A moral compass is a metaphor for a moral value system that provides guidance on "good" or "right" choices in human interaction and especially in decision-making situations. This value system can be very personal or represented by a larger group. Examples might be a certain philosophy, a religion, or the embodiment of this value system by a certain person [1] or defined organization.
The metaphor uses the image of a compass, a navigational instrument that allows the cardinal directions to be clearly determined in the earth's magnetic field with a freely rotating magnetized needle.
The figurative meaning of a "moral compass" makes it an orientation aid on the "path of life" or the "stormy seas of life" [2] providing the ability to make moral distinctions between "good" or "right" choices and "evil" or "wrong" choices in interpersonal relationships, especially in difficult, potentially conflict-laden situations that call for a decision to be made. [3]
The term "ethical compass", or "ethical moral compass", is sometimes used synonymously with moral compass. Strictly speaking, however, ethics deals with the theory of morality, i.e. ethics is the science that examines the various aspects of morality.
The exact historical origin and the actual originator of the metaphor "moral compass" are not clearly documented. An analogous formulation can already be found in French before it appeared in English and German literature.
In 1780, the French physician, historian and friend of the Enlightenment Nicolas-Gabriel Le Clerc (1726–1798) published the book La boussole morale et politique des hommes et des empires [4] (The Moral and Political Compass of Men and Empires), which was already announced in 1779. [5]
The Oxford English Dictionary states that the earliest known use of the English term "moral compass" dates back to 1843, penned by the English writer Charles Dickens [6] in the novel Martin Chuzzlewit. However, this metaphor is mentioned as early as the 1830s: in The New British Novelist, Comprising Works by the Most Popular and Fashionable Writers of the Present Day (1830), [7] in The works of Thomas Moore (1832), [8] and in The Works of Lord Byron: With His Letters and Journals, and His Life (1835) [9] .
The American Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary documents [3] that the term was first used in 1814 in the book An Inquiry Into the Principles and Policy of the Government of the United States [10] by the American politician John Taylor.
In German, the metaphor "moralischer Kompass" was not used in literature until the end of the 19th century (1899). [11] [12] However, the similar phrase "Kompass der Moralität" can be found as early as 1811 in the book [13] Die jüngern Horen [14] by the German writer Karl Ferdinand Menke (actually Karl Ferdinand Manko; 1772–1819), which he wrote together with his friend Christoph Christian Hohlfeldt.
The metaphor is used in a variety of ways in the media to show that an accepted moral course of action exists (a person "has a moral compass"), an immoral course of action exists ("lacks a moral compass"), or a course of action has been changed ("has lost his or her moral compass") or diverted ("has a moral compass that has been misdirected").
Examples:
The metaphor is widespread and is also used in Polish (kompas moralny), Portuguese (bússola moral), Spanish (brújula moral), Swedish and Danish (moralisk kompas(s)) etc.
Lars Hall and colleagues from the Swedish University of Lund have shown in experiments that test subjects with a clearly stated moral compass are able to quickly and flexibly change it. [19]
In the experiment, the researchers first had the test subjects fill out questionnaires on their moral views, which covered both basic attitudes and current hotly debated topics in the media. A sleight of hand was used – without the participants' knowledge – to change the answers marked on the questionnaires into their opposite meaning. It was then investigated whether the participants confronted with this were prepared to endorse and support the opposite view (which they had written down only a few moments ago and which they now saw reversed). The result showed that (a) the majority of reversals went undetected; (b) 69% of participants were unable to recognize at least one of two changes; and (c) participants additionally constructed coherent and unambiguous arguments supporting the opposite of their original position.
The results thus obtained suggest "a dramatic potential for flexibility in our moral attitudes" and point to a clear role of self-attribution and subsequent rationalization in attitude formation and change. [20]
There are a large number of international publications (books and scientific articles) that deal with the importance of the moral compass in general, in politics, business, religion, etc. The following list by date of publication gives a few selected examples.