P. D. Dinakaran

Last updated

P. D. Dinakaran
Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court
In office
8 August 2008 [1]  –29 July 2011 [2]
Preceded byBarin Ghosh
Succeeded byPermod Kohli
Personal details
Born9 May 1950 [3]
Arakkonam, Tamil Nadu

Paul Daniel Dinakaran Premkumar (born 9 May 1950) was the Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court. He resigned from the post following allegations of corruption and subsequent removal proceedings. [2]

Contents

Childhood and education

P.D Dinakaran was born in a Christian family at Arakkonam, North Arcot (now Vellore District). [4] He did his schooling and then attended the Madras Christian College, Chennai and studied chemistry. He obtained his Masters in Political Science and Public Administration and Bachelor of Law Degree from Madras Law College. [3]

Career

He started his career in Madras High Court. He also practised in the State and Central Administrative Tribunals at Madras. He served as Legal Adviser and Standing Counsel for Pondicherry University and for several State owned Corporations, such as Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Tamil Nadu Sugar Corporation, Tamil Nadu Sugar Federation Limited, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation (Aavin). [3]

He was also standing counsel for various religious institutions, such as Churches of South India, Madras Diocese and Coimbatore Diocese and Sri Subramania Swami Temple, Tiruttani and for several Local Bodies, Educational Institutions, Teacher's Federations, Agriculturists Associations, Marketing Societies and Social Organisations. [3]

On 28 August 2009, the Supreme Court of India announced that Dinakaran would be elevated to a Supreme Court Judge, but this was halted due to allegations of corruption and surrounding controversy. [5] Dinakaran subsequently refused to go on leave when asked by Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan and was transferred to the Sikkim High Court. [6] On 29 July 2011 he resigned from the post of Sikkim High Court Chief Justice. He was facing impeachment allegedly on the charges of corruption and judicial misconduct. [2]

Controversies

In September 2009, allegations were made against Dinakaran by several members of the Bar Council of India including Former Union Law Minister Ram Jethmalani [7] stating that he had huge assets and land acquisitions in his Hometown Arakkonam more than what was fixed by the Tamil Nadu Land reforms. The lawyers requested Chief Justice of India and Union Law Minister not to appoint Dinakaran as Supreme Court Judge and initiate an enquiry process regarding the allegation. The members wrote a letter to President Pratibha Patil, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Union Law Minister to intervene in this matter. [8] [9]

Justice Dinakaran had not been performing any judicial functions since December 2009 when the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha admitted a motion seeking his removal on charges of corruption and abuse of his judicial office. [10] The Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan had decided to replace Justice Dinakaran with Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice JS Khehar, [11] and recommended transfer of Dinakaran to the Sikkim High Court. [12] Later, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh questioned about the desirability of shifting Chief Justices. The Law Ministry returned the file to the collegium for consideration afresh. As a result, the collegium, headed by the then incumbent Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia, met and reconsidered the whole issue and stuck to the earlier decision to shift the Chief Justices. [13] The Sikkim Bar Association opposed the transfer of Dinakaran to the Sikkim High Court and asked the Supreme Court to reconsider the proposal, (which requires approval from Indian President Pratibha Patil). The Sikkim Bar Association president D R Thapa had asked "How come the person be fit to be discharge judicial duties in one state if he has not been found worthy of doing the same in another state?" [14] [15]

Impeachment proceedings and resignation

Facing impeachment on charges of corruption and judicial misconduct, he resigned from the post of Sikkim high court Chief Justice on 29 July 2011 expressing "lack of faith and confidence" in the three-member inquiry Committee probing charges against him. [2]

"Before demitting office, I must confess with a very heavy heart that in spite of my constitutional position, I have been denied fair opportunity to defend myself and my reputation by the Judges Inquiry Committee," he said in a two-page letter of resignation sent to President Pratibha Patil. [2]

Justice Dinakaran, a Dalit, also said he had a "sneaking suspicion" that his "misfortune" was because of the circumstances of his birth in the socially oppressed and underprivileged section of the society. [2]

This opinion of his at the time of resignation is surprising to say the least because of following facts:

  1. At first, Supreme Court of India had decided to elevate him as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India.
  2. Then cases of misconduct and corruption were alleged against him by Chennai-based Forum for Judicial Accountability, in September 2009. These allegations were confirmed by the Tiruvallur Collector in two reports. Only after this, the Supreme Court of India collegium dropped Justice Dinakaran's name for elevation.
  3. Thereafter on a complaint from 76 members of Parliament, the Rajya Sabha chairman admitted a motion for the removal of Justice Dinakaran.
  4. After that, Rajya Sabha chairman Hamid Ansari had in January 2010 constituted the three-member panel comprising Supreme Court Justice Aftab Alam (judge), Karnataka High Court Chief Justice J S Khehar and senior advocate P P Rao to examine the 12 charges framed in the notice of motion adopted by the House.
  5. Supreme Court of India bench headed by a very senior judge, Justice GS Singhvi permitted Dinakaran's plea seeking Rao's removal just on the ground that Rao was biased against him. However, the same bench refused to quash the charges framed by three-member panel saying "They are legally trained minds who can detect the fabricated material. In fact, it (three-member panel) would offer protection to a judge also from baseless allegations," [16]

Mysteriously, on 4 August 2011, Justice Dinakaran had a "change of heart" and wrote to the law ministry seeking to withdraw his resignation. But the ministry rejected his request. [17] However, his pre-emptive resignation did manage to scuttle the probe against him as the chairman of Rajya Sabha, Hamid Ansari, quietly buried the inquiry committee citing Dinakaran's resignation in July. [18]

Post retirement benefits

On 15 January 2012, it became public through an RTI query that Justice Dinakaran along with his other colleague facing similar accusations Justice Soumitra Sen will keep getting their post-retirement benefits, even though they resigned ahead of impeachment proceedings against them, as there are no Constitutional or statutory provisions restricting their entitlements in such a scenario. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

Supreme Court of India Highest court of India

The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial body of India and the highest court of India under the constitution. It is the most senior constitutional court, and has the power of judicial review. The Chief Justice of India is the head and chief judge of the Supreme Court and the court consists of a maximum of 34 judges and it has extensive powers in the form of original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions. It is regarded as the most powerful public institution in India.

P. Chidambaram Indian politician

Palaniappan Chidambaram is an Indian politician and former attorney who currently serves as Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha and formerly served as the Union Minister of Finance and Union Minister of Home Affairs of India.

Fathima Beevi

M. Fathima Beevi is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India. Appointed to the apex Court in 1989, she became the first female judge to be a part of the Supreme court of India, and the first Muslim woman to be appointed to any of the higher judiciaries in country. On her retirement from the court, she served as a member of the National Human Rights Commission and later as the Governor of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu from 1997 to 2001.

Madras High Court High court in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu

The Madras High Court is the second oldest High Court of India after the Calcutta High Court in Kolkata. It is located in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The court is one of the three High Courts in India established in the three Presidency Towns of Madras, Bombay and Calcutta by letters patent granted by Queen Victoria, bearing date 26 June 1862. It exercises original jurisdiction over the city of Chennai and appellate jurisdiction over the entire state of Tamil Nadu and Union territory of Puducherry, as well as extraordinary original jurisdiction, civil and criminal, under the letters patent and special original jurisdiction for the issue of writs under the Constitution of India. Covering 107 acres, the court complex is one of the largest in the world, next only to Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, London.

Dr. Ambedkar Government Law College, Chennai

Dr. Ambedkar Government Law College, commonly known by its former name Madras Law College, is a law school, located in Chennai (Madras), Tamil Nadu, India. It is also referred to as Government Law College or GLC, Chennai. Established in 1891, it is a prestigious institution that produced several legal luminaries of the 20th century. It was renamed in 1990, as Dr. Ambedkar Government Law College, by the Government of Tamil Nadu in commemoration of the birth centenary of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the father of Indian constitution. In 1997, the Government of Tamil Nadu passed an Act which brought the college under the wings of the newly established Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, splitting the college from the University of Madras. The College stands neglected ever since due to lack of funds and several internal politics.

Chief Election Commissioner of India

The Chief Election Commissioner of India heads the Election Commission of India, a body constitutionally empowered to conduct free and fair elections to the national and state legislatures and of President and Vice-President. This power of the Election Commission of India is derived from the Article 324 of the Constitution of India. Chief Election Commissioner of India is usually a member of the Indian Civil Service and mostly from the Indian Administrative Service. It is very difficult to remove the authority of the Chief Election Commissioner once appointed by the president, as two-thirds of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha need to present and vote against him for disorderly conduct or improper actions.

Judiciary of India Judicial wing of India

The Judiciary is a system of courts which interpret and apply the law. The role of the courts is to decide cases by determining the relevant facts and the relevant law, and applying the relevant facts to the relevant law. The Indian Judiciary administers a common law system in which customs, securities and legislation, all codify the law of the land. It has, in fact, inherited the legacy of the legal system established by the then colonial powers and the princely states since the mid-19th century, and has partly retained the characteristics of practices from the ancient and medieval times.

M. K. Alagiri Indian politician

Muthuvel Karunanidhi Alagiri, commonly known as M. K. Alagiri, is an Indian politician from Tamil Nadu and was a Union Cabinet Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers from 13 June 2009 to 20 March 2013. He is the first son of the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, M. Karunanidhi and his second wife Dayalu Ammal and the head of South Zone of Dravida Munnetra Kazagham.

Veeraswami Ramaswami was a judge of the Supreme Court of India and the first judge against whom removal proceedings were initiated in independent India.

Aladi Aruna (alias) V Arunachalam was an Indian politician .He was the Law Minister of Tamil Nadu. He was elected to the Tamil Nadu legislative assembly as a member of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam from Alangulam constituency in 1967, 1971 elections and 1996 elections. He was elected to the Lok Sabha the lower house of India's Parliament from Tirunelveli constituency in the 1977 elections. He was also a member of the Rajya Sabha the upper house of India's Parliament as a member of the Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. He came into limelight when he issued dissent note in the JPC report on the Bofors Scandal against a clean chit to Rajiv Gandhi government. He was murdered in 2004.

S. Ashok Kumar

Justice S. Ashok Kumar was a judge of the Madras High Court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court in India.

Soumitra Sen is a former judge of the Calcutta High Court. He was the first judge in independent India whose removal motion was passed in Rajya Sabha for misappropriation of funds.

The Supreme Court of India's collegium system, which appoints judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own judgments which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases.

Puspanathan Wilson is a Senior Advocate in India and has served as the Additional Solicitor General of India between August 2012 and May 2014 and the Additional Advocate General of the State of Tamil Nadu between August 2008 and May 2011.

R. Banumathi

R Banumathi was a Former Judge of the Supreme Court of India. She is from Tamil Nadu and the sixth woman to be a Judge of the Indian Supreme Court. Earlier, she served as the Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court and Judge at Madras High Court. She had also served as the Chancellor of Maharashtra National Law University, Aurangabad.

National Judicial Appointments Commission

National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was a proposed body which would have been responsible for the recruitment, appointment and transfer of judges and legal specialists in India. The Commission was established by amending the Constitution of India through the ninety-ninth constitution amendment with the Constitution Act, 2014 or 99th Constitutional Amendment Act-2014 passed by the Lok Sabha on 13 August 2014 and by the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2014. The NJAC would have replaced the collegium system for the appointment of judges as invoked by the Supreme court via judicial fiat by a new system. Along with the Constitution Amendment Act, the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014, was also passed by the Parliament of India to regulate the functions of the National Judicial Appointments Commission. The NJAC Bill and the Constitutional Amendment Bill, was ratified by 16 of the state legislatures in India, and subsequently assented by the President of India Pranab Mukherjee on 31 December 2014. The NJAC Act and the Constitutional Amendment Act came into force from 13 April 2015.

Disproportionate assets case against Jayalalithaa

Jayaram Jayalalithaa, commonly referred to as Jayalalithaa, was an Indian politician who was the six time Chief Minister of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. She was initially convicted for misusing her office during her tenure of 1991–96. Subramanian Swamy was the chief petitioner. Some of the allegations involved spending on her foster son's lavish marriage in 1996 and her acquisition of properties worth more than ₹66.65 crore, as well as jewellery, cash deposits, investments and a fleet of luxury cars. This was the first case where a ruling chief minister had to step down on account of a court sentence. Ultimately, in May 2015, her conviction was overturned, she was acquitted of all charges, and she then died before the Supreme Court of India reviewed the case in 2017.

L. Nageswara Rao

Lavu Nageswara Rao is a Judge of Supreme Court of India. He is the 7th person elevated directly from the bar to the Supreme Court and was sworn in on May 13, 2016. He was a Senior advocate and a former Additional Solicitor General of India.

Justice Chinnaswamy Swaminathan Karnan is a retired Indian judge. In May 2017, he was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Supreme Court of India, holding him guilty of contempt of court. He was the first Indian High Court judge to be sent to prison for contempt while in office.

Mrs. Justice B.V.Nagarathna is a judge of the Karnataka High Court, in India. She is the daughter of former Supreme Court Chief Justice E.S. Venkataramiah. She gained public attention in 2009 after being forcibly detained within the Karnataka High Court premises by a group of protesting lawyers. She has delivered a number of significant judgments relating to commercial and constitutional law in Karnataka.

References

  1. ↑ "PD Dinakaran sworn in as Karnataka CJ".
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "I am a victim of politics and legal system: Justice Dinakaran". The Times of India. 30 July 2011.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "Profile of Paul Daniel Dinakaran on Karnataka High Court website". Archived from the original on 23 September 2009.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  4. ↑ "Dinakaran targeted for being a South Indian and a Dalit". The Indian Express. 23 September 2009. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  5. ↑ "SC asks Karnataka Chief Justice Dinakaran to go on leave". The Times of India . 3 April 2010.
  6. ↑ Mahapatra, Dhananjay (10 April 2010). "Dinakaran to go to Sikkim, protests begin". The Times of India .
  7. ↑ "Judge's integrity in question". The Tribune . 14 September 2009.
  8. ↑ "CJI summoned Justice Dinakaran to Delhi". The Hindu . Chennai, India. 16 October 2009. Archived from the original on 17 September 2009.
  9. ↑ "Issues of deep concern". Outlook India . 16 September 2009.
  10. ↑ "Justice Dinakaran asked to go on leave". The Hindu . Chennai, India. 3 April 2010. Archived from the original on 6 April 2010.
  11. ↑ "J.S. Khehar to replace Dinakaran in Karnataka". The Hindu . Chennai, India. 10 April 2010.
  12. ↑ "Dinakaran not above law: Moily". The Hindu . Chennai, India. 25 April 2010. Archived from the original on 4 May 2010.
  13. ↑ Venkatesan, J. (30 July 2010). "Justice Dinakaran shifted to Sikkim High Court". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 15 January 2012.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  14. ↑ "Sikkim Bar Association protests Dinakaran's transfer (to Sikkim)". The Hindu . Chennai, India. 9 April 2010.
  15. ↑ "Supreme Court collegium sticks to shifting Justice Dinakaran to Sikkim". The Hindu . Chennai, India. 30 April 2010. Archived from the original on 7 November 2012.
  16. ↑ "SC lifts justice Dinakaran's impeachment proceedings". 5 July 2011. Retrieved 15 January 2012.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  17. ↑ "Justice Dinakaran bid to get back job rejected". The Times of India . 12 August 2011. Archived from the original on 3 January 2013. Retrieved 15 January 2012.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  18. ↑ "Dinakaran's pre-emptive resignation scuttles probe". Times of India. 2 October 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2012.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  19. ↑ "Dinakaran, Sen to get retirement perks". 15 January 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2012.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.