Maximum battleship

Last updated
"Maximum Battleship" Design no.1 "Maximum", or Tillman, Battleship Design 1.jpg
"Maximum Battleship" Design no.1

The "Maximum Battleships", also known as the "Tillman Battleships", were a series of World War I-era design studies for extremely large battleships, prepared in late 1916 and early 1917 upon the order of Senator "Pitchfork" Benjamin Tillman [1] by the Bureau of Construction and Repair (C&R) of the United States Navy. [2] They helped influence design work on the Pennsylvania and first South Dakota classes of battleships. The plans prepared for the senator were preserved by C&R in the first of its "Spring Styles" books, where it kept various warship designs conceptualized between 1911 and 1925. “Maximum battleships” referred to the largest-possible battleships the U.S. Navy could afford to construct and field while still being able to utilize the Panama Canal.

Contents

"Maximum Battleship" Design no.2 "Maximum Battleship" Design 2.jpg
"Maximum Battleship" Design no.2

Context

During the years leading up to World War I, some members of the U.S. Congress were growing frustrated with what they perceived to be chronic overspending by the U.S. Navy on battleships. [3]

"Maximum Battleship" Design no.3 "Maximum Battleship" Design 3.jpg
"Maximum Battleship" Design no.3

The only limits on the potential size of an American battleship were the dimensions of the locks of the Panama Canal. The locks measure roughly 1,000 by 110 feet (305 m × 34 m), and so the "maximum battleships" were 975 by 108 feet (297 m × 33 m). The Panamax draft limit during the designing of these battleships was 39 feet 6 inches (12.04 m), however the Department of the Navy required that all designs be limited to only 34 feet (10 m) in draft. [2]

Designs

"Maximum Battleship" Design no,4 "Maximum Battleship" Design 4.jpg
"Maximum Battleship" Design no,4

Tillman's first request for designs of so-called "maximum battleship" in 1912–1913 led to several estimates for battleships unconstrained by cost. Created by the US Navy Bureau of Construction and Repair (C&R), these ships would displace up to 38,000 long tons (39,000 t) and carry 14 inch guns. Although C&R was "appalled," in the words of naval historian Norman Friedman, by the extravagance of these designs, they admitted that far larger warships could transit the Panama Canal's locks, which, due to the US's geography, were often held to be the final limiting factor on the size of a US warship. Such larger designs would be often and seriously proposed within only a few years. [4]

In 1916, Tillman repeated his request, and C&R produced another series of design studies. C&R drew up four blueprints, all ships having varying characteristics despite being built on the same hull:

Comparisons to other US Navy battleships

The Tillman designs all included five casemate guns mounted aft, two on each side and one at the tip of the stern. Similar "stern chasers" had been previously mounted in Nevada, but were omitted from the Pennsylvania class. These casemates were a return to an older design idea; American battleship designers had abandoned hull-mounted casemates after the New Mexico class. They had transpired to be too "wet" – heavy seas rendered them unusable—and they had been removed from all earlier classes.

Tillman ITillman IITillman IIITillman IVTillman IV-1Tillman IV-2 South Dakota class Iowa class Montana class
Design13 Dec 191613 Dec 191613 Dec 191629 Dec 191630 Jan 191730 Jan 19178 Jul 19189 Jun 19386 Feb 1940
Displace-
ment
70,000 short tons (63,500 t)70,000 short tons (63,500 t)63,500 short tons (57,600 t)80,000 short tons (72,600 t)80,000 short tons (72,600 t)80,000 short tons (72,600 t)43,200 short tons (39,200 t)45,000 short tons (40,800 t)70,000 short tons (63,500 t)
Length975 feet (297 m)660 feet (200 m)860 feet (260 m)921 feet (281 m)
Beam108 feet (33 m)106 feet (32 m)108 feet (33 m)121 feet (37 m)
Draft32 feet 9 inches (10 m)32 feet 9 inches (10 m)36 feet (11 m)36 feet (11 m)
Speed26.5 knots (49.1 km/h; 30.5 mph)26.5 knots (49.1 km/h; 30.5 mph)30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph)25.2 knots (46.7 km/h; 29.0 mph)25.2 knots (46.7 km/h; 29.0 mph)25.2 knots (46.7 km/h; 29.0 mph)23.5 knots (43.5 km/h; 27.0 mph)33 knots (61 km/h; 38 mph)28 knots (52 km/h; 32 mph)
Main
battery
(12) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in four triple turrets(24) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in four six-gun turrets(12) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in four triple turrets(24) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in four six-gun turrets(13) 18-inch (457 mm), 50-caliber guns in five twin and one triple turret(15) 18-inch (457 mm), 50-caliber guns in five triple turrets(12) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in four triple turrets(9) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in three triple turrets(12) 16-inch (406 mm), 50-caliber guns in four triple turrets
Belt
armor
9–18-inch (229–457 mm)7–13-inch (178–330 mm)7–13-inch (178–330 mm)9–18-inch (229–457 mm)8–16-inch (203–406 mm)8–16-inch (203–406 mm)8–13.5-inch (203–343 mm)4–12.1-inch (102–307 mm)10.2–16.1-inch (259–409 mm)
Barbette
armor
5–17-inch (127–432 mm)4–12.5-inch (102–318 mm)}4–12.5-inch (102–318 mm)5–17-inch (127–432 mm)5–15-inch (127–381 mm)5–15-inch (127–381 mm)4.5–13.5-inch (114–343 mm)11.6–17.3-inch (295–439 mm)18–21.3-inch (457–541 mm)
Conning
Tower
armor
6–18-inch (152–457 mm)6–16-inch (152–406 mm)6–16-inch (152–406 mm)9–18-inch (229–457 mm)6–18-inch (152–457 mm)6–18-inch (152–457 mm)16-inch (406 mm)17.3-inch (439 mm)18-inch (457 mm)
"Maximum Battleship" Design IV-1 Tillman IV-1.jpg
"Maximum Battleship" Design IV-1
"Maximum Battleship" Design IV-2 Tillman IV-2.jpg
"Maximum Battleship" Design IV-2

Fate of the designed battleships

The Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 limited naval armaments, causing the cancellation of the South Dakotas and halting all consideration of the "maximum battleships."

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Montana</i>-class battleship Proposed class of American super-battleships

The Montana-class battleships were planned as successors of the Iowa class for the United States Navy, to be slower but larger, better armored, and with superior firepower. Five were approved for construction during World War II, but changes in wartime building priorities resulted in their cancellation in favor of continuing production of Essex-class aircraft carriers and Iowa-class battleships before any Montana-class keels were laid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heavy cruiser</span> Type of medium to large-sized warship

A heavy cruiser was a type of cruiser, a naval warship designed for long range and high speed, armed generally with naval guns of roughly 203 mm (8 inches) in calibre, whose design parameters were dictated by the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 and the London Naval Treaty of 1930. Heavy cruisers were generally larger, more heavily-armed and more heavily-armoured than light cruisers while being smaller, faster, and more lightly-armed and armoured than battlecruisers and battleships. Heavy cruisers were assigned a variety of roles ranging from commerce raiding to serving as 'cruiser-killers,' i.e. hunting and destroying similarly-sized ships

<i>Indiana</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Indiana class was a class of three pre-dreadnought battleships launched in 1893. These were the first battleships built by the United States Navy comparable to contemporary European ships, such as the British HMS Hood. Authorized in 1890 and commissioned between November 1895 and April 1896, these were relatively small battleships with heavy armor and ordnance that pioneered the use of an intermediate battery. Specifically intended for coastal defense, their freeboard was insufficient to deal well with the waves of the open ocean. The turrets lacked counterweights, and the main belt armor was placed too low to be effective under most conditions.

<i>Majestic</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the British Royal Navy

The Majestic class of nine pre-dreadnought battleships were built for the Royal Navy in the mid-1890s under the Spencer Programme, named after the First Lord of the Admiralty, John Poyntz Spencer. With nine units commissioned, they were the most numerous class of battleships. The nine ships, HMS Majestic, Caesar, Hannibal, Illustrious, Jupiter, Magnificent, Mars, Prince George, and Victorious, were built between 1894 and 1898 as part of a programme to strengthen the Royal Navy versus its two traditional rivals, France and Russia. This continued the naval re-armament initiatives begun by the Naval Defence Act 1889.

<i>North Carolina</i>-class battleship US Navy fast battleship class (1937–1947)

The North Carolina class were a pair of fast battleships, North Carolina and Washington, built for the United States Navy in the late 1930s and early 1940s.

<i>Nevada</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Nevada class comprised two dreadnought battleships—Nevada and Oklahoma—built for the United States Navy in the 1910s. They were significant developments in battleship design, being the first in the world to adopt "all or nothing" armor, a major step forward in armor protection because it emphasized protection optimized for long-range engagements before the Battle of Jutland demonstrated the need for such a layout. They also introduced three-gun turrets and oil-fired water-tube boilers to the US fleet. The two Nevadas were the progenitors of the standard-type battleship, a group that included the next four classes of broadly similar battleships that were intended to be tactically homogeneous.

<i>Kearsarge</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Kearsarge-class was a group of two pre-dreadnought battleships built for the United States Navy in the 1890s. The two ships—USS Kearsarge and USS Kentucky—represented a compromise between two preceding battleship designs, the low-freeboard Indiana class and the high-freeboard USS Iowa, though their design also incorporated several improvements. Their primary advances over earlier designs consisted of new quick-firing guns and improved armor protection, but their most novel feature was their two-story gun turrets that consisted of a secondary 8-inch (203 mm) gun turret fixed to the top of their primary 13-inch (330 mm) turrets. The ships suffered from a number of problems, however, including a tertiary battery mounted too low in the hull and poorly-designed turrets, though the latter were attempted again with the Virginia class in the early 1900s, also with negative results.

<i>Delaware</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Delaware-class battleships of the United States Navy were the second class of American dreadnoughts. With this class, the 16,000 long tons (16,257 t) limit imposed on capital ships by the United States Congress was waived, which allowed designers at the Navy's Bureau of Construction and Repair to correct what they considered flaws in the preceding South Carolina class and produce ships not only more powerful but also more effective and rounded overall. Launched in 1909, these ships became the first in US naval history to exceed 20,000 long tons (20,321 t).

<i>Lion</i>-class battleship Planned class of battleships for the Royal Navy

The Lion class was a class of six fast battleships designed for the Royal Navy (RN) in the late 1930s. They were a larger, improved version of the preceding King George V class, with 16-inch (406 mm) guns. Only two ships were laid down before the Second World War began in September 1939 and a third was ordered during the war, but their construction was suspended shortly afterwards. The design was modified in light of war experience in 1942, but the two ships already begun were scrapped later in the year.

G3 battlecruiser Abortive class of British Royal Navy battlecruisers

The G3 class was a class of battlecruisers planned by the Royal Navy after the end of World War I in response to naval expansion programmes by the United States and Japan. The four ships of this class would have been larger, faster and more heavily armed than any existing battleship. The G3s have been considered to be proper "fast battleships" since they were well-balanced designs with adequate protection. Nonetheless the class was officially designated as a "battlecruiser" due to their higher speed and lesser firepower and armour relative to the planned N3-class battleship design. The G3s would have carried nine 16-inch (406 mm) guns and were expected to achieve 32 knots, while the N3s would carry nine 18-inch (457 mm) guns on the same displacement at the expense of speed.

The N3 class was a dreadnought battleship class designed for the Royal Navy after World War I, incorporating lessons learned from that conflict. They were similar in design to the G3-class battlecruiser, but had larger guns and thicker armour. They were never ordered due to signing of the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922, which limited the size and armament of battleships to 35,000 long tons (36,000 t) and guns no bigger than 16 inches (406 mm).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fast battleship</span> Battleship that emphasizes speed without undue compromises in armor or armament

A fast battleship was a battleship which in concept emphasised speed without undue compromise of either armor or armament. Most of the early World War I-era dreadnought battleships were typically built with low design speeds, so the term "fast battleship" is applied to a design which is considerably faster. The extra speed of a fast battleship was normally required to allow the vessel to carry out additional roles besides taking part in the line of battle, such as escorting aircraft carriers.

<i>Tosa</i>-class battleship Class of Japanese dreadnoughts that did not see service as battleships

The Tosa-class battleships were two dreadnoughts ordered as part of the "Eight-Eight" fleet for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) during the early 1920s. The ships were larger versions of the preceding Nagato class, and carried an additional 41-centimeter (16.1 in) twin-gun turret. The design for the class served as a basis for the Amagi-class battlecruisers.

L 20e α-class battleship Cancelled battleship design of the German Imperial Navy

L 20e α was a design for a class of battleships to be built in 1918 for the German Kaiserliche Marine during World War I. Design work on the class of battleship to succeed the Bayern-class battleships began in 1914, but the outbreak of World War I in July 1914 led to these plans being shelved. Work resumed in early 1916 and lessons from the Battle of Jutland, fought later that year, were incorporated into the design. Reinhard Scheer, the commander of the fleet, wanted larger main guns and a higher top speed than earlier vessels, to combat the latest ships in the British Royal Navy. A variety of proposals were submitted, with armament ranging from the same eight 38 cm (15 in) guns of the Bayern class to eight 42 cm (16.5 in) guns.

<i>Lexington</i>-class battlecruiser Abortive WWI-era battlecruiser class of the U.S. Navy

The Lexington-class battlecruisers were officially the only class of battlecruiser to ever be ordered by the United States Navy. While these six vessels were requested in 1911 as a reaction to the building by Japan of the Kongō class, the potential use for them in the U.S. Navy came from a series of studies by the Naval War College which stretched over several years and predated the existence of the first battlecruiser, HMS Invincible. The fact they were not approved by Congress at the time of their initial request was due to political, not military considerations.

Dutch 1913 battleship proposal Dutch proposal to build new battleships

A Dutch proposal to build new battleships was originally tendered in 1912, after years of concern over the expansion of the Imperial Japanese Navy and the withdrawal of allied British warships from the China Station. Only four coastal defense ships were planned, but naval experts and the Tweede Kamer believed that acquiring dreadnoughts would provide a stronger defense for the Nederlands-Indië, so a Royal Commission was formed in June 1912.

<i>South Carolina</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

Two South Carolina-class battleships, also known as the Michigan class, were built for the United States Navy in the early twentieth century. Named South Carolina and Michigan, they were the first American dreadnoughts—powerful warships whose capabilities far outstripped those of the world's older battleships.

<i>Pennsylvania</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Pennsylvania class consisted of two super-dreadnought battleships built for the United States Navy just before the First World War. Named Pennsylvania and Arizona, after the American states of the same names, the two battleships were the United States' second battleship design to adhere to the "all or nothing" armor scheme. They were the newest American capital ships when the United States entered the First World War.

The J3 class battlecruiser was a design study conducted during the Royal Navy's 1921 Fleet modernization programme. As a follow-on to the Admiral-class battlecruiser, the J3 class incorporated all the lessons learned from the First World War, specifically the battle of Jutland. The design was seen as an improvement to the Admiral class by virtue of its heavier and improved armouring scheme, specifically the deck armour, although the offensive armament remained roughly the same. The design was superseded by the I3 and G3 battlecruiser designs, as both mounted a heavier main armament, and further improved the protection scheme, on roughly the same tonnage. The 1921 fleet program was cancelled due to signing of the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922, which limited the size and armament of battleships to 35,000 long tons (36,000 t) and no gun bigger than 16 inches (406 mm).

References

  1. Senate Congressional Record of the USA. Vol. 53. Library of Congress. 21 June 1916. p. 9680. Retrieved 14 September 2021 via Congress.gov.
  2. 1 2 Zimm, A. D. (1975). "Build the Limit: The American "Maximum Battleship" Designs of 1916-17". Warship International. 12 (1). International Naval Research Organization: 31–59. JSTOR   44890389 . Retrieved 14 September 2021 via JSTOR.
  3. Senate Congressional Record of the USA. Vol. 51. Library of Congress. 2 June 1914. p. 9638-9651. Retrieved 4 October 2021 via Congress.gov.
  4. Friedman, US Battleships, 148–149.

Bibliography