Neofunctionalization

Last updated
Neofunctionalization is the process by which a gene acquires a new function after a gene duplication event. The figure shows that once a gene duplication event has occurred one gene copy retains the original ancestral function (represented by the green paralog), while the other acquires mutations that allow it to diverge and develop a new function (represented by the blue paralog). Neofunctionalization after a gene duplication event.png
Neofunctionalization is the process by which a gene acquires a new function after a gene duplication event. The figure shows that once a gene duplication event has occurred one gene copy retains the original ancestral function (represented by the green paralog), while the other acquires mutations that allow it to diverge and develop a new function (represented by the blue paralog).

Neofunctionalization, one of the possible outcomes of functional divergence, occurs when one gene copy, or paralog, takes on a totally new function after a gene duplication event. Neofunctionalization is an adaptive mutation process; meaning one of the gene copies must mutate to develop a function that was not present in the ancestral gene. [1] [2] [3] In other words, one of the duplicates retains its original function, while the other accumulates molecular changes such that, in time, it can perform a different task. [4]

Contents

The process

The process of neofunctionalization begins with a gene duplication event, which is thought to occur as a defense mechanism against the accumulation of deleterious mutations. [5] [6] [7] Following the gene duplication event there are two identical copies of the ancestral gene performing exactly the same function. This redundancy allows one the copies to take on a new function. In the event that the new function is advantageous, natural selection positively selects for it and the new mutation becomes fixed in the population. [3] [8] The occurrence of neofunctionalization can most often be attributed to changes in the coding region or changes in the regulatory elements of a gene. [6] It is much more rare to see major changes in protein function, such as subunit structure or substrate and ligand affinity, as a result of neofunctionalization. [6]

Selective constraints

Neofunctionalization is also commonly referred to as "mutation during non-functionality" or "mutation during redundancy". [9] Regardless of if the mutation arises after non-functionality of a gene or due to redundant gene copies, the important aspect is that in both scenarios one copy of the duplicated gene is freed from selective constraints and by chance acquires a new function which is then improved by natural selection. [6] This process is thought to occur very rarely in evolution for two major reasons. The first reason is that functional changes typically require a large number of amino acid changes; which has a low probability of occurrence. Secondly, because deleterious mutations occur much more frequently than advantageous mutations in evolution. [6] This makes the likelihood that gene function is lost over time (i.e. pseudogenization) far greater than the likelihood of the emergence of a new gene function. [8] Walsh discovered that the relative probability of neofunctionalization is determined by the selective advantage and the relative rate of advantageous mutations. [10] This was proven in his derivation of the relative probability of neofunctionalization to pseudogenization, which is given by: where ρ is the ratio of advantageous mutation rate to null mutation rate and S is the population selection 4NeS (Ne: effective population size S: selection intensity). [10]

Classical model

In 1936, Muller originally proposed neofunctionalization as a possible outcome of a gene duplication event. [11] In 1970, Ohno suggested that neofunctionalization was the only evolutionary mechanism that gave rise to new gene functions in a population. [6] He also believed that neofunctionalization was the only alternative to pseudogenization. [2] Ohta (1987) was among the first to suggest that other mechanisms may exist for the preservation of duplicated genes in the population. [6] Today, subfunctionalization is a widely accepted alternative fixation process for gene duplicates in the population and is currently the only other possible outcome of functional divergence. [2]

Neosubfunctionalization

Neosubfunctionalization occurs when neofunctionalization is the result of subfunctionalization. In other words, once a gene duplication event occurs forming paralogs that after an evolutionary period subfunctionalize, one gene copy continues on this evolutionary journey and accumulates mutations that give rise to a new function. [6] [12] Some believe that neofunctionalization is the end stage for all subfunctionalized genes. For instance, according to Rastogi and Liberles "Neofunctionalization is the terminal fate of all duplicate gene copies retained in the genome and subfunctionlization merely exist as a transient state to preserve the duplicate gene copy." [2] The results of their study become punctuated as population size increases.

Examples

The evolution of the antifreeze protein in the Antarctic zoarcid fish Lycodichthys dearborni provides a prime example of neofunctionalization after gene duplication. In the case of the Antarctic zoarcid fish type III antifreeze protein gene (AFPIII; P12102 ) diverged from a paralogous copy of sialic acid synthase (SAS) gene. [13] The ancestral SAS gene was found to have both sialic acid synthase and rudimentary ice-binding functionalities. After duplication one of the paralogs began to accumulate mutations that lead to the replacement of SAS domains of the gene allowing for further development and optimization of the antifreeze functionality. [13] The new gene is now capable of noncolligative freezing-point depression, and thus is neofunctionalized. [13] This specialization allows Antarctic zoarcid fish to survive in the frigid temperatures of the Antarctic Seas.

Another example concerns the light-sensitive opsin proteins in vertebrate eyes that allow them to see different wavelengths of light. Extant vertebrates typically have four cone opsin classes (LWS, SWS1, SWS2, and Rh2) as well as one rod opsin class (rhodopsin, Rh1), all of which were inherited from early vertebrate ancestors. These five classes of vertebrate visual opsins emerged through a series of gene duplications beginning with LWS and ending with Rh1. [14] [15]

Model limitations

Limitations exist in neofunctionalization as a model for functional divergence primarily because:

  1. the amount of nucleotide changes giving rise to a new function must be very minimal; making the probability for pseudogenization much higher than neofunctionalization after a gene duplication event. [6]
  2. After a gene duplication event both copies may be subjected to selective pressure equivalent to that constraining the ancestral gene; meaning that neither copy is available for neofunctionalization. [6]
  3. In many cases positive Darwinian selection presents a more parsimonious explanation for the divergence of multigene families. [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mutation</span> Alteration in the nucleotide sequence of a genome

In biology, a mutation is an alteration in the nucleic acid sequence of the genome of an organism, virus, or extrachromosomal DNA. Viral genomes contain either DNA or RNA. Mutations result from errors during DNA or viral replication, mitosis, or meiosis or other types of damage to DNA, which then may undergo error-prone repair, cause an error during other forms of repair, or cause an error during replication. Mutations may also result from substitution, insertion or deletion of segments of DNA due to mobile genetic elements.

Molecular evolution describes how inherited DNA and/or RNA change over evolutionary time, and the consequences of this for proteins and other components of cells and organisms. Molecular evolution is the basis of phylogenetic approaches to describing the tree of life. Molecular evolution overlaps with population genetics, especially on shorter timescales. Topics in molecular evolution include the origins of new genes, the genetic nature of complex traits, the genetic basis of adaptation and speciation, the evolution of development, and patterns and processes underlying genomic changes during evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudogene</span> Functionless relative of a gene

Pseudogenes are nonfunctional segments of DNA that resemble functional genes. Most arise as superfluous copies of functional genes, either directly by gene duplication or indirectly by reverse transcription of an mRNA transcript. Pseudogenes are usually identified when genome sequence analysis finds gene-like sequences that lack regulatory sequences needed for transcription or translation, or whose coding sequences are obviously defective due to frameshifts or premature stop codons. Pseudogenes are a type of junk DNA.

Gene duplication is a major mechanism through which new genetic material is generated during molecular evolution. It can be defined as any duplication of a region of DNA that contains a gene. Gene duplications can arise as products of several types of errors in DNA replication and repair machinery as well as through fortuitous capture by selfish genetic elements. Common sources of gene duplications include ectopic recombination, retrotransposition event, aneuploidy, polyploidy, and replication slippage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene family</span> Set of several similar genes

A gene family is a set of several similar genes, formed by duplication of a single original gene, and generally with similar biochemical functions. One such family are the genes for human hemoglobin subunits; the ten genes are in two clusters on different chromosomes, called the α-globin and β-globin loci. These two gene clusters are thought to have arisen as a result of a precursor gene being duplicated approximately 500 million years ago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sequence homology</span> Shared ancestry between DNA, RNA or protein sequences

Sequence homology is the biological homology between DNA, RNA, or protein sequences, defined in terms of shared ancestry in the evolutionary history of life. Two segments of DNA can have shared ancestry because of three phenomena: either a speciation event (orthologs), or a duplication event (paralogs), or else a horizontal gene transfer event (xenologs).

Evolutionary capacitance is the storage and release of variation, just as electric capacitors store and release charge. Living systems are robust to mutations. This means that living systems accumulate genetic variation without the variation having a phenotypic effect. But when the system is disturbed, robustness breaks down, and the variation has phenotypic effects and is subject to the full force of natural selection. An evolutionary capacitor is a molecular switch mechanism that can "toggle" genetic variation between hidden and revealed states. If some subset of newly revealed variation is adaptive, it becomes fixed by genetic assimilation. After that, the rest of variation, most of which is presumably deleterious, can be switched off, leaving the population with a newly evolved advantageous trait, but no long-term handicap. For evolutionary capacitance to increase evolvability in this way, the switching rate should not be faster than the timescale of genetic assimilation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleopolyploidy</span> State of having undergone whole genome duplication in deep evolutionary time

Paleopolyploidy is the result of genome duplications which occurred at least several million years ago (MYA). Such an event could either double the genome of a single species (autopolyploidy) or combine those of two species (allopolyploidy). Because of functional redundancy, genes are rapidly silenced or lost from the duplicated genomes. Most paleopolyploids, through evolutionary time, have lost their polyploid status through a process called diploidization, and are currently considered diploids, e.g., baker's yeast, Arabidopsis thaliana, and perhaps humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PAX6</span> Protein-coding gene in humans

Paired box protein Pax-6, also known as aniridia type II protein (AN2) or oculorhombin, is a protein that in humans is encoded by the PAX6 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene cluster</span> Group of related genes in genomic DNA

A gene cluster is a group of two or more genes found within an organism's DNA that encode similar polypeptides or proteins which collectively share a generalized function and are often located within a few thousand base pairs of each other. The size of gene clusters can vary significantly, from a few genes to several hundred genes. Portions of the DNA sequence of each gene within a gene cluster are found to be identical; however, the protein encoded by each gene is distinct from the proteins encoded by the other genes within the cluster. Gene clusters often result from expansions of a single gene caused by repeated duplication events, and may be observed near one another on the same chromosome or on different, but homologous chromosomes. An example of a gene cluster is the Hox gene, which is made up of eight genes and is part of the Homeobox gene family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CLOCK</span> Human protein and coding gene

CLOCK is a gene encoding a basic helix-loop-helix-PAS transcription factor that is known to affect both the persistence and period of circadian rhythms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of color vision in primates</span> Loss and regain of colour vision during the evolution of primates

The evolution of color vision in primates is highly unusual compared to most eutherian mammals. A remote vertebrate ancestor of primates possessed tetrachromacy, but nocturnal, warm-blooded, mammalian ancestors lost two of four cones in the retina at the time of dinosaurs. Most teleost fish, reptiles and birds are therefore tetrachromatic while most mammals are strictly dichromats, the exceptions being some primates and marsupials, who are trichromats, and many marine mammals, who are monochromats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene redundancy</span>

Gene redundancy is the existence of multiple genes in the genome of an organism that perform the same function. Gene redundancy can result from gene duplication. Such duplication events are responsible for many sets of paralogous genes. When an individual gene in such a set is disrupted by mutation or targeted knockout, there can be little effect on phenotype as a result of gene redundancy, whereas the effect is large for the knockout of a gene with only one copy. Gene knockout is a method utilized in some studies aiming to characterize the maintenance and fitness effects functional overlap.

Functional divergence is the process by which genes, after gene duplication, shift in function from an ancestral function. Functional divergence can result in either subfunctionalization, where a paralog specializes one of several ancestral functions, or neofunctionalization, where a totally new functional capability evolves. It is thought that this process of gene duplication and functional divergence is a major originator of molecular novelty and has produced the many large protein families that exist today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subfunctionalization</span>

Subfunctionalization was proposed by Stoltzfus (1999) and Force et al. (1999) as one of the possible outcomes of functional divergence that occurs after a gene duplication event, in which pairs of genes that originate from duplication, or paralogs, take on separate functions. Subfunctionalization is a neutral mutation process of constructive neutral evolution; meaning that no new adaptations are formed. During the process of gene duplication paralogs simply undergo a division of labor by retaining different parts (subfunctions) of their original ancestral function. This partitioning event occurs because of segmental gene silencing leading to the formation of paralogs that are no longer duplicates, because each gene only retains a single function. It is important to note that the ancestral gene was capable of performing both functions and the descendant duplicate genes can now only perform one of the original ancestral functions.

Evolution by gene duplication is an event by which a gene or part of a gene can have two identical copies that can not be distinguished from each other. This phenomenon is understood to be an important source of novelty in evolution, providing for an expanded repertoire of molecular activities. The underlying mutational event of duplication may be a conventional gene duplication mutation within a chromosome, or a larger-scale event involving whole chromosomes (aneuploidy) or whole genomes (polyploidy). A classic view, owing to Susumu Ohno, which is known as Ohno model, he explains how duplication creates redundancy, the redundant copy accumulates beneficial mutations which provides fuel for innovation. Knowledge of evolution by gene duplication has advanced more rapidly in the past 15 years due to new genomic data, more powerful computational methods of comparative inference, and new evolutionary models.

A conserved non-coding sequence (CNS) is a DNA sequence of noncoding DNA that is evolutionarily conserved. These sequences are of interest for their potential to regulate gene production.

The evolution of bitter taste receptors has been one of the most dynamic evolutionary adaptations to arise in multiple species. This phenomenon has been widely studied in the field of evolutionary biology because of its role in the identification of toxins often found on the leaves of inedible plants. A palate more sensitive to these bitter tastes would, theoretically, have an advantage over members of the population less sensitive to these poisonous substances because they would be much less likely to ingest toxic plants. Bitter-taste genes have been found in a host of vertebrates, including sharks and rays, and the same genes have been well characterized in several common laboratory animals such as primates and mice, as well as in humans. The primary gene responsible for encoding this ability in humans is the TAS2R gene family which contains 25 functional loci as well as 11 pseudogenes. The development of this gene has been well characterized, with proof that the ability evolved before the human migration out of Africa. The gene continues to evolve in the present day.

<i>Lycodichthys</i> Genus of fishes

Lycodichthys is a genus of marine ray-finned fish belonging to the family Zoarcidae, the eelpouts. They are found in the Southern Ocean.

Constructive neutral evolution(CNE) is a theory that seeks to explain how complex systems can evolve through neutral transitions and spread through a population by chance fixation (genetic drift). Constructive neutral evolution is a competitor for both adaptationist explanations for the emergence of complex traits and hypotheses positing that a complex trait emerged as a response to a deleterious development in an organism. Constructive neutral evolution often leads to irreversible or "irremediable" complexity and produces systems which, instead of being finely adapted for performing a task, represent an excess complexity that has been described with terms such as "runaway bureaucracy" or even a "Rube Goldberg machine".

References

  1. ↑ Kleinjan DA, Bancewicz RM, Gautier P, Dahm R, Schonthaler HB, Damante G, et al. (February 2008). "Subfunctionalization of duplicated zebrafish pax6 genes by cis-regulatory divergence". PLOS Genetics. 4 (2): e29. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040029 . PMC   2242813 . PMID   18282108.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Rastogi S, Liberles DA (April 2005). "Subfunctionalization of duplicated genes as a transition state to neofunctionalization". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 5 (1): 28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-28 . PMC   1112588 . PMID   15831095.
  3. 1 2 Conrad B, Antonarakis SE (2007). "Gene duplication: a drive for phenotypic diversity and cause of human disease". Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 8: 17–35. doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.8.021307.110233. PMID   17386002.
  4. ↑ Ohno (1970). Evolution by Gene Duplication. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 59–87. ISBN   978-3-540-05225-8.
  5. ↑ De Smet R, Van de Peer Y (April 2012). "Redundancy and rewiring of genetic networks following genome-wide duplication events". Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 15 (2): 168–76. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.003. PMID   22305522.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Graur D, Li WH (2000). Fundamentals of molecular evolution (2nd ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates. ISBN   978-0-87893-266-5.
  7. ↑ Amoutzias GD, He Y, Gordon J, Mossialos D, Oliver SG, Van de Peer Y (February 2010). "Posttranslational regulation impacts the fate of duplicated genes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (7): 2967–71. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.2967A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911603107 . PMC   2840353 . PMID   20080574.
  8. 1 2 Innan H (September 2009). "Population genetic models of duplicated genes". Genetica. 137 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1007/s10709-009-9355-1. PMID   19266289. S2CID   31795158.
  9. ↑ Hughes AL (1999). Adaptive evolution of genes and genomes. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-511626-7.
  10. 1 2 Lynch M, Force A (January 2000). "The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization". Genetics. 154 (1): 459–73. doi:10.1093/genetics/154.1.459. PMC   1460895 . PMID   10629003.
  11. ↑ Muller HJ (May 1936). "Bar duplication". Science. 83 (2161): 528–30. Bibcode:1936Sci....83..528M. doi:10.1126/science.83.2161.528-a. PMID   17806465. S2CID   5426313.
  12. ↑ He X, Zhang J (February 2005). "Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution". Genetics. 169 (2): 1157–64. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.037051. PMC   1449125 . PMID   15654095.
  13. 1 2 3 Deng C, Cheng CH, Ye H, He X, Chen L (December 2010). "Evolution of an antifreeze protein by neofunctionalization under escape from adaptive conflict". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (50): 21593–8. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10721593D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007883107 . PMC   3003108 . PMID   21115821.
  14. ↑ Hunt DM, Carvalho LS, Cowing JA, Davies WL (October 2009). "Evolution and spectral tuning of visual pigments in birds and mammals". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 364 (1531): 2941–2955. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0044. PMC   2781856 . PMID   19720655.
  15. ↑ Trezise AE, Collin SP (October 2005). "Opsins: evolution in waiting". Current Biology. 15 (19): R794–R796. Bibcode:2005CBio...15.R794T. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.025 . PMID   16213808.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.