Mireles v. Waco

Last updated

Mireles v. Waco
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided October 21, 1991
Full case nameMireles v. Waco
Citations502 U.S. 9 ( more )
Holding
A state judge is absolutely immune to liability for acts committed while presiding over their court.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Byron White  · Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens  · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Case opinions
Per curiam
DissentStevens
DissentScalia, joined by Kennedy

Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9(1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a state judge is absolutely immune to liability for acts committed while presiding over their court. [1] [2]

Contents

Description

When a defense lawyer failed to appear for a scheduled hearing, the judge not only issued a bench warrant for his arrest, but instructed the police sent to arrest him to "rough him up a little" to teach him not to skip court dates. Although this was entirely unprofessional and possibly criminal, the judge was held, by the Supreme Court, to have absolute immunity from a lawsuit arising from the resulting beating, because the misbehavior occurred entirely within his activities as a judge presiding over a court. [1]

Stevens dissented because he did not believe that ordering police officers to use excessive force was a judicial act. Justices Scalia and Kennedy dissented because the case did not receive briefing and argument before the decision; additionally, they believed the situation was so rare that a Supreme Court decision on the subject was unnecessary. [1]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991).
  2. Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Immunity From Suit". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 239.