Lèse-nation, also lèze-nation, was a crime defined in France in connection with the French Revolution. It means an offence or defamation against the dignity of the nation. Both, the name as well as the corresponding law regarding the crime of lèse-nation, go back to the law relating to the crime of lèse-majesté. Both were adapted by the revolutionaries during the French Revolution, so that the focus was no longer on the monarch but on the nation. The English name for lèse-majesté is a modernised borrowing from the medieval French, where the term means a crime against The Crown. In classical Latin laesa māiestās means hurt or violated majesty. In the context of the term lèse-nation, it means a crime against the nation in the sense of harming the nation. [1]
The law regarding the crime of lèse-nation was in force between 1789 and 1791. It was immediately after the proclamation of the sovereignty of the nation, in the aftermath of the Tennis Court Oath from 20 June 1789, that the foundation for the law regarding the crime of lèse-nation was laid. On 23 June 1789, the National Assembly announced that it will prosecute as criminals all those who, individuals or bodies, attack its existence or the freedom of its members. [2]
Almost over night a new crime was invented. Or as Charles-Élie, Marquis de Ferrières, put it:
"We suddenly saw the appearance of a new crime unknown to our fathers, the crime of lèse-nation."
The events surrounding the Storming of the Bastille on 14 July 1789 played an important role in the development and implementation of the law. Since the Storming of the Bastille, many denunciations and the ghost of the complot obliged the National Assembly to face the problem of the political incrimination. Quick action was required. [4]
The law regarding the crime of lèse-nation was introduced in the early days of the French Revolution. It came into force on 23 July 1789 by decree of the National Assembly. It describes intentions that harm the nation and was modelled on the traditional crime of lèse-majesté as if to better illustrate the transfer of sovereignty. The law was introduced to protect the Revolution and its values. It also defined what the nation is. By taking into account the emerging regime's increasing fears of a counter-revolution, it became one of the most important legal measures at the beginning of the Revolution. In the long term, however, not. The weak judicial effectiveness of the law regarding the crime of lèse-nation contrasted with its political ambition. It explains its brief existence since, from 1791, the term crime contre la chose publique (crime against public affairs) was preferred, a criterion of all political justice. [1]
A crime of lèse-nation is to disregard, by will and by fact, the inviolable rights of the nation. Or in short, according to the revolutionaries: The criminals of lèse-nation are those who want to maintain the old despotism and aristocracy. And Maximilien Robespierre reminded his fellow revolutionaries in a speech on 25 October 1790 when it came to introducing new laws and establishing the judiciary: "The tribunal that you have formed must be endowed with courage and armed force, because it will have to fight against the great ones, who are enemies of the people." [5] [6]
It was defined that crimes of lèse-nation are attacks committed directly against the rights of society. There are two types: those who attack the physical existence of the nation and those who seek to harm its moral existence. The latter are as guilty as the first. Crimes of lèse-nation are rare when the constitution of the state is strengthened and the government established, that is, if the government is able to enforce the state's monopoly on the use of force. At this point, however, the young nation was still in the process to form up. Under the constitution of 1791, the crime had to be judged by the Haute Cour Nationale. [7] [8]
The most prominent personalities who were accused of the crime of lèse-nation were: Charles-Eugène de Lorraine, Prince de Lambesc, Charles Marie Auguste Joseph de Beaumont, Comte d'Autichamp, Victor François, Duc de Broglie, Charles Louis François de Paule de Barentin and Louis Pierre de Chastenet de Puységur. The only death sentence passed under this law was that of Thomas de Mahy, Marquis de Favras. The Marquis de Favras was sentenced to death on 18 February 1790. He was hanged the next day on the Place de Grève in Paris. The execution of this judgment is regarded as the first experience of political justice of the French Revolution. [2]
However, the most famous person accused of the crime of lèse-nation was Pierre Victor, Baron de Besenval de Brunstatt, a Swiss military officer in French service. His trial began on 21 November 1789. The baron's case became exemplary. Not only because he was a foreigner, a close friend of Queen Marie Antoinette and one of the first accused of the crime of lèse-nation, but also because of his fame and his famous friends who campaigned for his release, such as the Marquis de Lafayette, Jacques Necker and the Comte de Mirabeau. What was ultimately important for the baron's survival: These gentlemen also enjoyed respect among the revolutionaries. Furthermore, the baron was represented in court by the best and most prominent French lawyer at the time: Raymond Desèze. He later also defended King Louis XVI in court. The court was deeply impressed by Desèze's plaidoyer. This plaidoyer was even published and was considered a reference in court cases regarding the crime of lèse-nation. [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
In addition, as early as October 1789, the report of the Commission of Inquiry revealed that the only document currently in existence that could convict the Baron de Besenval of a crime of lèse-nation is a copy of a note written to the Governor of the Bastille, Bernard-René Jourdan, Marquis de Launay, in which the baron said: "Defend yourself to the last extreme, I will send you reinforcements." The original of this document no longer existed and the copy was not sufficient for a conviction in court, at least that's what was officially claimed. [15] [16]
Of course, there were also doubts about this official theory that the document was just a copy. After all, the document was dated and signed le 14 juillet 1789, le B. de Besenval. Critics of the Baron de Besenval saw this as an attempt by the baron's influential friends to save his neck. Later, in court on 3 December 1789, Pierre Victor de Besenval is said to have admitted that the document was genuine. However, circumstances had obviously changed in the meantime and this document alone was no longer enough to convict the baron. [17]
"The Maréchal de Broglie and the Baron de Besenval simply issued orders to ensure the food of the Parisians and to ensure peace and order in Paris. They never ordered the troops to enter Paris."
— Statement during the examination of the witness M. de Grandmaison, lawyer on the Rue de Richelieu in Paris, on 11 January 1790 in the trial of Pierre Victor, Baron de Besenval [18]
On Monday, 1 March 1790, the Baron de Besenval was acquitted of the crime of lèse-nation. A verdict that was not without controversy. Quite a few saw this judgment as a courtesy judgment for the baron's influental friends. [10] [19]
"Slave peoples only exist because there are criminals who are guilty of the crime of lèse-nation."
— Commentary by Louis-Marie Prudhomme in his newspaper Révolutions de Paris, published in January 1790, as part of the coverage of the trial of Pierre Victor, Baron de Besenval [20]
Raymond Romain, Comte de Sèze or Desèze was a French advocate. Together with François Tronchet and Malesherbes, he defended Louis XVI, when the King was brought before the Convention for trial. De Sèze is remembered for a speech on Louis' behalf which impressed even his opponents.
Antoine de Rivarol was a French royalist writer and translator who lived during the Revolutionary era. He was briefly married to the translator Louisa Henrietta de Rivarol.
Louis Philippe, comte de Ségur was a French diplomat and historian.
Jean Joseph Mounier was a French politician and judge.
Jean-Baptiste du Val-de-Grâce, baron de Cloots, better known as Anacharsis Cloots, was a Prussian nobleman who was a significant figure in the French Revolution. Perhaps the first to advocate a world parliament, an idea later espoused by Albert Camus and Albert Einstein, he was a world federalist and an internationalist anarchist. He was nicknamed "orator of mankind", "citizen of humanity" and "a personal enemy of God". American author Herman Melville refers to an "Anacharsis Clootz delegation" as a representation of global humanity in both Moby-Dick (1851), The Confidence-Man, and later in Billy Budd.
Thomas de Mahy, Marquis de Favras, was a French aristocrat and supporter of the House of Bourbon during the French Revolution. Often seen as a martyr of the Royalist cause, Favras was executed for his part in "planning against the people of France" under the Count of Provence.
Pierre Victor, baron de Besenval de Brünstatt, also Pierre Victor, baron de Besenval de Brunstatt, was a Swiss military officer in French service.
A closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the presentation of evidence. A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced at trial. It is not customary to raise objections during closing arguments, except for egregious behavior. However, such objections, when made, can prove critical later in order to preserve appellate issues.
Charles Thévenin was a neoclassical French painter, known for heroic scenes from the time of the French Revolution and First French Empire.
Antoine-François Momoro was a French printer, bookseller and politician during the French Revolution. An important figure in the Cordeliers club and in Hébertisme, he is the originator of the phrase ″Unité, Indivisibilité de la République; Liberté, égalité, fraternité ou la mort″, one of the mottoes of the French Republic.
The Grand Châtelet was a stronghold in Ancien Régime Paris, on the right bank of the Seine, on the site of what is now the Place du Châtelet; it contained a court and police headquarters and a number of prisons.
Joseph Alexandre Pierre, vicomte de Ségur (1756–1805), was a French poet, songwriter, and playwright.
Waldegg Castle, or Schloss Waldegg, is a castle near Solothurn, in the municipality of Feldbrunnen-St. Niklaus of the Canton of Solothurn in Switzerland. It is a Swiss heritage site of national significance.
Pierre-Ulric Dubuisson was an 18th-century French actor, playwright and theatre director.
Jean-Pierre-Louis de Luchet (1740–1792), also known as the Marquis de La Roche du Maine, or Marquis de Luchet, was a French journalist, essayist, and theatre manager.
Jean-Baptiste-Pierre Le Brun was a French painter, art collector and art dealer. Simon Denis was his pupil.
The Hôtel de Besenval is a historic hôtel particulier from the early 18th century in Paris with a cour d'honneur and a large English landscape garden, an architectural style commonly known as entre cour et jardin. This refers to a residence between the courtyard in front of the building and the garden at the back. The building is listed as a Monument historique by decree of 20 October 1928. It has housed the Embassy of the Swiss Confederation and the residence of the Swiss ambassador to France since 1938. The residence is named after its most famous former owner: Pierre Victor, Baron de Besenval de Brunstatt, usually just referred to as Baron de Besenval.
Luc-Vincent Thiéry (1734–1822) was a French lawyer and author, best known for his publications about Paris.
La Gimblette is one of the most famous paintings by the French painter Jean-Honoré Fragonard and one of the most famous Rococo paintings. Like other paintings by Fragonard, such as The Swing,La Gimblette also has a frivolous component.
"The lovers' paradise in the middle of the 18th century is no longer ours at the end of the 20th century. It is therefore not surprising that these pictures remain, in some respects, strange to us."
Victor von Gibelin, also called Beau Gibelin, was a Swiss military officer in French service and a politician in his hometown of Solothurn in Switzerland. He was the last officer of the Swiss Guards under King Louis XVI. He became famous for his friendship with Pierre Victor, Baron de Besenval de Brunstatt, a Swiss military officer in French service from Solothurn, and for his eyewitness report of the events surrounding the Storming of the Palais des Tuileries on 10 August 1792. His report was published posthumously in German and in French in 1866.
"Let's go and see, there's the handsome Gibelin, standing guard!"
in alphabetical order