Ordinal numerical competence

Last updated

In human developmental psychology or non-human primate experiments, ordinal numerical competence or ordinal numerical knowledge is the ability to count objects in order and to understand the greater than and less than relationships between numbers. It has been shown that children as young as two can make some ordinal numerical decisions. There are studies indicating that some non-human primates, like chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys have some ordinal numerical competence.

Contents

In humans

Prenatal

There is no evidence to support prenatal ordinal numerical competence. Teratogens such as stress [1] can alter prenatal neural development, leading to diminished competence after birth. Physical effects of teratogens are common, but endocrine effects are harder to measure. These are the factors that influence neural development and by extension the development of ordinal numerical competence. Premature birth is also a risk factor for developmental problems including reduced brain activity. [2] Brain activity is measured from outside the body with electroencephalography.

Infants

There have been a vast number of studies done on infants and their knowledge of numbers. Most research confirms that infants do in fact have a profound innate sense of number, both in abstract and finite ways. Infants as young as 49 hours can accurately match up images with a certain number of objects, with sounds that contain the same number ("ra, ra, ra, ra") as the number of objects in the image. [3] Because the sounds are abstract, or visibly there, we can see that infants as young as 49 hours have some abstract numerical sense as well as concrete numerical sense shown by their recognition of the image with the corresponding number of objects. [3] Similarly, infants around the age of 7 months can also match up images of random objects. [4]

Although children as young as 49 hours can match up the number of sounds with the number of objects, they can only do so at certain ratios. [3] When 1:3 ratios were used (4 sounds and 4 objects or 12 objects), around 90% of the infants paid more attention to the corresponding image thus showing their recognition. However, when 1:2 ratios were used, only 68% of infants showed recognition of the correct corresponding image. [3] This tells us that although infants can recognize corresponding numbers of sounds and objects, the two images of objects must be visibly different - one must have a much larger number of objects, or a much smaller number of objects. [3]

Although there has to be a stark difference in the choices for infants to recognize the correct matching set of numbers (1:3 vs 1:2), this seems to prove that infants have an innate numerical sense, but it may not be the same numerical sense as older children. Around the age of three and a half years children lose some of their numerical sense. Whereas children younger than three can recognize that four pebbles spread out in a line is less than six pebbles scrunched together in a line, children around the age of three and a half mysteriously lose this ability. [5] Researchers believe that this is because children around this age begin to rely heavily on the physical properties of the world and objects within it, [5] such that longer equals more. Although the ability to recognize that six pebbles closely lined up together is more than four pebbles spread out farther from one another goes away around that age, it comes back around four years of age when children begin to count. [5]

Adults

Both behavioral research and brain-imaging research show distinct differences in the way "exact" arithmetic and "approximate" arithmetic are processed. Exact arithmetic is information that is precise and follows specific rules and patterns such as multiplication tables or geometric formulas, and approximate arithmetic is a general comparison between numbers such as the comparisons of greater than or less than. Research shows that exact arithmetic is language-based and processed in the left inferior frontal lobe. Approximate arithmetic is processed much differently in a different part of the brain. Approximate arithmetic is processed in the bilateral areas of the parietal lobes. This part of the brain processes visual information to understand how objects are spatially related to each other, for example, understanding that 10 of something is more than two of something. This difference in brain function can create a difference in how we experience certain types of arithmetic. Approximate arithmetic can be experienced as intuitive and exact arithmetic experienced as recalled knowledge. [6]

The conclusions from behavioral research and brain-imaging research are supported by observations of patients with injuries to certain parts of the brain. People with left parietal injuries can lose the ability to understand quantities of things, but keep at least some ability to do exact arithmetic, such as multiplication. [7] [8] [9] [10] People with left-hemisphere brain damage can lose the ability to do exact arithmetic, but keep a sense of quantity, including the ability to compare larger and smaller numbers. [7] This information confirms that distinct parts of the brain are used to know and use approximate and exact arithmetic. [6]

Various researchers suggest that the processing of approximate arithmetic could be related to the numerical abilities that have been independently established in various animal species [11] [12] [13] [14] and in preverbal human infants. [15] This may mean that approximate arithmetic is an adaptive train that humans developed through evolution. [16] The combination of this potential evolutionary trait and language-based exact arithmetic may be the reason that humans are able to do advanced mathematics like physics. [6]

In non-humans

Animals share a non-verbal system for representing number as analogue magnitudes. [17] Animals have been known to base their rationality on Weber’s Law. This historically important psychological law quantifies the perception of change in a given stimulus. The law states that the change in a stimulus that will be just noticeable is a constant ratio of the original stimulus. Weber’s Law describes discriminability between values based on perceptual continua such as line length, brightness, and weight. [18]

Rhesus monkeys

Studies of rhesus monkeys' foraging decisions indicate that animals spontaneously, and without training, exhibit rudimentary numerical abilities. Most animals can determine numbers in the values 1 through 9, but recent experiments have discovered that rhesus monkeys can quantify values from 1 to 30. Monkeys' numerical discrimination capacity is imposed by the ratio of the values compared, rather than absolute set size. [12] This computation process focuses around Weber’s Law and the expectation violation procedure. This suggests that rhesus monkeys have access to a spontaneous system of representation, which encodes the numerical differences between sets of one, two and three objects, and contrasts three objects from either four or five objects as well. These representations indicate the semantics of an encoded natural language. These encoded natural languages are also seen in experiments with many animals including pigeons and rats.

Rats and pigeons

Experiments have shown that rats are able to be trained to press one lever after hearing two bursts of white noise, then press another lever after four bursts of white noise. The interburst interval is varied between trials so the discrimination is based on number of bursts and not time duration of the sequence. Studies show that rats as well as pigeons learned to make different responses to both short and long durations of signals. During testing, rats exhibited a pattern called break-run-break; when it came to responding after a stint of little to no response, they would suddenly respond in high frequency, then return to little or no response activity. [19] Data suggests that rats and pigeons are able to process time and number information at the same time. The Mode Control Model shows that these animals can process number and time information by transmission pulses to accumulators controlled by switches that operate different modes. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Numeracy</span> Ability to apply numerical concepts

Numeracy is the ability to understand, reason with, and to apply simple numerical concepts. The charity National Numeracy states: "Numeracy means understanding how mathematics is used in the real world and being able to apply it to make the best possible decisions...It’s as much about thinking and reasoning as about 'doing sums'". Basic numeracy skills consist of comprehending fundamental arithmetical operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. For example, if one can understand simple mathematical equations such as 2 + 2 = 4, then one would be considered to possess at least basic numeric knowledge. Substantial aspects of numeracy also include number sense, operation sense, computation, measurement, geometry, probability and statistics. A numerically literate person can manage and respond to the mathematical demands of life.

Dyscalculia is a disability resulting in difficulty learning or comprehending arithmetic, such as difficulty in understanding numbers, learning how to manipulate numbers, performing mathematical calculations, and learning facts in mathematics. It is sometimes colloquially referred to as "math dyslexia", though this analogy is misleading as they are distinct syndromes.

In psychology, number sense is the term used for the hypothesis that some animals, particularly humans, have a biologically determined ability that allows them to represent and manipulate large numerical quantities. The term was popularized by Stanislas Dehaene in his 1997 book "The Number Sense".

Developmental cognitive neuroscience is an interdisciplinary scientific field devoted to understanding psychological processes and their neurological bases in the developing organism. It examines how the mind changes as children grow up, interrelations between that and how the brain is changing, and environmental and biological influences on the developing mind and brain.

Numerical cognition is a subdiscipline of cognitive science that studies the cognitive, developmental and neural bases of numbers and mathematics. As with many cognitive science endeavors, this is a highly interdisciplinary topic, and includes researchers in cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, neuroscience and cognitive linguistics. This discipline, although it may interact with questions in the philosophy of mathematics, is primarily concerned with empirical questions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stanislas Dehaene</span> French cognitive neuroscientist

Stanislas Dehaene is a French author and cognitive neuroscientist whose research centers on a number of topics, including numerical cognition, the neural basis of reading and the neural correlates of consciousness. As of 2017, he is a professor at the Collège de France and, since 1989, the director of INSERM Unit 562, "Cognitive Neuroimaging".

Preferential looking is an experimental method in developmental psychology used to gain insight into the young mind/brain. The method as used today was developed by the developmental psychologist Robert L. Fantz in the 1960s.

Educational neuroscience is an emerging scientific field that brings together researchers in cognitive neuroscience, developmental cognitive neuroscience, educational psychology, educational technology, education theory and other related disciplines to explore the interactions between biological processes and education. Researchers in educational neuroscience investigate the neural mechanisms of reading, numerical cognition, attention and their attendant difficulties including dyslexia, dyscalculia and ADHD as they relate to education. Researchers in this area may link basic findings in cognitive neuroscience with educational technology to help in curriculum implementation for mathematics education and reading education. The aim of educational neuroscience is to generate basic and applied research that will provide a new transdisciplinary account of learning and teaching, which is capable of informing education. A major goal of educational neuroscience is to bridge the gap between the two fields through a direct dialogue between researchers and educators, avoiding the "middlemen of the brain-based learning industry". These middlemen have a vested commercial interest in the selling of "neuromyths" and their supposed remedies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Numerosity adaptation effect</span> Phenomenon in numerical cognition

The numerosity adaptation effect is a perceptual phenomenon in numerical cognition which demonstrates non-symbolic numerical intuition and exemplifies how numerical percepts can impose themselves upon the human brain automatically. This effect was first described in 2008.

The approximate number system (ANS) is a cognitive system that supports the estimation of the magnitude of a group without relying on language or symbols. The ANS is credited with the non-symbolic representation of all numbers greater than four, with lesser values being carried out by the parallel individuation system, or object tracking system. Beginning in early infancy, the ANS allows an individual to detect differences in magnitude between groups. The precision of the ANS improves throughout childhood development and reaches a final adult level of approximately 15% accuracy, meaning an adult could distinguish 100 items versus 115 items without counting. The ANS plays a crucial role in development of other numerical abilities, such as the concept of exact number and simple arithmetic. The precision level of a child's ANS has been shown to predict subsequent mathematical achievement in school. The ANS has been linked to the intraparietal sulcus of the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pierre Pica</span>

Pierre Pica, is a research associate at the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris. Associated Professor with the Brain Institute of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, he is a specialist in theoretical linguistics and more specifically of comparative syntax.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karen Wynn</span> Canadian psychologist

Karen Wynn is an artist and a Canadian and American Yale University Professor Emerita of psychology and cognitive science. She was born in Austin, Texas, and grew up on the Canadian prairies in Regina, Saskatchewan. Her research explores the cognitive capacities of infants and young children. She directed for over 3 decades the Infant Cognition Laboratory, first in the Psychology Department at the University of Arizona, and then in the Psychology Department at Yale University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neuronal recycling hypothesis</span>

The neuronal recycling hypothesis was proposed by Stanislas Dehaene in the field of cognitive neuroscience in an attempt to explain the underlying neural processes which allow humans to acquire recently invented cognitive capacities. This hypothesis was formulated in response to the 'reading paradox', which states that these cognitive processes are cultural inventions too modern to be the products of evolution. The paradox lies within the fact that cross-cultural evidence suggests specific brain areas are associated with these functions. The concept of neuronal recycling resolves this paradox by suggesting that novel functions actually utilize and 'recycle' existing brain circuitry. Once these cognitive functions find a cortical area devoted to a similar purpose, they can invade the existing circuit. Through plasticity, the cortex can adapt in order to accommodate for these novel functions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert S. Terrace</span> Professor of Psychology (b. 1936)

Herbert S. Terrace is a professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at Columbia University. His work covers a broad set of research interests that include behaviorism, animal cognition, ape language and the evolution of language. He is the author of Nim: A Chimpanzee Who Learned Sign Language (1979) and Why Chimpanzees Can't Learn Language and Only Humans Can (2019). Terrace has made important contributions to comparative psychology, many of which have important implications for human psychology. These include discrimination learning, ape language, the evolution of language, and animal cognition.

Number sense in animals is the ability of creatures to represent and discriminate quantities of relative sizes by number sense. It has been observed in various species, from fish to primates. Animals are believed to have an approximate number system, the same system for number representation demonstrated by humans, which is more precise for smaller quantities and less so for larger values. An exact representation of numbers higher than three has not been attested in wild animals, but can be demonstrated after a period of training in captive animals.

The parallel individuation system, also called object tracking system is a non-symbolic cognitive system that supports the representation of numerical values from zero to three or four. It is one of the two cognitive systems responsible for the representation of number, the other one being the approximate number system. Unlike the approximate number system, which is not precise and provides only an estimation of the number, the parallel individuation system is an exact system and encodes the exact numerical identity of the individual items. The parallel individuation system has been attested in human adults, non-human animals, such as fish and human infants, although performance of infants is dependent on their age and task.

Elizabeth M. Brannon is an American neuroscientist. She serves as Edmund J. and Louise W. Kahn Term Chair in the Natural Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Brannon's research, focused on comparative cognition, numerical cognition, and educational neuroscience, has earned an h-index of 68.

Lisa Feigenson is Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Johns Hopkins University and co-director of the Johns Hopkins University Laboratory for Child Development. Feigenson is known for her research on the development of numerical abilities, working memory, and early learning. She has served on the editorial board of Cognition and the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

Jessica Cantlon is the Ronald J. and Mary Ann Zdrojkowski Professor of Developmental Neuroscience at the Carnegie Mellon University. In 2017 she was selected as Time Person of the Year as one of the Silence Breakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fei Xu</span> American Professor of Psychology

Fei Xu is an American developmental psychologist and cognitive scientist who is currently a professor of psychology and the director of the Berkeley Early Learning Lab at UC Berkeley. Her research focuses on cognitive and language development, from infancy to middle childhood.

References

  1. ↑ Tegethoff, Marion; Naomi Greene, Jørn Olsen, Emmanuel Schaffner and Gunther Meinlschmidt (November 2011). "Stress During Pregnancy and Offspring Pediatrie Disease: A National Cohort Study". Environmental Health Perspectives. 119 (11): 1647–1652. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003253. PMC   3226491 . PMID   21775267.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ↑ Duffy, Frank H.; Heidelise Als and Gloria B. McAnulty (August 1990). "Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence for Gestational Age Effects in Healthy Preterm and Fullterm Infants Studied Two Weeks After Expected Due Date". Child Development. 61 (4): 1271–1286. doi:10.2307/1130893. JSTOR   1130893. PMID   2209195.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Izard, Veronique; Coralie Sann; Elizabeth S. Spelke; Arlette Streri; Charles R. Gallistel (2009). "Newborn Infants Perceive Abstract Numbers" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (25): 10382–10385. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10610382I. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812142106 . PMC   2700913 . PMID   19520833.
  4. ↑ Starkey, Prentice; Elizabeth S. Spelke and Rochel Gelman; Gelman, R (1983). "Detection of Intermodal Numerical Correspondences by Human Infants". Science. 222 (4620): 179–181. Bibcode:1983Sci...222..179S. doi:10.1126/science.6623069. PMID   6623069.
  5. 1 2 3 Mehler, Jaques; Thomas G. Bever (1967). "Cognitive Capacity of Very Young Children". Science. 158 (3797): 141–142. Bibcode:1967Sci...158..141M. doi:10.1126/science.158.3797.141. PMID   6054816. S2CID   16850066.
  6. 1 2 3 Dehaene, S.; E. Spelke; P. Pinel; R. Stanescu; S. Tsivkin (7 May 1999). "Sources of Mathematical Thinking: Behavioral and Brain-Imaging Evidence". Science. New Series. 284 (5416): 970–974. Bibcode:1999Sci...284..970D. doi:10.1126/science.284.5416.970. PMID   10320379.
  7. 1 2 Dehaene, S; L. Cohen (1997). "Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic". Cortex. 33 (2): 219–50. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70002-9. PMID   9220256. S2CID   4484920.
  8. ↑ Benton, A.L. (1992). "Gerstmann's Syndrome". Arch. Neurol. 49 (5): 445–447. doi:10.1001/archneur.1992.00530290027007. PMID   1580804.
  9. ↑ Takayama, Y.; M. Sugishita; I. Akiguchi; J. Kimura (1994). "Isolated Acalculia due to Left Parietal Lesion". Arch. Neurol. 51 (3): 286–291. doi:10.1001/archneur.1994.00540150084021. PMID   8129641.
  10. ↑ Delazer, M.; T. Benke (1997). "Arithmetic facts without meaning". Cortex. 33 (4): 697–710. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70727-5. PMID   9444471. S2CID   4475470.
  11. ↑ Boysen, S.T. and E.J. Capaldi (1993). The Development of Numerical Competence: Animal and Human Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  12. 1 2 Brannon, E.M.; H.S. Terrace (1998). "Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys". Science. 282 (5389): 746–9. Bibcode:1998Sci...282..746B. doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.746. PMID   9784133.
  13. ↑ Dehaene, S.; G. Dehaene-Lambertz; L. Cohen (1998). "Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain". Trends in Neurosciences. 21 (8): 355–61. doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01263-6. PMID   9720604. S2CID   17414557.
  14. ↑ Gallistel, C.R. (1989). "Animal cognition: The representation of space, time and number". Annual Review of Psychology. 40: 155–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001103. PMID   2648974.
  15. ↑ Wynn, K. (1998). "Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2 (8): 296–303. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01203-0. PMID   21227212. S2CID   38934825.
  16. ↑ Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense . New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   0-19-513240-8.
  17. ↑ Brannon, 2005; Brannon & Terrace, 1998-2000; Cantlon & Brannon, 2005; Feigenson, Dehaene, & Spelke, 2004; Gelman &Gallistel, 2004; Nieder, Freedman, & Miller, 2002; Nieder & Miller, 2003
  18. ↑ "Weber's law | Definition & Facts".
  19. 1 2 Roberts, William A. (April 1995). "Simultaneous Numerical and Temporal Processing in the Pigeon". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 4 (2): 47–51. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10771008. JSTOR   20182325. S2CID   144848675.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.