Microbial cell factory

Last updated
Schematic workflow for microbial factory optimization Schematic workflow for microbial factory optimization.svg
Schematic workflow for microbial factory optimization

Microbial cell factory is an approach to bioengineering which considers microbial cells as a production facility in which the optimization process largely depends on metabolic engineering. [1] MCFs is a derivation of cell factories, which are engineered microbes and plant cells. [2] In 1980s and 1990s, MCFs were originally conceived to improve productivity of cellular systems and metabolite yields through strain engineering. [3] A MCF develops native and nonnative metabolites through targeted strain design. [4] In addition, MCFs can shorten the synthesis cycle while reducing the difficulty of product separation.

Contents

[5]

History

Prior to MCFs, scientists employed traditional engineering techniques to produce various commodities. These methodologies include modifying metabolic pathways, eliminating enzymes, or the balancing of ATP to drive metabolic flux. [6] However, when these approaches were applied for industrial productions, they could not withstand the industrial environments that consisted of toxins and fluctuating temperatures. [6] Ultimately, the techniques were never able to scale up and output bio-products that were obtained in the laboratory. [7]

Thus, MCFs were developed by using a heterogenous biosynthesis pathway in a microbial host. [8] As a host, MCFs take in various substrates and convert them into valuable compounds. [9] These products can range from fuels, chemical, food ingredients, to pharmaceuticals. [10]  

Structure

Cell Wall

In microbial cells, the cell walls are either Gram-positive or Gram-negative. These outcomes are based on the Gram Stain test. Gram-positive cell walls have thick peptidoglycan layer and no outer lipid membrane while Gram-negative bacteria have a thin peptidoglycan layer and an outer lipid membrane. [11] Although a thick Gram-positive cell wall is advantageous, it is easier to attack as the peptidoglycan layer absorbs antibiotics and cleaning products. A Gram-negative cell wall is more resistant to such attacks and more difficult to destroy.  

Membrane

The membrane of microbial cells are bilayers, composed of phospholipids. [12] The phospholipids may range in chain length to branching. Ultimately, the phospholipid will determine the membrane properties, such as fluidity and charge, that will regulate the interactions with nearby proteins. In addition, the membrane oversees the development of the cell's morphology and cell sizes. [13] Escherichia coli is often utilized a base line to differentiate and define the membrane of MCFs. [14]

Nucleoid

The nucleoid forms an irregular shaped region within a prokaryote cell, containing all or majority of the genetic material to reproduce. [15] The nucleoid controls the activity of the MCF and reproduction of itself and products.

Current Developments

Current methods of programming MCFs utilize strain engineering, which rely on random mutagenesis. [16] In addition, the conventional techniques are labor-intensive, timely, and difficult to analyze. [16] This has led many scientific trials to utilize genomic editing tools to improve MCFs, such as ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR. These approaches allow genetic manipulation and analysis, specifically creating double stranded breaks within a genome sequence.

ZFNs

Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) were the first genomic editing tool to be able to target any genomic site. By inducing a double-stranded break, ZFNs can facilitate targeted editing. However, when employed to reinforce MCFs, ZFNs have an unusual low success rate. In various trials, the ZFNs were unable to obtain a three-finger array or the triplet was unable to be assembled into a new sequence. [16] [17] Thus, incorporation of ZFNs into MCFs has remained strenuous and costly.

TALENs

Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) work in a similar manner to ZFNs, but TALENs are based on fusion proteins. TALENs have been applied to numerous MCFs, such as yeast and zebrafish. [18] Many developments has explored fairyTALE, a liquid phase synthesis TALEN platform, to create nucleases, activators, and repressors for MCFs. [19] Although TALENs have fewer obstacles than ZFNs, they are still troublesome as assembling large quantities of repeats into an array remains a significant problem. [20]

CRISPR

Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and its associated proteins (Cas) has become one of the most popular genome editing tools due to its efficiency and low cost. The CRISPR/CAS9 has been utilized to enhance MCFs to produce yeast, bacteria, and E.coli. [21] When optimizing yeast, CRISPR/CAS9 promoting S.pyogenes has been found to be the most influential strategy. For E.coli, studies have determined a strategy preventing genome instability to be the most robust metabolic engineering approach regardless of the specific methodology. [21]

Large-Scale Application

The most significant advantage of MCFs is the ability to be utilized in industrial environments with minimal limitations. Through metabolic engineering, MCFs rely on innovative strategic tools for the development and optimization of metabolic and gene regulatory networks for efficient production. [22] Going from lab to large scale development involves consideration of three factors: product yield, productivity, and the product titre. [22] A common dilemma however is the trade-off between product yield and productivity. If a company maximizes productivity, they will ultimately lower their product yield and vice versa.

To combat this issue, strategies have been developed to maximize all three factors. One of the most common techniques is utilizing fed-batch culture. Fed-batch culture is, in the broadest sense, defined as an operational technique in biotechnological processes where one or more nutrients (substrates) are fed (supplied) to the bioreactor during cultivation and in which the product(s) remain in the bioreactor until the end of the run. [23] Another method is utilizing continuous cultivation strategy. The premise behind continuous cultivation is to maintain a steady-state cell metabolism over long periods of times. [24] By having multiple approaches for MCF, companies may customize each process to their specific product(s).

Commercialization

The commercialization of MCFs has ranged from chemical to biofuels.

Table 1: Commercialization of MCFs [22]
ProductProduction OrganismStatusFeed StockCompaniesReference
Chemical
AcetoneClostridium acetobuylicumCommercializedCornGreen Biologicswww.greenbiologics.com
Citric AcidAspergillus nigerCommercialized
Succinic AcidE. coliCommercializedCorn SugarsBioAmberwww.bio-amber.com
E. coliCommercializedSucroseMyriantwww.myriant.com
S. cerevisiaeCommercializedStarch, sugarsReverdiawww.reverdia.com
B. succiniproducensCommercializedGlycerol, sugarsSuccinitywww.succinity.com
Lactic AcidCommercializedCorn sugars and moreNatureWorkswww.natureworksllc.com
Itaconic AcidAspergillus terreusCommercializedBiochemistryQingdao Kehaiwww.kehai.info/en
1,3-PDOE. coliCommercializedCorn SugarsDuPont Tate & Lylewww.duponttateandlyle.com
1,3-BDODemonstratedGenomatica and Versaliswww.genomatica.com
1,4-BDOE.coliCommercializedSugarGenomatica and DuPont Tate & Lylewww.genomatica.com
1,5-PDACommercializedSugarCathay Industrial Biotechwww.cathaybiotech.com
3-HPCommercializedMetabolixwww.metabolix.com
DemonstrationNovozymes and Cargillwww.novozymes.com
IsopreneS. cerevisiaePreparingSugar, celluloseAmyris, Braskem, Michelinwww.amyris.com
PreparingDuPont, Goodyearwww.biosciences.dupont.com
IsobuteneE. coliDemonstrationGlucose, sucroseGlobal Bioenergieswww.global-bioenergies.com
Adipic acidCandida sp.DemonstrationPlant oilsVerdezynewww.verdezyne.com
Sebacic acidCandida sp.DemonstrationPlant oilsVerdezynewww.verdezyne.com
DDDACandida sp.Under commercializationPlant oilsVerdezynewww.verdezyne.com
SqualeneS. cerevisiaeCommercializedSugarcaneAmyriswww.amyris.com
PHAE. coliCommercializedMetabolixwww.metabolix.com
Fuels
EthanolS. cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Kluyveromyces marxianusCommercializedSugarcane, corn sugar, lignocelluloseMany
Clostridium autoethanogenumDemonstrationFlue gasLanzatechwww.lazatech.com
FarneseneS. cerevisiaeCommercializedAmyriswww.amyris.com
ButanolClostridium acetobuylicumCommercializedCornGreen Biologicswww.greenbiologics.com
IsobutanolYeastCommercializedSugarsGevowww.gevo.com

Related Research Articles

A restriction enzyme, restriction endonuclease, REase, ENase orrestrictase is an enzyme that cleaves DNA into fragments at or near specific recognition sites within molecules known as restriction sites. Restriction enzymes are one class of the broader endonuclease group of enzymes. Restriction enzymes are commonly classified into five types, which differ in their structure and whether they cut their DNA substrate at their recognition site, or if the recognition and cleavage sites are separate from one another. To cut DNA, all restriction enzymes make two incisions, once through each sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA double helix.

Gene knockouts are a widely used genetic engineering technique that involves the targeted removal or inactivation of a specific gene within an organism's genome. This can be done through a variety of methods, including homologous recombination, CRISPR-Cas9, and TALENs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Germline mutation</span> Inherited genetic variation

A germline mutation, or germinal mutation, is any detectable variation within germ cells. Mutations in these cells are the only mutations that can be passed on to offspring, when either a mutated sperm or oocyte come together to form a zygote. After this fertilization event occurs, germ cells divide rapidly to produce all of the cells in the body, causing this mutation to be present in every somatic and germline cell in the offspring; this is also known as a constitutional mutation. Germline mutation is distinct from somatic mutation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insertion (genetics)</span> Type of mutation

In genetics, an insertion is the addition of one or more nucleotide base pairs into a DNA sequence. This can often happen in microsatellite regions due to the DNA polymerase slipping. Insertions can be anywhere in size from one base pair incorrectly inserted into a DNA sequence to a section of one chromosome inserted into another. The mechanism of the smallest single base insertion mutations is believed to be through base-pair separation between the template and primer strands followed by non-neighbor base stacking, which can occur locally within the DNA polymerase active site. On a chromosome level, an insertion refers to the insertion of a larger sequence into a chromosome. This can happen due to unequal crossover during meiosis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CRISPR</span> Family of DNA sequence found in prokaryotic organisms

CRISPR is a family of DNA sequences found in the genomes of prokaryotic organisms such as bacteria and archaea. These sequences are derived from DNA fragments of bacteriophages that had previously infected the prokaryote. They are used to detect and destroy DNA from similar bacteriophages during subsequent infections. Hence these sequences play a key role in the antiviral defense system of prokaryotes and provide a form of acquired immunity. CRISPR is found in approximately 50% of sequenced bacterial genomes and nearly 90% of sequenced archaea.

The word metagenics uses the prefix meta and the suffix gen. Literally, it means "the creation of something which creates". In the context of biotechnology, metagenics is the practice of engineering organisms to create a specific enzyme, protein, or other biochemicals from simpler starting materials. The genetic engineering of E. coli with the specific task of producing human insulin from starting amino acids is an example. E. coli has also been engineered to digest plant biomass and use it to produce hydrocarbons in order to synthesize biofuels. The applications of metagenics on E. coli also include higher alcohols, fatty-acid based chemicals and terpenes.

Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) are artificial restriction enzymes generated by fusing a zinc finger DNA-binding domain to a DNA-cleavage domain. Zinc finger domains can be engineered to target specific desired DNA sequences and this enables zinc-finger nucleases to target unique sequences within complex genomes. By taking advantage of endogenous DNA repair machinery, these reagents can be used to precisely alter the genomes of higher organisms. Alongside CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN, ZFN is a prominent tool in the field of genome editing.

The non-mevalonate pathway—also appearing as the mevalonate-independent pathway and the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate/1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (MEP/DOXP) pathway—is an alternative metabolic pathway for the biosynthesis of the isoprenoid precursors isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP). The currently preferred name for this pathway is the MEP pathway, since MEP is the first committed metabolite on the route to IPP.

A cell-free system is an in vitro tool widely used to study biological reactions that happen within cells apart from a full cell system, thus reducing the complex interactions typically found when working in a whole cell. Subcellular fractions can be isolated by ultracentrifugation to provide molecular machinery that can be used in reactions in the absence of many of the other cellular components. Eukaryotic and prokaryotic cell internals have been used for creation of these simplified environments. These systems have enabled cell-free synthetic biology to emerge, providing control over what reaction is being examined, as well as its yield, and lessening the considerations otherwise invoked when working with more sensitive live cells.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insert (molecular biology)</span>

In Molecular biology, an insert is a piece of DNA that is inserted into a larger DNA vector by a recombinant DNA technique, such as ligation or recombination. This allows it to be multiplied, selected, further manipulated or expressed in a host organism.

Rhodobacter sphaeroides is a kind of purple bacterium; a group of bacteria that can obtain energy through photosynthesis. Its best growth conditions are anaerobic phototrophy and aerobic chemoheterotrophy in the absence of light. R. sphaeroides is also able to fix nitrogen. It is remarkably metabolically diverse, as it is able to grow heterotrophically via fermentation and aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Such a metabolic versatility has motivated the investigation of R. sphaeroides as a microbial cell factory for biotechnological applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transcription activator-like effector nuclease</span>

Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) are restriction enzymes that can be engineered to cut specific sequences of DNA. They are made by fusing a TAL effector DNA-binding domain to a DNA cleavage domain. Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) can be engineered to bind to practically any desired DNA sequence, so when combined with a nuclease, DNA can be cut at specific locations. The restriction enzymes can be introduced into cells, for use in gene editing or for genome editing in situ, a technique known as genome editing with engineered nucleases. Alongside zinc finger nucleases and CRISPR/Cas9, TALEN is a prominent tool in the field of genome editing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genome editing</span> Type of genetic engineering

Genome editing, or genome engineering, or gene editing, is a type of genetic engineering in which DNA is inserted, deleted, modified or replaced in the genome of a living organism. Unlike early genetic engineering techniques that randomly inserts genetic material into a host genome, genome editing targets the insertions to site-specific locations. The basic mechanism involved in genetic manipulations through programmable nucleases is the recognition of target genomic loci and binding of effector DNA-binding domain (DBD), double-strand breaks (DSBs) in target DNA by the restriction endonucleases, and the repair of DSBs through homology-directed recombination (HDR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetic engineering techniques</span> Methods used to change the DNA of organisms

Genetic engineering techniques allow the modification of animal and plant genomes. Techniques have been devised to insert, delete, and modify DNA at multiple levels, ranging from a specific base pair in a specific gene to entire genes. There are a number of steps that are followed before a genetically modified organism (GMO) is created. Genetic engineers must first choose what gene they wish to insert, modify, or delete. The gene must then be isolated and incorporated, along with other genetic elements, into a suitable vector. This vector is then used to insert the gene into the host genome, creating a transgenic or edited organism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cas9</span> Microbial protein found in Streptococcus pyogenes M1 GAS

Cas9 is a 160 kilodalton protein which plays a vital role in the immunological defense of certain bacteria against DNA viruses and plasmids, and is heavily utilized in genetic engineering applications. Its main function is to cut DNA and thereby alter a cell's genome. The CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technique was a significant contributor to the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2020 being awarded to Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epigenome editing</span>

Epigenome editing or epigenome engineering is a type of genetic engineering in which the epigenome is modified at specific sites using engineered molecules targeted to those sites. Whereas gene editing involves changing the actual DNA sequence itself, epigenetic editing involves modifying and presenting DNA sequences to proteins and other DNA binding factors that influence DNA function. By "editing” epigenomic features in this manner, researchers can determine the exact biological role of an epigenetic modification at the site in question.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surveyor nuclease assay</span>

Surveyor nuclease assay is an enzyme mismatch cleavage assay used to detect single base mismatches or small insertions or deletions (indels).

J. Keith Joung is an American pathologist and molecular biologist who holds the Robert B. Colvin Endowed Chair in Pathology at Massachusetts General Hospital and is Professor of Pathology at Harvard Medical School. He is a leading figure in the field of genome editing and has pioneered the development of designer nucleases and sensitive off-target detection methods.

Off-target genome editing refers to nonspecific and unintended genetic modifications that can arise through the use of engineered nuclease technologies such as: clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), meganucleases, and zinc finger nucleases (ZFN). These tools use different mechanisms to bind a predetermined sequence of DNA (“target”), which they cleave, creating a double-stranded chromosomal break (DSB) that summons the cell's DNA repair mechanisms and leads to site-specific modifications. If these complexes do not bind at the target, often a result of homologous sequences and/or mismatch tolerance, they will cleave off-target DSB and cause non-specific genetic modifications. Specifically, off-target effects consist of unintended point mutations, deletions, insertions inversions, and translocations.

Prime editing is a 'search-and-replace' genome editing technology in molecular biology by which the genome of living organisms may be modified. The technology directly writes new genetic information into a targeted DNA site. It uses a fusion protein, consisting of a catalytically impaired Cas9 endonuclease fused to an engineered reverse transcriptase enzyme, and a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA), capable of identifying the target site and providing the new genetic information to replace the target DNA nucleotides. It mediates targeted insertions, deletions, and base-to-base conversions without the need for double strand breaks (DSBs) or donor DNA templates.

References

  1. Villaverde, Antonio (2010-07-05). "Nanotechnology, bionanotechnology and microbial cell factories". Microbial Cell Factories. 9: 53. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-53 . ISSN   1475-2859. PMC   2916890 . PMID   20602780.
  2. "Cell factory - benefits and potential of cell factories | VTT". www.vttresearch.com. Retrieved 2022-04-18.
  3. Bailey, James E. (1991-06-21). "Toward a Science of Metabolic Engineering" . Science. 252 (5013): 1668–1675. Bibcode:1991Sci...252.1668B. doi:10.1126/science.2047876. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   2047876. S2CID   42386044.
  4. Gohil, Nisarg; Bhattacharjee, Gargi; Singh, Vijai (2021), "An introduction to microbial cell factories for production of biomolecules", Microbial Cell Factories Engineering for Production of Biomolecules, Elsevier, pp. 1–19, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821477-0.00021-0, ISBN   978-0-12-821477-0, S2CID   234144332 , retrieved 2022-04-18
  5. Liu, Xiaonan; Ding, Wentao; Jiang, Huifeng (2017-07-19). "Engineering microbial cell factories for the production of plant natural products: from design principles to industrial-scale production". Microbial Cell Factories. 16 (1): 125. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0732-7 . ISSN   1475-2859. PMC   5518134 . PMID   28724386.
  6. 1 2 Gong, Zhiwei; Nielsen, Jens; Zhou, Yongjin J. (October 2017). "Engineering Robustness of Microbial Cell Factories" . Biotechnology Journal. 12 (10): 1700014. doi:10.1002/biot.201700014. ISSN   1860-6768. PMID   28857502. S2CID   24689122.
  7. Ling, Hua; Teo, Weisuong; Chen, Binbin; Leong, Susanna Su Jan; Chang, Matthew Wook (October 2014). "Microbial tolerance engineering toward biochemical production: from lignocellulose to products". Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 29: 99–106. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.03.005. PMID   24743028.
  8. Zhao, Liting; Ma, Zhongbao; Yin, Jian; Shi, Guiyang; Ding, Zhongyang (April 2021). "Biological strategies for oligo/polysaccharide synthesis: biocatalyst and microbial cell factory" . Carbohydrate Polymers. 258: 117695. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117695. PMID   33593568. S2CID   231943952.
  9. Navarrete, Clara; Jacobsen, Irene Hjorth; Martínez, José Luis; Procentese, Alessandra (July 2020). "Cell Factories for Industrial Production Processes: Current Issues and Emerging Solutions". Processes. 8 (7): 768. doi: 10.3390/pr8070768 . ISSN   2227-9717.
  10. Keasling, Jay D. (2010-12-03). "Manufacturing Molecules Through Metabolic Engineering" . Science. 330 (6009): 1355–1358. Bibcode:2010Sci...330.1355K. doi:10.1126/science.1193990. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   21127247. S2CID   25164872.
  11. Sizar, Omeed; Unakal, Chandrashekhar G. (2022), "Gram Positive Bacteria", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID   29261915 , retrieved 2022-04-18
  12. Strahl, Henrik; Errington, Jeff (2017-09-08). "Bacterial Membranes: Structure, Domains, and Function" . Annual Review of Microbiology. 71 (1): 519–538. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095630. ISSN   0066-4227. PMID   28697671.
  13. Guo, Liang; Diao, Wenwen; Gao, Cong; Hu, Guipeng; Ding, Qiang; Ye, Chao; Chen, Xiulai; Liu, Jia; Liu, Liming (March 2020). "Engineering Escherichia coli lifespan for enhancing chemical production" . Nature Catalysis. 3 (3): 307–318. doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0411-7. ISSN   2520-1158. S2CID   213162228.
  14. Wang, Jianli; Ma, Wenjian; Wang, Xiaoyuan (2021-03-20). "Insights into the structure of Escherichia coli outer membrane as the target for engineering microbial cell factories". Microbial Cell Factories. 20 (1): 73. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01565-8 . ISSN   1475-2859. PMC   7980664 . PMID   33743682.
  15. Youssef, Noor; Budd, Aidan; Bielawski, Joseph P. (2019), Anisimova, Maria (ed.), "Introduction to Genome Biology and Diversity", Evolutionary Genomics: Statistical and Computational Methods, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1910, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3–31, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9074-0_1 , ISBN   978-1-4939-9074-0, PMID   31278660, S2CID   195813641
  16. 1 2 3 Si, Tong; Xiao, Han; Zhao, Huimin (2015-11-15). "Rapid Prototyping of Microbial Cell Factories via Genome-scale Engineering". Biotechnology Advances. 33 (7): 1420–1432. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.11.007. ISSN   0734-9750. PMC   4439387 . PMID   25450192.
  17. Ramirez, Cherie L.; Foley, Jonathan E.; Wright, David A.; Müller-Lerch, Felix; Rahman, Shamim H.; Cornu, Tatjana I.; Winfrey, Ronnie J.; Sander, Jeffry D.; Fu, Fengli; Townsend, Jeffrey A.; Cathomen, Toni (May 2008). "Unexpected failure rates for modular assembly of engineered zinc fingers". Nature Methods. 5 (5): 374–375. doi:10.1038/nmeth0508-374. ISSN   1548-7105. PMC   7880305 . PMID   18446154.
  18. Li, T.; Huang, S.; Zhao, X.; Wright, D. A.; Carpenter, S.; Spalding, M. H.; Weeks, D. P.; Yang, B. (2011). "Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes". Nucleic Acids Research. 39 (14): 6315–6325. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr188. PMC   3152341 . PMID   21459844.
  19. Liang, Jing; Chao, Ran; Abil, Zhanar; Bao, Zehua; Zhao, Huimin (2014-02-21). "FairyTALE: A High-Throughput TAL Effector Synthesis Platform" . ACS Synthetic Biology. 3 (2): 67–73. doi:10.1021/sb400109p. ISSN   2161-5063. PMID   24237314.
  20. Briggs, A. W.; Rios, X.; Chari, R.; Yang, L.; Zhang, F.; Mali, P.; Church, G. M. (2012). "Iterative capped assembly: Rapid and scalable synthesis of repeat-module DNA such as TAL effectors from individual monomers". Nucleic Acids Research. 40 (15): e117. doi:10.1093/nar/gks624. PMC   3424587 . PMID   22740649 . Retrieved 2022-04-18.
  21. 1 2 Jakočiūnas, Tadas; Jensen, Michael K.; Keasling, Jay D. (2016-03-01). "CRISPR/Cas9 advances engineering of microbial cell factories" . Metabolic Engineering. 34: 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.003. ISSN   1096-7176. PMID   26707540.
  22. 1 2 3 Gustavsson, Martin; Lee, Sang Yup (September 2016). "Prospects of microbial cell factories developed through systems metabolic engineering". Microbial Biotechnology. 9 (5): 610–617. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.12385. ISSN   1751-7915. PMC   4993179 . PMID   27435545.
  23. Yamanè, Tsuneo; Shimizu, Shoichi (1984). "Fed-batch techniques in microbial processes" . Bioprocess Parameter Control. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. 30. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 147–194. doi:10.1007/BFb0006382. ISBN   978-3-540-39004-6.
  24. Nieto-Taype, Miguel Angel; Garcia-Ortega, Xavier; Albiol, Joan; Montesinos-Seguí, José Luis; Valero, Francisco (2020-06-25). "Continuous Cultivation as a Tool Toward the Rational Bioprocess Development With Pichia Pastoris Cell Factory". Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 8: 632. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00632 . ISSN   2296-4185. PMC   7330098 . PMID   32671036.