Moral progress

Last updated

Moral progress refers to improvement in concepts such as moral beliefs and practices experienced on a societal scale. [1] Michele Moody-Adams noted that "moral progress in belief involves deepening our grasp of existing moral concepts, while moral progress in practices involves realizing deepened moral understandings in behavior or social institutions". [2]

Contents

Definitions

Allen Buchanan defined moral progress as "morally progressive changes in social practices and institutions ... movement towards some morally desirable condition or state of affairs". [1] Michele Moody-Adams defined local moral progress as "coming to appreciate more fully the richness and the range of applications of a particular moral concept", or developing a new one, and the spread of "practices embodying deepened understanding of justice and related moral notions"; in other words, a deepening of our grasp of moral concepts. [2] [3] Another view is that moral progress is "a greater success in describing moral reality". [3]

Moral progress on a societal scale should not be confused with moral development in individuals, occasionally also referred to as moral progress. [4]

Aspects

Moral progress in societies leads to moral progress in individual beliefs throughout said society.[ clarification needed ] [2] Understanding morality is also not required, once governments decide to implement moral progress notions, and do so through various incentives. [2] This can lead to the faster progress in moral progress in practices than in the moral progress in beliefs; in other words, with external pressures, individuals and organizations may behave better not because of their inherent beliefs, but because of considerations of social expediency and enlightened self-interest. [2] Buchanan differentiates between improvements from a moral point of view, which are caused by external factors, some possibly independent of human motivation and agency, and genuine moral progress. However, he notes that the former generally leads to the later anyway. [5]

Moral progress in the last few centuries has been often the result of the actions of morally progressive social movements who attempt to popularize new morals. [6]

Measurement of universal moral progress is difficult, because there is no universal consensus in regards to the final destination, nor objective standards of ethics. [2] [1] [3] Most complex moral concepts have more than a single established definition. This makes measuring moral progress even more difficult from measuring human progress in general. [2] Measurement of local, more specific moral progress are easier, as it is simpler to reach consensus on local, more specific ethical issues. [2] As Musschenga and Meyned noted, "Most contemporary Dutchmen will agree that the Netherlands since the 16th century made moral progress. It is doubtful whether Dutchmen from the 16th century would also agree." [4] Jeremy Evans, however, made an argument that is should be possible to create a definition of moral progress that "relies on a correlation between increasing population welfare ... and ethical advancement". [7]

Types of moral progress

Buchanan provides a typology of moral progress: [8]

Moral circle expansion

Moral circle expansion is the process of increasing the number and type of entities given moral consideration over time. Social scientist Jacy Reese Anthis, for example, has argued for moral circle expansion as an important metric of moral progress and as an approach to bettering the long-term future for all sentient beings. [9] His organization, the Sentience Institute, researches moral circle expansion via studying historical and current examples of moral progress, such as the British abolitionist movement. [10]

Examples

Buchanan called the modern human rights movement "the most robust instance of [moral] progress" [11] Other examples of moral progress may include:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Morality</span> Differentiation between right and wrong

Morality is the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper (right) and those that are improper (wrong). Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a code of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion or culture, or it can derive from a standard that a person believes should be universal. Morality may also be specifically synonymous with "goodness" or "rightness".

Ethical consumerism is a type of consumer activism based on the concept of dollar voting. People practice it by buying ethically made products that support small-scale manufacturers or local artisans and protect animals and the environment, while boycotting products that exploit children as workers, are tested on animals, or damage the environment.

Behavioral geography is an approach to human geography that examines human behavior by separating it into different parts. In addition, behavioral geography is an ideology/approach in human geography that makes use of the methods and assumptions of behaviorism to determine the cognitive processes involved in an individual's perception of or response and reaction to their environment. Behavioral geographers focus on the cognitive processes underlying spatial reasoning, decision making, and behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary ethics</span> Study of evolution on morality or ethics

Evolutionary ethics is a field of inquiry that explores how evolutionary theory might bear on our understanding of ethics or morality. The range of issues investigated by evolutionary ethics is quite broad. Supporters of evolutionary ethics have claimed that it has important implications in the fields of descriptive ethics, normative ethics, and metaethics.

Green libertarianism is a form of green politics. Alternately, it is a form of libertarianism in which the free market provides environmentally beneficial outcomes. Marcel Wissenburg (2009) maintains that proponents of the latter comprise a minority of green political theorists.

Biocultural anthropology can be defined in numerous ways. It is the scientific exploration of the relationships between human biology and culture. "Instead of looking for the underlying biological roots of human behavior, biocultural anthropology attempts to understand how culture affects our biological capacities and limitations."

Animal ethics is a branch of ethics which examines human-animal relationships, the moral consideration of animals and how nonhuman animals ought to be treated. The subject matter includes animal rights, animal welfare, animal law, speciesism, animal cognition, wildlife conservation, wild animal suffering, the moral status of nonhuman animals, the concept of nonhuman personhood, human exceptionalism, the history of animal use, and theories of justice. Several different theoretical approaches have been proposed to examine this field, in accordance with the different theories currently defended in moral and political philosophy. There is no theory which is completely accepted due to the differing understandings of what is meant by the term ethics; however, there are theories that are more widely accepted by society such as animal rights and utilitarianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pragmatic ethics</span> Theory of normative philosophical ethics and meta-ethics

Pragmatic ethics is a theory of normative philosophical ethics and meta-ethics. Ethical pragmatists such as John Dewey believe that some societies have progressed morally in much the way they have attained progress in science. Scientists can pursue inquiry into the truth of a hypothesis and accept the hypothesis, in the sense that they act as though the hypothesis were true; nonetheless, they think that future generations can advance science, and thus future generations can refine or replace their accepted hypotheses. Similarly, ethical pragmatists think that norms, principles, and moral criteria are likely to be improved as a result of inquiry.

Darcia Narvaez is a Professor of Psychology Emerita at the University of Notre Dame who has written extensively on issues of character, moral development, and human flourishing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare biology</span> Proposed field of research

Welfare biology is a proposed cross-disciplinary field of research to study the positive and negative well-being of sentient individuals in relation to their environment. Yew-Kwang Ng first advanced the field in 1995. Since then, its establishment has been advocated for by a number of writers, including philosophers, who have argued for the importance of creating the research field, particularly in relation to wild animal suffering. Some researchers have put forward examples of existing research that welfare biology could draw upon and suggested specific applications for the research's findings.

<i>Better Never to Have Been</i> 2006 book by David Benatar

Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence is a 2006 book by South African philosopher David Benatar, best known for being associated with antinatalism and philosophical pessimism. The book was preceded by Benatar's 1997 paper "Why It Is Better Never to Come into Existence", where he expounded on what would eventually become the book's major concepts.

Nicholas Southwood is an Australian philosopher and Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University. He is a co-editor of the Journal of Political Philosophy and Director of the Centre for Moral, Social and Political Theory. Southwood is known for his research on contractualism and social philosophy.

Sandrine Berges is a French philosopher and Professor of Philosophy at Bilkent University. She is known for her works on feminist philosophy, ethics and political philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oscar Horta</span> Spanish animal activist and moral philosopher

Óscar Horta Álvarez is a Spanish animal activist and moral philosopher who is currently a professor in the Department of Philosophy and Anthropology at the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) and one of the co-founders of the organization Animal Ethics. He is known for his work in animal ethics, especially around the problem of wild animal suffering. He has also worked on the concept of speciesism and on the clarification of the arguments for the moral consideration of nonhuman animals. In 2022, Horta published his first book in English, Making a Stand for Animals.

The eradication or abolition of suffering is the concept of using biotechnology to create a permanent absence of involuntary pain and suffering in all sentient beings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethics of uncertain sentience</span> Applied ethics issue

The ethics of uncertain sentience refers to questions surrounding the treatment of and moral obligations towards individuals whose sentience—the capacity to subjectively sense and feel—and resulting ability to experience pain is uncertain; the topic has been particularly discussed within the field of animal ethics, with the precautionary principle frequently invoked in response.

<i>Evolutional Ethics and Animal Psychology</i> 1897 book by Edward Payson Evans

Evolutional Ethics and Animal Psychology is an 1897 book by the American scholar and early animal rights advocate Edward Payson Evans, which argues for the use of animal psychology as the basis for animal rights in the historical evolution of ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mona Simion</span> British philosopher

Mona Simion is a philosopher. She is professor of philosophy at the University of Glasgow where she is also deputy director of the COGITO Epistemology Research Centre. Simion's work focuses on issues in epistemology, ethics, the philosophy of language, and feminist philosophy.

Moral circle expansion is the process of increasing the number and type of entities given moral consideration over time and potentially into the future. The general idea of moral inclusion was discussed by ancient philosophers and since the 19th century has inspired social movements related to human rights and animal rights. Especially in relation to animal rights, the philosopher Peter Singer has written about the subject since the 1970s, and since 2017 so has the think tank Sentience Institute, part of the 21st-century effective altruism movement. There is significant debate on whether humanity actually has an expanding moral circle, considering topics such as the lack of a uniform border of growing moral consideration and the disconnect between people's moral attitudes and their behavior. Research into the phenomenon is ongoing.

Mark Alfano is an American philosopher and Associate Professor of Philosophy at Macquarie University. He is the editor of The Moral Psychology of the Emotions, a series of books published by Rowman & Littlefield. Alfano is known for his research on virtue ethics., virtue epistemology, social epistemology, and Friedrich Nietzsche.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Buchanan, Allen E. (2018). The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. Oxford University Press. p. 46. ISBN   978-0-19-086841-3.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Moody-Adams, Michele M. (1999). "The idea of moral progress". Metaphilosophy. 30 (3): 168–185. doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00120. JSTOR   24439208.
  3. 1 2 3 Musschenga, Albert W.; Meynen, Gerben (2017-02-01). "Moral Progress: an Introduction". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 20 (1): 3–15. doi: 10.1007/s10677-017-9782-5 . ISSN   1572-8447.
  4. 1 2 Minnameier, Gerhard (2009-08-01). "Measuring Moral Progress". Journal of Adult Development. 16 (3): 131–143. doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9058-y. ISSN   1573-3440. S2CID   142735170.
  5. ↑ Buchanan, Allen E. (2018). The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. Oxford University Press. p. 51. ISBN   978-0-19-086841-3.
  6. 1 2 Moody-Adams, Michele M. (2017). "Moral Progress and Human Agency". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 20 (1): 153–168. doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9748-z. ISSN   1572-8447. S2CID   151692461.
  7. ↑ Evans, Jeremy (2017-02-01). "A Working Definition of Moral Progress". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 20 (1): 75–92. doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9753-2. ISSN   1572-8447. S2CID   151726500.
  8. ↑ Buchanan, Allen E. (2018). The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. Oxford University Press. p. 53. ISBN   978-0-19-086841-3.
  9. ↑ Reese, Jacy (6 November 2018). The End of Animal Farming: How Scientists, Entrepreneurs, and Activists are Building an Animal-Free Food System. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN   9780807039878.
  10. ↑ "Introducing Sentience Institute". Sentience Institute. 2 June 2017. Retrieved 2019-08-05.
  11. ↑ Buchanan, Allen E. (2018). The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. Oxford University Press. p. 379. ISBN   978-0-19-086841-3.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Buchanan, Allen E. (2018). The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. Oxford University Press. p. 47. ISBN   978-0-19-086841-3.
  13. ↑ Jamieson, Dale (2017-02-01). "Slavery, Carbon, and Moral Progress". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 20 (1): 169–183. doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9746-1. ISSN   1572-8447. S2CID   44381011.
  14. ↑ Hermann, Julia (2019). "The dynamics of moral progress". Ratio. 32 (4): 300–311. doi: 10.1111/rati.12232 . ISSN   1467-9329.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.