Shortly after McHugh's birth,her father was transferred to Andover,Massachusetts,and later,to Wilmington,Delaware. Then,during her freshman year of high school,the family moved again to accommodate her father's career,relocating to Salt Lake City,Utah.
In 1975,McHugh graduated from Judge Memorial Catholic High School in Salt Lake City,where she participated in sports,student government,drill team,yearbook,and other activities. McHugh was selected as the Judge Memorial Sterling Scholar of English and Literature.[citation needed]
In August 2005,McHugh was appointed to the Court of Appeals by Utah GovernorJon M. Huntsman,Jr. and served in that capacity until she was appointed a federal circuit judge. In 2010,the Chief of Justice of the Utah Supreme Court appointed McHugh to serve as a member of the Judicial Conduct Commission to fill the vacancy created when her colleague,Judge Russell Bench,retired on December 31,2009. In 2011,McHugh was appointed as the appellate court member of the Commission on Civic and Character Education,where she served with the Lieutenant Governor,members of the Utah Legislature,and representatives of the State Board of Education. On January 1,2012,McHugh began a two-year term as the presiding judge of the Utah Court of Appeals.
McHugh wrote for the state court in each of the following decisions.
Birch v. Fire Insurance Exchange,2005 UT App 395,122 P.3d 696.[8] Randy Birch filed a claim with Fire Insurance Exchange (Fire Exchange) for losses incurred when a fire started by neighborhood children playing with matches spread to his home. Birch's policy with Fire Exchange provided coverage for the full replacement value of the damaged property,subject to a $500 deductible. Birch and Fire Exchange agreed that the replacement value of the property was $7732.91,and Fire Exchange paid Birch $7231.91,minus the $500 deductible. After that,Fire Exchange sought subrogation from the insurers of the neighborhood children who had started the fire,eventually agreeing to a 5% reduction in the replacement cost to reflect the depreciating of the property before the fire. Fire Exchange then forwarded Birch a check for $475,which represented 95% of the deductible. Birch objected because he should have been paid 100% of the deductible before Fire Exchange could retain any of the amount collected from the children's insurers. When Fire Exchange refused to forward the additional 5% to Birch,he initiated a class action in the district court on behalf of himself and other similarly situated policyholders. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Fire Exchange,and Birch appealed. Birch claimed that Utah Supreme Court precedent required that he be “made whole”before Fire Exchange could retain any amounts obtained through subrogation. The Utah Court of Appeals rejected Birch's argument,holding as a matter of first impression that he had been made whole. The Court of Appeals noted that Birch lost depreciated property worth $7346.26. Due to his insurance contract with Fire Exchange,Birch was entitled to more than the value of the property when it was destroyed in replacement value,minus his deductible. Fire Exchange paid Birch $7232.91 in replacement value and $475 to reimburse his deductible for a total of $7707.91. Because the total Birch received was $361.65 more than his actual losses of $7346.26,the Court of Appeals concluded that he had been made whole and affirmed the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Fire Exchange.
Fordham v. Oldroyd,2006 UT App 50,131 P.3d 280,affirmed,2007 UT 74,171 P.3d 411. State highway patrol trooper,Richard Fordham,brought an action against Ryan Oldroyd,a motorist whose negligence caused a traffic accident to which Fordham responded in an official capacity. While Trooper Fordham was retrieving flares from the trunk of his patrol car to mark the Oldroyd accident,an approaching driver lost control of her car and struck Fordham,inflicting substantial injuries. Trooper Fordham sued Oldroyd for the injuries he incurred when struck by the third party's vehicle,claiming that Oldroyd's negligence caused Fordham to be at the scene of the accident when the other vehicle lost control. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Oldroyd,and Fordham appealed. The Court of Appeals noted that this case presented Utah's first opportunity to consider whether the professional-rescuer doctrine operates to bar a police officer's claim against the party whose negligence caused the officer to be present at the scene,but where a third party actually inflicts the officer's injuries. Under the doctrine,a professional rescuer,such as a police officer,cannot recover for injuries sustained when responding to an emergency from the person who negligently created the circumstances creating the emergency. After considering the rationale for and against the doctrine,the Utah Court of Appeals concluded that it should be adopted in Utah. The court cautioned,however,that the doctrine is narrow,barring suit only for the negligence that creates the need for the professional rescuer's presence in the first instance,and not for any negligence resulting in injuries thereafter.
Forsberg v. Bovis Lend Lease,Inc.,2008 UT App 146,184 P. 3d 610,cert. denied,199 P.3d 367. After an electrical subcontractor on a hospital construction project filed for bankruptcy,the trustees of certain employment benefit funds (the Funds) sued the general contractor,its surety,and the owner for unpaid fringe benefit contributions to the Funds and to foreclose on its mechanics’lien. The District Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment,concluding that the Funds did not have standing,that fringe benefits were not recoverable either under the mechanics’lien statute or the private payment bond statute and that ERISA preempted claims under either statute. The Funds appealed. Each issue raised on appeal was an issue of first impression in Utah. With respect to standing,the Utah Court of Appeals concluded that the Funds were within the zone of interest contemplated by the Utah Legislature because they were entitled to enforce the rights of the employees. Next,the Court of Appeals held that ERISA did not preempt Utah's mechanics’lien and private bond statutes. Finally,the appellate court determined that the fringe benefits were part of the value of labor or services provided on the project and,therefore,could be recovered under the statutes. Consequently,the Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the District Court.
State v. Marks,2011 UT App 262,262 P.3d 13. Billy J. Marks was convicted of one count of sodomy on a child in connection with his conduct with his mentally challenged grandson and appealed his conviction. Marks argued that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by excluding evidence of 1) his grandson's possession of pornography,and 2) his grandson's simulation of sexual intercourse with his younger sister. According to Marks,the evidence was relevant to the grandson's sexual knowledge and his ability to fabricate the allegations. Marks also claimed the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because the grandson's testimony was inherently inconsistent. The Utah Court of Appeals recognized the tension between rule 412 of the Utah Rules of Evidence,Utah's rape shield law,which bars evidence of the alleged victim's other sexual behavior,and the confrontation clause of the United States Constitution,that protects the accused's right to present a complete defense. The Court of Appeals concluded that a complete defense in a criminal case,includes the right to conduct reasonable cross-examination that is not limited arbitrarily or disproportionately to the purpose of any evidentiary rule limiting such cross-examination. Considering the purposes of rule 412 and the facts and circumstances at issue,the Court of Appeals concluded that excluding the evidence was not arbitrary or disproportionate to the purposes of Utah's rape shield rule. The Court of Appeals also held that the victim's testimony was not so inconsistent as to be inherently improbable. Thus,the court affirmed Mark's conviction.
Professional and community service
1996 –Chairperson of the Utah State Bar Distinguished Committee
1997 –University of Utah College of Law Young Alumna of the Year
2001 –Christine M. Durham Utah Woman Lawyer of the Year
2009 –Dorothy Merrill Brothers Award for the Advancement of Women in the Legal Profession
McHugh is a past president of Women Lawyers in Utah,past co-chair of the American Bar Association Conference of Environmental Law,and past chair of the Needs of Children Committee of the Utah State Bar. She has served as a master of the bench in the American Inns of Court program and has completed training as a Fellow of the Advanced Science &Technology Adjudication Resource Center.
McHugh has been active in local charities,including,Catholic Community Services,the Office of the Guardian Ad Litem,Utah Children,Big Brothers Big Sisters,and The Legal Aid Society.[4]
Related Research Articles
Priscilla Richman is an American lawyer and jurist serving as the chief United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. She was previously a justice of the Supreme Court of Texas from 1995 to 2005.
Robert David Sack is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Barbara Louise Milano Keenan is a senior United States circuit judge of United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and a former justice on the Supreme Court of Virginia.
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila,542 U.S. 200 (2004),was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court limited the scope of the Texas Healthcare Liability Act (THCLA). The effective result of this decision was that the THCLA,which held Case Management and Utilization Review decisions by Managed Care entities like CIGNA and Aetna to a legal duty of care according to the laws of The State of Texas could not be enforced in the case of Health Benefit plans provided through private employers,because the Texas statute allowed compensatory or punitive damages to redress losses or deter future transgressions,which were not available under ERISA §1132. The ruling still allows the State of Texas to enforce the THCLA in the case of Government-sponsored (Medicare,Medicaid,Federal,State,Municipal Employee,etc.,Church-sponsored,or Individual Health Plan Policies,which are saved from preemption by ERISA. The history that allows these Private and Self-Pay Insurance to be saved dates to the "Interstate Commerce" power that was given the federal Government by the Supreme Court. ERISA,enacted in 1974,relied on the "Interstate Commerce" rule to allow federal jurisdiction over private employers,based on the need of private employers to follow a single set of paperwork and rules for pensions and other employee benefit plans where employers had employees in multiple states. Except for private employer plans,insurance can be regulated by the individual states,and Managed Care entities making medical decisions can be held accountable for those decisions if negligence is involved,as allowed by the Texas Healthcare Liability Act.
Gustavo Antonio GelpíJr. is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. He is a former chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.
Adalberto Jose Jordan is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. He is also an adjunct professor at the University of Miami School of Law,his alma mater,and at Florida International University's College of Law. In February 2016,The New York Times identified Jordan as a potential Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia. In early March,Jordan removed himself from consideration.
Patricia Ann Millett is an American lawyer and jurist serving since 2013 as a U.S. circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She formerly headed the Supreme Court practice at the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &Feld. Millett also was a longtime former assistant to the United States Solicitor General and served as an occasional blogger for SCOTUSblog. At the time of her confirmation to the D.C. Circuit,she had argued 32 cases before the United States Supreme Court—once the record for a female lawyer. In February 2016,The New York Times identified her as a potential nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia.
Stephanos Bibas is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Before his appointment to the bench,Bibas was a professor of law and criminology at the University of Pennsylvania Law School,where he also served as director of its Supreme Court clinic.
Matthew B. Durrant is the chief justice of the Utah Supreme Court. He is a graduate of both Brigham Young University and Harvard Law School. Durrant had a clerkship with Judge Monroe McKay of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit,a position as a lawyer for the Utah firm Parr,Brown,Gee,and Loveless for over a decade,and time spent on the bench of Utah's Third Judicial District.
Alison Julie Nathan is an American lawyer who has served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit since 2022. She served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York from 2011 to 2022. She previously served as associate White House counsel for President Barack Obama.
John Zihun Lee is an American lawyer serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. He served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois from 2012 to 2022.
Robin Stacie Rosenbaum is an American lawyer who has served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit since 2014. She previously was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida from 2012 to 2014.
J. Frederic Voros Jr. is an American jurist,hymnist,and author. He was a judge on the Utah Court of Appeals from 2009 to 2017.
Jill Anne Pryor is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Pryor was born in Harrisburg,Pennsylvania.
Cornelia Thayer Livingston Pillard,known professionally as Nina Pillard,is an American lawyer and jurist serving since 2013 as a U.S. circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Before becoming a judge,Pillard was a law professor at Georgetown University.
Salvador Mendoza Jr. is an American lawyer serving as United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He previously served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington from 2014 to 2022 and as a Washington state court judge from 2002 to 2014.
Julius Ness "Jay" Richardson is an American judge and lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He was formerly an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina.
Michael Hun Park is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He was a law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito. Prior to becoming a judge,Park was a named partner at Consovoy McCarthy,a prominent law firm in the conservative legal movement. While at the firm,Park represented the state of Kansas in its efforts to cut Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood. Judge Park was appointed by President Trump and is a member of the Federalist Society.
Jodi Marie Warmbrod Dishman is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.
Dana Marie Douglas is an American attorney who is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. She previously served as a United States magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana from 2019 to 2022.
1 2 "Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2011-11-10. Retrieved 2011-10-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link), Carolyn Baldwin McHugh Biography PDF.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
