Milan Smith | |
---|---|
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | |
Assumed office May 18, 2006 | |
Appointed by | George W. Bush |
Preceded by | A. Wallace Tashima |
Personal details | |
Born | Pendleton,Oregon,U.S. | May 19,1942
Relations | Gordon H. Smith (brother) |
Education | Brigham Young University (BA) University of Chicago (JD) |
Milan Dale Smith,Jr. (born May 19,1942) is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [1] Smith's brother,Gordon H. Smith,was a Republican U.S. Senator from 1997 to 2009. Milan Smith is neither a Republican nor a Democrat,and he considers himself to be a political independent. [2]
Smith was born in Pendleton,Oregon. He is the son of Milan D. Smith,Sr.,who served as chief of staff of the Department of Agriculture under Secretary Ezra Taft Benson. Smith received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Brigham Young University in 1966. Smith attended the University of Chicago Law School on a full-tuition scholarship,graduating in 1969 with a Juris Doctor.
After law school,Smith became an associate attorney at the Los Angeles firm of O'Melveny &Myers. In 1972,Smith left O'Melveny to co-found his own law firm,Smith &Hilbig,which eventually became Smith,Crane,Robinson &Parker. He was a President-General Counsel of the Los Angeles State Building Authority from 1983 to 2006. Smith was a Vice Chairman of the California Fair Employment and Housing Commission from 1987 to 1991.
Smith was nominated by President George W. Bush on February 14,2006,to fill a seat vacated by Judge A. Wallace Tashima. [3] The Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary of the American Bar Association rated him "well qualified," the highest possible rating. [4] He was confirmed just over three months later by the United States Senate on May 16,2006,by a 93–0 vote. [5] He was the fifth judge appointed to the Ninth Circuit by Bush,and the first since Carlos Bea was confirmed in 2003. He received his commission on May 18,2006. [6] In 2022,Smith told the Deseret News that he has no plans to retire and wishes to "die with my boots on." [7]
Smith has been one of the Ninth Circuit's most prolific writers. According to one periodical,he authored the most majority opinions of any judge on the Ninth Circuit in the three-year period ending on May 10,2013. [8]
James Harvie Wilkinson III is an American jurist who serves as a United States circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. His name has been raised at several junctures in the past as a possible nominee to the United States Supreme Court.
Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052,is a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution did not guarantee individuals the right to bear arms. The case involved a challenge to the constitutionality of the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 (AWCA),California legislation that banned the manufacture,sale,transportation,or importation of specified semi-automatic firearms. The plaintiffs alleged that various provisions of the AWCA infringed upon their individual constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms.
Danny Julian Boggs is an American lawyer and a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He was appointed to the court in 1986 and served as its chief judge from September 2003 to August 2009. Boggs was on the short list of President George W. Bush's candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Mary Margaret McKeown is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit based in San Diego. McKeown has served on the Ninth Circuit since her confirmation in 1998.
Marsha Lee Berzon is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Diane Pamela Wood is an American attorney who serves as the director of the American Law Institute and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School. She previously served as a circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Sandra Segal Ikuta is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Stephen Roy Reinhardt was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,with chambers in Los Angeles,California. He was the last federal appeals court judge in active service to have been appointed to his position by President Jimmy Carter.
Diarmuid Fionntain O'Scannlain is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. His chambers are located in Portland,Oregon.
Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
United States v. Weitzenhoff,35 F.3d 1275 is a legal opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that addresses the confusing mens rea requirement of a federal environmental law that imposed criminal sanctions on certain polluters. The main significance of the court's opinion was that it interpreted the word "knowingly" in the statute to mean a general awareness of the wrongfulness of one's actions or the likelihood of illegality,rather than an actual knowledge of the statute being violated. Circuit Court Judge Betty Binns Fletcher authored the majority's legal opinion in this case.
Roger Thomas Benitez is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. He is known for his rulings striking down several California gun control laws.
John Thomas Noonan Jr. was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nordyke v. King was a case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in which a ban of firearms on all public property and whether the Second Amendment should be applied to the state and local governments is to be decided. After several hearings at different levels of the federal court system,Alameda County,California promised that gun shows could be held on county property,essentially repudiating its ordinance.
The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER) was a nonprofit organization active in the United States from 2009 through 2015. The organization was established to support the plaintiffs in Hollingsworth v. Perry,a federal lawsuit challenging California's Proposition 8 under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. AFER retained former United States Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson and David Boies to lead the legal team representing the plaintiffs challenging Proposition 8.
Doe v. Unocal,395 F.3d 932,opinion vacated and rehearing en banc granted,395 F.3d 978,was a lawsuit filed against Unocal for alleged human rights violations.
Andrew David Hurwitz is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He served as a justice of the Arizona Supreme Court from 2003 to 2012.
Wal-Mart v. Dukes,564 U.S. 338 (2011),was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart. Lead plaintiff Betty Dukes,a Walmart employee,and others alleged gender discrimination in pay and promotion policies and practices in Walmart stores.
Paul Jeffrey Watford is an American lawyer who served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 2012 to 2023. In 2016,The New York Times identified Watford as a potential Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia. Watford resigned his judgeship in 2023 and became a partner at the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &Rosati.
Peruta v. San Diego,824 F.3d 919,was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" before issuing a concealed carry permit.