Queen sacrifice

Last updated
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move. White can checkmate with a sham queen sacrifice as follows: 1.Qh7+ Kf8 2.Qh8+ Nxh8 3.Rxh8#

In chess, a queen sacrifice is a move that sacrifices a queen, the most powerful piece, in return for some compensation, such as a tactical or positional advantage.

Contents

Queen sacrifice: real versus sham

In his book The Art of Sacrifice in Chess, Rudolf Spielmann distinguishes between real and sham sacrifices. A sham sacrifice leads to a forced and immediate benefit for the sacrificer, usually in the form of a quick checkmate (or perpetual check or stalemate if seeking a draw), or the recouping of the sacrificed material after a forced line . Since any amount of material can be sacrificed as long as checkmate will be achieved, the queen is not above being sacrificed as part of a combination. [1]

Possible reasons for a sham queen sacrifice include:

Despite the terminology "sham", sham queen sacrifices are still often considered brilliancies and are often featured in famous games.

On the other hand, "real" sacrifices, according to Spielmann, are those where the compensation is not immediate, but more positional in nature. Because the queen is the most powerful piece (see chess piece relative value), positional sacrifices of the queen virtually always entail some partial material compensation (for example, sacrificing the queen for a rook and bishop).

An opportunity may arise where a player trades off their queen for other pieces which may together be of equal or greater value than the queen. Bent Larsen remarks that giving up the queen for a rook and two minor pieces is sometimes called a "queen sacrifice", but since a rook plus two minor pieces is more valuable than the queen, he says it should not be considered a sacrifice. [2]

Examples

Anderssen vs. Kieseritzky, 1851

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move

A celebrated game by Adolf Anderssen, the Immortal Game, featured a queen sacrifice as part of White's final mating combination. In the diagram position Anderssen gave up his queen with 22.Qf6+! to deflect Black's knight: the game continued 22...Nxf6 23.Be7#. This is an example of a sham queen sacrifice, as the sacrifice resulted in checkmate only one move later. White was able to mate since his minor pieces were clustered around the Black king, while Black's pieces were either undeveloped or trapped in the white camp and so unable to defend.

Anderssen vs. Dufresne, 1852

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move

In another celebrated game by Anderssen, the Evergreen Game, Anderssen once again sacrificed his queen for a mating combination, playing 21.Qxd7+!!. The game continued 21...Kxd7 22.Bf5+ Ke8 23.Bd7+ Kf8 24.Bxe7#. The game is another example of a sham queen sacrifice. Although Black is on the verge of checkmating White, his defences around his king are weak, so White was able to mate.

Spielmann vs. Moeller, 1920

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 13.h4

For an example of a "real" (positional) queen sacrifice, Rudolf Spielmann presented this game against Jorgen Moeller in Gothenburg 1920. In the first diagram Black threatens 9...Bg4 winning the queen, since it must not leave the f2-square unguarded under threat of checkmate. But Spielmann played 9.Nd2! allowing Black to win his queen, and after 9...Bg4 10.Nxe4 Bxf3 11.Nxf3 Qh6 12.Nf6+ Kd8 13.h4 the position in the second diagram was reached. White has only a knight and bishop for his queen and pawn, but his minor pieces are very active and the black queen is out of play. White won on move 28. [3]

Pilnik vs. Reshevsky, 1942

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move

A queen sacrifice can sometimes be used as a resource to draw. Here Hermann Pilnik (White) is defending an endgame three pawns down, but played Qf2!, when Samuel Reshevsky (Black) had nothing better than ...Qxf2 stalemate. [4]

Byrne vs. Fischer, 1956

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black to move
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 25...Nxd1

In The Game of the Century, Bobby Fischer uncorked a queen sacrifice to obtain a winning material advantage. In the first diagram, White's king is stuck in the center and Black has control of the open e-file. Fischer ignored the threat to his queen and played 17...Be6!!. The game continued 18.Bxb6 Bxc4+ 19.Kg1 Ne2+ 20.Kf1 Nxd4+ 21.Kg1 Ne2+ 22.Kf1 Nc3+ 23.Kg1 axb6 24.Qb4 Ra4 25.Qxb6 Nxd1 and Black has emerged with a large material and positional advantage. He can threaten back-rank mate to win even more material; his pieces are coordinated and White's rook is trapped in the corner. Black went on to win the game. [5]

Carlsen vs. Karjakin, 2016

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move. Carlsen played 50.Qh6+!!

In the World Chess Championship 2016, Magnus Carlsen defeated Sergey Karjakin in the final tie-break game with the queen sacrifice 50.Qh6+!!. Either way the queen is captured, there is mate on the next move: 50...Kxh6 51.Rh8#, or 50...gxh6 51.Rxf7#. [6]

Other notable games

Related Research Articles

Chess strategy is the aspect of chess play concerned with evaluation of chess positions and setting goals and long-term plans for future play. While evaluating a position strategically, a player must take into account such factors as the relative value of the pieces on the board, pawn structure, king safety, position of pieces, and control of key squares and groups of squares. Chess strategy is distinguished from chess tactics, which is the aspect of play concerned with the move-by-move setting up of threats and defenses. Some authors distinguish static strategic imbalances, which tend to persist for many moves, from dynamic imbalances, which are temporary. This distinction affects the immediacy with which a sought-after plan should take effect. Until players reach the skill level of "master", chess tactics tend to ultimately decide the outcomes of games more often than strategy. Many chess coaches thus emphasize the study of tactics as the most efficient way to improve one's results in serious chess play.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Game of the Century (chess)</span> 1956 chess game

The Game of the Century is a chess game that was won by the 13-year-old future world champion Bobby Fischer against Donald Byrne in the Rosenwald Memorial Tournament at the Marshall Chess Club in New York City on October 17, 1956. In Chess Review, Hans Kmoch dubbed it "The Game of the Century" and wrote: "The following game, a stunning masterpiece of combination play performed by a boy of 13 against a formidable opponent, matches the finest on record in the history of chess prodigies."

Stalemate is a situation in chess where the player whose turn it is to move is not in check and has no legal move. Stalemate results in a draw. During the endgame, stalemate is a resource that can enable the player with the inferior position to draw the game rather than lose. In more complex positions, stalemate is much rarer, usually taking the form of a swindle that succeeds only if the superior side is inattentive. Stalemate is also a common theme in endgame studies and other chess problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immortal Game</span> Chess game played by Adolf Anderssen and Lionel Kieseritzky

The Immortal Game was a chess game played in 1851 by Adolf Anderssen and Lionel Kieseritzky. It was played while the London 1851 chess tournament was in progress, an event in which both players participated. The Immortal Game was itself a casual game, however, not played as part of the tournament. Anderssen won the game by allowing a double rook sacrifice, a major loss of material, while also developing a mating attack with his remaining minor pieces. Despite losing the game, Kieseritzky was impressed with Anderssen's performance. Shortly after it was played, Kieseritzky published the game in La Régence, a French chess journal which he helped to edit. In 1855, Ernst Falkbeer published an analysis of the game, describing it for the first time with its sobriquet "immortal".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Checkmate</span> Winning game position in chess

Checkmate is any game position in chess and other chess-like games in which a player's king is in check and there is no legal move for the player. Checkmating the opponent wins the game.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boden's Mate</span> Checkmate pattern

Boden's Mate is a checkmating pattern in chess characterized by bishops on two criss-crossing diagonals, with possible flight squares for the king being occupied by friendly pieces or under attack by enemy pieces. Most often the checkmated king has castled queenside, and is mated on c8 or c1. Many variants on the mate are seen, for example a king on e8 checkmated by bishops on g6 and a3, and a king on f1 checkmated by bishops on h3 and b6. Often the mate is immediately preceded by a sacrifice that opens up the diagonal on which the bishop delivers checkmate, and the mate is often a pure mate.

In chess, a pure mate is a checkmate position such that the mated king is attacked exactly once, and prevented from moving to any of the adjacent squares in its field for exactly one reason per square. Each of the squares in the mated king's field is attacked or "guarded" by one—and only one—attacking unit, or else a square which is not attacked is occupied by a friendly unit, a unit of the same color as the mated king. Some authors allow that special situations involving double check or pins may also be considered as pure mate.

Anderssen's Opening is a chess opening defined by the opening move:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Promotion (chess)</span> Chess rule

In chess, promotion is the replacement of a pawn with a new piece when the pawn is moved to its last rank. The player replaces the pawn immediately with a queen, rook, bishop, or knight of the same color. The new piece does not have to be a previously captured piece. Promotion is mandatory when moving to the last rank; the pawn cannot remain as a pawn.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romantic chess</span> Style of chess

Romantic chess is a style of chess popular in the 18th century until its decline in the 1880s. This style of chess emphasizes quick, tactical maneuvers rather than long-term strategic planning. Romantic players consider winning to be secondary to winning with style. The Romantic era of play was followed by the Scientific, Hypermodern, and New Dynamism eras. Games during this era generally consisted of 1.e4 openings such as the King's Gambit and Giuoco Piano. Queen-side pawn openings were not popular and seldom played. The Romantic era is generally considered to have ended with the 1873 Vienna tournament where Wilhelm Steinitz popularized positional play and the closed game. This domination ushered in a new age of chess known as the "Modern", or Classical school, which would last until the 1930s when hypermodernism began to become popular.

In chess, a sacrifice is a move that gives up a piece with the objective of gaining tactical or positional compensation in other forms. A sacrifice could also be a deliberate exchange of a chess piece of higher value for an opponent's piece of lower value.

In chess, a fortress is an endgame drawing technique in which the side behind in material sets up a zone of protection that the opponent cannot penetrate. This might involve keeping the enemy king out of one's position, or a zone the enemy cannot force one out of. An elementary fortress is a theoretically drawn position with reduced material in which a passive defense will maintain the draw.

In chess, a desperado is a piece that is either en prise or trapped, but captures an enemy piece before it is itself captured in order to compensate the loss a little, or is used as a sacrifice that will result in stalemate if it is captured. The former case can arise in a situation where both sides have hanging pieces, in which case these pieces are used to win material prior to being captured. A desperado in the latter case is usually a rook or a queen; such a piece is sometimes also called crazy or mad.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swindle (chess)</span> Chess maneuver

In chess, a swindle is a ruse by which a player in a losing position tricks their opponent and thereby achieves a win or draw instead of the expected loss. It may also refer more generally to obtaining a win or draw from a clearly losing position. I. A. Horowitz and Fred Reinfeld distinguish among "traps", "pitfalls", and "swindles". In their terminology, a "trap" refers to a situation where players go wrong through their own efforts. In a "pitfall", the beneficiary of the pitfall plays an active role, creating a situation where a plausible move by the opponent will turn out badly. A "swindle" is a pitfall adopted by a player who has a clearly lost game. Horowitz and Reinfeld observe that swindles, "though ignored in virtually all chess books", "play an enormously important role in over-the-board chess, and decide the fate of countless games".

A pawnless chess endgame is a chess endgame in which only a few pieces remain, and no pawns. The basic checkmates are types of pawnless endgames. Endgames without pawns do not occur very often in practice except for the basic checkmates of king and queen versus king, king and rook versus king, and queen versus rook. Other cases that occur occasionally are (1) a rook and minor piece versus a rook and (2) a rook versus a minor piece, especially if the minor piece is a bishop.

In chess, a windmill is a tactic in which a piece repeatedly gains material while simultaneously creating an inescapable series of alternating direct and discovered checks. Because the opponent must attend to check every move, they are unable to prevent their pieces from being captured; thus, windmills can be extremely powerful. A windmill most commonly consists of a rook supported by a bishop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Checkmate pattern</span> Chess patterns

In chess, checkmate pattern is a recognizable/particular/studied arrangements of pieces that delivers checkmate. Several checkmate patterns occur frequently enough to have acquired specific names in chess commentary. The diagrams that follow show these checkmates with White checkmating Black.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of chess</span> Strategy board game

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to chess:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McDonnell–La Bourdonnais, match 4, game 16</span> Chess game played in London

The sixteenth chess game in the fourth match between Alexander McDonnell and Louis-Charles Mahé de La Bourdonnais played in London in 1834 is famous for demonstrating the power of a mobile central block of pawns. Its final position is one of the most famous in the history of the game.

References

  1. Rudolf Spielmann. The Art of Sacrifice in Chess.
  2. Bent Larsen. Lærebok i sjakk (in Norwegian).
  3. The game can be played through here The game was annotated by Spielmann in The Art of Sacrifice in Chess.
  4. "Carl Pilnick vs Samuel Reshevsky (1942)".
  5. Graham Burgess, John Nunn, and John Emms, The Mammoth book of the World's Greatest Chess Games, 2010
  6. Gaffney, Matt (1 December 2016). "50.Qh6+!!". Slate. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
  7. Edward Lasker vs G A Thomas, 1912
  8. Larsen vs Petrosian, 1966
  9. Felipe Castro, Luiz (2020-06-12). "O brasileiro que derrotou o campeão mundial de xadrez". Veja (in Brazilian Portuguese). Retrieved 2021-02-01.
  10. "Chess: Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura level in Lindores semis". The Guardian . 2020-05-29. Retrieved 2021-02-01.