Jeffrey Sutton | |
---|---|
Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | |
Assumed office May 1, 2021 | |
Preceded by | R. Guy Cole Jr. |
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | |
Assumed office May 5,2003 | |
Appointed by | George W. Bush |
Preceded by | David Aldrich Nelson |
2nd Solicitor General of Ohio | |
In office 1995–1998 | |
Attorney General | Betty Montgomery |
Preceded by | Richard Cordray |
Succeeded by | Edward B. Foley |
Personal details | |
Born | Jeffrey Stuart Sutton October 31,1960 Dhahran,Saudi Arabia |
Education | Williams College (BA) Ohio State University (JD) |
Jeffrey Stuart Sutton (born October 31,1960) is an American lawyer and jurist serving as the Chief United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Sutton received a Bachelor of Arts degree in history from Williams College in 1983. [1] Sutton worked as a paralegal in Washington,D.C.,and spent a summer at an archaeological dig site in Jordan as part of a United States Department of State cultural exchange program,then returned to Ohio to be a high school history teacher and varsity soccer coach at the Columbus Academy,a private school in Gahanna,Ohio. [1]
Sutton received his Juris Doctor from Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law in 1990. He then clerked for Judge Thomas Meskill of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1990 to 1991. Next he clerked at the United States Supreme Court from 1991 to 1992,primarily working under Antonin Scalia,who later said Sutton was "one of the very best law clerks [he] ever had", [2] as well as for Lewis F. Powell Jr.,who had assumed senior status.
Sutton was in private practice in Columbus from 1992 to 1995 and 1998 to 2003,serving as Solicitor General of Ohio from 1995 to 1998. He has also served as an adjunct professor of law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law [3] since 1994 and more recently as a visiting lecturer at Harvard Law School. [4] He teaches state constitutional law,a subject in which he is particularly interested and about which he has written extensively. [5]
Sutton was first nominated by President George W. Bush on May 9,2001,to a seat on the Sixth Circuit vacated by David A. Nelson,who assumed senior status on October 1,1999. That nomination,made during the 107th United States Congress,never received a floor vote in the United States Senate. Sutton was not confirmed until almost two years later,on April 29,2003,when the Senate of the 108th United States Congress confirmed him by a 52–41 vote. [6] He received his commission on May 5,2003. [7] He became Chief Judge on May 1,2021. [8]
In 2007,Sutton dissented in part when the Sixth Circuit held that a police officer did not have qualified immunity for arresting a speaker for using foul language at a town meeting. [9] In June 2011,Sutton became the first judge appointed by a Republican to rule in favor of the health care mandate in President Barack Obama's Health Care law. [10]
In November 2014,Sutton authored the 2–1 opinion ruling upholding same-sex marriage bans in Michigan,Kentucky,Ohio,and Tennessee in the Sixth Circuit reversing six previous federal district court rulings. The ruling was the second federal court ruling and the only Federal Court of Appeals ruling [11] to uphold same-sex marriage bans after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor in June 2013. This ran counter to rulings by the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 4th,7th,9th and 10th circuits,which then led the U.S. Supreme Court to grant writ of certiorari to review same-sex marriage bans when it previously declined to do so. [12] [13] In Obergefell v. Hodges the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Sixth Circuit.
On July 8,2023,Sutton temporarily halted a lower court injunction [14] on Tennessee's law banning gender affirming care for minors. [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] Sutton reasoned that there is no "deeply rooted" historical or traditional evidence that the treatment is allowed. [20] [21] He did note that the current ruling allowing the ban on gender-affirming care to go into effect is temporary,saying,"We may be wrong." [22] He has currently set forth a tentative date of September 30,2023 to have a final judgement on the matter. [23]
Since joining the bench,Judge Sutton has been one of the most prolific feeder judges,sending a number of his law clerks to the Supreme Court. [24]
Sutton chaired the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules of the Judicial Conference of the United States from 2009 to 2012,and served on the committee beginning in 2005. He went on to chair the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure from 2012 to 2015. [25]
On a podcast with Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman,Judge Sutton,a conservative originalist,expressed the view that the United States Supreme Court's December 2000 decision in Bush v. Gore was wrongly decided. [26]
Utah Constitutional Amendment 3 was an amendment to the Utah state constitution that sought to define marriage as a union exclusively between a man and woman. It passed in the November 2,2004,election,as did similar amendments in ten other states.
Danny Julian Boggs is an American attorney and a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He was appointed to the court in 1986 and served as its chief judge from September 2003 to August 2009. Boggs was on the short list of President George W. Bush's candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Deborah Louise Cook is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,based in Akron,Ohio. She served as a justice of the Ohio Supreme Court from 1995 to 2003.
Lexmark International,Inc. v. Static Control Components,Inc.,is an American legal case involving the computer printer company Lexmark,which had designed an authentication system using a microcontroller so that only authorized toner cartridges could be used. The resulting litigation has resulted in significant decisions affecting United States intellectual property and trademark law.
Raymond Michael Kethledge is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2008. Kethledge appeared on Donald Trump's list of potential Supreme Court of the United States nominees in 2016,and was described by press reports as a finalist in President Trump's nomination to replace Anthony Kennedy on the court.
Martha Craig "Cissy" Daughtrey is a Senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Robert Lewis Hinkle is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
Padmanabhan Srikanth "Sri" Srinivasan is an Indian-born American lawyer and jurist serving as the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Before he was a circuit judge,Srinivasan served as Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States and argued 25 cases before the United States Supreme Court. He has also lectured at Harvard Law School.
United States v. Windsor,570 U.S. 744 (2013),is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights case concerning same-sex marriage. The Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA),which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages,was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Lesbian,gay,bisexual,and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Arkansas may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arkansas. Same-sex marriage became briefly legal through a court ruling on May 9,2014,subject to court stays and appeals. In June 2015,the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that laws banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional,legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States nationwide including in Arkansas. Nonetheless,discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity was not banned in Arkansas until the Supreme Court banned it nationwide in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020.
Lesbian,gay,bisexual,and transgender (LGBT) Tennesseans face some legal challenges that non-LGBT Tennesseans do not. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in the state. Marriage licenses have been issued to same-sex couples in Tennessee since the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26,2015.
Lesbian,gay,bisexual,and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. commonwealth of Kentucky still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Kentucky,although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy statute for same-sex couples. Same sex-marriage is legal in the Kentucky under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision,which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages,and all other same sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country,was handed down on June 26,2015.
Jon Steven Tigar is an American lawyer serving as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. He was previously a California state court judge on the Alameda County Superior Court from 2002 to 2013.
The lead cases on same-sex marriage in Kentucky are Bourke v. Beshear,and its companion case Love v. Beshear. In Bourke,a U.S. district court found that the Equal Protection Clause requires Kentucky to recognize valid same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. In Love,the same court found that this same clause renders Kentucky's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Both decisions were stayed and consolidated upon appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals,which heard oral arguments in both cases on August 6,2014. On November 6,the Sixth Circuit upheld Kentucky's ban on same-sex marriage.
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Kentucky since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26,2015. The decision,which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages,was handed down on June 26,2015,and Governor Steve Beshear and Attorney General Jack Conway announced almost immediately that the court's order would be implemented.
Tanco v. Haslam was the lead case in the dispute of same-sex marriage in Tennessee. A U.S. District Court granted a preliminary injunction requiring the state to recognize the marriages of the plaintiffs,three same-sex couples. The court found the equal protection analysis used in Bourke v. Beshear,a case dealing with a comparable Kentucky statute "especially persuasive." On April 25,2014,that injunction was stayed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Tanco was appealed to the Sixth Circuit,which reversed the district court and upheld Tennessee's refusal to recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions on November 6.
In Brenner v. Scott and its companion case,Grimsley v. Scott,a U.S. district court found Florida's constitutional and statutory same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional. On August 21,2014,the court issued a preliminary injunction that prevents that state from enforcing its bans and then stayed its injunction until stays are lifted in the three same-sex marriage cases then petitioning for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court–Bostic,Bishop,and Kitchen–and for 91 days thereafter. When the district court's preliminary injunction took effect on January 6,2015,enforcement of Florida's bans on same-sex marriage ended.
Obergefell v. Hodges,576 U.S. 644 (2015),is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states,the District of Columbia,and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples,with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities. Prior to Obergefell,same-sex marriage had already been established by statute,court ruling,or voter initiative in thirty-six states,the District of Columbia,and Guam.
In the United States,the history of same-sex marriage dates from the early 1940s,when the first lawsuits seeking legal recognition of same-sex relationships brought the question of civil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples to public attention though they proved unsuccessful. However marriage wasn't a request for the LGBTQ movement until the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Washington (1987). The subject became increasingly prominent in U.S. politics following the 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Baehr v. Miike that suggested the possibility that the state's prohibition might be unconstitutional. That decision was met by actions at both the federal and state level to restrict marriage to male-female couples,notably the enactment at the federal level of the Defense of Marriage Act.
Bostock v. Clayton County,590 U.S. ___ (2020),is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.