Photography and Non-Logical Form

Last updated

Photography and non-logical form
Author Ekaterina Vasileva (art historian)
CountryRussia
LanguageRussian
GenreNon-fiction, art history
Website Google Books

Photography and non-logical form is a book and research concept by art critic and art historian Ekaterina Vasilyeva. [1] The book provides an idea that draws attention to the irrational basis of photography. [2] The study considers photography as a tool that reveals the irrational and archaic principle of thinking. Considered one of the formative books in the field of photography theory. [3] [4] [5] The book is created as a collection of essays published in the 2010s in academic sources. The texts touch on aspects of a single topic and raise the general problem of the phenomenon of the non-logical in photography. It was published as a separate book by New Literary Review in 2019. [6]

Contents

General aspects

The study considers photography as a phenomenon in which not only the visual but also the semantic component is important. [7] The basis of the concept is the representation of photography as an irrational system that uses a non-logical form as a main mechanism. [8] The concept of the book synthesizes the theory of photography and the theory of thinking, considering the rational and non-logical as a single mechanism. [9] In photography, the non-logical form can be considered as part of the civilizational consciousness. [10] The photographic system reveals that forms of thought traditionally defined as archaic are an integral component of modern consciousness. [11] [12] [13]

Photography and the non-logical: general principles

The modern analytical system considers logical thinking to be its basis: rational knowledge is built on its principles. The concept of a non-logical system connects the photography with the space of the irrational. [14] Photography, like many other civilizational forms, retains elements of prelogical consciousness. This concept was partly presented in the works of Roland Barthes, [15] Jean Baudrillard, [16] Rosalind Krauss [17] and subsequently formulated in the book "Photography and Non-logical Form". The concept is based on the study of the principles of non-logical consciousness, initiated by Ernst Cassirer, [18] Lucien Lévy-Bruhl [19] and Claude Lévi-Strauss. [20] Ekaterina Vasilyeva's research deals with the ability of photography to support a non-logical system. Photography violates the principle of language and meaning, changes the usual continuity of time, otherwise defines the system and structure of space.

The idea of a sign and the system of language

The book draws attention to the fact that photography noticeably violates the principle of language. Photography cannot reproduce the linguistic principle of the exchange between the signifier and the signified and draws attention to itself as a phenomenon that specifically forms the structure of meaning. [21] This observation was also expressed by other researchers in their studies. [22] [23] Ekaterina Vasilyeva draws attention to the fact that photography cannot act as a sign and cannot use the system of meaning formation inherent in language. [24] [25] Photography demonstrates the principle of meaning formation, independent of the sign. The book emphasizes that the phenomenon of photographic meaning is characterized by semantic uncertainty. [26] The photograph demonstrates the possibility of a principle unrelated to the monetary or linguistic system. Along with other researchers, the author comes to the conclusion that photography does not support the language system. [27]

Photography and the categorical structure of thinking

Photography breaks the standard taxonomic model and overcomes the system of categorical thinking. [28] Categories, generalizations and concepts in photography are replaced by literal images. In a photograph, a general representation of the subject is impossible. The frame allows a specific image of a given subject. In photography, the principle of system and structure is replaced by the idea of a literal list. This brings photography closer to both archaic thinking and modern principles of object consciousness. [29]

Photography and taxonomic model

Photography violates the principles of classification adopted in the civilizational system and subject to categorical or hierarchical thinking. [30] The photographic representation does not support the root taxon system and the underlying classified entities. Civilizational thinking is a hierarchy of subordinate concepts. [31] [32] [33] Photography operates on principles that are not linked by circumstances of subordination. [34] Photography forms a fundamentally different model: it does not use general or generalizing concepts, but is a literal list of specific, often secondary, objects. [35] This literal listing (or representation) of specific objects cannot be used as an element of subordinate categories. Researchers pay attention to the fact that the principle of generalization, on which the taxonomic system is built, is not possible in photography. [36] Photography is addressed to specific subjects, and not to their generalization and systematization. “Classification is ... the separation of the main and the secondary. The taxonomic model presupposes an order of precedence, a hierarchy of the important and the insignificant, the main and the peripheral.” [37] Researchers point out that photography, in fact, does not allow for the possibility of such a division.

Photo and time category

Photography is often considered one of those phenomena that reveals a specific position in the system of time. [38] Photography does not refute the pattern of linear time, but it does not support it either. [39] [40] Photography is characterized by inconsistency with the system of time, tied to the continuity of past, present and future. “The photograph sees the time flow as a set of isolated “nows” that violate the idea of linearity and build a chaotic environment,” notes photography researcher Ekaterina Vasilieva. [41] Photography radically mixes the emphasis between past, present and future: frames as events can be arranged in any sequence. [42] At the same time, photography always belongs to the present and, at the same time, is always connected with the past. . [43]

Photography and the problem of depicting space

The study is based on the assumption that photography uses a specific model of space. [44] Its peculiarity lies not only in the ability to convert a three-dimensional volume into a two-dimensional image, but also in the ability to represent space as a specific structure. [45] Photography does not reproduce space as a single organism, but considers it as a set of fragments. Photography presents the elements of space as qualitatively different, destroying the idea of the world as a single system. [46] This way of representing space can be considered typical for archaic systems and mythological consciousness. [47] [48] [49] “Photography captures the surrounding space as a set of fragments.” [50] The author of the book notes that pictorial space refers to the idea of the whole. Other authors have made similar observations. [51] [52] “Photography opens up space as a form of optical illusion, moving ever further away from the idea associated with the wall of the picture.” [53] The photographic system faces the same system as the mythological space: its parts are fragmentary and are not connected with each other either meaningfully or logically. [54] Photography divides physical space into fragments and constructs a new spatial environment on their basis. The effect of “metaphysical emptiness” has acquired particular significance in photography. [55] An example of a metaphysical representation of space is the photographs of Eugène Atget. [56]

Photography and the problem of presence

The photograph presents a specific paradox in terms of the circumstance of presence. [57] The author of the book draws attention to the fact that when talking about photography, we do not always understand what means “to be”, and what “not to be” means. In particular, Martin Heidegger spoke about the possibility of defining being by time, and time by being. [58] When the components of this connection are broken, the idea of presence and existence in photography appears as a paradox. Photography, which initially violates the picture of time, demonstrates a paradoxical situation in terms of the picture of presence. [59] If the picture of time is broken in a photograph, it is difficult to determine what “to be” means in relation to the frame. [60] The study defines the specifics of photography as a violation of the unity of being and time. [61]

Criticism

Critics evaluate the book as an important precedent in the field of photography theory. [62] [63] [64] They characterize the book as a study in an attempt to consider photography as part of an irrational system in today's culture. [65] The researchers believe that the book is "one of the few attempts in recent years to move away from traditional research patterns that have developed in the field of photography." [66] Critics believe that the study forms its own analytical program and forms a new analytical vector in the study of photography. [67]

Critics note the importance of the concept for the study of modern culture in general. [68] [69] “Vasilyeva’s research shows the presence in a number of media phenomena of modern culture of elements that have their own activity and logic, beyond the control of human rationality.” [70]

Libraries

The book “Photography and Non-Logical Form” is presented in the collections of the following libraries:

See also

Related Research Articles

Post-structuralism is a philosophical movement that questions the objectivity or stability of the various interpretive structures that are posited by structuralism and considers them to be constituted by broader systems of power. Although post-structuralists all present different critiques of structuralism, common themes among them include the rejection of the self-sufficiency of structuralism, as well as an interrogation of the binary oppositions that constitute its structures. Accordingly, post-structuralism discards the idea of interpreting media within pre-established, socially constructed structures.

Semiotics is the systematic study of sign processes and the communication of meaning. In semiotics, a sign is defined as anything that communicates intentional and unintentional meaning or feelings to the sign's interpreter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roland Barthes</span> French philosopher and essayist

Roland Gérard Barthes was a French literary theorist, essayist, philosopher, critic, and semiotician. His work engaged in the analysis of a variety of sign systems, mainly derived from Western popular culture. His ideas explored a diverse range of fields and influenced the development of many schools of theory, including structuralism, anthropology, literary theory, and post-structuralism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean Baudrillard</span> French sociologist and philosopher (1929–2007)

Jean Baudrillard was a French sociologist, philosopher and poet, with interest in cultural studies. He is best known for his analyses of media, contemporary culture, and technological communication, as well as his formulation of concepts such as hyperreality. Baudrillard wrote about diverse subjects, including consumerism, critique of economy, social history, aesthetics, Western foreign policy, and popular culture. Among his most well-known works are Seduction (1978), Simulacra and Simulation (1981), America (1986), and The Gulf War Did Not Take Place (1991). His work is frequently associated with postmodernism and specifically post-structuralism. Nevertheless, Baudrillard had also opposed post-structuralism, and had distanced himself from postmodernism.

<i>Camera Lucida</i> (book) Book by Roland Barthes

Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography is a short book published in 1980 by the French literary theorist and philosopher Roland Barthes. It is simultaneously an inquiry into the nature and essence of photography and a eulogy to Barthes' late mother. The book investigates the effects of photography on the spectator.

<i>Mythologies</i> (book) 1957 book on semiotics by Roland Barthes

Mythologies is a 1957 book by Roland Barthes. It is a collection of essays first published from 1954 to 1956 in the French literary review Les Lettres nouvelles, examining the tendency of contemporary social value systems to create modern myths. Barthes also looks at the semiology of the process of myth creation, updating Ferdinand de Saussure's system of sign analysis by adding a second level where signs are elevated to the level of myth.

Narratology is the study of narrative and narrative structure and the ways that these affect human perception. It is an anglicisation of French narratologie, coined by Tzvetan Todorov. Its theoretical lineage is traceable to Aristotle (Poetics) but modern narratology is agreed to have begun with the Russian formalists, particularly Vladimir Propp, and Mikhail Bakhtin's theories of heteroglossia, dialogism, and the chronotope first presented in The Dialogic Imagination (1975).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugène Atget</span> French photographer (1857–1927)

Eugène Atget was a French flâneur and a pioneer of documentary photography, noted for his determination to document all of the architecture and street scenes of Paris before their disappearance to modernization. Most of his photographs were first published by Berenice Abbott after his death. Though he sold his work to artists and craftspeople, and became an inspiration for the surrealists, he did not live to see the wide acclaim his work would eventually receive.

"The Death of the Author" is a 1967 essay by the French literary critic and theorist Roland Barthes (1915–1980). Barthes' essay argues against traditional literary criticism's practice of relying on the intentions and biography of an author to definitively explain the "ultimate meaning" of a text. Instead, the essay emphasizes the primacy of each individual reader's interpretation of the work over any "definitive" meaning intended by the author, a process in which subtle or unnoticed characteristics may be drawn out for new insight. The essay's first English-language publication was in the American journal Aspen, no. 5–6 in 1967; the French debut was in the magazine Manteia, no. 5 (1968). The essay later appeared in an anthology of Barthes' essays, Image-Music-Text (1977), a book that also included his "From Work to Text".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jane Gallop</span> American professor (born 1952)

Jane Anne Gallop is an American professor who since 1992 has served as Distinguished Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, where she has taught since 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Marville</span> French photographer

Charles Marville, the pseudonym of Charles François Bossu, was a French photographer, who mainly photographed architecture, landscapes and the urban environment. He used both paper and glass negatives. He is most well known for taking pictures of ancient Parisian quarters before they were destroyed and rebuilt under "Haussmannization", Baron Haussmann's new plan for modernization of Paris. "Marville created a model of photographic perception of the architectural environment that we still use and rely on today". In 1862, he was named official photographer of Paris.

Truth claim, in photography, is a term Tom Gunning uses to describe the prevalent belief that traditional photographs accurately depict reality. He states that the truth claim relies on both the indexicality and visual accuracy of photographs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Susanne Langer</span> American philosopher, known for theories on the influences of art on the mind

Susanne Katherina Langer was an American philosopher, writer, and educator known for her theories on the influences of art on the mind. She was one of the earliest American women to achieve an academic career in philosophy and the first woman to be professionally recognized as an American philosopher. Langer is best remembered for her 1942 book Philosophy in a New Key, which was followed by a sequel, Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art, in 1953. In 1960, Langer was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Photobiography is a "person's biography as revealed through photographs". This is a neologism that was used for the first time in the French language in Manifeste photobiographique (1983), written by Gilles Mora and co-written with Claude Nori.

Carol Jane Mavor is an American writer and professor. Her work includes the books Pleasures Taken: Performances of Sexuality and Loss in Victorian Photographs, Becoming: The Photographs of Clementina, Viscountess Hawarden, and Blue Mythologies: Reflections on a Colour. She is Professor of Art History and Visual Culture at the University of Manchester.

European Photography, based in Berlin, is an independent art magazine for international contemporary photography and new media. It was founded in 1980 and is published by the German artist Andreas Müller-Pohle.

TEN.8 was a British photography magazine founded in 1979 and published quarterly in Birmingham, England, throughout the 1980s, folding in 1992.

La Recherche photographique: histoire-esthétique was a specialised peer-reviewed bi-annual French journal, published from September 1986 to spring 1997, and edited by Paris Audiovisuel and the University of Paris 8.

Les Cahiers de la photographie, published between 1981 and 1994 was a French magazine devoted to photography with the goal of promoting criticism of contemporary photography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ekaterina Vasileva (art historian)</span>

Ekaterina Vasileva is a Russian art critic, specialist in the history and theory of photography,fashion, design and contemporary art. Candidate of Sciences, Associate Professor at Saint Petersburg State University. Member of the Union of Artists of Russia, member of the Union of Photographers of Russia, member of the International Association of Art Critics, member of the Union of Journalists of Russia. The works of Ekaterina Vasilyeva are in the collections of the largest Russian libraries, as well as in the collections of the Library of Congress (Washington), the Warburg Library (London), the Cini Foundation Library (Venice), etc.

References

  1. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review, 312 p.
  2. ↑ Review of the book by Ekaterina Vasilyeva “Photography and Non-Logical Form” // Union of Photographers of Russia. 2019.
  3. ↑ Pozdnyakova K.G. (2023) Theory of photography in 36 chapters // Bulletin of culture and arts. 2023. No. 1 (73). pp. 96-101.
  4. ↑ Stepanov M.A. (2019) Image outside of Logos // International Journal of Cultural Research. No. 3. pp. 231–235.
  5. ↑ “Photography and Non-Logical Form” by Ekaterina Vasilyeva - the Logic of Meaning // Review of the site photographer.ru, 2020.
  6. ↑ The publishing house “NLO” published Ekaterina Vasilyeva’s book “Photography and Non-Logical Form” // Review of the site photographer.ru, 2019.
  7. ↑ “Photography and Non-Logical Form” by Ekaterina Vasilyeva - the Logic of Meaning // Review of the site photographer.ru, 2020.
  8. ↑ Stepanov M.A. (2019) Image outside of Logos // International Journal of Cultural Research. No. 3. pp. 231–235.
  9. ↑ Pozdnyakova K.G. (2023) Theory of photography in 36 chapters // Bulletin of culture and arts. 2023. No. 1 (73). pp. 96-101.
  10. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  11. ↑ Lévy-Bruhl L. La mentalité primitive. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1922.
  12. ↑ Lévi-Strauss C. Le Totémisme aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF, 1962.
  13. ↑ Steblin-Kamensky M. Myth. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.
  14. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  15. ↑ Barthes R. Camera Lucida. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.
  16. ↑ Baudrillard J. La Photographie ou l’Écriture de la Lumiere: Litteralite de l’Image // L’Echange Im-possible. Paris: Galilée, 1999. P. 175–184.
  17. ↑ Krauss R. Le Photographique : Pour une théorie des écarts. Paris: Macula, 1990.
  18. ↑ Cassirer E. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Bd 1—3, Вerlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1923—1929.
  19. ↑ Lévy-Bruhl L. La mentalité primitive. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1922.
  20. ↑ Lévi-Strauss C. Le Totémisme aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF, 1962.
  21. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  22. ↑ Barthes R. Camera Lucida. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.
  23. ↑ Petrovskaya E. Theory of image. M.: RSUH, 2010.
  24. ↑ Saussure, Ferdinand de. (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, eds. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne – Paris: Payot.
  25. ↑ Peirce, C.S. (c.1894 MS), "What Is a Sign?". Published in part in CP 2.281, 285, and 297-302, and in full in EP 2:4-10. Peirce Edition Project.
  26. ↑ Vasilieva, E. V. (2016). The idea of sign and the principle of exchange in the field of photography and in the system of language. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 6(1), 4-34.
  27. ↑ Baudrillard J. La Photographie ou l’Écriture de la Lumiere: Litteralite de l’Image // L’Echange Im-possible. Paris: Galilée, 1999. P. 175–184.
  28. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  29. ↑ Lévy-Bruhl L. La mentalité primitive. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1922.
  30. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  31. ↑ Lévi-Strauss C. Le Totémisme aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF, 1962.
  32. ↑ Lévy-Bruhl L. La mentalité primitive. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1922.
  33. ↑ Durkheim E. Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse : le système totémique en Australie, Paris: Félix Alcan,1912.
  34. ↑ Barthes R. Camera Lucida. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.
  35. ↑ Baudrillard J. La Photographie ou l’Écriture de la Lumiere: Litteralite de l’Image // L’Echange Im-possible. Paris: Galilée, 1999. P. 175–184.
  36. ↑ Barthes R. Camera Lucida. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.
  37. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review, p. 19.
  38. ↑ Barthes R. Camera Lucida. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.
  39. ↑ Vasilieva, E. V. (2018). Photography and phenomena of time. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 4(1), 64-79.
  40. ↑ Petrovskaya E. Theory of image. M.: RSUH, 2010.
  41. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review, p. 65.
  42. ↑ Barthes R. Camera Lucida. New York: Hill & Wang, 1980.
  43. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review, p. 65.
  44. ↑ Krauss R. (1982) Photography's Discursive Spaces: Landscape/View. Art Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4, The Crisis in the Discipline. pp. 311-319
  45. ↑ Nesbit M. Atget’s Seven Albums. New Haven; London: Yale Publications in the History of Art, 1993.
  46. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  47. ↑ Cassirer E. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Bd 1—3, Вerlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1923—1929.
  48. ↑ Steblin-Kamensky M. Myth. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.
  49. ↑ Propp V. Historical roots of the Magic Tale. Leningrad: Leningrad State University Publishing House, 1946.
  50. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review, p. 27.
  51. ↑ Krauss R. (1982) Photography's Discursive Spaces: Landscape/View. Art Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4, The Crisis in the Discipline. pp. 311-319
  52. ↑ Baudrillard J. La Photographie ou l’Écriture de la Lumiere: Litteralite de l’Image // L’Echange Impossible. Paris: Galilée, 1999. P. 175–184.
  53. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review, p. 27.
  54. ↑ Steblin-Kamensky M. Myth. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.
  55. ↑ Vasilyeva E. Early urban photography: to the problem of iconography of space // International Journal of Cultural Research. 2019. No. 4 (37). pp. 65-86.
  56. ↑ Nesbit M. Atget’s Seven Albums. New Haven; London: Yale Publications in the History of Art, 1993.
  57. ↑ Petrovskaya E. Theory of image. M.: RSUH, 2010.
  58. ↑ Heidegger M. (1962). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson. London: SCM Press.
  59. ↑ Petrovskaya E. Theory of image. M.: RSUH, 2010.
  60. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  61. ↑ Vasileva E. (2019) Photography and Non-Logical Form. M.: New Literary Review.
  62. ↑ Stepanov M.A. (2019) Image outside of Logos // International Journal of Cultural Research. No. 3. pp. 231–235.
  63. ↑ Pozdnyakova K.G. (2023) Theory of photography in 36 chapters // Bulletin of culture and arts. 2023. No. 1 (73). pp. 96-101.
  64. ↑ “Photography and Non-Logical Form” by Ekaterina Vasilyeva - the Logic of Meaning // Review of the site photographer.ru, 2020.
  65. ↑ Review of the book by Ekaterina Vasilyeva “Photography and Non-Logical Form” // Union of Photographers of Russia. 2019.
  66. ↑ “Photography and Non-Logical Form” by Ekaterina Vasilyeva - the Logic of Meaning // Review of the site photographer.ru, 2020.
  67. ↑ Stepanov M.A. (2019) Image outside of Logos // International Journal of Cultural Research. No. 3. pp. 231–235.
  68. ↑ Pozdnyakova K.G. (2023) Theory of photography in 36 chapters // Bulletin of culture and arts. 2023. No. 1 (73). pp. 96-101
  69. ↑ “Photography and Non-Logical Form” by Ekaterina Vasilyeva - the Logic of Meaning // Review of the site photographer.ru, 2020.
  70. ↑ Stepanov M.A. (2019) Image outside of Logos // International Journal of Cultural Research. No. 3. pp. 231–235.

First edition

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.