Net Neutrality II

Last updated
"Net Neutrality II"
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver segment
Episode no.Season 4
Episode 11 (segment)
Presented by John Oliver
Original air dateMay 7, 2017 (2017-05-07)
Running time19 minutes
List of episodes

"Net Neutrality II" is the second segment of the HBO news satire television series Last Week Tonight with John Oliver devoted to net neutrality in the United States. It aired on May 7, 2017, for 19 minutes, as part of the eleventh episode of the fourth season, and the 100th episode overall.

Contents

During this segment, comedian John Oliver discusses the threat to net neutrality. Under the previous administration of President Barack Obama, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was considering two options for net neutrality in early 2014, which Oliver covered in a previous segment entitled "Net Neutrality". The FCC proposed permitting fast and slow broadband lanes, which would compromise net neutrality, but was also considering reclassifying broadband as a telecommunication service, which would preserve net neutrality. After a surge of comments supporting net neutrality that were inspired by Oliver's episode, the FCC voted to reclassify broadband as a utility in 2015.

The second episode dealt with a resurgence of the same problem, except under the administration of Donald Trump. The FCC was proposing to eliminate the 2015 rules that classified broadband as a utility, thereby allowing the implementation of slow and fast lanes. Despite another surge of comments following the second episode, the FCC proceeded with its plans to eliminate the 2015 regulations.

Plot

External videos
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Net Neutrality II (HBO) on YouTube

Oliver recaps his previous "Net Neutrality" episode and its aftermath. Afterward, Oliver describes the reason for his second episode: the Trump administration is rolling back Obama-era regulations, including Wheeler's net-neutrality rules. The comedian says, "I genuinely would not be surprised if one night Trump went on TV just to tell us that he personally killed every [Thanksgiving] turkey Obama ever pardoned". [1] [2] [3]

John Oliver (pictured in 2016), the host of Last Week Tonight John Oliver November 2016.jpg
John Oliver (pictured in 2016), the host of Last Week Tonight

Oliver shows a clip of YouTube personality Tay Zonday, who summarizes the concept of net neutrality. Zonday says that under net neutrality laws, ISPs have to treat all web traffic the same, and as an example, he says that an ISP cannot favor one search engine by slowing down traffic that uses other search engines. After the clip ends, Oliver paraphrases what Zonday just said: that under the concept of net neutrality, ISPs cannot impact or restrict people's online actions, and big companies cannot prevent competition from small companies. Oliver says that in the case of the latter, "Ancestry.com could easily crush my new site JustTellMeIfImRelatedToANazi.com. It's like ancestry.com except you get to skip all the bullshit." [2] He then notes that major ISPs like Charter, Cox, and Comcast have all published statements that endorsed "a free and open internet", and that Verizon even made a video explaining that the change would "put the open Internet rules in an enforceable way on a different legal footing".

The comedian next explains Titles I and II of the Communications Act of 1934; the ruling provided by Comcast v. FCC; and Pai's appointment by President Trump. Oliver says that based on this context, Verizon's bid for a "different legal footing" was akin to "O. J. Simpson asking why you won't let him hold any of your samurai swords". He continues that the new FCC chairman's promise that the current rules' "days were numbered" and his vow to "take a weed whacker" to the current rules was like "serial killer talk". [3] Pai's easygoing attitude, casual quotations of The Big Lebowski on his Twitter account, and affinity for his large Reese's-branded coffee mug made him personable, and according to Oliver, even more dangerous. [3] Oliver says that Pai is a former lawyer for Verizon [4] who has said that "we were not living in some digital dystopia before the partisan imposition of a massive plan hatched in Washington saved all of us", [5] to which the comedian adds, "Except for Pizza Rat".

Oliver then takes a serious tone, saying that reclassification of ISPs was the only way to regulate them, and points out that Pai had erroneously said that there is no evidence of throttling by cable companies. Oliver refutes Pai's statement with a Bloomberg News article about how Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile had blocked their respective subscribers from accessing Google Wallet on their phones because it competed with their Isis Mobile Wallet service. [6]

The comedian says that Pai has also proposed "laughably lacking" alternatives to net neutrality. One alternative stipulated that ISPs simply include a voluntary statement in their terms of service indicating that they would not throttle or block content, [7] [8] which Oliver says would "make net neutrality as binding as a proposal on The Bachelor ". [2] Pai's other rationales for reclassifying ISPs was that the new rules already resulted in decreased investment in broadband networks. [1] Brian Schatz, a Democratic U.S. Senator representing Hawaii and the ranking member of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation, and the Internet, said that Pai's claim of decreased investment was untrue. [9] Oliver then quotes a 2014 phone call from Francis J. Shammo, the chief financial officer of Verizon, in which the latter says that the new net-neutrality rules did not affect Verizon's business. Oliver says, "that doesn't really sound like net neutrality was jeopardizing investment at all". [3] [10]

The ISPs' position on the net neutrality issue is that protections could be retained by an Act of Congress, but Oliver says that he does not trust Congress to go through. He also expresses distrust of President Trump, who had claimed that Obama's net-neutrality protections would "target conservative media", when in fact, that could only be achieved by the opposite scenario: a lack of net-neutrality protections. At the end of the segment, Oliver urges viewers to go to GoFCCYourself.com, a website redirecting to the specific FCC proposal. [1] [2] [8] He says, "Every Internet group needs to come together like you successfully did three years ago … gamers; YouTube celebrities; Instagram models; Tom from MySpace, if you’re still alive. We need all of you. You cannot say you are too busy when 540,000 of you commented on Beyonce’s pregnancy announcement." [3]

Web exclusive

External videos
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Net Neutrality Update – Web Exclusive (HBO) on YouTube

In a segment posted only on YouTube the following week, Oliver talks about an update at the FCC. [11] He describes how gofccyourself.com started trending on Twitter after the Net Neutrality II segment aired. [10] Ultimately, the FCC website got 1.6 million extra comments as a result of the segment. Oliver shows a video of a news anchor describing this fact while using an image of Stephen Colbert, another comedian. [12] [11]

Oliver then reads off a comment from a person claiming to be from the International Space Station who complained about his porn website access being interrupted, to which he responds, "There is no one up there who has any use for porn, and I'll tell you why: they are way too busy space fucking". [11] He also noted that several comments were using fake names like Homer Simpson, Barack Obama, and Michael Jackson, then said that "Michael Jackson" is a very common name, although one commenter writing under that name had listed an address of "420 Buthole st"—a reference to cannabis culture and posteriors. Oliver describes that some media had doubts about this net-neutrality drive, with one news anchor alleging that there were 128,000 spambot comments with fake names. He then says that some of the comments were racist, saying, "Let me just say, if any of those came from anyone who watches this show, stop it! Writing racist things on the Internet is not how you win the net neutrality debate, it's how you win the presidency." [11] [12] The comedian concludes by calling on viewers to refrain from adding any more comments, since the FCC stopped taking any comments a week before their May 18 vote on the issue. [11]

Effects and reception

Oliver's segment was thought to have caused viewers to submit an extra 150,000 comments on the net neutrality proposal. [13] As with the previous "Net Neutrality" segment, the FCC site was thought to have crashed temporarily as a result of the surge in commenting. However, the FCC later stated that the site was unavailable due to distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks that were unrelated to the Oliver segments. HBO also denied having initiated the DDoS attacks. [14] Engadget noted that apart from the specific page about the net-neutrality proposal, the rest of the FCC site was working at normal speeds. [15] Several Congressional Democrats doubted that the cause of the FCC website's outage was a DDoS attack, and they called on the FCC to investigate the issue. [16] BuzzFeed journalist Kevin Collier filed a lawsuit against the FCC after it refused to publish data related to the outage under the Freedom of Information Act. [17]

In response to the segment, Ajit Pai made a video in which he read and responded to mean tweets about himself in the style of a Jimmy Kimmel Live! "Mean Tweets" segment. Pai read several tweets that mentioned several things that John Oliver had talked about in "Net Neutrality II", such as The Big Lebowski quotes and the Reese's mug, but he did not read any tweets referring to net neutrality itself. [18] [19] Gizmodo criticized Pai's video, saying that he refused to debate Oliver's points and instead "addresses a bunch of Twitter eggs", anonymous user profiles, "with the implication that anyone who opposes his cash grab for corporations is a moron". [19]

Commenting period closes and FCC votes

As a result of the surge in comments, the public commenting period was extended by two weeks to August 30. [20] A poll in mid-August found that 60% of Americans supported the rules while 17% opposed them. The ratio of support was consistent for voters from both the Democratic and Republican parties. [21] [22]

By the time the commenting period closed, the FCC had received 22 million comments on the issue, which was the highest number of comments for any FCC proposal to date. [23] However, this included over 1 million comments from a spambot, most of which were made in support of the proposal to repeal net neutrality. [24] [25] One estimate placed the total number of fake comments in excess of 7 million, using variations from seven email templates. The fake emails used duplicate and temporary email addresses, submitted under names such as "The Internet", and at one point, 500,000 comments were sent in the span of a single second. [25] [26] Because the legitimacy of so many of the comments was questioned, the FCC considered disregarding every comment. [27] Following this revelation, Pai refused to investigate the fake comments, so New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman set up his own webpage to help the public determine whether their names and information were used in any of the fake comments. [28] [29]

Despite the 22 million comments, the FCC announced plans to repeal net neutrality anyway in November 2017. [30] [31] After this announcement, several news media made references to the John Oliver segments about the issue. [32] [33] On December 14, 2017, the FCC voted in favor of repealing these policies. [34] [35]

Related Research Articles

A common carrier in common law countries is a person or company that transports goods or people for any person or company and is responsible for any possible loss of the goods during transport. A common carrier offers its services to the general public under license or authority provided by a regulatory body, which has usually been granted "ministerial authority" by the legislation that created it. The regulatory body may create, interpret, and enforce its regulations upon the common carrier with independence and finality as long as it acts within the bounds of the enabling legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet service provider</span> Organization that provides access to the Internet

An Internet service provider (ISP) is an organization that provides myriad services related to accessing, using, managing, or participating in the Internet. ISPs can be organized in various forms, such as commercial, community-owned, non-profit, or otherwise privately owned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Net neutrality</span> Principle that Internet service providers should treat all data equally

Network neutrality, often referred to as net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally, offering users and online content providers consistent transfer rates regardless of content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination address, or method of communication. Net neutrality was advocated for in the 1990s by the presidential administration of Bill Clinton in the United States. Clinton's signing of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, an amendment to the Communications Act of 1934, set a worldwide example for net neutrality laws and the regulation of ISPs.

In the United States, net neutrality—the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) should make no distinctions between different kinds of content on the Internet, and to not discriminate based on such distinctions—has been an issue of contention between end-users and ISPs since the 1990s. With net neutrality, ISPs may not intentionally block, slow down, or charge different rates for specific online content. Without net neutrality, ISPs may prioritize certain types of traffic, meter others, or potentially block specific types of content, while charging consumers different rates for that content.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in the United States</span>

The Internet in the United States grew out of the ARPANET, a network sponsored by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense during the 1960s. The Internet in the United States of America in turn provided the foundation for the worldwide Internet of today.

Tiered service structures allow users to select from a small set of tiers at progressively increasing price points to receive the product or products best suited to their needs. Such systems are frequently seen in the telecommunications field, specifically when it comes to wireless service, digital and cable television options, and broadband internet access.

Net bias is the counter-principle to net neutrality, which indicates differentiation or discrimination of price and the quality of content or applications on the Internet by ISPs. Similar terms include data discrimination, digital redlining, and network management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ajit Pai</span> American attorney and former FCC chairman (born 1973)

Ajit Varadaraj Pai is an American lawyer who served as chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from 2017 to 2021. He has been a partner at the private-equity firm Searchlight Capital since April 2021.

Fight for the Future is a nonprofit advocacy group in the area of digital rights founded in 2011. The group aims to promote causes related to copyright legislation, as well as online privacy and censorship through the use of the Internet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom Wheeler</span> American businessman and politician (born 1946)

Thomas Edgar Wheeler is an American businessman and former government official. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 31st Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission.

<i>Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC</i> (2014)

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 740 F.3d 623, was a case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacating portions of the FCC Open Internet Order of 2010, which the court determined could only be applied to common carriers and not to Internet service providers. The case was initiated by Verizon, which would have been subjected to the proposed FCC rules, though they had not yet gone into effect. The case has been regarded as an important precedent on whether the FCC can regulate network neutrality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zero-rating</span> Internet access under certain conditions

Zero-rating is the practice of providing Internet access without financial cost under certain conditions, such as by permitting access to only certain websites or by subsidizing the service with advertising or by exempting certain websites from the data allowance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Slowdown Day</span>

Internet Slowdown Day, part of the "Battle for the Net" initiative, was a series of protests against the repeal of net neutrality laws coordinated by websites and advocacy groups in the United States occurring on September 10, 2014. The official site explains: "On September 10th, sites across the web will display an alert with a symbolic 'loading' symbol and promote a call to action for users to push comments to the FCC, Congress, and the White House."

Net neutrality law refers to laws and regulations which enforce the principle of net neutrality.

<i>United States Telecom Association v. FCC</i> (2016)

United States Telecom Association v. FCC, 825 F. 3d 674, was a case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upholding an action by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the previous year in which broadband Internet was reclassified as a "telecommunications service" under the Communications Act of 1934, after which Internet service providers (ISPs) were required to follow common carrier regulations.

On 28 March 2017, the United States House of Representatives passed a resolution of disapproval to overturn the Broadband Consumer Privacy Proposal privacy law by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and was expected to be approved by United States' President Donald Trump. It was passed with 215 Republican votes against 205 votes of disapproval.

The Day of Action to Save Net Neutrality was an event on July 12, 2017, in which various organizations and individuals advocated for net neutrality in the United States. The event was a response to plans by Federal Communications Commission chairman Ajit Pai to end United States government policies which establish net neutrality. Over 50,000 websites, including many organizations, contributed activism after Fight for the Future, Demand Progress, and Free Press convened the event. The group called it "the largest online protest in history", a term which had previously referred to protests against Internet censorship in 2012.

"Net Neutrality" is the first segment devoted to net neutrality in the United States of the HBO news satire television series Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. It aired for 13 minutes on June 1, 2014, as part of the fifth episode of Last Week Tonight's first season.

Net neutrality is the principle that governments should mandate Internet service providers to treat all data on the Internet the same, and not discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication. For instance, under these principles, internet service providers are unable to intentionally block, slow down or charge money for specific websites and online content.

<i>Mozilla Corp. v. FCC</i> 2019 American court case

Mozilla Corp. v. FCC, 940 F. 3d 1 was a ruling the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2019 related to net neutrality in the United States. The case centered on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)'s decision in 2017 to rollback its prior 2015 Open Internet Order, reclassifying Internet services as an information service rather than as a common carrier, deregulating principles of net neutrality that had been put in place with the 2015 order. The proposed rollback had been publicly criticized during the open period of discussion, and following the FCC's issuing of the rollback, several states and Internet companies sued the FCC. These cases were consolidated into the one led by the Mozilla Corporation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Oliver, John (May 7, 2017). Net Neutrality II. HBO . Retrieved September 11, 2017– via YouTube.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Locker, Melissa (2017-05-08). "John Oliver Is Calling on You to Save Net Neutrality, Again". Time. Retrieved 2017-11-29.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Puzzanghera, Jim (May 8, 2017). "John Oliver begs Internet users to save net neutrality: 'We need all of you'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  4. ↑ Kang, Cecilia (2017-02-05). "Trump's F.C.C. Pick Quickly Targets Net Neutrality Rules". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  5. ↑ Pai, Ajit (April 26, 2017). "REMARKS OF FCC CHAIRMAN AJIT PAI AT THE NEWSEUM" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. p. 5. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
  6. ↑ Milian, Mark; Levy, Ari (2013-06-07). "Google Wallet Is Leaking Money" . Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
  7. ↑ Shepardson, David (2017-04-07). "U.S. net neutrality advocates blast Pai effort to reverse rules". Reuters. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
  8. 1 2 Gartenberg, Chaim (May 8, 2017). "John Oliver pleads with viewers to revive net neutrality fight". The Verge. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  9. ↑ Coldewey, Devin (2017-04-26). "Sen. Schatz on FCC: 'They have no idea how outraged people are about to be'". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
  10. 1 2 Izadi, Elahe (May 8, 2017). "John Oliver revives his signature fight — net neutrality — in an ingenious way". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Oliver, John (May 14, 2017). Net Neutrality Update. HBO . Retrieved September 11, 2017– via YouTube.
  12. 1 2 Reed, Ryan (May 15, 2017). "Watch John Oliver Defend 'Go FCC Yourself' Net Neutrality Movement". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
  13. ↑ Snider, Mike; Weise, Elizabeth (May 9, 2017). "John Oliver may have helped spur 150,000 comments to FCC on Net neutrality". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2017-09-22.
  14. ↑ Castillo, Michelle (2017-05-09). "John Oliver's plea for net neutrality may have provoked hackers to knock out FCC website". CNBC. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  15. ↑ Seppala, Timothy (2017-05-08). "Net-neutrality supporters cripple the FCC website again (update)". Engadget. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  16. ↑ "Dems Want Proof FCC Net Neutrality Page Was Actually Attacked". Nextgov.com. 2017-08-17. Retrieved 2017-12-13.
  17. ↑ Finley, Klint (August 18, 2017). "The FCC says it wants to be more transparent. Just don't ask tough questions". WIRED. Retrieved 2017-12-13.
  18. ↑ Weber, Peter; Colizza, Christina (2017-05-16). "FCC chairman Ajit Pai, stung by John Oliver-inspired criticism, reads mean tweets about himself". The Week. Retrieved 2017-12-14.
  19. 1 2 Jones, Rhett (2017-05-13). "FCC Chairman Is Laughing at Americans Who Don't Want to Kill the Open Internet". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2017-12-14.
  20. ↑ "FCC extends net neutrality public comment period until August 30th". Engadget. 2017-08-11. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  21. ↑ Neidig, Harper (2017-06-23). "Poll: 60 percent of voters support FCC's net neutrality rules". TheHill. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  22. ↑ Timm, Trevor (2017-08-30). "We've got less than 24 hours left to protect net neutrality". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  23. ↑ Kastrenakes, Jacob (2017-08-31). "The net neutrality comment period was a complete mess". The Verge. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  24. ↑ Sonnad, Nikhil (2017-11-28). "How a spambot made 1 million anti-net neutrality comments look genuine". Quartz. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  25. 1 2 Lapowsky, Issie (November 29, 2017). "Bogus Emails and Bee Movie: Digging Into the FCC's Broken Net Neutrality Comments". WIRED. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  26. ↑ "Public Comments to the Federal Communications Commission About Net Neutrality Contain Many Inaccuracies and Duplicates". Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2017-11-29. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  27. ↑ Finley, Klint (September 2, 2017). "FCC's Broken Comments System Could Help Doom Net Neutrality". WIRED. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  28. ↑ "New York Attorney General investigating false 'net neutrality' comment". U.S. 2017-11-21. Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  29. ↑ Rosenberg, Eli (2017-11-22). "Investigation of fake net neutrality foes has been stymied by the FCC, New York attorney general says". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2017-12-12.
  30. ↑ "FCC chief plans to ditch U.S. 'net neutrality' rules". Reuters. 2017-11-22. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
  31. ↑ Kang, Cecilia (2017-11-21). "F.C.C. Plans Net Neutrality Repeal in a Victory for Telecoms". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2017-11-22.
  32. ↑ Donnelly, Grace (November 21, 2017). "What Net Neutrality Means for You and Your Time Online". Fortune. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
  33. ↑ Johnson, Ted (2017-11-22). "What the Repeal of Net Neutrality Will Mean for Hollywood". Variety. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
  34. ↑ Fung, Brian (2017-12-14). "The FCC just voted to repeal its net neutrality rules, in a sweeping act of deregulation". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2017-12-14.
  35. ↑ "Net neutrality is dead". NBC News. Retrieved 2017-12-14.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.