Poor Act 1551

Last updated

Poor Act 1551
Act of Parliament
Coat of Arms of England (1509-1554).svg
Long title An Act for the Provision and Relief of the Poor.
Citation 5 & 6 Edw. 6. c. 2
Dates
Royal assent 15 April 1552
Repealed28 July 1863
Other legislation
Repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1863
Status: Repealed

The Act for the Provision and Relief of the Poor was a statute passed by the Parliament of England during the reign of King Edward VI. It is a part of the Tudor Poor Laws and reaffirms previous poor laws enacted in 1536, 1547, and 1549 which focused primarily on the punishment of vagabonds. [1] The Poor Act 1551 designated a new position, "collector of alms," in each parish. Local authorities and residents elected two alms collectors to request, record, and distribute charitable donations for poor relief. It further provided that each parish would keep a register of all its “impotent, aged, and needy persons” and the aid they received. Parish authorities were directed to “gently exhort” any person that could contribute but would not, referring them to the Bishop of the Diocese if they continued to refuse. Punishment for neglecting poor relief obligations was adopted in 1563 and reliance on charity was replaced by a system of taxation in 1597. [2] Under the assumption that all poor would be cared for, begging openly was now forbidden. [3] Licensed begging would be reinstated by the Marian Parliament of 1555 with the requirement that legal beggars wear badges. [4]

Contents

Social context

During the Tudor period, cultural perceptions began to shift away from the medieval theological belief that poverty was a virtue. [5] The philosophical influence of Renaissance humanism [6] and the emergence of a Protestant work ethic [7] and rogue literature [8] contributed to views encouraging industriousness and the stewardship of wealth and vilifying idleness, begging, and vagrancy. As poverty rates and the costs of poor relief rose, communities attempted to define and limit who qualified for aid, restricting support by locality and moral conduct. [9]

Economic context

The rise of poverty rates during the Tudor period can be attributed to a confluence of factors. Rebellions in 1549 hampered harvest efforts and crop shortages in the following years contributed to price inflation. [10] A series of coin debasements between 1544-1551 undermined economic confidence. [11] Rapid population growth and the effects of Tudor enclosure policies led to the supply of labour exceeding demand and agricultural and industrial wages falling sharply. High birth-rates also meant a large percentage of the population were too young to contribute economically. [12] Additionally, the dissolution of the monasteries removed all Catholic Church-operated charities, religious guilds, and lay fraternities that provided formal and informal aid and confiscated parish lands and livestock which had also been used to provide poor relief. The process of replacing these institutions was often slow and uneven. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland</span> English nobleman, politician, and military commander (1504–1553)

John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland was an English general, admiral, and politician, who led the government of the young King Edward VI from 1550 until 1553, and unsuccessfully tried to install Lady Jane Grey on the English throne after the King's death. The son of Edmund Dudley, a minister of Henry VII executed by Henry VIII, John Dudley became the ward of Sir Edward Guildford at the age of seven. Dudley grew up in Guildford's household together with his future wife, Guildford's daughter Jane, with whom he was to have 13 children. Dudley served as Vice-Admiral and Lord Admiral from 1537 until 1547, during which time he set novel standards of navy organisation and was an innovative commander at sea. He also developed a strong interest in overseas exploration. Dudley took part in the 1544 campaigns in Scotland and France and was one of Henry VIII's intimates in the last years of the reign. He was also a leader of the religious reform party at court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English Poor Laws</span> Laws regarding poverty in England, 16th–19th century

The English Poor Laws were a system of poor relief in England and Wales that developed out of the codification of late-medieval and Tudor-era laws in 1587–1598. The system continued until the modern welfare state emerged in the late 1940s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Hooper (bishop)</span> English Protestant bishop, reformer, and martyr (d. 1555)

John Roy Hooper was an English churchman, Anglican Bishop of Gloucester, later of Worcester and Gloucester, a Protestant reformer and a Protestant martyr. A proponent of the English Reformation, he was executed for heresy by burning during the reign of Queen Mary I.

The Charity Organisation Societies were founded in England in 1869 following the 'Goschen Minute' that sought to severely restrict outdoor relief distributed by the Poor Law Guardians. In the early 1870s, a handful of local societies were formed with the intention of restricting the distribution of outdoor relief to the elderly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poor Law Amendment Act 1834</span> United Kingdom poor relief law

The Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 (PLAA) known widely as the New Poor Law, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed by the Whig government of Earl Grey denying the right of the poor to subsistence. It completely replaced earlier legislation based on the Poor Relief Act 1601 and attempted to fundamentally change the poverty relief system in England and Wales. It resulted from the 1832 Royal Commission into the Operation of the Poor Laws, which included Edwin Chadwick, John Bird Sumner and Nassau William Senior. Chadwick was dissatisfied with the law that resulted from his report. The Act was passed two years after the Representation of the People Act 1832 which extended the franchise to middle-class men. Some historians have argued that this was a major factor in the PLAA being passed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Act of Uniformity 1551</span> United Kingdom law of religion and the Church of England

The Act of Uniformity 1551, sometimes referred to as the Act of Uniformity 1552, or the Uniformity Act 1551 was an Act of the Parliament of England.

<i>A Caveat or Warning for Common Cursitors</i> 16th century book on vagabonds

A Caveat or Warning for Common Cursitors, vulgarly called vagabonds was first published in 1566 by Thomas Harman, and although no copies of that edition survive, it must have been popular, because two printers were punished by the Stationers' Company in 1567 for pirated editions. Two editions were published in 1568, and a revised edition in 1573. It is one of the fundamental texts for rogue literature.

The Mid-Tudor Crisis denotes the period of English history between 1547 and 1558, when, it has been argued by Whitney Jones and others, English government and society were in imminent danger of collapse in the face of a combination of weak rulers, economic pressures, a series of rebellions, and religious upheaval in the wake of the English Reformation, among other factors. Recently, historians such as David Loades have disputed the underlying assumptions of the thesis and have argued that this period was actually one of success and even outright achievements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poor Relief Act 1601</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Poor Relief Act 1601 was an Act of the Parliament of England. The Act for the Relief of the Poor 1601, popularly known as the Elizabethan Poor Law, the "43rd Elizabeth", or the "Old Poor Law", was passed in 1601 and created a poor law system for England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poor relief</span> British government and ecclesiastical action to relieve poverty

In English and British history, poor relief refers to government and ecclesiastical action to relieve poverty. Over the centuries, various authorities have needed to decide whose poverty deserves relief and also who should bear the cost of helping the poor. Alongside ever-changing attitudes towards poverty, many methods have been attempted to answer these questions. Since the early 16th century legislation on poverty enacted by the Parliament of England, poor relief has developed from being little more than a systematic means of punishment into a complex system of government-funded support and protection, especially following the creation in the 1940s of the welfare state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagrancy</span> Condition of homelessness without regular employment or income

Vagrancy is the condition of wandering homelessness without regular employment or income. Vagrants usually live in poverty and support themselves by travelling while engaging in begging, scavenging, or petty theft. In Western countries, vagrancy was historically a crime punishable with forced labor, military service, imprisonment, or confinement to dedicated labor houses.

Social work as a profession dates back to years ago, with the first social welfare agencies appearing in urban areas in the 1800s. It has its roots in the attempts of society at large to deal with the problem of poverty and inequality. Social work is intricately linked with the idea of charity work, but must be understood in broader terms. The concept of charity goes back to ancient times, and the practice of providing for the poor has roots in all major world religions.

The Tudor poor laws were the laws regarding poor relief in the Kingdom of England around the time of the Tudor period (1485–1603). The Tudor Poor Laws ended with the passing of the Elizabethan Poor Law in 1601, two years before the end of the Tudor dynasty, a piece of legislation which codified the previous Tudor legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagabonds Act 1530</span> English legislation

The Vagabonds Act 1530 was an act passed under Henry VIII and is a part of the Tudor Poor Laws of England. In full, it was entitled "An Act directing how aged, poor and impotent Persons, compelled to live by Alms, shall be ordered; and how Vagabonds and Beggars shall be punished."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagabonds Act 1536</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Act for Punishment of Sturdy Vagabonds and Beggars was an act passed in Tudor England by Henry VIII. It is part of the Tudor Poor Laws. It was the earliest English Poor Law to provide for structured collections for the poor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagabonds Act 1547</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Vagabonds Act 1547, also known as the Vagrancy Act 1547, was a statute passed in England by King Edward VI and his Lord Protector, Edward Seymour. It provided that vagabonds could be enslaved for two years and continued weekly parish collections for the poor. The enslaved vagabonds were to be fed bread and water or small drink and were allowed to be worked by beating, chaining, or other methods the master may choose. Vagabond slaves were allowed to be bought and sold just as other slaves. Also, should no private man want the vagabond slave, the slave was to be sent to their town of birth and be forced to work as a slave for that community. Vagabond children could be claimed as "apprentices" and be held as such until the age of 24 if a boy, or the age of 20 if a girl. Should they attempt to escape this apprenticeship, they were subject to enslavement for the remainder of the apprenticeship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poor Act 1555</span> Law passed by Queen Mary I

The Poor Act 1555 was a law passed in England by Queen Mary I. It is a part of the Tudor Poor Laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poor Act 1562</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Poor Act 1562 or Act for the Relief of the Poor was a law passed in England under Queen Elizabeth I. It is a part of the Tudor Poor Laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagabonds Act 1572</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Vagabonds Act 1572 or the Vagabonds, etc. Act 1572 was a law passed in England under Queen Elizabeth I. It is a part of the Tudor Poor Laws and a predecessor to the Elizabethan Poor Laws.

Marjorie Keniston McIntosh is an American historian of Great Britain.

References

  1. 5&6 Edw. VI c. 2; Beier, A.L. (1983). The Problem of the Poor in Tudor and Early Stuart England . London: Methuen & Co Ltd. p.  39-40.; Elton, G.R. (1953). "An Early Tudor Poor Law". The Economic History Review. 6 (1): 55–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1953.tb01486.x.
  2. Beier 1983, p. 41; Slack, Paul (1990). The English Poor Law 1531-1782. Macmillan Press Ltd. p. 10.
  3. 5&6 Edw. VI c. 2; Slack 1990, p. 59-60; Beier 1983, p. 40
  4. Rushton, Neil (2001). "Monastic Charitable Provision in Tudor England: Quantifying and Qualifying Poor Relief in the Early Sixteenth Century". Continuity and Change. 16 (1): 9–44. doi:10.1017/s0268416001003708.; Hindle, Steve (2004). "Dependency, Shame and Belonging: Badging the Deserving Poor, c.1550-1750". Cultural and Social History. 1 (1): 6–35.
  5. Thomas, Paul (1999). Authority and Disorder in Tudor Times 1485-1603. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 40–41.
  6. Beier 1983, p. 17; Harvey, Richard (1979). "Recent Research on Poverty in Tudor-Stuart England: Review and Commentary". International Review of Social History. 24 (2): 237–252. doi: 10.1017/s0020859000006040 .
  7. Beier 1983, p. 14
  8. Beier 1983, p. 17
  9. McIntosh, Marjorie (2005). "Poverty, Charity, and Coercion in Elizabethan England". The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 35 (3): 457–479. doi:10.1162/0022195052564234.; Beier 1983, p. 23
  10. Jordan, W.K. (1970). Edward VI: The Threshold of Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 472.
  11. Wordie, J.R. (1997). "Deflationary Factors in the Tudor Price Rise". Past and Present. 154: 32–70. doi:10.1093/past/154.1.32.; Leonard, E.M. (1900). The Early History of English Poor Relief. Cambridge University Press. p.  16.; Jordan 1970, p. 459
  12. Beier 1983, p.7; Wordie 1997
  13. McIntosh, Marjorie (1988). "Local Responses to the Poor in Late Medieval and Tudor England". Continuity and Change. 3 (2): 209–245. doi:10.1017/s0268416000000953.; McIntosh 2005; Beier 1983, p. 19-23