Opera Game

Last updated

Animation of the Opera Game Opera Game, 1858.gif
Animation of the Opera Game

The Opera Game was a chess game played in 1858 at an opera house in Paris. The American master Paul Morphy played against two amateurs: the German noble Karl II, Duke of Brunswick, and the French aristocrat Comte Isouard de Vauvenargues. It was played as a consultation game , with Duke Karl and Count Isouard jointly deciding each move for the black pieces, while Morphy controlled the white pieces by himself. The game was played in a box while an opera was performed on stage. [a] Morphy quickly checkmated his opponents following rapid development and sacrifice of material , including a queen sacrifice.

Contents

It is among the most famous of chess games. [4] The game is often used by chess instructors to teach the importance of piece development, the value of sacrifices in mating combinations , and other concepts.

The game

White: Paul Morphy   Black: Duke of Brunswick and Count Isouard   Opening: Philidor Defence ( ECO C41)
Paris, October/November [1] [3] 1858

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6

This is Philidor's Defence, named after François-André Danican Philidor, the leading chess master of the second half of the 18th century and a pioneer of modern chess strategy. He was also a noted opera composer. It is a solid opening, but slightly passive, and it ignores the important d4-square. Most modern players prefer 2...Nc6 or 2...Nf6, Petrov's Defence.

3. d4 Bg4?!

Though common at the time, 3...Bg4 is now considered inferior. [5] Bobby Fischer, in his analysis of the game, called it a weak move. Today 3...exd4 or 3...Nf6 are more commonly played. Philidor's original idea, 3...f5, is a risky alternative.

4. dxe5 Bxf3

If 4...dxe5, then 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Nxe5 and White wins a pawn and Black has lost the ability to castle, and White is threatening Nxf7+ winning the rook. If 4...Qe7, White remains a pawn up with 5.Qd5. Black, however, did have the option of 4...Nd7 5.exd6 Bxd6. In this position, Black is down a pawn but has some compensation in the form of better development.

5. Qxf3

Steinitz's recommendation 5.gxf3 dxe5 6.Qxd8+ Kxd8 7.f4 is also good, but Morphy prefers to keep the queens on. After Black recaptures the pawn on e5, White has a significant lead in development. A recapture with the queen is the most natural as it keeps a healthy kingside pawn structure .

5...dxe5 6. Bc4 Nf6?

This seemingly sound developing move runs into a surprising refutation . After White's next move, both f7 and b7 will be under attack. Better would have been to directly protect the f7-pawn with 6...Qd7 or 6...Qf6, making White's next move less potent.
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 7...Qe7

7. Qb3 Qe7 (diagram)

Black's only reasonable move. White was threatening mate in two, for example, 7...Nc6 8.Bxf7+ Ke7 (or Kd7) 9.Qe6#. 7...Qd7 loses the rook to 8.Qxb7 followed by 9.Qxa8 (since 8...Qc6? would lose the queen to 9.Bb5).
Although this move prevents immediate disaster, Black blocks the f8-bishop, impeding development and kingside castling.

8. Nc3

Morphy could have won a pawn by 8.Qxb7 Qb4+ 9.Qxb4 Bxb4+. White can also win more material with 8.Bxf7+ Qxf7 9.Qxb7, but Black has dangerous counterplay after 9...Bc5! and 10.Qxa8 0-0, or 10.Qc8+ Ke7 11.Qxh8 Bxf2+!. "But that would have been a butcher’s method, not an artist's." (Lasker). [1] [3] In keeping with his style, Morphy prefers rapid development and initiative over material.

8... c6

The best move, allowing Black to defend his pawn while strengthening the light squares , which have already been weakened by Black trading off his light-square bishop.

9. Bg5 b5?

Black attempts to drive away the bishop and gain some time , but this move allows Morphy a strong sacrifice to keep the initiative. This move loses but it is difficult to find anything better; for example 9...Na6 10.Bxf6 gxf6 11.Bxa6 bxa6 12.Qa4 Qb7 and Black's position is very weak.

10. Nxb5!

Morphy chooses not to retreat the bishop, which would allow Black to gain time for development.

10... cxb5

Black could have prolonged the game by playing 10...Qb4+, forcing the exchange of queens, but White wins comfortably after either 11.Nc3 or 11.Qxb4 Bxb4+ 12.c3!

11. Bxb5+

Not 11.Bd5? Qb4+, unpinning the knight and allowing the rook to evade capture.

11... Nbd7

11...Kd8 holds out longer, but 12.0-0-0+ still gives White a winning attack.
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 12...Rd8

12. 0-0-0 Rd8 (diagram)

The combination of the pins on the knights and the open file for White's rook will lead to Black's defeat.

13. Rxd7 Rxd7

Removing another defender.

14. Rd1

White's piece activity is in marked contrast to Black's passivity. Black's d7-rook cannot be saved, since it is pinned to the king by the bishop and attacked by the rook, and though the knight defends it, the knight is pinned to the queen.

14... Qe6

Qe6 is a futile attempt to unpin the knight (allowing it to defend the rook) and offer a queen trade, to take some pressure out of the white attack. Even if Morphy did not play his next crushing move, he could have always traded his bishop for the knight, followed by winning the rook.

15. Bxd7+ Nxd7

If 15...Qxd7, then 16.Qb8+ Ke7 17.Qxe5+ Kd8 18.Bxf6+ gxf6 19.Qxf6+ Kc8 20.Rxd7 Kxd7 21.Qxh8 and White is clearly winning. Moving the king leads to mate: 15...Ke7 16.Qb4+ Qd6 (16...Kd8 17.Qb8+ Ke7 18.Qe8#) 17.Qxd6+ Kd8 18.Qb8+ Ke7 19.Qe8# or 15...Kd8 16.Qb8+ Ke7 17.Qe8#.

16. Qb8+!

Morphy finishes with a queen sacrifice.

16... Nxb8 17. Rd8# 1–0

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Final position after 17.Rd8#. White mates with his two remaining pieces.

This mating pattern is sometimes called the "opera mate" in reference to this game. [6] Other than the king, all of White's remaining pieces play a role in the checkmate. Therefore, the position satisfies the definition of an economical mate. Economical mate is one of a few terms used by chess problem composers to describe the aesthetic properties of a checkmate position; related concepts include pure mate, model mate, and ideal mate. [7] [8] The final position nearly satisfies the criteria of a model mate, but fails for one reason: there are two reasons why the black king cannot be moved to the square f8. It is occupied by a bishop of the same color, and it is guarded by the white rook.

Notes

  1. It is unclear which opera was being performed while the chess game was played. Although some sources have indicated The Barber of Seville , [1] [2] chess historian Edward Winter indicated that other sources have pointed to Bellini's Norma , among other possibilities. Although Winter himself refrained from pronouncing on the matter, his correspondent Fabrizio Zavatarelli wrote that the game was likely played during a performance of either the Barber of Seville or Norma. Winter's analysis points to a day in late October or early November of 1858, but this is also uncertain. [3]

Related Research Articles

The Latvian Gambit is a chess opening characterised by the moves:

In the game of chess, perpetual check is a situation in which one player can play an unending series of checks, from which the defending player cannot escape. This typically arises when the player who is checking feels their position in the game is inferior, they cannot deliver checkmate, and wish to force a draw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immortal Game</span> Chess game played in London in 1851

The Immortal Game was a chess game played in 1851 between Adolf Anderssen and Lionel Kieseritzky during the London 1851 chess tournament, an event in which both players participated. It was itself a casual game, however, not played as part of the tournament. Anderssen won the game by sacrificing all of his major pieces while developing a mating attack with his remaining minor pieces. Despite losing the game, Kieseritzky was impressed with Anderssen's performance. Kieseritzky published the game shortly thereafer in La Régence, a French chess journal which he helped to edit. Ernst Falkbeer published an analysis of the game in 1855, describing it for the first time with its sobriquet "immortal".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smothered mate</span> Type of checkmate in chess

In chess, a smothered mate is a checkmate delivered by a knight in which the mated king is unable to move because it is completely surrounded by its own pieces, which a knight can jump over.

In chess, scholar's mate is the checkmate achieved by the following moves, or similar:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hastings 1895 chess tournament</span>

The Hastings 1895 chess tournament was a round-robin tournament of chess conducted at the Brassey Institute in Hastings, England from 5 August to 2 September 1895.

The Philidor Defence is a chess opening characterised by the moves:

In chess and other related games, a double check is a check delivered by two pieces simultaneously. In chess notation, it is almost always represented the same way as a single check ("+"), but is sometimes symbolized by "++". This article uses "++" for double check and "#" for checkmate.

Anderssen's Opening is a chess opening defined by the opening move:

Handicaps in chess are handicapping variants which enable a weaker player to have a chance of winning against a stronger one. There are a variety of such handicaps, such as material odds, extra moves, extra time on the chess clock, and special conditions. Various permutations of these, such as "pawn and two moves", are also possible.

In chess, a queen sacrifice is a move that sacrifices a queen, the most powerful piece, in return for some compensation, such as a tactical or positional advantage.

In chess, a sacrifice is a move that gives up a piece with the objective of gaining tactical or positional compensation in other forms. A sacrifice could also be a deliberate exchange of a chess piece of higher value for an opponent's piece of lower value.

In chess, a desperado is a piece that is either en prise or trapped, but captures an enemy piece before it is itself captured in order to compensate the loss a little, or is used as a sacrifice that will result in stalemate if it is captured. The former case can arise in a situation where both sides have hanging pieces, in which case these pieces are used to win material prior to being captured. A desperado in the latter case is usually a rook or a queen; such a piece is sometimes also called crazy or mad.

Leopold Adamovich Mitrofanov was a Russian chess composer, an International Judge of Chess Composition and an International Master of Chess Composition. He was born in Leningrad and, by profession, was a chemical engineer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1889</span> Chess match between Wilheilm Steinitz and Mikhail Chigorin

The second World Chess Championship was held in Havana, Cuba in 1889. Defending champion Wilhelm Steinitz beat challenger Mikhail Chigorin with a score of 10½ -6½.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1935</span>

A World Chess Championship was played between challenger Max Euwe and title-holder Alexander Alekhine in various cities and towns in the Netherlands from 3 October to 16 December 1935. Euwe was the winner by overcoming a three-point deficit as late as the ninth game.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1981</span>

The 1981 World Chess Championship was played between Anatoly Karpov and Viktor Korchnoi in Merano, Italy from October 1 to November 19, 1981. Karpov won with six wins against two, with 10 draws. The two players had already played against each other in the World Chess Championship match 1978 in the Philippines, when Karpov also won.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Checkmate pattern</span> Chess patterns

In chess, several checkmate patterns occur frequently enough to have acquired specific names in chess commentary. By definition, a checkmate pattern is a recognizable/particular/studied arrangements of pieces that delivers checkmate. The diagrams that follow show these checkmates with White checkmating Black.

In chess, an economical mate is a checkmate position such that all of the attacker's remaining knights, bishops, rooks and queens contribute to the mating attack. The attacker's king and pawns may also contribute to the mate, but their assistance is not required, nor does it disqualify the position from being an economical mate. Economical mates are of interest to chess problem composers for their aesthetic value. In real gameplay, their occurrence is incidental. Nevertheless, some notable games have concluded with an economical mate such as the Opera game, won by Paul Morphy.

The queen versus rook endgame is a chess endgame where one player has just a king and queen, and the other player has just a king and rook. As no pawns are on the board, it is a pawnless chess endgame. The side with the queen wins with best play, except for a few rare positions where the queen is immediately lost, or because a draw by stalemate or perpetual check can be forced. However, the win is difficult to achieve in practice, especially against precise defense.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Sergeant, Philip W. (1957). Morphy's Games of Chess. Dover. pp. 149–150. ISBN   0486203867.
  2. Whyld, Kenneth (1993). Learn Chess in a Weekend. Knopf/DK. p. 87. ISBN   9780679422297.
  3. 1 2 3 Winter, Edward. "Morphy v the Duke and Count". chesshistory.com.
  4. Marshall, Frank J. (1932). Comparative Chess. Philadelphia: David McKay company. p. 54. Retrieved 27 November 2021.
  5. von Bilguer, Paul Rudolf (1843). Handbuch des Schachspiels.
  6. Jonathan Tisdall, Improve Your Chess Now, Everyman Chess, 1997, pp 192, 194, 201-202, ISBN   1-85744-156-7
  7. Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1996) [first pub. 1992]. The Oxford Companion to Chess (second ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 179, 262, 326–327. ISBN   9780198661641.
  8. Horton, Byrne J. (1959). Dictionary of Modern Chess. Philosophical Library. pp. 56, 133–134, 164.

Further reading