Mutual fund separation theorem

Last updated April 18, 2021

In portfolio theory, a mutual fund separation theorem, mutual fund theorem, or separation theorem is a theorem stating that, under certain conditions, any investor's optimal portfolio can be constructed by holding each of certain mutual funds in appropriate ratios, where the number of mutual funds is smaller than the number of individual assets in the portfolio. Here a mutual fund refers to any specified benchmark portfolio of the available assets. There are two advantages of having a mutual fund theorem. First, if the relevant conditions are met, it may be easier (or lower in transactions costs) for an investor to purchase a smaller number of mutual funds than to purchase a larger number of assets individually. Second, from a theoretical and empirical standpoint, if it can be assumed that the relevant conditions are indeed satisfied, then implications for the functioning of asset markets can be derived and tested.

Portfolio separation in mean-variance analysis

Portfolios can be analyzed in a mean-variance framework, with every investor holding the portfolio with the lowest possible return variance consistent with that investor's chosen level of expected return (called a minimum-variance portfolio), if the returns on the assets are jointly elliptically distributed, including the special case in which they are jointly normally distributed.^[1]^[2] Under mean-variance analysis, it can be shown^[3] that every minimum-variance portfolio given a particular expected return (that is, every efficient portfolio) can be formed as a combination of any two efficient portfolios. If the investor's optimal portfolio has an expected return that is between the expected returns on two efficient benchmark portfolios, then that investor's portfolio can be characterized as consisting of positive quantities of the two benchmark portfolios.

No risk-free asset

To see two-fund separation in a context in which no risk-free asset is available, using matrix algebra, let $\sigma ^{2}$ be the variance of the portfolio return, let $\mu$ be the level of expected return on the portfolio that portfolio return variance is to be minimized contingent upon, let $r$ be the vector of expected returns on the available assets, let $X$ be the vector of amounts to be placed in the available assets, let $W$ be the amount of wealth that is to be allocated in the portfolio, and let $1$ be a vector of ones. Then the problem of minimizing the portfolio return variance subject to a given level of expected portfolio return can be stated as

Minimize

\sigma ^{2}

subject to

X^{T}r=\mu

and

X^{T}1=W

where the superscript $^{T}$ denotes the transpose of a matrix. The portfolio return variance in the objective function can be written as $\sigma ^{2}=X^{T}VX,$ where $V$ is the positive definite covariance matrix of the individual assets' returns. The Lagrangian for this constrained optimization problem (whose second-order conditions can be shown to be satisfied) is

L=X^{T}VX+2\lambda (\mu -X^{T}r)+2\eta (W-X^{T}1),

with Lagrange multipliers $\lambda$ and $\eta$ . This can be solved for the optimal vector $X$ of asset quantities by equating to zero the derivatives with respect to $X$ , $\lambda$ , and $\eta$ , provisionally solving the first-order condition for $X$ in terms of $\lambda$ and $\eta$ , substituting into the other first-order conditions, solving for $\lambda$ and $\eta$ in terms of the model parameters, and substituting back into the provisional solution for $X$ . The result is

X^{\mathrm {opt} }={\frac {W}{\Delta }}[(r^{T}V^{-1}r)V^{-1}1-(1^{T}V^{-1}r)V^{-1}r]+{\frac {\mu }{\Delta }}[(1^{T}V^{-1}1)V^{-1}r-(r^{T}V^{-1}1)V^{-1}1]

where

\Delta =(r^{T}V^{-1}r)(1^{T}V^{-1}1)-(r^{T}V^{-1}1)^{2}>0.

For simplicity this can be written more compactly as

X^{\mathrm {opt} }=\alpha W+\beta \mu

where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are parameter vectors based on the underlying model parameters. Now consider two benchmark efficient portfolios constructed at benchmark expected returns $\mu _{1}$ and $\mu _{2}$ and thus given by

X_{1}^{\mathrm {opt} }=\alpha W+\beta \mu _{1}

and

X_{2}^{\mathrm {opt} }=\alpha W+\beta \mu _{2}.

The optimal portfolio at arbitrary $\mu _{3}$ can then be written as a weighted average of $X_{1}^{\mathrm {opt} }$ and $X_{2}^{\mathrm {opt} }$ as follows:

X_{3}^{\mathrm {opt} }=\alpha W+\beta \mu _{3}={\frac {\mu _{3}-\mu _{2}}{\mu _{1}-\mu _{2}}}X_{1}^{\mathrm {opt} }+{\frac {\mu _{1}-\mu _{3}}{\mu _{1}-\mu _{2}}}X_{2}^{\mathrm {opt} }.

This equation proves the two-fund separation theorem for mean-variance analysis. For a geometric interpretation, see the Markowitz bullet.

One risk-free asset

If a risk-free asset is available, then again a two-fund separation theorem applies; but in this case one of the "funds" can be chosen to be a very simple fund containing only the risk-free asset, and the other fund can be chosen to be one which contains zero holdings of the risk-free asset. (With the risk-free asset referred to as "money", this form of the theorem is referred to as the monetary separation theorem.) Thus mean-variance efficient portfolios can be formed simply as a combination of holdings of the risk-free asset and holdings of a particular efficient fund that contains only risky assets. The derivation above does not apply, however, since with a risk-free asset the above covariance matrix of all asset returns, $V$ , would have one row and one column of zeroes and thus would not be invertible. Instead, the problem can be set up as

Minimize

\sigma ^{2}

subject to

(W-X^{T}1)r_{f}+X^{T}r=\mu ,

where $r_{f}$ is the known return on the risk-free asset, $X$ is now the vector of quantities to be held in the risky assets, and $r$ is the vector of expected returns on the risky assets. The left side of the last equation is the expected return on the portfolio, since $(W-X^{T}1)$ is the quantity held in the risk-free asset, thus incorporating the asset adding-up constraint that in the earlier problem required the inclusion of a separate Lagrangian constraint. The objective function can be written as $\sigma ^{2}=X^{T}VX$ , where now $V$ is the covariance matrix of the risky assets only. This optimization problem can be shown to yield the optimal vector of risky asset holdings

X^{\mathrm {opt} }={\frac {(\mu -Wr_{f})}{(r-1r_{f})^{T}V^{-1}(r-1r_{f})}}V^{-1}(r-1r_{f}).

Of course this equals a zero vector if $\mu =Wr_{f}$ , the risk-free portfolio's return, in which case all wealth is held in the risk-free asset. It can be shown that the portfolio with exactly zero holdings of the risk-free asset occurs at $\mu ={\tfrac {Wr^{T}V^{-1}(r-1r_{f})}{1^{T}V^{-1}(r-1r_{f})}}$ and is given by

X^{*}={\frac {W}{1^{T}V^{-1}(r-1r_{f})}}V^{-1}(r-1r_{f}).

It can also be shown (analogously to the demonstration in the above two-mutual-fund case) that every portfolio's risky asset vector (that is, $X^{\mathrm {opt} }$ for every value of $\mu$ ) can be formed as a weighted combination of the latter vector and the zero vector. For a geometric interpretation, see the efficient frontier with no risk-free asset.

Portfolio separation without mean-variance analysis

If investors have hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA) (including the power utility function, logarithmic function and the exponential utility function), separation theorems can be obtained without the use of mean-variance analysis. For example, David Cass and Joseph Stiglitz ^[4] showed in 1970 that two-fund monetary separation applies if all investors have HARA utility with the same exponent as each other.^[5]^:ch.4

More recently, in the dynamic portfolio optimization model of Çanakoğlu and Özekici,^[6] the investor's level of initial wealth (the distinguishing feature of investors) does not affect the optimal composition of the risky part of the portfolio. A similar result is given by Schmedders.^[7]

Related Research Articles

In probability theory, the central limit theorem (CLT) establishes that, in many situations, when independent random variables are added, their properly normalized sum tends toward a normal distribution even if the original variables themselves are not normally distributed. The theorem is a key concept in probability theory because it implies that probabilistic and statistical methods that work for normal distributions can be applicable to many problems involving other types of distributions.

In mathematics, the $L p$ spaces are function spaces defined using a natural generalization of the $p$ -norm for finite-dimensional vector spaces. They are sometimes called Lebesgue spaces, named after Henri Lebesgue, although according to the Bourbaki group they were first introduced by Frigyes Riesz. $L p$ spaces form an important class of Banach spaces in functional analysis, and of topological vector spaces. Because of their key role in the mathematical analysis of measure and probability spaces, Lebesgue spaces are used also in the theoretical discussion of problems in physics, statistics, finance, engineering, and other disciplines.

In probability, and statistics, a multivariate random variable or random vector is a list of mathematical variables each of whose value is unknown, either because the value has not yet occurred or because there is imperfect knowledge of its value. The individual variables in a random vector are grouped together because they are all part of a single mathematical system — often they represent different properties of an individual statistical unit. For example, while a given person has a specific age, height and weight, the representation of these features of an unspecified person from within a group would be a random vector. Normally each element of a random vector is a real number.

In finance, the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a model used to determine a theoretically appropriate required rate of return of an asset, to make decisions about adding assets to a well-diversified portfolio.

Covariance matrix measure of covariance of components of a random vector

In probability theory and statistics, a covariance matrix is a square matrix giving the covariance between each pair of elements of a given random vector. Any covariance matrix is symmetric and positive semi-definite and its main diagonal contains variances.

In mathematical finance, a risk-neutral measure is a probability measure such that each share price is exactly equal to the discounted expectation of the share price under this measure. This is heavily used in the pricing of financial derivatives due to the fundamental theorem of asset pricing, which implies that in a complete market a derivative's price is the discounted expected value of the future payoff under the unique risk-neutral measure. Such a measure exists if and only if the market is arbitrage-free.

In mathematics, the total variation identifies several slightly different concepts, related to the structure of the codomain of a function or a measure. For a real-valued continuous function f, defined on an interval [a, b] ⊂ ℝ, its total variation on the interval of definition is a measure of the one-dimensional arclength of the curve with parametric equation x ↦ f(x), for x ∈ [a, b].

Modern portfolio theory (MPT), or mean-variance analysis, is a mathematical framework for assembling a portfolio of assets such that the expected return is maximized for a given level of risk. It is a formalization and extension of diversification in investing, the idea that owning different kinds of financial assets is less risky than owning only one type. Its key insight is that an asset's risk and return should not be assessed by itself, but by how it contributes to a portfolio's overall risk and return. It uses the variance of asset prices as a proxy for risk.

In finance, arbitrage pricing theory (APT) is a general theory of asset pricing that holds that the expected return of a financial asset can be modeled as a linear function of various factors or theoretical market indices, where sensitivity to changes in each factor is represented by a factor-specific beta coefficient. The model-derived rate of return will then be used to price the asset correctly—the asset price should equal the expected end of period price discounted at the rate implied by the model. If the price diverges, arbitrage should bring it back into line. The theory was proposed by the economist Stephen Ross in 1976. The linear factor model structure of the APT is used as the basis for many of the commercial risk systems employed by asset managers.

In finance, the beta is a measure of how an individual asset moves when the overall stock market increases or decreases. Thus, beta is a useful measure of the contribution of an individual asset to the risk of the market portfolio when it is added in small quantity. Thus, beta is referred to as an asset's non-diversifiable risk, its systematic risk, market risk, or hedge ratio. Beta is not a measure of idiosyncratic risk.

In statistics, sometimes the covariance matrix of a multivariate random variable is not known but has to be estimated. Estimation of covariance matrices then deals with the question of how to approximate the actual covariance matrix on the basis of a sample from the multivariate distribution. Simple cases, where observations are complete, can be dealt with by using the sample covariance matrix. The sample covariance matrix (SCM) is an unbiased and efficient estimator of the covariance matrix if the space of covariance matrices is viewed as an extrinsic convex cone in R^p×p; however, measured using the intrinsic geometry of positive-definite matrices, the SCM is a biased and inefficient estimator. In addition, if the random variable has normal distribution, the sample covariance matrix has Wishart distribution and a slightly differently scaled version of it is the maximum likelihood estimate. Cases involving missing data require deeper considerations. Another issue is the robustness to outliers, to which sample covariance matrices are highly sensitive.

Constant proportion portfolio investment (CPPI) is a trading strategy that allows an investor to maintain an exposure to the upside potential of a risky asset while providing a capital guarantee against downside risk. The outcome of the CPPI strategy is somewhat similar to that of buying a call option, but does not use option contracts. Thus CPPI is sometimes referred to as a convex strategy, as opposed to a "concave strategy" like constant mix.

In economics and finance, exponential utility is a specific form of the utility function, used in some contexts because of its convenience when risk is present, in which case expected utility is maximized. Formally, exponential utility is given by:

A portfolio manager (PM) is a professional responsible for making investment decisions and carrying out investment activities on behalf of vested individuals or institutions. The investors invest their money into the PM's investment policy for future fund growth such as a retirement fund, endowment fund, education fund, or for other purposes. PMs work with a team of analysts and researchers, and are responsible for establishing an investment strategy, selecting appropriate investments, and allocating each investment properly towards an investment fund or asset management vehicle.

Goals-Based Investing or Goal-Driven Investing is the use of financial markets to fund goals within a specified period of time. Traditional portfolio construction balances expected portfolio variance with return and uses a risk aversion metric to select the optimal mix of investments. By contrast, GBI optimizes an investment mix to minimize the probability of failing to achieve a minimum wealth level within a set period of time.

In probability theory, the family of complex normal distributions characterizes complex random variables whose real and imaginary parts are jointly normal. The complex normal family has three parameters: location parameter μ, covariance matrix $, and the relation matrix . The standard complex normal is the univariate distribution with,, and .$

In probability and statistics, an elliptical distribution is any member of a broad family of probability distributions that generalize the multivariate normal distribution. Intuitively, in the simplified two and three dimensional case, the joint distribution forms an ellipse and an ellipsoid, respectively, in iso-density plots.

Capital market line (CML) is the tangent line drawn from the point of the risk-free asset to the feasible region for risky assets. The tangency point M represents the market portfolio, so named since all rational investors should hold their risky assets in the same proportions as their weights in the market portfolio.

In decision theory, economics, and finance, a two-moment decision model is a model that describes or prescribes the process of making decisions in a context in which the decision-maker is faced with random variables whose realizations cannot be known in advance, and in which choices are made based on knowledge of two moments of those random variables. The two moments are almost always the mean—that is, the expected value, which is the first moment about zero—and the variance, which is the second moment about the mean.

In finance, the Markowitz model - put forward by Harry Markowitz in 1952 - is a portfolio optimization model; it assists in the selection of the most efficient portfolio by analyzing various possible portfolios of the given securities. Here, by choosing securities that do not 'move' exactly together, the HM model shows investors how to reduce their risk. The HM model is also called mean-variance model due to the fact that it is based on expected returns (mean) and the standard deviation (variance) of the various portfolios. It is foundational to Modern portfolio theory.

References

↑ Chamberlain, G (1983). "A characterization of the distributions that imply mean-variance utility functions". Journal of Economic Theory . 29: 185–201. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(83)90129-1.
↑ Owen, J.; Rabinovitch, R. (1983). "On the class of elliptical distributions and their applications to the theory of portfolio choice". Journal of Finance . 38 (3): 745–752. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02499.x.
↑ Merton, Robert; September (1972). "An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier" (PDF). Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis . 7 (4): 1851–1872. doi:10.2307/2329621. JSTOR 2329621.
↑ Cass, David; Stiglitz, Joseph (1970). "The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation". Journal of Economic Theory . 2 (2): 122–160. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90002-5.
↑ Huang, Chi-fu, and Robert H. Litzenberger, Foundations for Financial Economics, North-Holland, 1988.
↑ Çanakoğlu, Ethem; Özekici, Süleyman (2010). "Portfolio selection in stochastic markets with HARA utility functions". European Journal of Operational Research. 201 (2): 520–536. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.017.
↑ Schmedders, Karl H. (June 15, 2006) "Two-fund separation in dynamic general equilibrium," SSRN Working Paper Series. https://ssrn.com/abstract=908587

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Chamberlain, G (1983). "A characterization of the distributions that imply mean-variance utility functions". Journal of Economic Theory . 29: 185–201. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(83)90129-1.

[2] Owen, J.; Rabinovitch, R. (1983). "On the class of elliptical distributions and their applications to the theory of portfolio choice". Journal of Finance . 38 (3): 745–752. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02499.x.

[3] Merton, Robert; September (1972). "An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier" (PDF). Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis . 7 (4): 1851–1872. doi:10.2307/2329621. JSTOR 2329621.

[4] Cass, David; Stiglitz, Joseph (1970). "The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation". Journal of Economic Theory . 2 (2): 122–160. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90002-5.

[5] Huang, Chi-fu, and Robert H. Litzenberger, Foundations for Financial Economics, North-Holland, 1988.

[6] Çanakoğlu, Ethem; Özekici, Süleyman (2010). "Portfolio selection in stochastic markets with HARA utility functions". European Journal of Operational Research. 201 (2): 520–536. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.017.

[7] Schmedders, Karl H. (June 15, 2006) "Two-fund separation in dynamic general equilibrium," SSRN Working Paper Series. https://ssrn.com/abstract=908587

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]