Matt A. Barreto

Last updated

Matthew Alejandro Barreto (born June 6, 1976) is a political scientist. [1] and co-founder of the national polling and research firm Barreto Segura Partners Research.

Contents

Barreto is Professor of Political Science and Chicana/o Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles and a leading expert on Latino political behavior and public opinion. [2] Before moving to UCLA he taught at the University of Washington. [3] In 2020 he was lead Latino pollster for the Biden Presidential campaign [4] and in 2021 was named senior advisor [5] to the Biden White House-aligned group Building Back Together. [6] He has prepared expert reports and expert testimony in several lawsuits challenging voter identification laws in Wisconsin, [7] Pennsylvania, [8] Texas, [9] North Carolina, [10] and North Dakota [11] and is considered a leading expert on the impact of voter identification laws. [12] [13] In 2007 Barreto co-founded the polling firm Latino Decisions with Dr. Gary Segura, as a political consulting firm specializing in Latino voter behavior. In 2021 Barreto and Segura left Latino Decisions [14] to form a new Latino-owned political consulting firm, [15] Barreto Segura Partners. In 2015 Barreto was hired by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign to manage Latino polling and focus group research. [16] His 2013 book Change They Can't Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America (co-authored with Dr. Christopher Parker) won an American Political Science Association Best Book Award, [17] and his 2014 book Latino America: How America's Most Dynamic Population is Poised to Transform the Politics of the Nation was reviewed by the Wall Street Journal, [18] Washington Post [19] [20] and Publishers Weekly, [21] and was featured in interviews on MSNBC, [22] PBS, C-SPAN, [23] NPR, [24] and Univision. [25]

Biography

Barreto was born in San Juan, Puerto Rico and raised in Topeka, Kansas. [26] According to his book Latino America, Barreto is Hispanic-American of Peruvian heritage. [27] Barreto received a bachelor's degree in Political Science from Eastern New Mexico University [28] in 1998, and earned a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of California, Irvine in 2005. [29]

Political Consultant

In 2007 Barreto co-founded the polling and research firm Latino Decisions with Dr. Gary Segura, and in partnership with Pacific Market Research [30] in Renton, Washington. At the time Barreto and Segura were both professors at the University of Washington and conducting public opinion research among Hispanics. Previously, Barreto and Segura had collaborated on Latino polling research for the Tomas Rivera Policy Institute [31] during their years at the Claremont Colleges. As of the November 2020 election, Latino Decisions was regarded as "the leading Latino political opinion research group" in the United States. [32] The Austin-American Statesmen called Latino Decisions "one of the most trusted Latino polling services in the nation," [33] and Time Magazine said "the polling firm Latino Decisions is the gold standard of Latino-American polling." [34] In 2021 Barreto and Segura left Latino Decisions [14] to form a new Latino-owned political consulting firm, [35] [15] Barreto Segura Partners.

As Managing Partner of Latino Decisions [36] Barreto implemented large projects for the National Association of Latino Elected Officials, National Council of La Raza, Latino Victory Project, America's Voice, AFL-CIO, SEIU and many other political advocacy groups. Barreto’s research was recognized in the 30 Latinos key to the 2012 election by Politic365, which said Barreto's "polling firm published key polls and stats throughout the campaign, consistently, that shaped the way the campaigns did their work.". [37] The Huffington Post named Barreto one of the top 15 leading Latino pundits [38] noting that he was “the pollster that has his finger on the pulse of the Latino electorate.” [39] In August 2015 NBC News reported that Barreto was hired by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign to run polling and focus groups on Latino voters. [40] Frank Sharry, an immigration reform advocate working in Washington D.C. "praised the work of Barreto" as having "developed a methodologically-sound, data-driven approach to polling Latino voters...the Clinton campaign is fortunate - and smart - to have them on board," In 2016 he was a consultant on Latino polling for U.S. Senator Michael Bennet in Colorado and Catherine Cortez-Masto in Nevada, both of whom won their elections to the U.S. Senate. Cortez-Masto was the first Hispanic woman elected to the U.S. Senate. [41]

Barreto has been invited to brief the U.S. Senate, the White House, Congressional Committees, and has been a keynote speaker at many of the major Hispanic association conferences including NALEO, LULAC, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, NCLR and others. [42] In 2016 he was a featured speaker at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Aspen, Colorado. [43]

During 2020 Barreto was hired by the Biden Presidential campaign to conduct polling and advise on Latino voter outreach. [44] Following the campaign, the Latino voter outreach plan was credited with delivering the states of Nevada and Arizona to the Biden-Harris ticket. [45] While some media outlets focused on the gains Trump made with Latino voters in Miami, [46] Barreto pushed back aggressively on the media framing of the Latino vote in 2020 stating that Biden had mobilized record turnout among Hispanic voters, [47] stating in an interview with Martha Ramirez: [48] "Journalists, mostly white, and their white editors, became fascinated by vote data in Miami early on election night that showed Trump improving among Cubans and South Americans. Those of us carefully following the Latino vote had seen this trend all along and were not surprised. Then, instead of reporting on how Latino voters were a very important part of the Biden coalition, and provided the margin of victory due to very robust voter turnout in states like Arizona and Nevada, the media decided to go on a full-fledged assault about how Latinos were fleeing the Democratic Party. This is complete nonsense. What we saw in 2020 was first and foremost an incredible voter turnout among Latinos; our ballots cast grew by about 30% since 2016 compared to 15% growth for the country as a whole. Latino voters came out in huge numbers in Maricopa and Pima counties in Arizona for Biden. Latino voters, mostly Puerto Rican, came out in big numbers for Biden in Philadelphia. Latino voters came out in record-breaking numbers for Biden, and then Warnock and Ossoff in Georgia. These stories were ignored in favor of the Miami and RGV fixation of the Latino swing to Trump. It was bad reporting all around.” In February 2021 Barreto was named senior advisor to the Biden White House aligned C4, Building Back Together. [49] As part of the outreach work of Building Back Together, Barreto helped direct the Latino "always on" plan to engage the Latino community [50] and promote events such as Vice President Harris meeting with DACA recipients [51] and has implemented polling for the White House. [52]

Voting Rights Act Expert

In 2009 Barreto published one of the first academic studies on the impact of voter identification laws (co-authored with Dr. Gabriel Sanchez and Dr. Stephen Nuño). [53] His early research documented that racial minorities and low-income citizens had lower rates of government-issued photo identification and could face barriers to voting under strict voter ID laws. As more states passed voter ID laws Barreto and Sanchez were retained by the ACLU and other lawyers challenging these laws to provide expert reports and testify at trial about their research findings.

In Texas, Federal Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos wrote that Barreto and Sanchez are “experts in survey research, particularly in the field of racial and ethnic politics,” who “conducted a four-week survey of over 2,300 eligible voters in Texas, and concluded that African-American eligible voters are 1.78 times more likely to lack qualified SB 14 ID than Anglo eligible voters. The observed racial disparity was magnified with Hispanic eligible voters as they are 2.42 times more likely to lack qualified SB 14 ID compared to Anglo eligible voters.” (pg 57). In examining the evidence put forth by Barreto and Sanchez, [54] the court wrote that the experts “are impressively credentialed and who explained their data, methodologies, and other facts upon which they relied in clear terms according to generally accepted and reliable scientific methods for their respective fields. The Court finds that approximately 608,470 registered voters in Texas lack proper SB 14 ID. The Court also finds that SB 14 disproportionately impacts both African-Americans and Hispanics in Texas.” (pg 59).

In 2016 Barreto and Sanchez conducted a survey and authored an expert report in North Dakota which found Native Americans were disadvantaged by the state's voter ID law. According to their report 23.5% of Native Americans lacked a valid ID compared to 12% of non-Native Americans in North Dakota. [55] In August 2016 a Federal Court issued a preliminary injunction against the voter identification law based on Barreto's research. [56] In his ruling, Judge Daniel L. Hovland wrote "The Defendant has provided no legislative testimony or findings to counter the Barreto/Sanchez Survey, nor in any manner challenged any of the evidence the Plaintiffs have submitted...Given the thorough and unrefuted record developed by the Plaintiffs in this case, and the lack of any evidence presented by the Defendant to the contrary, the Court gives the findings of the Barreto/Sanchez Survey, and the other studies and data presented by the Plaintiffs, considerable weight" (pg 9)

Similar to the outcomes in Texas and North Dakota, a state court in Pennsylvania struck down a voter ID law. As in the Texas and North Dakota cases, Barreto worked with Sanchez on a survey and expert report which documented that the Pennsylvania voter ID law had a discriminatory effect and would negatively impact hundreds of thousands of potential voters. [57] In January 2014 after an appeal by the state, Judge Bernard L. McGinley ruled against the voter ID law. [58] According to the decision issued by Judge McGinley, the Court “had a high degree of confidence in Professor Barreto’s survey results and that those results corroborate that hundreds of thousands of voters lack a compliant ID” (pg 10).

The voter ID law in Wisconsin has received considerable legal attention since 2011. Barreto and Sanchez authored an expert report based on a survey in Wisconsin. In his 2014 decisions against the voter ID law, Federal Judge Lynn Adelman [59] stated that “it is absolutely clear that Act 23 will prevent more legitimate votes from being cast than fraudulent votes,” (pg 38) and after careful review of Barreto's survey stated "I remain convinced that his results support the conclusion that Blacks and Latinos are less likely than whites to possess qualifying forms of ID." (pg 57). [60] Adelman ruled that the voter ID law violated the Federal Voting Rights Act, Section 2. The state of Wisconsin appealed the decision, and after extensive back-and-forth, the law was upheld and allowed to stand in place for the 2016 presidential election.

As a result of his role in these high-profile lawsuits, Barreto is considered a leading expert on the impact of voter identification laws. [61] [62] [63]

Academic Research

Barreto has published four books and more than 50 academic articles and book chapters on the topics of racial and ethnic politics in America, most often focusing on Latinos political behavior. According to Google Scholar, his research has been cited more than 2,000 times [64] in other academic research articles and books. [65] His early research on Latino voting patterns argued that Latino voters do not necessarily have lower rates of voting than other racial groups, but instead receive less campaign investment. [66] When campaigns conduct outreach to Latino voters, Barreto has documented that they turnout to vote at equal or higher rates than non-Latinos. [67] Barreto has also received recognition for his research on the Tea Party Movement, co-authored with Dr. Christopher Parker, which resulted in an award-winning book Change They Can't Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America which won the American Political Science Association Best Book Award [17] for Race, Ethnicity, Politics in 2014. Their book argued that Tea Party supporters were not typical mainstream conservatives upset about government spending, but rather they were reactionary conservatives who were motivated by changing demographics in the country and the election of Barack Obama as the first African American president. While many other studies have now come to this same conclusion, [68] Barreto and Parker were the first to empirically document this trend as early as April 2010 [69] in a blog post on 538 written by contributor Thomas Schaller. [70] [71] Barreto has also received attention for his work with Karam Dana on original survey data collection of American Muslims. Barreto and Dana collaborated on the 2007 Muslim American Public Opinion Survey [72] which interviewed 1,410 American Muslims [73] about their views and attitudes towards politics in the United States. A key finding of their study was that the more religious Muslims, and those more involved in the mosque, were more likely to become incorporated and participate in American civics and politics [74] [75]

Barreto has served two terms on the Board of the American National Election Study (ANES) for the 2012 and 2016 national studies. [76] In 2008 he was awarded a National Science Foundation grant to implement a Latino oversample on the American National Election Study, which was the first time the ANES included a large sample of Latinos in their survey, which continued in 2012 and 2016.

Related Research Articles

An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a survey or a poll, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals. A person who conducts polls is referred to as a pollster.

Compulsory voting, also called universal civic duty voting or mandatory voting, is the requirement that registered voters participate in an election. In practice, one only needs to check-in at a polling place, submit a blank ballot, or provide an excused reason, such as disability, illness, age, travel, a natural disaster, or religious objections.

Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election manipulation, voter fraud or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election, either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both. It differs from but often goes hand-in-hand with voter suppression. What exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country.

Vote counting is the process of counting votes in an election. It can be done manually or by machines. In the United States, the compilation of election returns and validation of the outcome that forms the basis of the official results is called canvassing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression</span> Strategy designed to restrict specific groups of people from voting

Voter suppression is a strategy used to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing specific groups of people from voting. It is distinguished from political campaigning in that campaigning attempts to change likely voting behavior by changing the opinions of potential voters through persuasion and organization, activating otherwise inactive voters, or registering new supporters. Voter suppression, instead, attempts to gain an advantage by reducing the turnout of certain voters. Suppression is an anti-democratic tactic associated with authoritarianism. Some argue the term 'voter suppression' downplays the harm done when voices aren't reflected in an election, calling for terms like 'vote destruction' that accounts for the permanence of each vote not being cast.

An absentee ballot is a vote cast by someone who is unable or unwilling to attend the official polling station to which the voter is normally allocated. Methods include voting at a different location, postal voting, proxy voting and online voting. Increasing the ease of access to absentee ballots is seen by many as one way to improve voter turnout through convenience voting, though some countries require that a valid reason, such as infirmity or travel, be given before a voter can participate in an absentee ballot. Early voting overlaps with absentee voting. Early voting includes votes cast before the official election day(s), by mail, online or in-person at voting centers which are open for the purpose. Some places call early in-person voting a form of "absentee" voting, since voters are absent from the polling place on election day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Postal voting</span> Voting, election, ballot papers, distributed to electors or returned by post, mail

Postal voting is voting in an election where ballot papers are distributed to electors by post, in contrast to electors voting in person at a polling station or electronically via an electronic voting system.

Latino Americans have received a growing share of the national vote in the United States due to their increasing population. As of the 2020 U.S. Census, 62.1 million Latinos live in the United States, representing 18.9% of the total U.S. population. This is a 23% increase since 2010. This racial/ethnic group is the second largest after non-Hispanic whites in the U.S. In 2020, the states with the highest Hispanic or Latino populations were; Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, and Texas. According to the Brookings Institution, Latinos will become the nations largest minority by 2045 and the deciding population in future elections. With the help of laws and court case wins, Latinos have been able to receive the help needed to participate in American Politics. According to data provided by The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS), 72% of Latinos believe that it is very/somewhat important to get their voice heard by voting. They have traditionally been a key Democratic Party constituency, but more recently have begun to split between the Democratic and Republican Party. Since the Latino population is large and diverse, a lot of political differences exist between gender, national origin, and generational groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brennan Center for Justice</span> Nonprofit law and public policy institute at New York University School of Law

The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a liberal or progressive nonprofit law and public policy institute. The organization is named after Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. The Brennan Center advocates for public policy positions including raising the minimum wage, opposing voter ID laws, and calling for public funding of elections. The organization opposed the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, which held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by nonprofits.

Vote.org, formerly Long Distance Voter, is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is based in the United States. It provides online voter guides for every state, including voter registration forms, absentee ballot applications, and information on deadlines, directions, and ID and residency requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter identification laws</span> Laws requiring proof of identity to vote

A voter identification law is a law that requires a person to show some form of identification in order to vote. In some jurisdictions requiring photo IDs, voters who do not have photo ID often must have their identity verified by someone else or sign a Challenged Voter Affidavit in order to receive a ballot to vote.

The Latino vote or refers to the voting trends during elections in the United States by eligible voters of Latino background. This phrase is usually mentioned by the media as a way to label voters of this ethnicity, and to opine that this demographic group could potentially tilt the outcome of an election, and how candidates have developed messaging strategies to this ethnic group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter identification laws in the United States</span>

Voter ID laws in the United States are laws that require a person to provide some form of official identification before they are permitted to register to vote, receive a ballot for an election, or to actually vote in elections in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statewide opinion polling for the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries</span>

This article contains opinion polling by U.S. state for the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries. For currency and accuracy, please note the specific dates for each polling as listed below. For the significance of the earliest state votes, the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, see United States presidential primary – Iowa and New Hampshire. To know when any given state votes, see the timeline of primaries and caucuses.

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and Section 4(b), which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subject to preclearance based on their histories of discrimination in voting.

VoteRiders is an American non-partisan, non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to ensure that all US citizens over 18 years old are able to exercise their right to vote. Through resources and media exposure, one of its main focuses is assisting citizens who want to secure their voter ID, and it often collaborates with other organizations in these efforts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression in the United States</span> Efforts used to prevent eligible voters from voting

Voter suppression in the United States consists of various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. Before and during the American Civil War, most African-Americans had not been able to vote. After the Civil War, all African-American men were granted voting rights, causing some Southern Democrats and former Confederate states to institute actions such as poll taxes or language tests that were ostensibly not in contradiction to the U.S. Constitution at the time, but were used to limit and suppress voting access, most notably African American communities that made up large proportions of the population in those areas, but in many regions the majority of the electorate as a whole was functionally or officially unable to register to vote or unable to cast a ballot. African Americans' access to registration and voting in the South was often difficult until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and continues to be a subject of debate.

Voter impersonation, also sometimes called in-person voter fraud, is a form of electoral fraud in which a person who is eligible to vote in an election votes more than once, or a person who is not eligible to vote does so by voting under the name of an eligible voter. In the United States, voter ID laws have been enacted in a number of states by Republican legislatures and governors since 2010 with the purported aim of preventing voter impersonation. Existing research and evidence shows that voter impersonation is extremely rare. Between 2000 and 2014, there were only 31 documented instances of voter impersonation. There is no evidence that it has changed the result of any election. In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 percent" of individual votes nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent — about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jurij Toplak</span> Slovenian jurist

Jurij Toplak is a constitutional scholar, university administrator, election law, and human rights expert. He is a recurring visiting professor at the Fordham University School of Law in New York. Since 2016, he has served as the provost and vice-president of the Alma Mater Europaea university. The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, The New York Times, and The Boston Globe published his legal comments.

Data for Progress (DFP) is an American left-wing think tank, polling firm, and political advocacy group. Until his dismissal in November 2022, the organization was headed by data scientist and activist Sean McElwee, who co-founded the organization in 2018.

References

  1. ↑ "UCLA Department of Political Science". www.polisci.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  2. ↑ UCLA. "Matt Barreto | Media Guide to UCLA Experts". UCLA Newsroom. Retrieved 2017-01-03.
  3. ↑ "Matt Barreto | Department of Political Science | University of Washington". www.polisci.washington.edu. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  4. ↑ "Can Joe Biden win over the young Latinos who flocked to Bernie Sanders?". the Guardian. 2020-08-16. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  5. ↑ Jeremy Diamond and Jeff Zeleny. "Pro-Biden outside group launching with White House's blessing". CNN. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  6. ↑ "Democrats bet on early Latino outreach to avoid '20 pitfalls". AP NEWS. 2021-07-08. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  7. ↑ Barreto, Matt (April 23, 2012). "RATES OF POSSESSION OF ACCEPTED PHOTO IDENTIFICATION, AMONG DIFFERENT SUBGROUPS IN THE ELIGIBLE VOTER POPULATION, MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN" (PDF). American Civil Liberties Union. ACLU of Wisconsin.
  8. ↑ ACLU of Pennsylvania (July 16, 2012). "Expert Report of Matt A. Barreto" (PDF). www.aclupa.org. ACLU of PA.
  9. ↑ Gonzales Ramos, Nelva (October 9, 2014). "Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 628 Filed in TXSD on 10/09/14" (PDF). electionlawblog.org. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION.
  10. ↑ Biggs, Loretta (December 31, 2019). "MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, NORTH CAROLINA NAACP v. COOPER" (PDF).
  11. ↑ Hovland, Daniel L. (August 1, 2016). "Case 1:16-cv-00008-DLH-CSM Document 50 Filed 08/01/16" (PDF). assets.documentcloud.org. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA.
  12. ↑ "Texas Photo ID Trial Update: Day Three Morning Session | Brennan Center for Justice". www.brennancenter.org. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  13. ↑ "Meet the States Denying Millions of Minorities the Vote on Super Tuesday". CityLab. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  14. 1 2 "Latino pollsters Matt Barreto, Gary Segura split from Latino Decisions, form their own firm". NBC News. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  15. 1 2 "Well-known Latino pollsters part ways with their firm, form Latino-owned group". news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  16. ↑ "Hillary Clinton Brings On Latino Polling Firm In Key Hire". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  17. 1 2 Parker, Christopher S.; Barreto, Matt A. (26 May 2013). Parker, C.S. and Barreto, M.: Change They Can't Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. (Hardcover). Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691151830 . Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  18. ↑ Barone, Michael (2014-10-07). "Book Review: 'Latino America' by Matt Barreto and Gary Segura & 'A Race for the Future' by Mike Gonzalez". The Wall Street Journal . ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  19. ↑ Chinni, Dante (2014-10-24). "Book review: 'Latino America,' on Latino politics, by Matt Barreto, Gary Segura". The Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  20. ↑ Archipelago, World. "Latino America". www.publicaffairsbooks.com. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  21. ↑ "Nonfiction Book Review: Latino America: How America's Most Dynamic Population is Poised to Transform the Politics of the Nation by Matt Barreto and Gary Segura. Public Affairs, $26.99 (304p) ISBN 978-1-61039-501-4". PublishersWeekly.com. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  22. ↑ "How Latino voters can impact the midterms". MSNBC . Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  23. ↑ "Panel Discussion on Latino America". C-SPAN.org. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  24. ↑ How The Latino Vote Will Change Everything , retrieved 2017-01-04
  25. ↑ "10 Common Misconceptions About Latinos in America". Fusion. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  26. ↑ "Curriculum Vitae - Matthew A. Barreto" (PDF). www.mattbarreto.com. Matt Barreto. August 1, 2016.
  27. ↑ Barreto, Matt; Segura, Gary (2014-09-30). Latino America: How AmericaÕs Most Dynamic Population is Poised to Transform the Politics of the Nation. PublicAffairs. ISBN   9781610395014.
  28. ↑ "1-29-08 ENMU Briefs". The Eastern New Mexico News. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  29. ↑ "UCLA Department of Chicana/o Studies". www.chavez.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  30. ↑ "Public Opinion Polling". Pacific Market Research. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  31. ↑ Tomás Rivera Policy Institute. "TRPI Research Archive: Politics". www.trpi.org. Archived from the original on 2014-11-17.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  32. ↑ Carroll, Rory (2015-08-14). "Bernie Sanders largely unknown to Latino voters – but has room for growth". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  33. ↑ "Latino Vote: Why Donald Trump is bad news for Republicans | Somos Austin" . Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  34. ↑ Scherer, Michael. "Predicting the Latino Vote in 2012". Time. ISSN   0040-781X . Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  35. ↑ Conant, Ericka (2021-04-26). "Latino voters get early love from outside Biden group ahead of mid-term elections". AL DÍA News. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  36. ↑ "Latino Decisions :: Matt A. Barreto". www.latinodecisions.com. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  37. ↑ Calderón, Sara Inés. "The 30 Latinos & Latinas Who Made the 2012 Election Politic365 | Politic365" . Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  38. ↑ "Dear Media, Please Interview Hispanics When Writing About Latino Politics". The Huffington Post. 2013-05-28. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  39. ↑ "AIF Blog". Aspen Ideas Festival. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  40. ↑ "Clinton Campaign Hires Latino Decisions for Polling". NBC News. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  41. ↑ "Cortez Masto takes Senate seat as first Latina, Nevada woman". LasVegasSun.com. 2017-01-03. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  42. ↑ "Latino Decisions :: Matt A. Barreto". www.latinodecisions.com. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  43. ↑ "Matt Barreto | Aspen Ideas Speaker". Aspen Ideas Festival. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  44. ↑ Associated Press (July 9, 2021). "Democrats Bet on Early Latino Outreach to Avoid '20 Pitfalls". U.S. News.
  45. ↑ "Exclusive: Biden Campaign Spent $125 Million on Latino Voters, Who Fueled Arizona Win". Newsweek. 2020-11-07. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  46. ↑ Ariza, Andrew Boryga, Yvonne H. Valdez, Mario. "How Trump won big with Latinos in Florida — and then some". sun-sentinel.com. Retrieved 2021-09-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. ↑ "Trump's gains in Texas and Florida don't tell the full Latino story". POLITICO. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  48. ↑ Martha Ramirez (April 6, 2021). "Democrats and Progressives Reckon with an Apparent Rightward Shift of Immigrant Voters". U.S. News.
  49. ↑ Day, Ken Thomas and Chad (2021-02-17). "WSJ News Exclusive | Biden Allies to Launch Advocacy Group to Promote Covid-19 Relief Plan, Other Policies". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  50. ↑ EDT, Adrian Carrasquillo On 4/26/21 at 6:00 AM (2021-04-26). "Biden outside group goes all in on Latino voters to sell COVID-19 rescue package". Newsweek. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  51. ↑ EDT, Adrian Carrasquillo On 6/15/21 at 11:45 AM (2021-06-15). "Biden outside group doubles down on dreamers as Harris meets with immigrants". Newsweek. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  52. ↑ Zilbermints, Regina (2021-05-12). "Biden's internal polling touts public support for immigration reform". TheHill. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  53. ↑ PS: Political Science & Politics. "The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana" (PDF). www.apsanet.org/ps. Cambridge Press.
  54. ↑ "The VRA at 50: The Texas Voter ID Story". Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  55. ↑ Hovland, Daniel L. (August 2016). "Brakebill v. Jaeger Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (PDF).
  56. ↑ "North Dakota's Voter ID Law Latest to Be Overturned". FRONTLINE. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  57. ↑ "Latino Decisions research critical to overturning Pennsylvania Voter-ID law". Latino Decisions. 2014-01-27. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  58. ↑ "Pennsylvania judge strikes down voter ID law". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  59. ↑ Davey, Monica; Yaccino, Steven (2014-04-29). "Federal Judge Strikes Down Wisconsin Law Requiring Photo ID at Polls". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  60. ↑ Adelman, Lynn. "U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin. Decision and Order in Frank v. Walker" (PDF). U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin.
  61. ↑ "Matt Barreto". Wisconsin Public Radio. 2014-09-19. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  62. ↑ "Meet the States Denying Millions of Minorities the Vote on Super Tuesday". CityLab. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  63. ↑ "Plaintiffs' Expert Report Finds Statistical Disparities in Voter ID Availability for Minorities in Wisconsin | Election Law Blog". electionlawblog.org. 8 May 2012. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  64. ↑ "Matt A. Barreto - Google Scholar Citations". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  65. ↑ "Matt A. Barreto - Google Scholar Citations". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  66. ↑ "Ethnic Cues". University of Michigan Press. 22 November 2010. ISBN   9780472021857.
  67. ↑ Barreto, Matt A. (2007-08-01). "İSí Se Puede! Latino Candidates and the Mobilization of Latino Voters". American Political Science Review. 101 (3): 425–441. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070293. ISSN   1537-5943. S2CID   55334651.
  68. ↑ McElwee, Sean (2016-02-10). "There's powerful evidence that racial attitudes drive Tea Party support". Vox. Retrieved 2017-01-06.
  69. ↑ "New Data on Tea Party Sympathizers". FiveThirtyEight. 2010-04-12. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  70. ↑ "Pollster Responds to Your Questions". FiveThirtyEight. 2010-04-14. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  71. ↑ "You Asked For It, You Got It". FiveThirtyEight. 2010-04-16. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  72. ↑ "MAPOS Project Website". www.muslimamericansurvey.org. Retrieved 2017-01-06.
  73. ↑ "MAPOS Survey Details". www.muslimamericansurvey.org. Retrieved 2017-01-06.
  74. ↑ Dana, Karam; Barreto, Matt A.; Oskooii, Kassra A. R. (2011-09-27). "Mosques as American Institutions: Mosque Attendance, Religiosity and Integration into the Political System among American Muslims". Religions. 2 (4): 504–524. doi: 10.3390/rel2040504 .
  75. ↑ Dana, Karam (March 8, 2011). "National Survey of American Muslims Finds Mosques Help Muslims Integrate into American Political Life" (PDF). www.muslimamericansurvey.org/findings.htm.
  76. ↑ "ANES > People > Current Board". www.electionstudies.org. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.