Optomotor response

Last updated

In behavioral biology, the optomotor response is an innate, orienting behavior evoked by whole-field visual motion and is common to fish and insects during locomotion, such as swimming, walking and flying. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] The optomotor response has algorithmic properties such that the direction of the whole-field coherent motion dictates the direction of the behavioral output (e.g., leftward visual stimuli lead to turning left, and rightward visual stimuli lead to turning right). For instance, when zebrafish larvae are presented with a sinusoidal black and white grating pattern, the larvae will turn and swim in the direction of the perceived motion. [10]

Contents

Optomotor response in Drosophila melanogaster Optomotor Response.svg
Optomotor response in Drosophila melanogaster

Purpose

The optomotor response is essential for animals to correct unplanned course perturbations while navigating through their environment, such as current shifts around a swimming fish or air gusts around flying insects. The response is rapid and instinctual, with pure delay times of just 20-40ms for fruit flies in flight. [11]

The optomotor response is a central feature of a fly's flight control system: flies subject to unplanned apparent self-motion move to minimize the resultant optic flow (retinal movement patterns) and correct involuntary deviations from course. [1] [12] [13] [14] [15] In their natural environments, full-field optic flow patterns are elicited by distinct flight maneuvers; for instance, rotational optic flow is generated by body rotation during hovering, whereas expansion optic flow is elicited by body translation during straight flight. As such, flies respond to panoramic retinal patterns of visual expansion with robust steering maneuvers away from the expansion point (mimicking an approaching object) to avoid collisions and maintain upwind flight postures. [16]

Research Applications

The optomotor response is frequently used as a behavioral assay. In zebrafish, the optomotor response is frequently used as a metric of visual performance as it can be reliably evoked from 7 days post fertilization throughout adulthood. [4] [7] The contrast and wavelength (color) of the stripes can be manipulated to assess the specific properties of their visual system, such as testing the contribution of color to motion detection. [17] In flies, the optomotor response is used to understand the functional properties of neural circuits in the context of a specific behavior and examine the sensorimotor transformations underlying that behavior. To describe the physiological or behavioral properties of the optomotor response, researchers typically vary the spatial period of projected visual patterns and their velocity. The stimulus regime is often composed of periods of open-loop large-field rotation or expansion stimuli alternating with periods of closed-loop stripe fixation in which the animal has control of the position of a single vertical bar.

Characteristics

Both behavioral and physiological optomotor responses have distinct tuning curves for the temporal, spatial and contrast structure of moving images. [5] [18] [19] The magnitude and time-course of the optomotor response to optic flow depends on the temporal frequency of image motion, the spatial period of the display pattern, the periodic contrast and the spatial organization of the stimulus, e.g. rotation or expansion. Typically, low spatial-period patterns (i.e. narrow stripes) produce weaker steering responses than high spatial-period patterns (i.e. wide stripes). [16] The strength of the optomotor response to different temporal frequencies for are state-dependent: stationary flies have a peak temporal frequency optima around 1 Hz, [16] [20] while walking flies have a peak behavior response to optic flow between 1–4 Hz [5] [21] [20] [16] and the optimal frequency during flight is much faster, between 3–12 Hz [22] [20] [16]

Related Research Articles

Halteres Pair of small club-shaped insect organs

Halteres are a pair of small club-shaped organs on the body of two orders of flying insects that provide information about body rotations during flight. Examples of insects with halteres are houseflies, mosquitoes, gnats, strepsiptera, and craneflies.

<i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> Species of fruit fly

Drosophila melanogaster is a species of fly in the family Drosophilidae. The species is often referred to as the fruit fly or lesser fruit fly, or less commonly the "vinegar fly" or "pomace fly". Starting with Charles W. Woodworth's 1901 proposal of the use of this species as a model organism, D. melanogaster continues to be widely used for biological research in genetics, physiology, microbial pathogenesis, and life history evolution. As of 2017, five Nobel Prizes have been awarded to drosophilists for their work using the insect.

Hummingbird hawk-moth Species of moth

The hummingbird hawk-moth is a species of hawk moth found across temperate regions of Eurasia. The species is named for its similarity to hummingbirds, as they feed on the nectar of tube-shaped flowers using their long proboscis while hovering in the air; this resemblance is an example of convergent evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superior colliculus</span> Structure in the midbrain

In neuroanatomy, the superior colliculus is a structure lying on the roof of the mammalian midbrain. In non-mammalian vertebrates, the homologous structure is known as the optic tectum, or optic lobe. The adjective form tectal is commonly used for both structures.

Neural adaptation or sensory adaptation is a gradual decrease over time in the responsiveness of the sensory system to a constant stimulus. It is usually experienced as a change in the stimulus. For example, if a hand is rested on a table, the table's surface is immediately felt against the skin. Subsequently, however, the sensation of the table surface against the skin gradually diminishes until it is virtually unnoticeable. The sensory neurons that initially respond are no longer stimulated to respond; this is an example of neural adaptation.

Cursorial

A cursorial organism is one that is adapted specifically to run. An animal can be considered cursorial if it has the ability to run fast or if it can keep a constant speed for a long distance. "Cursorial" is often used to categorize a certain locomotor mode, which is helpful for biologists who examine behaviors of different animals and the way they move in their environment. Cursorial adaptations can be identified by morphological characteristics, physiological characteristics, maximum speed, and how often running is used in life. There is much debate over how to define a cursorial animal specifically. The most accepted definitions include that a cursorial organism could be considered adapted to long-distance running at high speeds or has the ability to accelerate quickly over short distances. Among vertebrates, animals under 1 kg of mass are rarely considered cursorial, and cursorial behaviors and morphology is thought to only occur at relatively large body masses in mammals. There are a few mammals that have been termed "micro-cursors" that are less than 1 kg in mass and have the ability to run faster than other small animals of similar sizes.

Escape response, escape reaction, or escape behavior is a mechanism by which animals avoid potential predation. It consists of a rapid sequence of movements, or lack of movement, that position the animal in such a way that allows it to hide, freeze, or flee from the supposed predator. Often, an animal's escape response is representative of an instinctual defensive mechanism, though there is evidence that these escape responses may be learned or influenced by experience.

Campaniform sensilla Class of mechanoreceptors found in insects

Campaniform sensilla are a class of mechanoreceptors found in insects, which respond to local stress and strain within the animal's cuticle. Campaniform sensilla function as proprioceptors that detect mechanical load as resistance to muscle contraction, similar to mammalian Golgi tendon organs. Sensory feedback from campaniform sensilla is integrated in the control of posture and locomotion.

Motion camouflage Camouflage by choosing path to avoid seeming to move against background

Motion camouflage is camouflage which provides a degree of concealment for a moving object, given that motion makes objects easy to detect however well their coloration matches their background or breaks up their outlines. The principal form of motion camouflage, and the type generally meant by the term, involves an attacker's mimicking the optic flow of the background as seen by its target. This enables the attacker to approach the target while appearing to remain stationary from the target's perspective, unlike in classical pursuit. The attacker chooses its flight path so as to remain on the line between the target and some landmark point. The target therefore does not see the attacker move from the landmark point. The only visible evidence that the attacker is moving is its looming, the change in size as the attacker approaches. Motion is also used in a variety of other camouflage strategies, including swaying to mimic plant movements in the wind or ocean currents.

Bird vision Senses for birds

Vision is the most important sense for birds, since good eyesight is essential for safe flight. Birds have a number of adaptations which give visual acuity superior to that of other vertebrate groups; a pigeon has been described as "two eyes with wings". Birds are theropod dinosaurs, and the avian eye resembles that of other reptiles, with ciliary muscles that can change the shape of the lens rapidly and to a greater extent than in the mammals. Birds have the largest eyes relative to their size in the animal kingdom, and movement is consequently limited within the eye's bony socket. In addition to the two eyelids usually found in vertebrates, bird's eyes are protected by a third transparent movable membrane. The eye's internal anatomy is similar to that of other vertebrates, but has a structure, the pecten oculi, unique to birds.

The H1 neuron is located in the visual cortex of true flies of the order Diptera and mediates motor responses to visual stimuli. H1 is sensitive to horizontal motion in the visual field and enables the fly to rapidly and accurately respond to optic flow with motor corrections to stabilize flight. It is particularly responsive to horizontal forward motion associated with movement of the fly's own body during flight. Damage to H1 impairs the fly's ability to counteract disturbances during flight, suggesting that it is a necessary component of the optomotor response. H1 is an ideal system for studying the neural basis of information processing due to its highly selective and predictable responses to stimuli. Since the initial anatomical and physiological characterizations of H1 in 1976, study of the neuron has greatly benefited the understanding of neural coding in a wide range of organisms, especially the relationship between the neural code and behavior.

Models of neural computation are attempts to elucidate, in an abstract and mathematical fashion, the core principles that underlie information processing in biological nervous systems, or functional components thereof. This article aims to provide an overview of the most definitive models of neuro-biological computation as well as the tools commonly used to construct and analyze them.

Ralph Mitchell Siegel, a researcher who studied the neurological underpinnings of vision, was a professor of neuroscience at Rutgers University, Newark, in the Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience. He died September 2, 2011 at his home following a long illness.

Fish are exposed to large oxygen fluctuations in their aquatic environment since the inherent properties of water can result in marked spatial and temporal differences in the concentration of oxygen. Fish respond to hypoxia with varied behavioral, physiological, and cellular responses in order to maintain homeostasis and organism function in an oxygen-depleted environment. The biggest challenge fish face when exposed to low oxygen conditions is maintaining metabolic energy balance, as 95% of the oxygen consumed by fish is used for ATP production releasing the chemical energy of nutrients through the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Therefore, hypoxia survival requires a coordinated response to secure more oxygen from the depleted environment and counteract the metabolic consequences of decreased ATP production at the mitochondria. This article is a review of the effects of hypoxia on all aspects of fish, ranging from behavior down to genes.

Time-place learning (TPL) is the process by which animals link events with both the location and time of occurrence. It enables them to decide which locations to visit or to avoid based on previous experience and knowledge of the current time of day. TPL presumably allows animals to maximize their chances of finding resources and avoiding predators, increasing survival chances. TPL requires spatial memory and a sense of time. The latter may be based on external time-cues (Zeitgebers), or internally generated circadian rhythms. TPL may fundamentally underlie episodic memory.

This article is about structure from motion in psychophysics.

Insect cognition

Insect cognition describes the mental capacities and study of those capacities in insects. The field developed from comparative psychology where early studies focused more on animal behavior. Researchers have examined insect cognition in bees, fruit flies, and wasps. 

James "Jim" William Truman is an American chronobiologist known for his seminal research on circadian rhythms in silkmoth (Saturniidae) eclosion, particularly the restoration of rhythm and phase following brain transplantation. He is a professor emeritus at the University of Washington and a former senior fellow at Howard Hughes Medical Institution Janelia Research Campus.

Hair plate

Hair-plates are a type of proprioceptor found in the folds of insect joints. They consist of a cluster of hairs, in which each hair is innervated by a single mechanosensory neuron. Functionally, hair-plates operate as "limit-detectors" by signaling the extreme ranges of motion of a joint.

The study of animal locomotion is a branch of biology that investigates and quantifies how animals move.

References

  1. 1 2 Götz, Karl Georg (June 1968). "Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion". Kybernetik. 4 (6): 199–208. doi:10.1007/BF00272517. PMID   5731498. S2CID   24070951.
  2. Borst, A; Bahde, S (1993). "Comparison between the movement detection systems underlying the optomotor and the landing response in the housefly". Biol. Cybern. 56 (4): 217–224. doi:10.1007/BF00365216. S2CID   44797496.
  3. Reichardt, W (1966). "Detection of single quanta by the compound eye of the fly Mollusca". Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Functional Organization of the Compound Eye: 267–289.
  4. 1 2 Hu, M; Easter, SS (1999). "Retinal neurogenesis: the formation of the initial central patch of postmitotic cells". Dev Biol. 207 (2): 309–21. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9031 . PMID   10068465.
  5. 1 2 3 Buchner, E (1984). "Behavioral analysis of spatial vision in insects". Photoreception and Vision in Invertebrates: 522–561.
  6. Wehrhahn, C (1985). Visual guidance of flies during flight. Oxford: Pergamon Press. pp. 673–684.
  7. 1 2 Schmitt, EA; Dowling, JE (1994). "Early eye morphogenesis in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio". J Comp Neurol. 344 (4): 532–42. doi:10.1002/cne.903440404. PMID   7929890. S2CID   29909206.
  8. Arnold, G. P. (1974). "Rheotropism in fishes". Biological Reviews. 49 (4): 515–576. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1974.tb01173.x. PMID   4616732. S2CID   30755969.
  9. Lehrer, M. (1993). "Spatial vision in the honeybee: the use of different cues in different tasks". Vision Research. 34 (18): 2363–2385. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)90282-8. PMID   7975277. S2CID   40688546.
  10. Fleisch, VC; Neuhauss, SCF (2006). "Visual Behavior in Zebrafish". Zebrafish. 3 (2): 191–201. doi:10.1089/zeb.2006.3.191. PMID   18248260.
  11. Theobald, JC; Ringach, DL; Frye, MA (2010). "Dynamics of optomotor responses in drosophila to perturbations in optic flow". Journal of Experimental Biology. 213 (8): 1366–1375. doi:10.1242/jeb.037945. PMC   2846167 . PMID   20348349.
  12. Reichardt, W; Poggio, T (1976). "Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysis". Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 9 (3): 211–275. doi:10.1017/S0033583500002523. PMID   790441. S2CID   45258548.
  13. Collett, TS (1980). "Angular tracking and the optomotor response an analysis of visual reflex interaction in a hoverfly". Jour of Comp Physiol. 140 (2): 145–158. doi:10.1007/BF00606306. S2CID   44050294.
  14. Gotz, Karl G.; Wehrhahn, Christian (November 1984). "Optomotor control of the force of flight in Drosophila and Musca". Biological Cybernetics. 51 (2): 129–134. doi:10.1007/BF00357926. ISSN   1432-0770. S2CID   33981643.
  15. Lehmann, Fritz-Olaf; Mronz, Markus (1 July 2008). "The free-flight response of Drosophila to motion of the visual environment". Journal of Experimental Biology. 211 (13): 2026–2045. doi: 10.1242/jeb.008268 . ISSN   0022-0949. PMID   18552291.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Frye, Mark A.; Condro, Michael; Chow, Dawnis M.; Duistermars, Brian J. (15 September 2007). "The spatial, temporal and contrast properties of expansion and rotation flight optomotor responses in Drosophila". Journal of Experimental Biology. 210 (18): 3218–3227. doi: 10.1242/jeb.007807 . ISSN   0022-0949. PMID   17766299.
  17. Krauss, Andrea; Neumeyer, Christa (1 May 2003). "Wavelength dependence of the optomotor response in zebrafish (Danio rerio)". Vision Research. 43 (11): 1275–1284. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00090-7 . ISSN   0042-6989. PMID   12726833.
  18. Götz, Karl Georg (1 September 1975). "The optomotor equilibrium of theDrosophila navigation system". Journal of Comparative Physiology. 99 (3): 187–210. doi:10.1007/BF00613835. ISSN   1432-1351. S2CID   23177851.
  19. Warrant, E. J.; Bidweii, N. J.; O'Carroll, D. C. (July 1996). "Insect motion detectors matched to visual ecology". Nature. 382 (6586): 63–66. Bibcode:1996Natur.382...63O. doi:10.1038/382063a0. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   21638927. S2CID   4303068.
  20. 1 2 3 Chiappe, M. Eugenia; Seelig, Johannes D.; Reiser, Michael B.; Jayaraman, Vivek (24 August 2010). "Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision". Current Biology. 20 (16): 1470–1475. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.072. ISSN   0960-9822. PMC   4435946 . PMID   20655222.
  21. Götz, Karl Georg; Wenking, Hans (1 September 1973). "Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitflyDrosophila". Journal of Comparative Physiology. 85 (3): 235–266. doi:10.1007/BF00694232. ISSN   1432-1351. S2CID   12552378.
  22. Dickinson, Michael H.; Straw, Andrew D.; Rohrseitz, Nicola; Fry, Steven N. (15 April 2009). "Visual control of flight speed in Drosophila melanogaster". Journal of Experimental Biology. 212 (8): 1120–1130. doi: 10.1242/jeb.020768 . ISSN   0022-0949. PMID   19329746.