This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations .(September 2021) |
In mathematics, particularly set theory, non-recursive ordinals are large countable ordinals greater than all the recursive ordinals, and therefore can not be expressed using recursive ordinal notations.
The smallest non-recursive ordinal is the Church Kleene ordinal, , named after Alonzo Church and S. C. Kleene; its order type is the set of all recursive ordinals. Since the successor of a recursive ordinal is recursive, the Church–Kleene ordinal is a limit ordinal. It is also the smallest ordinal that is not hyperarithmetical, and the smallest admissible ordinal after (an ordinal is called admissible if .) The -recursive subsets of are exactly the subsets of . [1]
The notation is in reference to , the first uncountable ordinal, which is the set of all countable ordinals, analogously to how the Church-Kleene ordinal is the set of all recursive ordinals. Some old sources use to denote the Church-Kleene ordinal. [2]
For a set , a set is -computable if it is computable from a Turing machine with an oracle state that queries . The relativized Church–Kleene ordinal is the supremum of the order types of -computable relations. The Friedman-Jensen-Sacks theorem states that for every countable admissible ordinal , there exists a set such that . [3]
, first defined by Stephen G. Simpson[ citation needed ] is an extension of the Church–Kleene ordinal. This is the smallest limit of admissible ordinals, yet this ordinal is not admissible. Alternatively, this is the smallest α such that is a model of -comprehension. [1]
The th admissible ordinal is sometimes denoted by . [4] [5]
Recursively "x" ordinals, where "x" typically represents a large cardinal property, are kinds of nonrecursive ordinals. [6] Rathjen has called these ordinals the "recursively large counterparts" of x, [7] however the use of "recursively large" here is not to be confused with the notion of an ordinal being recursive.
An ordinal is called recursively inaccessible if it is admissible and a limit of admissibles. Alternatively, is recursively inaccessible iff is the th admissible ordinal, [5] or iff , an extension of Kripke–Platek set theory stating that each set is contained in a model of Kripke–Platek set theory. Under the condition that ("every set is hereditarily countable"), is recursively inaccessible iff is a model of -comprehension. [8]
An ordinal is called recursively hyperinaccessible if it is recursively inaccessible and a limit of recursively inaccessibles, or where is the th recursively inaccessible. Like "hyper-inaccessible cardinal", different authors conflict on this terminology.
An ordinal is called recursively Mahlo if it is admissible and for any -recursive function there is an admissible such that (that is, is closed under ). [2] Mirroring the Mahloness hierarchy, is recursively -Mahlo for an ordinal if it is admissible and for any -recursive function there is an admissible ordinal such that is closed under , and is recursively -Mahlo for all . [6]
An ordinal is called recursively weakly compact if it is -reflecting, or equivalently, [2] 2-admissible. These ordinals have strong recursive Mahloness properties, if α is -reflecting then is recursively -Mahlo. [6]
An ordinal is stable if is a -elementary-substructure of , denoted . [9] These are some of the largest named nonrecursive ordinals appearing in a model-theoretic context, for instance greater than for any computably axiomatizable theory . [10] Proposition 0.7. There are various weakenings of stable ordinals: [1]
Even larger nonrecursive ordinals include: [1]
In set theory, a Woodin cardinal is a cardinal number such that for all functions , there exists a cardinal with and an elementary embedding from the Von Neumann universe into a transitive inner model with critical point and .
In mathematics, in set theory, the constructible universe, denoted by , is a particular class of sets that can be described entirely in terms of simpler sets. is the union of the constructible hierarchy. It was introduced by Kurt Gödel in his 1938 paper "The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis". In this paper, he proved that the constructible universe is an inner model of ZF set theory, and also that the axiom of choice and the generalized continuum hypothesis are true in the constructible universe. This shows that both propositions are consistent with the basic axioms of set theory, if ZF itself is consistent. Since many other theorems only hold in systems in which one or both of the propositions is true, their consistency is an important result.
In set theory, a limit ordinal is an ordinal number that is neither zero nor a successor ordinal. Alternatively, an ordinal λ is a limit ordinal if there is an ordinal less than λ, and whenever β is an ordinal less than λ, then there exists an ordinal γ such that β < γ < λ. Every ordinal number is either zero, or a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal.
In the mathematical field of set theory, ordinal arithmetic describes the three usual operations on ordinal numbers: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. Each can be defined in essentially two different ways: either by constructing an explicit well-ordered set that represents the result of the operation or by using transfinite recursion. Cantor normal form provides a standardized way of writing ordinals. In addition to these usual ordinal operations, there are also the "natural" arithmetic of ordinals and the nimber operations.
In mathematics, the epsilon numbers are a collection of transfinite numbers whose defining property is that they are fixed points of an exponential map. Consequently, they are not reachable from 0 via a finite series of applications of the chosen exponential map and of "weaker" operations like addition and multiplication. The original epsilon numbers were introduced by Georg Cantor in the context of ordinal arithmetic; they are the ordinal numbers ε that satisfy the equation
In the mathematical discipline of set theory, there are many ways of describing specific countable ordinals. The smallest ones can be usefully and non-circularly expressed in terms of their Cantor normal forms. Beyond that, many ordinals of relevance to proof theory still have computable ordinal notations. However, it is not possible to decide effectively whether a given putative ordinal notation is a notation or not ; various more-concrete ways of defining ordinals that definitely have notations are available.
In set theory, an ordinal number α is an admissible ordinal if Lα is an admissible set ; in other words, α is admissible when α is a limit ordinal and Lα ⊧ Σ0-collection. The term was coined by Richard Platek in 1966.
In mathematics, specifically computability and set theory, an ordinal is said to be computable or recursive if there is a computable well-ordering of a computable subset of the natural numbers having the order type .
In recursion theory, α recursion theory is a generalisation of recursion theory to subsets of admissible ordinals . An admissible set is closed under functions, where denotes a rank of Godel's constructible hierarchy. is an admissible ordinal if is a model of Kripke–Platek set theory. In what follows is considered to be fixed.
In proof theory, ordinal analysis assigns ordinals to mathematical theories as a measure of their strength. If theories have the same proof-theoretic ordinal they are often equiconsistent, and if one theory has a larger proof-theoretic ordinal than another it can often prove the consistency of the second theory.
In set theory and computability theory, Kleene's is a canonical subset of the natural numbers when regarded as ordinal notations. It contains ordinal notations for every computable ordinal, that is, ordinals below Church–Kleene ordinal, . Since is the first ordinal not representable in a computable system of ordinal notations the elements of can be regarded as the canonical ordinal notations.
In mathematics, the Veblen functions are a hierarchy of normal functions, introduced by Oswald Veblen in Veblen (1908). If φ0 is any normal function, then for any non-zero ordinal α, φα is the function enumerating the common fixed points of φβ for β<α. These functions are all normal.
In mathematical logic and set theory, an ordinal collapsing function is a technique for defining certain recursive large countable ordinals, whose principle is to give names to certain ordinals much larger than the one being defined, perhaps even large cardinals, and then "collapse" them down to a system of notations for the sought-after ordinal. For this reason, ordinal collapsing functions are described as an impredicative manner of naming ordinals.
In set theory, an ordinal number, or ordinal, is a generalization of ordinal numerals aimed to extend enumeration to infinite sets.
In mathematics, primitive recursive set functions or primitive recursive ordinal functions are analogs of primitive recursive functions, defined for sets or ordinals rather than natural numbers. They were introduced by Jensen & Karp (1971).
This is a glossary of terms and definitions related to the topic of set theory.
Buchholz's psi-functions are a hierarchy of single-argument ordinal functions introduced by German mathematician Wilfried Buchholz in 1986. These functions are a simplified version of the -functions, but nevertheless have the same strength as those. Later on this approach was extended by Jäger and Schütte.
In set theory and logic, Buchholz's ID hierarchy is a hierarchy of subsystems of first-order arithmetic. The systems/theories are referred to as "the formal theories of ν-times iterated inductive definitions". IDν extends PA by ν iterated least fixed points of monotone operators.
In mathematics, Rathjen's psi function is an ordinal collapsing function developed by Michael Rathjen. It collapses weakly Mahlo cardinals to generate large countable ordinals. A weakly Mahlo cardinal is a cardinal such that the set of regular cardinals below is closed under . Rathjen uses this to diagonalise over the weakly inaccessible hierarchy.
In model theory, a mathematical discipline, a β-model is a model which is correct about statements of the form "X is well-ordered". The term was introduced by Mostowski (1959) as a strengthening of the notion of ω-model. In contrast to the notation for set-theoretic properties named by ordinals, such as -indescribability, the letter β here is only denotational.