N-vector model

In statistical mechanics, the n-vector model or O(n) model is a simple system of interacting spins on a crystalline lattice. It was developed by H. Eugene Stanley as a generalization of the Ising model, XY model and Heisenberg model. ^[1] In the n-vector model, n-component unit-length classical spins ${\displaystyle \mathbf {s} _{i}}$ are placed on the vertices of a d-dimensional lattice. The Hamiltonian of the n-vector model is given by:

${\displaystyle H=K{\sum }_{\langle i,j\rangle }\mathbf {s} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{j}}$

where the sum runs over all pairs of neighboring spins ${\displaystyle \langle i,j\rangle }$ and ${\displaystyle \cdot }$ denotes the standard Euclidean inner product. Special cases of the n-vector model are:

${\displaystyle n=0}$: The self-avoiding walk ^{[2] [3]}

${\displaystyle n=1}$: The Ising model

${\displaystyle n=2}$: The XY model

${\displaystyle n=3}$: The Heisenberg model

${\displaystyle n=4}$: Toy model for the Higgs sector of the Standard Model

The general mathematical formalism used to describe and solve the n-vector model and certain generalizations are developed in the article on the Potts model.

Reformulation as a loop model

In a small coupling expansion, the weight of a configuration may be rewritten as

${\displaystyle e^{H}{\underset {K\to 0}{\sim }}\prod _{\langle i,j\rangle }\left(1+K\mathbf {s} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{j}\right)}$

Integrating over the vector ${\displaystyle \mathbf {s} _{i}}$ gives rise to expressions such as

${\displaystyle \int d\mathbf {s} _{i}\ \prod _{j=1}^{4}\left(\mathbf {s} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{j}\right)=\left(\mathbf {s} _{1}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{2}\right)\left(\mathbf {s} _{3}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{4}\right)+\left(\mathbf {s} _{1}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{4}\right)\left(\mathbf {s} _{2}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{3}\right)+\left(\mathbf {s} _{1}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{3}\right)\left(\mathbf {s} _{2}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{4}\right)}$

which is interpreted as a sum over the 3 possible ways of connecting the vertices ${\displaystyle 1,2,3,4}$ pairwise using 2 lines going through vertex ${\displaystyle i}$. Integrating over all vectors, the corresponding lines combine into closed loops, and the partition function becomes a sum over loop configurations:

${\displaystyle Z=\sum _{L\in {\mathcal {L}}}K^{E(L)}n^{|L|}}$

where ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}}$ is the set of loop configurations, with ${\displaystyle |L|}$ the number of loops in the configuration ${\displaystyle L}$, and ${\displaystyle E(L)}$ the total number of lattice edges.

In two dimensions, it is common to assume that loops do not cross: either by choosing the lattice to be trivalent, or by considering the model in a dilute phase where crossings are irrelevant, or by forbidding crossings by hand. The resulting model of non-intersecting loops can then be studied using powerful algebraic methods, and its spectrum is exactly known. ^[4] Moreover, the model is closely related to the random cluster model, which can also be formulated in terms of non-crossing loops. Much less is known in models where loops are allowed to cross, and in higher than two dimensions.

Continuum limit

The continuum limit can be understood to be the sigma model. This can be easily obtained by writing the Hamiltonian in terms of the product

${\displaystyle -{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\mathbf {s} _{i}-\mathbf {s} _{j})\cdot (\mathbf {s} _{i}-\mathbf {s} _{j})=\mathbf {s} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{j}-1}$

where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {s} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{i}=1}$ is the "bulk magnetization" term. Dropping this term as an overall constant factor added to the energy, the limit is obtained by defining the Newton finite difference as

${\displaystyle \delta _{h}[\mathbf {s} ](i,j)={\frac {\mathbf {s} _{i}-\mathbf {s} _{j}}{h}}}$

on neighboring lattice locations ${\displaystyle i,j.}$ Then ${\displaystyle \delta _{h}[\mathbf {s} ]\to \nabla _{\mu }\mathbf {s} }$ in the limit ${\displaystyle h\to 0}$, where ${\displaystyle \nabla _{\mu }}$ is the gradient in the ${\displaystyle (i,j)\to \mu }$ direction. Thus, in the limit,

${\displaystyle -\mathbf {s} _{i}\cdot \mathbf {s} _{j}\to {\tfrac {1}{2}}\nabla _{\mu }\mathbf {s} \cdot \nabla _{\mu }\mathbf {s} }$

which can be recognized as the kinetic energy of the field ${\displaystyle \mathbf {s} }$ in the sigma model. One still has two possibilities for the spin ${\displaystyle \mathbf {s} }$: it is either taken from a discrete set of spins (the Potts model) or it is taken as a point on the sphere ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}}$; that is, ${\displaystyle \mathbf {s} }$ is a continuously-valued vector of unit length. In the later case, this is referred to as the ${\displaystyle O(n)}$ non-linear sigma model, as the rotation group ${\displaystyle O(n)}$ is group of isometries of ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}}$, and obviously, ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}}$ isn't "flat", i.e. isn't a linear field.

References

1. Stanley, H. E. (1968). "Dependence of Critical Properties upon Dimensionality of Spins". Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 (12): 589–592. Bibcode:1968PhRvL..20..589S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.589.
2. de Gennes, P. G. (1972). "Exponents for the excluded volume problem as derived by the Wilson method". Phys. Lett. A. 38 (5): 339–340. Bibcode:1972PhLA...38..339D. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(72)90149-1.
3. Gaspari, George; Rudnick, Joseph (1986). "n-vector model in the limit n→0 and the statistics of linear polymer systems: A Ginzburg–Landau theory". Phys. Rev. B. 33 (5): 3295–3305. Bibcode:1986PhRvB..33.3295G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.33.3295. PMID   9938709.
4. Jacobsen, Jesper Lykke; Ribault, Sylvain; Saleur, Hubert (2023-05-03). "Spaces of states of the two-dimensional $O(n)$ and Potts models". SciPost Physics. 14 (5). arXiv: 2208.14298 . doi: 10.21468/scipostphys.14.5.092 . ISSN   2542-4653.