Related Research Articles
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an intergovernmental body of the United Nations. Its job is to advance scientific knowledge about climate change caused by human activities. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) established the IPCC in 1988. The United Nations endorsed the creation of the IPCC later that year. It has a secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland, hosted by the WMO. It has 195 member states who govern the IPCC. The member states elect a bureau of scientists to serve through an assessment cycle. A cycle is usually six to seven years. The bureau selects experts to prepare IPCC reports. It draws the experts from nominations by governments and observer organizations. The IPCC has three working groups and a task force, which carry out its scientific work.
The Second Assessment Report (SAR) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), published in 1995, is an assessment of the then available scientific and socio-economic information on climate change. The report was split into four parts: a synthesis to help interpret UNFCCC article 2, The Science of Climate Change, Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change, Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Each of the last three parts was completed by a separate Working Group (WG), and each has a Summary for Policymakers (SPM) that represents a consensus of national representatives.
The Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) is a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that was published in 2000. The greenhouse gas emissions scenarios described in the Report have been used to make projections of possible future climate change. The SRES scenarios, as they are often called, were used in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR), published in 2001, and in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), published in 2007. The SRES scenarios were designed to improve upon some aspects of the IS92 scenarios, which had been used in the earlier IPCC Second Assessment Report of 1995. The SRES scenarios are "baseline" scenarios, which means that they do not take into account any current or future measures to limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Climate change mitigation is action to limit climate change. This action either reduces emissions of greenhouse gases or removes those gases from the atmosphere. The recent rise in global temperature is mostly due to emissions from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. There are various ways that mitigation can reduce emissions. These are transitioning to sustainable energy sources, conserving energy, and increasing efficiency. It is possible to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This can be done by enlarging forests, restoring wetlands and using other natural and technical processes. The name for these processes is carbon sequestration. Governments and companies have pledged to reduce emissions to prevent dangerous climate change. These pledges are in line with international negotiations to limit warming.
The economic analysis of climate change explains how economic thinking, tools and techniques are applied to calculate the magnitude and distribution of damage caused by climate change. It also informs the policies and approaches for mitigation and adaptation to climate change from global to household scales. This topic is also inclusive of alternative economic approaches, including ecological economics and degrowth. In a cost–benefit analysis, the trade offs between climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation are made explicit. Cost–benefit analyses of climate change are produced using integrated assessment models (IAMs), which incorporate aspects of the natural, social, and economic sciences. The total economic impacts from climate change are difficult to estimate, but increase for higher temperature changes.
Ann Florini is a Fellow in the Political Reform Program at New America; a founding Board Member of the Economics of Mutuality Foundation; a Senior Global Futures Scientist at the Julie n Wrigley Global Futures Lab, Arizona State University; a Professor of Practice at the Thunderbird School of Global Management NatureFinance and the Task Force on Nature Markets. Until June 2018 she was Professor of Public Policy in the School of Social Sciences at Singapore Management University, where she was Academic Director of the Masters of Tri-Sector Collaboration, and was Non-resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC.
Thomas C. Heller is a climate policy lawyer and academic. He currently serves as the chairman of the board for Climate Policy Initiative, an organization he founded in 2009 that works to improve energy and land use policies, with offices and programs in Brazil, China, Europe, India, and Indonesia, and the United States.
Diana Liverman is a retired Regents Professor of Geography and Development and past Director of the University of Arizona School of Geography, Development and Environment in the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences in Tucson, Arizona.
Girish Sant was a noted energy analyst held in high esteem as an energy policy commentator from India. He co-founded the non-governmental organisation Prayas in Pune, India. His analytical inputs helped shape India's energy policy over the decades of the 1990s and 2000s. He was considered an effective team builder and mentored several energy researchers and activists.
Michael J. Prince is a Canadian political scientist and public policy and administration scholar. Prince is the Lansdowne Professor of Social Policy at the University of Victoria in Canada.
The contributions of women in climate change have received increasing attention in the early 21st century. Feedback from women and the issues faced by women have been described as "imperative" by the United Nations and "critical" by the Population Reference Bureau. A report by the World Health Organization concluded that incorporating gender-based analysis would "provide more effective climate change mitigation and adaptation."
Gopal Krishna Sarangi is an Indian economist specializing in energy economics, climate change, energy regulations, energy access, etc. He is at present an Assistant Professor at Department of Policy Studies, Teri University.
Prayas (Energy Group) is an Indian research and analysis organisation working in the area of energy policy. It is part of a non-governmental charitable trust called Prayas (long name is Initiatives in Health, Energy and Parenthood) located in Pune, India. The aim of Prayas is to make energy a tool for sustainable and equitable development for all citizens, by analysis, discourse building, policy and regulatory engagements and collaboration with other civil society organisations.
Fatima Denton is a British-Gambian climatologist. She is the director at the Ghanaian branch of the United Nations University, at the UNU Institute for Natural Resources in Africa (UNU-INRA) in Accra. She focuses on innovation, science, technology and natural resource management. She partners with countries such as Benin and Liberia to develop and implement country needs assessment missions.
Vishal Narain is an Indian, inter-disciplinary water researcher. His work cuts across the frontiers of the natural and social sciences, with a specific interest in institutions, governance and policy. He is currently a professor in the School of Public Policy and Governance at the Management Development Institute, Gurgaon.
Niklas Höhne is a German scientist in the field of national and international climate policy and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. He is founder of the NewClimate Institute in Cologne, Germany and professor at Wageningen University.
Diana Ürge-Vorsatz is a Hungarian scientist. She is professor of Environmental Sciences at Central European University. She is the Director of the Center for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy. She has published widely on environmental and energy studies, primarily climate change mitigation.
Green recovery packages are proposed environmental, regulatory, and fiscal reforms to rebuild prosperity in the wake of an economic crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). They pertain to fiscal measures that intend to recover economic growth while also positively benefitting the environment, including measures for renewable energy, efficient energy use, nature-based solutions, sustainable transport, green innovation and green jobs, amongst others.
Climate change vulnerability is a concept that describes how strongly people or ecosystems are likely to be affected by climate change. It is defined as the "propensity or predisposition to be adversely affected" by climate change. It can apply to humans and also to natural systems. Related concepts include climate sensitivity and the ability, or lack thereof, to cope and adapt. Vulnerability is a component of climate risk. Vulnerability differs within communities and across societies, regions, and countries, and can increase or decrease over time.
Joyashree Roy is an Indian economist with specialization in the fields of Environmental economics, energy economics and Climate change mitigation.
References
- ↑ "Navroz K Dubash | WRI India". World Resources Institute India. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020.
- ↑ "IPCC Authors". apps.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
- ↑ "United in Science 2020". World Meteorological Organization. 2019-09-19. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
- ↑ "IPCC Authors". apps.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
- ↑ "Fifty-sixth Session of the IPCC (IPCC-56) and Fourteenth Session of IPCC Working Group III (WGIII-14) — IPCC" . Retrieved 2022-06-25.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K., ed. (2019). India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199498734.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-909840-8.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K.; Kale, Sunila S.; Bharvirkar, Ranjit, eds. (2018). Mapping Power: The Political Economy of Electricity in India's States. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199487820.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-909375-5.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K.; Morgan, Bronwen, eds. (2013-06-27). The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies. Law and Global Governance. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-967716-0.
- ↑ "Handbook of Climate Change and India: Development, Politics and Governance". Routledge & CRC Press. Retrieved 2021-07-05.
- ↑ "NIPFP | web page". www.nipfp.org.in. Retrieved 2021-07-05.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K.; Narasimha Rao, D. (2007). The practice and politics of regulation: regulatory governance in Indian electricity. Delhi: Macmillan India. ISBN 978-0-230-63296-7.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K. (2002). Tubewell capitalism: groundwater development and agrarian change in Gujarat. Studies in social ecology and environmental history. New Delhi ; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-565747-0.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz (2002-06-28). Power Politics. ISBN 978-1-56973-503-9.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K. (2002). Power politics : equity and environment in electricity reform. ISBN 978-1-56973-503-9.
- ↑ Dubash, Navroz K.; Dupar, Mairi; Kothari, Smitu; Lissu, Tundu (2001). A watershed in global governance ? An independent assessment of the World Commission on Dams. ISBN 978-1-56973-494-0.
- ↑ Seymour, Frances J.; Dubash, Navroz Kersi; Brunner, Jake (2000). The right conditions: the World Bank, structural adjustment, and forest policy reform. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. ISBN 978-1-56973-424-7.
- ↑ Seymour, Frances; World Resources Institute, eds. (2000). The right conditions: the World Bank, structural adjustment, and forest policy reform. Washington, D.C: World Resources Institute. ISBN 978-1-56973-424-7.
- ↑ Filer, Colin; Dubash, Navroz K.; Kilyali, Kalit (2000). The thin green line: World Bank leverage and forest policy reform in Papua New Guinea. NRI monograph. Boroko, Papua New Guinea : Canberra, ACT, Australia: National Research Institute ; Australian National University. ISBN 978-9980-75-107-2.
- ↑ "TN Khoshoo Memorial Award and Lecture". Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment. Retrieved 2021-04-22.