Outreau case

Last updated
Outreau Case
Location Outreau, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France
Datebetween 1997 and 2000
Attack type
 Child sexual abuse
Victims12 children

The Outreau case refers to a criminal case of pedophilia which took place between 1997 and 2000 in Outreau (a French commune) in northern France and a partial judicial error which led to provisional detentions between 2001 and 2004. Following alerts launched by social services within the Delay family, a long investigation seemed to reveal an extensive pedophile network: around forty adults had been accused and around fifty children were potentially victims.

Contents

The trial took place in May–July 2004 before the Cour d'assises, a criminal trial court, of the commune Pas-de-Calais (Saint-Omer) where 12 children were recognised victims of rape, sexual assault, corruption of minors and pimping. 10 of the 17 accused adults were sentenced to prison. The appeal trial at the Paris Court of Appeal took place in November 2005, where six of the ten accused were acquitted and four having not appealed. The case thus resulted in four final convictions of the two couples, as well as the acquittal of thirteen of the seventeen accused (some of whom were parents of children recognised as victims), several of whom had been held in prison for 1 to 3 years.

The acquitted received apologies from President Jacques Chirac and were compensated for their imprisonment. One of the accused, François Mourmand, who had been accused of having murdered a child, died after 17 months in pre-trial detention. A parliamentary commission of inquiry took place in 2005 to analyse the causes of the dysfunctions of justice in the case.

The theme of the case, the high number of children recognized as victims, the potential murder of a child, as well as the number of adults indicted and kept in pre-trial detention made this case a national headline and gave rise to strong public criticism. The particularities of the trials of the Outreau affair made it a sensitive and controversial subject, while the words of the child victims have been misrepresented and not all those acquitted would be innocent. The Outreau affair caused distrust among young victims in France, with a 40% drop in child sexual assault convictions in the decade following the acquittal on appeal. [1]

Outreau case

The "Outreau case", which concerned an alleged criminal network in Outreau, a working class town next to Boulogne-sur-Mer in the Pas-de-Calais region, began in November 2001. The first trial took place in Saint-Omer in 2004, and the appeal took place in Paris in 2005.

Seventeen people were prosecuted, but more than fifty people were investigated. Mostly parents, they were charged with child sexual abuse and incest and their children were separated from them for much of this time. The affair began when some school teachers and social workers noticed “strange sexual behavior” from four children of the Delay-Badaoui family. Psychologists believed the children to be credible witnesses, and later an administrative report showed that doctors found evidence of sexual abuse on 5 children. The parents were accused on the testimony of some of the children, which was then backed up by the confessions of some of the accused. During his incarceration, Daniel Legrand, the youngest of the accused, declared having witnessed the murder of a little girl. He sent a letter to the judge and also to the newspaper France 3, giving the investigation a national dimension. The information was cross-referenced with other testimonies but the child's body was never found. [2]

The defendants were held in custody for from one to three years. In the first trial (in 2004), four of the eighteen admitted guilt and were convicted, [3] while seven denied involvement and were acquitted. Six further defendants denied the charges but were convicted and given light sentences[ clarification needed ] – they appealed their convictions, and were heard by the Paris Cour d'assises in autumn 2005. On the first day of the hearing, the prosecution's claims were destroyed, and all six were acquitted. [4] Another defendant died in prison while awaiting trial. [5]

Judicial process

First trial

The trial took place before Saint-Omer's Cour d'assises , composed of three professional judges and nine jurors.

The case involved an alleged ring of 17 persons, with the charges based on one woman's evidence and some corroborating statements from alleged victims. The alleged offenders were condemned on the grounds of certain adults' and, most of all, the children's testimony, together with psychiatric evidence. The children's testimony took place in "huis clos" (behind closed doors); such a procedure is normal in France for victims of sexual abuse, especially minors.

The six convicted persons who denied any responsibility appealed their convictions.

The woman who had given much of the evidence later confessed in court she had lied, and the children's revelations were found to be unreliable. Only four of the accused ever confessed, all the others insisted on their innocence: one died in jail during the investigation, [5] 7 others were acquitted during the first trial in May 2004, the last 6 during the second trial on the evening of 1 December 2005.

Second trial

The appeal took place before Paris' Cour d'assises, composed of three professional judges and twelve jurors, used as an appellate court for review of both facts and law.

On its first day, the prosecution's claims were dismissed, owing to the statement of the main prosecution witness, Myriam Badaoui, who had declared on 18 November that the six convicted persons "had not done anything" and that she had herself lied. Thierry Delay, her former husband, backed up her statement. During the trial, the psychological evidence was also called into question, as it appeared biased and lacking in weight. The denials of two children, who admitted that they had formerly lied, also contributed to the destruction of the prosecution's claims. One of the psychologists said on TV: "I am paid the same as a cleaning lady, so I provide a cleaning lady's expertise," which caused further public indignation.

At the end of the trial, the prosecutor (avocat général) asked for the acquittal of all of the accused persons. The defence renounced its right to plead, preferring to observe a minute of silence in favour of François Mourmand, who had died in prison during remand. Yves Bot, general prosecutor of Paris, came to the trial on its last day, without previously notifying the president of the Cour d'assises, Mrs. Mondineu-Hederer; while there, Bot presented his apologies to the defendants on behalf of the legal system—he did this before the verdict was delivered, taking for granted a "not guilty" ruling, for which some magistrates reproached him afterwards.

All six defendants were finally acquitted on 1 December 2005, putting an end to five years of trials, which have been described by the French media as a "judicial foundering" or even as a "judicial Chernobyl".

Remaining sentences

Four people remained convicted after the appeal trial: Myriam Badaoui (who had not appealed her conviction), her husband, and a couple of neighbours. Myriam Badaoui, her husband, and one of the neighbours confessed that they had wrongfully accused other people to have been involved in the abuse cases, whereas only the four of them had been involved. [6]

Myriam Badaoui was convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison, her husband to 20 years. Myriam Badaoui was freed in 2015. [7]

Aftermath

Questioning on French justice and media involvement

The affair caused public indignation and questions about the general workings of justice in France. The role of an inexperienced magistrate, Fabrice Burgaud, [8] fresh out of the Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature was underscored, as well as the undue weight given to children's words and to psychiatric expertise, both of which were revealed to have been wrong.

The media's relation of the events was also questioned; although they were quick to point out the judicial error, they also had previously endorsed the "Outreau affair".

IGAS report on children's medical records

In 2007 the existence of a confidential IGAS (General Inspectorate of Health and Social Affairs) report was announced by Le Point newspaper, in which it emerged that for 5 of the 17 children in the case, whose parents were acquitted, signs suggestive of sexual abuse had been identified. The report also allegedly denied any wrongdoing from the social services. The report was never published or proved [9]

Parliamentary inquiry

After the second trial, the Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, the minister of justice Pascal Clément and President Chirac himself officially apologised to the victims in the name of the government and of the judicial institutions.

In January 2006, there was a special parliamentary enquiry (for the first time broadcast live on television) about this catastrophe judiciaire (judicial disaster), which had been called by President Chirac in order to help prevent a recurrence of this situation through alterations in France's legal system. The role of experts (who had drawn hasty conclusions from children's testimony) and child protection advocates, lack of legal representation, the responsibility of the judges (the prosecution's case depended in this instance on a single investigative magistrate) and the role of the mass media were examined.

The acquitted persons' hearing by the parliamentary enquiry caused a surge of emotion through the whole country. The affair was designated a "judiciary shipwreck".

Fabrice Burgaud

On 24 April 2009 the Conseil supérieur de la magistrature, held by upper French magistrates, sentenced Burgaud to a reprimand (réprimande avec inscription au dossier), the lowest disciplinary penalty in the French judiciary system. Fabrice Burgaud was heard in 2015 during a third trial and denied again any wrongdoing. [10]

Subsequent convictions

On February 23, 2012, the criminal court of Boulogne-sur-Mer sentenced Franck and Sandrine Lavier, two acquitted from Outreau, to ten and eight months in prison respectively, suspended for habitual violence (not of a sexual nature) against two of their children. In November 2023 Franck Lavier was sentenced to six months in prison for sexual assault on his daughter [11]

Film and media

In 2011 a film, Présumé coupable (English title: Presumed Guilty) was released, a drama documentary about the case from the viewpoint of Alain Marecaux, one of the acquitted defendants (even though accused of sex offense by his son François-Xavier Marécaux), based on his memoirs.

In 2012 another film Outreau, l'autre vérité (English title: Outreau, the other truth) was released. It is a documentary about the case from the viewpoint of some of the children, the experts and the magistrates. It paints a picture of how the press was manipulated by the defence lawyers, and how the words of the children were stifled.

In 2023, a mixed fiction-documental TV series was released on the French public channel France 2.

In 2024 Netflix released a documentary TV series on the case, The Outreau Case: A French Nightmare . [12]

Victim Children's viewpoint

During the release in 2023 of a television series on France 2, one of the victims, a child of the main family of the case, Jonathan Delay, called for a boycott of the France 2 TV series, which according to him, constitutes "media manipulation", by presenting "adults as being the first victims of this affair”. The series does not show that certain children, including Jonathan Delay, remain convinced that some of the acquitted were in fact guilty. [13]

During the hearing, the behaviour of Éric Dupond-Moretti, lawyer for the Outreau acquitted, and later French Justice minister, is also called into question. According to a rumour that reappeared during the France 2 series, he terrorized a 7-year-old girl who, out of fear, urinated on herself. Éric Maurel, at the time prosecutor of Saint-Omer, says in front of the General Inspectorate of Judicial Services that he believes that during the trial the victims “were mishandled”, that “the children were harassed by questions from the various defense lawyers. There was tension and very strong verbal violence, organised and part of a defense strategy, including between defense lawyers, despite the president's attempts to restore calm. He mentions “the case of a child of around ten years old who was heard for several hours in the civil parties’ box” [14]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McMartin preschool trial</span> 1980s day care sexual abuse case

The McMartin preschool trial was a day care sexual abuse case in the 1980s, prosecuted by the Los Angeles District Attorney, Ira Reiner. Members of the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in Manhattan Beach, California, were charged with hundreds of acts of sexual abuse of children in their care. Accusations were made in 1983, with arrests and the pretrial investigation taking place from 1984 to 1987 and trials running from 1987 to 1990. The case lasted seven years but resulted in no convictions, and all charges were dropped in 1990. By the case's end, it had become the longest and most expensive series of criminal trials in American history. The case was part of day-care sex-abuse hysteria, a moral panic over alleged Satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s.

The Kern County child abuse cases started the day care sexual abuse hysteria of the 1980s in Kern County, California. The cases involved allegations of satanic ritual abuse by a sex ring against as many as 60 children who testified they had been abused. At least 36 people were convicted and most of them spent years in prison. Thirty-four convictions were overturned on appeal. The district attorney responsible for the convictions was Ed Jagels, who was sued by at least one of those whose conviction was overturned, and who remained in office until 2009. Two of the convicted individuals were unable to prove their innocence because they died in prison.

In 2004, seven men living on Pitcairn Island faced 55 charges relating to sexual offences against children and young adults. The accused represented a third of the island's male population and included Steve Christian, the mayor. On 24 October, all but one of the defendants were found guilty on at least some of the charges. Another six men living abroad, including Shawn Christian, who later served as mayor of Pitcairn, were tried on 41 charges in a separate trial in Auckland, New Zealand, in 2005.

William LaFortune is an American politician who served as the 37th Mayor of Tulsa, Oklahoma from 2002 to 2006 and is currently a district judge in Tulsa County.

Wee Care Nursery School, located in Maplewood, New Jersey, was the subject of a day care child abuse case that was tried during the 1980s. Although Margaret Kelly Michaels was prosecuted and convicted, the decision was reversed after she spent five years in prison. An appellate court ruled that several features of the original trial had produced an unjust ruling and the conviction was reversed. The case was studied by several psychologists who were concerned about the interrogation methods used and the quality of the children's testimony in the case. This resulted in research concerning the topic of children's memory and suggestibility, resulting in new recommendations for performing interviews with child victims and witnesses.

The Little Rascals Day Care Center was a day care in Edenton, North Carolina, where, from 1989 to 1995, there were arrests, charges and trials of seven people associated with the day care center, including the owner-operators, Bob and Betsy Kelly. In retrospect, the case reflected day care sex abuse hysteria, including allegations of satanic ritual abuse. The testimony of the children was coached.

Day-care sex-abuse hysteria was a moral panic that occurred primarily during the 1980s and early 1990s, and featured charges against day-care providers accused of committing several forms of child abuse, including Satanic ritual abuse. The collective cases are often considered a part of the Satanic panic. A 1982 case in Kern County, California, United States, first publicized the issue of day-care sexual abuse, and the issue figured prominently in news coverage for almost a decade. The Kern County case was followed by cases elsewhere in the United States, as well as Canada, New Zealand, Brazil, and various European countries.

In France, a cour d'assises, or Court of Assizes or Assize Court, is a criminal trial court with original and appellate limited jurisdiction to hear cases involving defendants accused of felonies, meaning crimes as defined in French law. It is the only French court that uses a jury trial.

The Wenatchee child abuse prosecutions in Wenatchee, Washington, US, of 1994 and 1995, were the last "large scale Multi-Victim / Multi-Offender case" during the hysteria over child molestation in the 1980s and early 1990s. Many poor and intellectually disabled suspects pled guilty, while those who hired private lawyers were acquitted. Eventually all those accused in these cases were released, and the authorities paid damages to some of those originally accused.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip Wilson (bishop)</span> Australian Roman Catholic archbishop (1950–2021)

Philip Edward Wilson was an Australian Roman Catholic prelate who was the eighth Archbishop of Adelaide from 2001 to 2018. He was President of the Australian Catholic Bishops' Conference from 2006 to 2010. From 1996 to 2001 Wilson was bishop of the Diocese of Wollongong, where he gained a reputation as a "healing bishop" for handling child-abuse scandals.

The sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania, U.S., is a significant episode in the series of Catholic sex abuse cases in the United States, Ireland and elsewhere. The Philadelphia abuses were substantially revealed through a grand jury investigation in 2005. In early 2011, a new grand jury reported extensive new charges of abusive priests active in the archdiocese. In 2012, a guilty plea by priest Edward Avery and the related trial and conviction of William Lynn and mistrial on charges against James J. Brennan followed from the grand jury's investigations. In 2013, Charles Engelhardt and teacher Bernard Shero were tried, convicted and sentenced to prison. Lynn was the first official to be convicted in the United States of covering up abuses by other priests in his charge and other senior church officials have been extensively criticized for their management of the issue in the archdiocese.

The Catholic sexual abuse scandal in Europe has affected several dioceses in European nations. This article summarises reported cases of sexual abuse perpetrated by clergy and representatives of the Catholic Church by country and diocese.

The Country Walk case is a 1985 child sex abuse case which occurred in Florida and was described as a "Multi-Victim, Multi-Offender" case. Francisco Fuster-Escalona, known as Frank Fuster, was convicted on multiple charges and sentenced to a minimum of 165 years behind bars, while his wife Illiana served three years. Appeals courts at the state and federal level have consistently ruled against Frank Fuster.

<i>Guilty</i> (2011 film) 2011 film

Guilty is a 2011 French drama film directed by Vincent Garenq about the Outreau trial. Garenq was nominated for the 2012 Best Writing (Adaptation) César Award and Philippe Torreton was nominated as Best Actor.

Jacqueline Sauvage of Montargis, France, killed her husband Norbert Marot by shooting him in the back three times with a hunting rifle on 10 September 2012. This occurred the day after Sauvage's son committed suicide. Sauvage stated that Mr Marot had physically and sexually abused his wife, daughters and possibly his son.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frank Berton</span> French attorney

Frank Berton is a French attorney best known for his work with L'affaire d'Outreau and the November 2015 Paris attacks. He specializes in Penal Law and Press Rights law.

Francis Evrard is a French-Belgian serial rapist and pedophile, whose rise to notoriety came following his 2007 abduction, kidnapping and rape of a 5-year-old boy from his hometown of Roubaix, in Nord. His trial, held in 2009, was accompanied by debates on the treatment of sex offenders.

Julien Burgaud, is a French magistrate, best known for presiding over the Outreau case in 2004. On February 8, 2006, Burgaud appeared before the members of the French Parliament in a review of his actions as magistrate during that trial.

<i>Pell v The Queen</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

Pell v The Queen was a High Court of Australia decision that overturned the conviction of Cardinal George Pell for sexual offences against a child. On 22 June 2017, Victoria Police announced Pell was arrested for historical sexual assault charges on two choirboys at St. Patricks Cathedral in Melbourne. The allegations stemmed from Pell's time spent as Archbishop of Melbourne, and pertained to two anonymous victims referred to throughout the court process as victim 'A' and victim 'B'. B died before the allegations went to trial. Pell was tried twice in the County Court of Victoria.

The Outreau Case: A French Nightmare is a Netflix original documentary series on the Outreau case, a criminal case of pedophilia which took place between 1997 and 2000 in Outreau in northern France. The series features the child abuse allegations that led to a judicial disaster, revisiting the complex and controversial Outreau case.

References

  1. ↑ "En dix ans, le nombre de personnes condamnées pour viol a chuté de 40 %". Le Monde.fr. 14 September 2018.
  2. ↑ "Murder of a little girl, what's the evidence ?". 11 March 2024.
  3. ↑ Fouché, Alexandra (2004-06-02). "Outreau puts French justice in question". BBC News Online. Retrieved 2008-05-29. One of France's highest-profile sex abuse case in years has ended with guilty verdicts against 10 people, but with accusations of an even wider pedophile ring not proved.
  4. ↑ "Six cleared over French child sex". BBC News. December 1, 2005. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  5. 1 2 "Comment l'affaire d'Outreau a ébranlé la justice française". Lemonde.fr. 2015-05-19. Retrieved 2016-05-22.
  6. ↑ "L'audience du vendredi 18 novembre - 21 novembre 2005 - L'Obs". Tempsreel.nouvelobs.com. 2005-11-21. Archived from the original on 2012-07-18. Retrieved 2016-05-22.
  7. ↑ "Myriam Badaoui, des "projecteurs" d'Outreau à l'anonymat en Bretagne". Franceinfo (in French). 2015-05-27. Retrieved 2019-08-21.
  8. ↑ "Paedophile case that could bring down the Napoleonic system", Adam Sage, The Times , 2006-04-04
  9. ↑ "Le rapport qui embarrasse". 19 April 2007.
  10. ↑ Procès Outreau : le juge Fabrice Burgaud en difficulté devant la cour de Rennes
  11. ↑ "Franck Lavier, acquitté d'Outreau, condamné à six mois de prison avec sursis pour agressions sexuelles sur sa fille".
  12. ↑ "Here's Everything Coming to Netflix in March 2024". 21 February 2024.
  13. ↑ "Appel au boycott de la série "Outreau" : Une affaire sensible et des mémoires difficiles à concilier". 24 January 2023.
  14. ↑ "Procès d'Outreau : Est-il vrai qu'Eric Dupond-Moretti a «terrorisé» une petite fille au point qu'elle a fini par «s'uriner dessus» ?".
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.