</span> Quantum bit

An electron-on-helium qubit is a quantum bit for which the orthonormal basis states |0⟩ and |1⟩ are defined by quantized motional states or alternatively the spin states of an electron trapped above the surface of liquid helium. The electron-on-helium qubit was proposed as the basic element for building quantum computers with electrons on helium by Platzman and Dykman in 1999. 

References

  1. Tacchino, Francesco; Chiesa, Alessandro; Carretta, Stefano; Gerace, Dario (2019-12-19). "Quantum Computers as Universal Quantum Simulators: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives". Advanced Quantum Technologies. 3 (3): 1900052. arXiv: 1907.03505 . doi:10.1002/qute.201900052. ISSN   2511-9044. S2CID   195833616.
  2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019). Grumbling, Emily; Horowitz, Mark (eds.). Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects. Washington, DC. p. 127. doi:10.17226/25196. ISBN   978-0-309-47970-7. OCLC   1091904777. S2CID   125635007.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. Clarke, John; Wilhelm, Frank K. (18 June 2008). "Superconducting quantum bits". Nature. 453 (7198): 1031–1042. Bibcode:2008Natur.453.1031C. doi:10.1038/nature07128. PMID   18563154. S2CID   125213662.
  4. Kaminsky, William M.; Lloyd, Seth; Orlando, Terry P. (12 March 2004). "Scalable Superconducting Architecture for Adiabatic Quantum Computation". arXiv: quant-ph/0403090 . Bibcode : 2004quant.ph..3090K
  5. Khazali, Mohammadsadegh; Mølmer, Klaus (11 June 2020). "Fast Multiqubit Gates by Adiabatic Evolution in Interacting Excited-State Manifolds of Rydberg Atoms and Superconducting Circuits". Physical Review X. 10 (2): 021054. arXiv: 2006.07035 . Bibcode:2020PhRvX..10b1054K. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021054 .
  6. Henriet, Loic; Beguin, Lucas; Signoles, Adrien; Lahaye, Thierry; Browaeys, Antoine; Reymond, Georges-Olivier; Jurczak, Christophe (22 June 2020). "Quantum computing with neutral atoms". Quantum. 4: 327. arXiv: 2006.12326 . Bibcode:2020Quant...4..327H. doi:10.22331/q-2020-09-21-327. S2CID   219966169.
  7. Dumke, R.; Volk, M.; Müther, T.; Buchkremer, F. B. J; Birkl, G.; Ertmer, W. (August 8, 2002). "Micro-optical Realization of Arrays of Selectively Addressable Dipole Traps: A Scalable Configuration for Quantum Computation with Atomic Qubits". Phys. Rev. Lett. 89: 097903. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.097903.
  8. Imamog¯lu, A.; Awschalom, D. D.; Burkard, G.; DiVincenzo, D. P.; Loss, D.; Sherwin, M.; Small, A. (15 November 1999). "Quantum Information Processing Using Quantum Dot Spins and Cavity QED". Physical Review Letters. 83 (20): 4204–4207. arXiv: quant-ph/9904096 . Bibcode:1999PhRvL..83.4204I. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4204. S2CID   18324734.
  9. Fedichkin, L.; Yanchenko, M.; Valiev, K. A. (June 2000). "Novel coherent quantum bit using spatial quantization levels in semiconductor quantum dot". Quantum Computers and Computing. 1: 58. arXiv: quant-ph/0006097 . Bibcode:2000quant.ph..6097F.
  10. Ivády, Viktor; Davidsson, Joel; Delegan, Nazar; Falk, Abram L.; Klimov, Paul V.; et al. (6 December 2019). "Stabilization of point-defect spin qubits by quantum wells". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 5607. arXiv: 1905.11801 . Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.5607I. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13495-6. PMC   6898666 . PMID   31811137.
  11. "Scientists Discover New Way to Get Quantum Computing to Work at Room Temperature". interestingengineering.com. 24 April 2020.
  12. Bertoni, A.; Bordone, P.; Brunetti, R.; Jacoboni, C.; Reggiani, S. (19 June 2000). "Quantum Logic Gates based on Coherent Electron Transport in Quantum Wires". Physical Review Letters. 84 (25): 5912–5915. Bibcode:2000PhRvL..84.5912B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5912. hdl: 11380/303796 . PMID   10991086.
  13. Ionicioiu, Radu; Amaratunga, Gehan; Udrea, Florin (20 January 2001). "Quantum Computation with Ballistic Electrons". International Journal of Modern Physics B. 15 (2): 125–133. arXiv: quant-ph/0011051 . Bibcode:2001IJMPB..15..125I. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.251.9617 . doi:10.1142/S0217979201003521. S2CID   119389613.
  14. Ramamoorthy, A; Bird, J. P.; Reno, J. L. (11 July 2007). "Using split-gate structures to explore the implementation of a coupled-electron-waveguide qubit scheme". Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 19 (27): 276205. Bibcode:2007JPCM...19A6205R. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/27/276205. S2CID   121222743.
  15. Berrios, Eduardo; Gruebele, Martin; Shyshlov, Dmytro; Wang, Lei; Babikov, Dmitri (2012). "High fidelity quantum gates with vibrational qubits". Journal of Chemical Physics. 116 (46): 11347–11354. Bibcode:2012JPCA..11611347B. doi:10.1021/jp3055729. PMID   22803619.
  16. Leuenberger, Michael N.; Loss, Daniel (April 2001). "Quantum computing in molecular magnets". Nature. 410 (6830): 789–793. arXiv: cond-mat/0011415 . Bibcode:2001Natur.410..789L. doi:10.1038/35071024. PMID   11298441. S2CID   4373008.
  17. Harneit, Wolfgang (27 February 2002). "Fullerene-based electron-spin quantum computer". Physical Review A. 65 (3): 032322. Bibcode:2002PhRvA..65c2322H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032322.
  18. Igeta, K.; Yamamoto, Y. (1988). Quantum mechanical computers with single atom and photon fields. International Quantum Electronics Conference.
  19. Chuang, I. L.; Yamamoto, Y. (1995). "Simple quantum computer". Physical Review A. 52 (5): 3489–3496. arXiv: quant-ph/9505011 . Bibcode:1995PhRvA..52.3489C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3489. PMID   9912648. S2CID   30735516.
  20. Knill, G. J.; Laflamme, R.; Milburn, G. J. (2001). "A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics". Nature. 409 (6816): 46–52. Bibcode:2001Natur.409...46K. doi:10.1038/35051009. PMID   11343107. S2CID   4362012.
  21. "Indian scientist among those who made building blocks of quantum computer". Deccan Herald. 2023-05-06. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  22. "Traditional hardware can match Google's quantum computer performance: Researchers". Deccan Herald. 2022-08-07. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  23. Nizovtsev, A. P. (August 2005). "A quantum computer based on NV centers in diamond: Optically detected nutations of single electron and nuclear spins". Optics and Spectroscopy. 99 (2): 248–260. Bibcode:2005OptSp..99..233N. doi:10.1134/1.2034610. S2CID   122596827.
  24. Dutt, M. V. G.; Childress, L.; Jiang, L.; Togan, E.; Maze, J.; et al. (1 June 2007). "Quantum Register Based on Individual Electronic and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond". Science. 316 (5829): 1312–1316. Bibcode:2007Sci...316.....D. doi:10.1126/science.1139831. PMID   17540898. S2CID   20697722.
  25. Baron, David (June 7, 2007). "At room temperature, carbon-13 nuclei in diamond create stable, controllable quantum register". The Harvard Gazette, FAS Communications.
  26. Neumann, P.; Mizuochi, N.; Rempp, F.; Hemmer, P.; Watanabe, H.; et al. (6 June 2008). "Multipartite Entanglement Among Single Spins in Diamond". Science. 320 (5881): 1326–1329. Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1326N. doi:10.1126/science.1157233. PMID   18535240. S2CID   8892596.
  27. Anderlini, Marco; Lee, Patricia J.; Brown, Benjamin L.; Sebby-Strabley, Jennifer; Phillips, William D.; Porto, J. V. (July 2007). "Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice". Nature. 448 (7152): 452–456. arXiv: 0708.2073 . Bibcode:2007Natur.448..452A. doi:10.1038/nature06011. PMID   17653187. S2CID   4410355.
  28. "Thousands of Atoms Swap 'Spins' with Partners in Quantum Square Dance". NIST . January 8, 2018.
  29. Ohlsson, N.; Mohan, R. K.; Kröll, S. (1 January 2002). "Quantum computer hardware based on rare-earth-ion-doped inorganic crystals". Opt. Commun. 201 (1–3): 71–77. Bibcode:2002OptCo.201...71O. doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01666-2.
  30. Longdell, J. J.; Sellars, M. J.; Manson, N. B. (23 September 2004). "Demonstration of conditional quantum phase shift between ions in a solid". Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (13): 130503. arXiv: quant-ph/0404083 . Bibcode:2004PhRvL..93m0503L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.130503. PMID   15524694. S2CID   41374015.
  31. Náfrádi, Bálint; Choucair, Mohammad; Dinse, Klaus-Peter; Forró, László (18 July 2016). "Room temperature manipulation of long lifetime spins in metallic-like carbon nanospheres". Nature Communications. 7 (1): 12232. arXiv: 1611.07690 . Bibcode:2016NatCo...712232N. doi:10.1038/ncomms12232. PMC   4960311 . PMID   27426851.