Philidor Defence

Last updated
Philidor Defence
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Moves1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6
ECO C41
Named after François-André Danican Philidor
Parent King's Knight Opening
Synonym(s)Philidor's Defence

The Philidor Defence (or Philidor's Defence) is a chess opening characterised by the moves:

Contents

1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 d6

The opening is named after the famous 18th-century player François-André Danican Philidor, who advocated it as an alternative to the common 2...Nc6. His original idea was to challenge White's centre by the pawn thrust ...f7–f5.

Today, the Philidor is known as a solid but passive choice for Black, and is seldom seen in top-level play except as an alternative to the heavily analysed openings that can ensue after the normal 2...Nc6. It is considered a good opening for amateur players who seek a defensive strategy that is simpler and easier to understand than the complex positions that result from an opening such as the French Defence.

The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings code for Philidor Defence is C41.

Use

The Philidor occurred in one of the most famous games ever played, "The Opera Game" played in 1858 between the American chess master Paul Morphy and two strong amateurs, the German noble Duke Karl of Brunswick and the French aristocrat Count Isouard. The game continued 3.d4 Bg4, a deviation from modern standard lines. The Philidor Defence declined in popularity as positional play became more developed, and it had almost completely vanished from top-tier chess by World War I.

As of 2017, there are no top players who employ the Philidor with regularity, although Étienne Bacrot and Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu have occasionally experimented with it in classical play. Its popularity in master play has increased slightly, however, over the last 20 years. It has also become fairly popular in rapid, blitz, and bullet chess. [1]

Main line: 3.d4

With 3.d4, White immediately challenges Black in the centre . Black has several options.

3...exd4

The most common Black response is 3...exd4 which relieves the central tension , although it gives up the centre. After 4.Nxd4 Nf6 (4...d5 5.exd5, the Paulsen Attack, [2] continues 5...Qxd5 6.Qe2+ Be7 7.Nb5 Na6 8.N1c3+/= Paulsen [3] ) 5.Nc3, Black normally continues ...Be7 and ...0-0 (the Antoshin Variation) and achieves a strong defensive position. A sample line is: 5...Be7 6.Bc4 0-0 7.0-0 c5, and the position is equal .

In this line Black can also fianchetto his bishop to g7, although this is uncommon. Bent Larsen tried this in a few games, including a draw against Mikhail Tal in 1969. [4]

Instead of 4.Nxd4, White can play 4.Qxd4, as Paul Morphy favoured, intending 4...Nc6 5.Bb5 Bd7 6.Bxc6 Bxc6 7.Nc3 Nf6 8.Bg5 followed by 0-0-0. This line was played in many 19th-century games.

Hanham Variation

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 7...c6. Black's aim in the Hanham is a strongpoint defence of e5.

The other main option for Black is to maintain the central tension and adopt a setup with ...Nd7, ...Be7, and ...c6. This plan is named the Hanham Variation (after the American chess master James Moore Hanham) and was favoured by Aron Nimzowitsch. A common line is: 3...Nf6 4.Nc3 Nbd7 5.Bc4 Be7 6.0-0 (6.Ng5 is an interesting alternative: after 6...0-0 7.Bxf7+ Rxf7 8.Ne6 Qe8 9.Nxc7 Qd8 10.Nxa8, White is up material , but Black can develop a strong initiative after, for example, 10...b5 11.Nxb5 Qa5+) 6...0-0 7.a4 (to prevent ...b5) c6 (see diagram).

Grandmaster (GM) Larry Kaufman notes that the Hanham Variation aims to maintain Black's pawn on e5, analogously to closed lines of the Ruy Lopez, and opines that "it would be quite popular and on a par with the major defences to 1.e4, except for the annoying detail that Black can't actually reach the Hanham position by force." [5]

As an alternative to 4.Nc3 in response to Black's 3...Nf6, according to both Kaufman and GM Christian Bauer, White retains some advantage with: 4.dxe5! Nxe4 5.Qd5! (the Rellstab Variation; [6] 5.Nbd2 is the Sokolsky Variation [7] ) 5...Nc5 6.Bg5 Be7 7.exd6 Qxd6 8.Nc3. [8] [9]

Alternative move order

Black sometimes tries 3...Nd7 intending 4.Nc3 Ngf6, reaching the Hanham Variation. But then 4.Bc4! is awkward for Black to meet, since 4...Ngf6 loses to 5.dxe5 Nxe5 (5...dxe5?? 6.Ng5! wins) 6.Nxe5 dxe5 7.Bxf7+ Kxf7 8.Qxd8 Bb4+ 9.Qd2 Bxd2+ 10.Nxd2 winning a pawn, and 4...Be7 loses a pawn to 5.dxe5 Nxe5 (5...dxe5?? 6.Qd5! wins) 6.Nxe5 dxe5 7.Qh5! [8] [10] So 4...c6 is best for Black, but leaves White with the advantage of the bishop pair after 5.0-0 Be7 6.dxe5 dxe5 (6...Nxe5 loses a pawn to 7.Nxe5 dxe5 8.Qh5) 7.Ng5! Bxg5 8.Qh5! Qe7 and now 9.Bxg5 or 9.Qxg5. [11]

Black experiments to reach the Hanham Variation

In recent years, Black has experimented with other move orders in an attempt to reach the Hanham Variation while avoiding 3...Nf6 4.dxe5! and 3...Nd7 4.Bc4!

  • One such line is 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nbd7 intending 4.Nf3 e5. White can deviate, however, with 4.f4!? [12] [13] or even 4.g4!? [14]
  • Another try is 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e5 which transposes to the Hanham after 4.Nf3 Nbd7, but White can instead try to gain a small advantage with 4.dxe5 (Kaufman opines that 4.Nge2 is "also promising") 4...dxe5 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Bc4. [13] After 4.dxe5, Bauer concludes that "White stands a trifle better", but that "provided he plays accurately, Black doesn't have much to fear following 6.Bc4, by choosing any of the three valid replies, 6...Ke8, 6...Bb4, or 6...Be6. Then 7.Bxe6 fxe6 his position remains a hard nut to crack." [15]

Philidor Countergambit: 3...f5

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Philidor Countergambit: 3...f5!?

A more aggressive approach for Black after 3.d4 is 3...f5!? (diagram), Philidor's original intention and recommendation. In the 19th century, 3...f5 was also played by Paul Morphy. The move can lead to more open positions than the other lines, but is often considered dubious. [16] [17] Others maintain that 3...f5 is a valid idea. GM Tony Kosten considers the move respectable in his monograph on the opening. [18] The move was also played by David Bronstein and by Teimour Radjabov.

After 3...f5 White has several ways to proceed:

3...Bg4?!

Inferior is 3...Bg4?!, in light of 4.dxe5 Bxf3 (Black cannot recapture since 4...dxe5? 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Nxe5 wins a clean pawn; or, Black can gambit a pawn with 4...Nd7, the Albin Variation [34] ) 5.Qxf3 (or White can obtain an endgame advantage with 5.gxf3 dxe5 6.Qxd8+ Kxd8 7.f4+/− Maróczy [35] ) 5...dxe5 6.Bc4 giving White the advantage of the bishop pair in an open position as well as a large development advantage. Black cannot block the attack on the f7-pawn with the "natural" 6...Nf6? because White wins a pawn with 7.Qb3 (played in the famous "Opera Game", where Morphy as White refrained from taking the b7-pawn and retained a strong initiative after 7...Qe7 8.Nc3). Black does better with 6...Qf6 7.Qb3 Bc5 8.0-0 Bb6 9.a4 a5 10.Nc3 Ne7 11.Be3 Nd7 12.Rad1+/−, or 6...Qd7!? (Maróczy). [35]

Other 3rd moves for White

An alternative approach for White is 3.Bc4, delaying d2–d4, or forgoing it entirely, playing d2–d3 instead. The move 3.Bc4 is also White's route to a possible Légal Trap. Some continuations:

Against the alternative 3.c3, Black can try 3...f5 (3...Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 transposes to the Ponziani Opening) 4.exf5 Bxf5 5.Qb3 Nf6 6.Ng5 d5 7.Qxb7 Nbd7 8.Qc6 Bd6 with compensation and initiative . [38]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Latvian Gambit is a chess opening characterised by the moves:

The Vienna Game is an opening in chess that begins with the moves:

Alekhine's Defence is a chess opening that begins with the moves:

Petrov's Defence or the Petrov Defence is a chess opening characterised by the following moves:

The Bishop's Opening is a chess opening that begins with the moves:

The Scotch Game, or Scotch Opening, is a chess opening that begins with the moves:

The Frankenstein–Dracula Variation is a chess opening for Black, usually considered a variation of the Vienna Game, beginning with the moves:

The Dunst Opening is a chess opening in which White opens with the move:

The Hungarian Defense is a chess opening that begins with the moves:

The Elephant Gambit is a rarely played chess opening beginning with the moves:

The Englund Gambit is a rarely played chess opening that starts with the moves:

Tarrasch Trap refers to two different chess opening traps in the Ruy Lopez that are named for Siegbert Tarrasch. Unlike many variations that appear only in analysis, Tarrasch actually sprung his traps against masters in tournament games.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gyula Breyer</span> Hungarian chess player

Gyula "Julius" Breyer was a Hungarian chess player and 1912 Hungarian national champion.

A Steinitz Variation is any of several chess openings introduced and practiced, or adopted and advocated by Wilhelm Steinitz, the first officially recognized World Chess Champion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1890–1891</span> Chess match between Wilheilm Steinitz and Isidor Gunsberg

The third World Chess Championship was held in New York City from 9 December 1890 to 22 January 1891. Holder Wilhelm Steinitz narrowly defeated his Hungarian challenger, Isidor Gunsberg.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1935</span> Chess match between Alexander Alekhine and Max Euwe

The 1935 World Chess Championship was played between challenger Max Euwe and title-holder Alexander Alekhine. It was played in various cities and towns in the Netherlands from October 3 to December 16. Euwe was the winner by overcoming a three-point deficit as late as the ninth game.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Hanham</span> American chess player

Major James Moore Hanham was an American chess master, who played in many American and international chess tournaments between 1884 and 1889. He fought on the side of the North during the American Civil War, reaching the rank of Major. He is remembered today for several innovations in the opening, particularly the Hanham Variation of Philidor's Defense.

The Semi-Italian Opening is one of Black's responses to the Italian Game. It begins with the moves:

References

  1. "The Philidor". Chessgames.com .
  2. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 293. Paulsen Attack.
  3. Matanović 1997 (Vol C), p. 214, n. 19.
  4. "Mikhail Tal vs. Bent Larsen, Eersel NED (1969)". Chessgames.com .
  5. Kaufman 2004, p. 65.
  6. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 334. Rellstab Variation.
  7. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 378. Sokolsky Variation.
  8. 1 2 Kaufman 2004, p. 69.
  9. Bauer 2006, p. 32.
  10. Bauer 2006, p. 16.
  11. Bauer 2006, pp. 17–22.
  12. Bauer 2006, p. 179.
  13. 1 2 Kaufman 2004, p. 199.
  14. Bauer 2006, pp. 197–206.
  15. Bauer 2006, p. 174.
  16. Kaufman 2004, p. 22.
  17. Bauer 2006, pp. 22–32.
  18. Tony Kosten, Winning with the Philidor, Batsford Chess, 1992.
  19. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 460. Zukertort Variation.
  20. Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 21.
  21. Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 197, n. 24.
  22. Matanović 1997 (Vol C), p. 214, n. 6.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Korn 1982, p. 16, n. (p).
  24. Matanović 1997 (Vol C), p. 214, n. 3.
  25. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 185. Jaenisch Variation.
  26. 1 2 Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 14.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Matanović 1997 (Vol C), p. 214, n. 2.
  28. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 104. del Rio Attack.
  29. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 36. Berger Variation.
  30. 1 2 Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 10.
  31. Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 13.
  32. Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 9.
  33. Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 8.
  34. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 6. Albin Variation.
  35. 1 2 Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 7.
  36. Matanović 1997 (Vol C), p. 214, n. 1.
  37. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 234. López Countergambit.
  38. 1 2 3 Matanović 1981 (Vol C), p. 196, n. 2.
  39. François André Philidor, Analyse du jeu des Échecs, 1749.
  40. Hooper & Whyld 1996, p. 398. Steinitz Variation.
  41. Kasparov & Keene 1982, p. 294.

Bibliography

Further reading