National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Last updated

National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Ohio v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 7, 2022
Decided January 13, 2022
Full case nameNational Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.
Ohio, et al. v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.
Docket nos. 21A244
21A247
Citations595 U.S. ___ ( more )
142 S. Ct. 661; 211 L. Ed. 2d 448; 2022 U.S. LEXIS 496
Argument Oral argument
Decision Opinion
Holding
OSHA's vaccine mandate was an unlawful exercise of power, going beyond what Congress tasked it to regulate in the enabling statute.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas  · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito  · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan  · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh  · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
Per curiam
ConcurrenceGorsuch, joined by Thomas, Alito
DissentBreyer, Sotomayor, Kagan

National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), is a Supreme Court of the United States case before the Court on an application for a stay of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 vaccination or test mandate. On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court ordered a stay of the mandate. [1]

Contents

Background

In September 2021, President of the United States Joe Biden announced his administration would be promulgating a vaccination or test mandate for all private companies with 100 or more employees. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration announced its Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) on November 5, 2021. On November 6, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a nationwide stay of the ETS's implementation; it issued an opinion explaining its reasoning on November 12, 2021. [2]

Challenges to OSHA regulations are randomly assigned to one of the twelve United States courts of appeals with geographic jurisdiction. The challenges to the COVID-19 ETS were all transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on November 16, 2021. The petitioners sought initial hearing en banc for consideration of the challenges. On December 15, 2021, the court denied the petition by an 8–8 vote, over the dissents of Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton and Judge John K. Bush, joined by six additional judges. [3]

On December 17, 2021, a panel of the court dissolved the Fifth Circuit's stay of the ETS by a 2–1 vote. Judge Joan Larsen dissented. [4]

Supreme Court

Numerous challengers filed emergency applications at the Supreme Court of the United States in the days after the Fifth Circuit's stay was dissolved. The federal government responded to the applications on December 30, 2021. In an unusual proceeding for emergency applications, oral argument was held on January 7, 2022. The National Federation of Independent Business, representing many private companies, and Ohio, representing more than 20 states, argued for the petitioners. The Supreme Court granted a stay of the ETS in a per curiam order on January 13, 2022. The order stated that the OSHA mandate exceeded the authority that it was given by Congress; OSHA could only regulate occupational safety, and the vaccine mandate was seen as "broad public health measures." The order stated that "Permitting OSHA to regulate the hazards of daily life — simply because most Americans have jobs and face those same risks while on the clock — would significantly expand OSHA’s regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization." [5] In a concurring statement written by Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, Gorsuch wrote that it should be up to states and Congress to decide best how to respond to a pandemic like COVID. [5]

A joint dissent to the order was written by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. They stated that employees have "little control, and therefore little capacity to mitigate risk", and that the ruling "stymies the Federal Government’s ability to counter the unparalleled threat that COVID-19 poses to our Nation’s workers." [5] The three countered Gorsuch's statement and stated that OSHA was the actor with the best understanding of workplace in light of threat like COVID, and not the court system. [5]

See also

Related Research Articles

In United States administrative law, an organic statute is a statute enacted by Congress that creates an administrative agency and defines its authorities and responsibilities. Organic statutes may also impose administrative procedures on an agency that differ from the Administrative Procedure Act. Any modifications to an agency’s statutory powers beyond those included in the organic statute are added by Congress in subsequent enabling statutes.

Marsha Berzon American judge

Marsha Lee Siegel Berzon is a Senior United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

William Alan Fletcher is a Senior United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Appointed by President Bill Clinton, Fletcher was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 1998. Fletcher taught at the UC Berkeley School of Law from 1977 to 1998.

Sandra Segal Ikuta American judge

Sandra Segal Ikuta is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Sandra Lea Lynch is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. She is the first woman to serve on that court. Lynch served as chief judge of the First Circuit from 2008 to 2015.

Neil Gorsuch US Supreme Court justice since 2017

Neil McGill Gorsuch is an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President Donald Trump on January 31, 2017, and has served since April 10, 2017.

Jerry Edwin Smith American judge

Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state. Jacobson has been invoked in numerous other Supreme Court cases as an example of a baseline exercise of the police power.

James L. Dennis is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with chambers in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Reed Charles O'Connor is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. He was nominated by President George W. Bush in 2007.

2016 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2016 term, which began October 3, 2016 and concluded October 1, 2017.

Stuart Kyle Duncan is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Benjamin Michael Flowers is an American lawyer from Ohio who has served as the Solicitor General of Ohio since 2019.

2019 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down ten per curiam opinions during its 2019 term, which began October 7, 2019 and concluded October 4, 2020.

2020 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down thirteen per curiam opinions during its 2020 term, which began October 5, 2020 and concluded October 3, 2021.

COVID-19 vaccination in the United States Plan to immunize against COVID-19

The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the United States is an ongoing mass immunization campaign for the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first granted emergency use authorization to the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine on December 10, 2020, and mass vaccinations began four days later. The Moderna vaccine was granted emergency use authorization on December 17, 2020, and the Janssen vaccine was granted emergency use authorization on February 27, 2021. By April 19, 2021, all U.S. states had opened vaccine eligibility to residents aged 16 and over. On May 10, 2021, the FDA approved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for adolescents aged 12 to 15. On August 23, 2021, the FDA granted full approval to the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine for individuals aged 16 and over.

Klaassen v. Indiana University, is a 2021 United States federal court case in which students attending Indiana University challenged the institution's COVID-19 vaccine mandate set to go into effect in September 2021. A motion for preliminary injunction was denied by Judge Damon R. Leichty on July 18, 2021. On August 2, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also denied a motion to enjoin the mandate while Leichty's ruling was appealed. On August 12, 2021, Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied relief to the petitioners, allowing the vaccination mandate to go into effect. The case is named for lead plaintiff Ryan Klassen of Noble County, Indiana.

COVID-19 vaccination mandates in the United States Mandates for people to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S.

COVID-19 vaccine mandates have been enacted by numerous states and municipalities in the United States, and also by private entities. In September 2021, President Joe Biden announced that the federal government would take steps to mandate COVID-19 vaccination for certain entities under the authority of the federal government or federal agencies.

2021 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States has handed down seven per curiam opinions during its 2021 term, which began October 4, 2021 and will conclude October 2, 2022.

The Biden Administration COVID-19 action plan, also called the Path out of the Pandemic, is a substantial increase in the use of vaccination mandates as part of the U.S. federal government response to the COVID-19 pandemic announced by President Joe Biden on September 9, 2021, to be carried out by officials in the Biden administration. The plan included various announced prospective efforts, as well as the issuance of several executive orders.

References

  1. ↑ Kendall, Brent; Bravin, Jess (January 13, 2022). "Supreme Court Blocks Biden Vaccine Rules for Large Employers". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved January 13, 2022.
  2. ↑ https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  3. ↑ https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/21a0283p-06.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  4. ↑ https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/21a0287p-06.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  5. 1 2 3 4 Howe, Amy (January 13, 2022). "Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers". SCOTUSBlog . Retrieved January 13, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.