Procrastination

Last updated
Statue of Paul Pato, the personification of procrastination, made by Janos Nagy in Szogyen (now: Svodin) PPszobor.jpg
Statue of Paul Pato, the personification of procrastination, made by János Nagy in Szőgyén (now: Svodín)

Procrastination is the act of unnecessarily delaying or postponing something despite knowing that there could be negative consequences for doing so. It is a common human experience involving delays in everyday chores or even putting off tasks such as attending an appointment, submitting a job report or academic assignment, or broaching a stressful issue with a partner. It is often perceived as a negative trait due to its hindering effect on one's productivity, associated with depression, low self-esteem, guilt, and feelings of inadequacy. [1] However, it can also be considered a wise response to certain demands that could present risky or negative outcomes or require waiting for new information to arrive. [2]

Contents

From a cultural and social perspective, students from both Western and non-Western cultures are found to exhibit academic procrastination, but for different reasons. Students from Western cultures tend to procrastinate in order to avoid doing worse than they have done before or failing to learn as much as they should have, whereas students from non-Western cultures tend to procrastinate in order to avoid looking incompetent or demonstrating a lack of ability in front of their peers. [3] Different cultural perspectives of time management can impact procrastination. For example, in cultures that have a multi-active view of time, people tend to place a higher value on making sure a job is done accurately before finishing. In cultures with a linear view of time, people tend to designate a certain amount of time on a task and stop once the allotted time has expired. [4]

A study of the behavioral patterns of pigeons through delayed gratification suggests that procrastination is not unique to humans but can also be observed in some other animals. [5] There are experiments finding clear evidence for "procrastination" among pigeons, which show that pigeons tend to choose a complex but delayed task rather than an easy but hurry-up one. [6]

Procrastination has been studied by philosophers, psychologists and, more recently, behavioral economists. [7]

Etymology

Latin : procrastinare, pro-, 'forward', with -crastinus, 'until next day' from cras, 'tomorrow'. The word originated from the Latin word procrastinatus, which itself evolved from the prefix pro-, 'forward', and crastinus, 'of tomorrow'. [8]

Prevalence

In a study of academic procrastination from the University of Vermont, published in 1984, 46% of the subjects reported that they "always" or "nearly always" procrastinated writing papers, while approximately 30% reported procrastinating studying for exams and reading weekly assignments (by 28% and 30% respectively). Nearly a quarter of the subjects reported that procrastination was a problem for them regarding the same tasks. However, as many as 65% indicated that they would like to reduce their procrastination when writing papers, and approximately 62% indicated the same for studying for exams and 55% for reading weekly assignments. [9]

A 1992 study showed that "52% of surveyed students indicated having a moderate to high need for help concerning procrastination." [10]

A study done in 2004 showed that 70% of university students categorized themselves as procrastinators while a 1984 study showed that 50% of the students would procrastinate consistently and considered it a major problem in their lives. [11]

In a study performed on university students, procrastination was shown to be greater with tasks that were perceived as unpleasant or as impositions than with tasks for which the student believed they lacked the required skills for accomplishing the task. [12]

Another point of relevance is that of procrastination in industry. A study from the State of the Art journal "The Impact of Organizational and Personal Factors on Procrastination in Employees of a Modern Russian Industrial Enterprise published in the Psychology in Russia", helped to identify the many factors that affected employees' procrastination habits. Some of which include intensity of performance evaluations, importance of their duty within a company, and their perception and opinions on management and/or upper level decisions. [13]

Behavioral criteria of academic procrastination

Gregory Schraw, Theresa Wadkins, and Lori Olafson in 2007 proposed three criteria for a behavior to be classified as academic procrastination: it must be counterproductive, needless, and delaying. [14] Steel reviewed all previous attempts to define procrastination, and concluded in a 2007 study that procrastination is "to voluntarily delay an intended course of action despite expecting to be worse off for the delay." [15] Sabini and Silver argued that postponement and irrationality are the two key features of procrastination. Delaying a task is not deemed as procrastination, they argue, if there are rational reasons behind the delay. [16] Further, in a study conducted by Pogorskiy and Beckmann, learners' procrastination is characterised by stable sequential patterns in learners' web navigation behaviour. [17]

An approach that integrates several core theories of motivation as well as meta-analytic research on procrastination is the temporal motivation theory. It summarizes key predictors of procrastination (expectancy, value, and impulsiveness) into a mathematical equation. [15]

Psychological perspective

The pleasure principle may be responsible for procrastination; one may prefer to avoid negative emotions by delaying stressful tasks. In 2019, a research conducted by Rinaldi et al. indicated that measurable cognitive impairments may play a role in procrastination. [18] As the deadline for their target of procrastination grows closer, they are more stressed and may, thus, decide to procrastinate more to avoid this stress. [19] Some psychologists cite such behavior as a mechanism for coping with the anxiety associated with starting or completing any task or decision. [20] Piers Steel indicated in 2010 that anxiety is just as likely to induce people to start working early as late, and that the focus of studies on procrastination should be impulsiveness. That is, anxiety will cause people to delay only if they are impulsive. [21] [ page needed ]

Coping responses

Negative coping responses of procrastination tend to be avoidant or emotional rather than task-oriented or focused on problem-solving. Emotional and avoidant coping is employed to reduce stress (and cognitive dissonance) associated with delaying intended and important personal goals. This option provides immediate pleasure and is consequently very attractive to impulsive procrastinators, at the point of discovery of the achievable goals at hand. [22] [23] [ page needed ] There are several emotion-oriented strategies, similar to Freudian defense mechanisms, coping styles and self-handicapping.

Coping responses of procrastinators include the following: [24]

Task- or problem-solving measures are taxing from a procrastinator's outlook. If such measures are pursued, it is less likely the procrastinator would remain a procrastinator. However, pursuing such measures requires actively changing one's behavior or situation to prevent and minimize the re-occurrence of procrastination.

In 2006, it was suggested that neuroticism has no direct links to procrastination and that any relationship is fully mediated by conscientiousness. [25] In 1982, it had been suggested that irrationality was an inherent feature of procrastination. "Putting things off even until the last moment isn't procrastination if there is a reason to believe that they will take only that moment". [26] Steel et al. explained in 2001, "actions must be postponed and this postponement must represent poor, inadequate, or inefficient planning". [27]

Cultural perspective

According to Holly McGregor and Andrew Elliot (2001); Christopher Wolters (2003), academic procrastination among portions of undergraduate students has been correlated to "performance-avoidance orientation" which is one factor of the four factor model of achievement orientation. [3] Andrew Elliot and Judith Harackiewicz (1996) showed that students with performance-avoidance orientations tended to be concerned about comparisons with their peers. These students procrastinated as a result of not wanting to look incompetent, or to avoid demonstrating a lack of ability and adopt a facade of competence for a task in front of their peers. [3]

Gregory Arief Liem and Youyan Nie (2008) found that cultural characteristics are shown to have a direct influence on achievement orientation because it is closely aligned with most students' cultural values and beliefs. [3] Sonja Dekker and Ronald Fischer's (2008) meta-analysis across thirteen different societies revealed that students from Western cultures tend to be motivated more by "mastery-approach orientation" because the degree of incentive value for individual achievement is strongly reflective of the values of Western culture. By contrast, most students from Eastern cultures have been found to be "performance-avoidance orientated". They often make efforts to maintain a positive image of their abilities, which they display while in front of their peers. [3] In addition, Hazel Rose Markus and Shinobu Kitayama (1991) showed that in non-Western cultures, rather than standing out through their achievements, people tend to be motivated to become part of various interpersonal relationships and to fit in with those that are relevant to them. [3]

Research by Sushila Niles (1998) with Australian students and Sri Lankan students confirmed these differences, revealing that Australian students often pursued more individual goals, whereas Sri Lankan students usually desired more collaborative and social goals. [3] Multiple studies by Kuo-Shu Yang and An-Bang Yu (1987, 1988, 1990) have indicated that individual achievement among most Chinese and Japanese students were measured by a fulfillment of their obligation and responsibility to their family network, not to individual accomplishments. [3] Yang and Yu (1987) have also shown that collectivism and Confucianism are very strong motivators for achievement in many non-Western cultures because of their emphasis on cooperation in the family unit and community. [3] Guided by these cultural values, it is believed that the individual intuitively senses the degree of pressure that differentiates his or her factor of achievement orientation. [3]

Health perspective

To a certain degree it is normal to procrastinate and it can be regarded as a useful way to prioritize between tasks, due to a lower tendency of procrastination on truly valued tasks. [28] However, excessive procrastination can become a problem and impede normal functioning. When this happens, procrastination has been found to result in health problems, stress, [29] anxiety, a sense of guilt and crisis as well as loss of personal productivity and social disapproval for not meeting responsibilities or commitments. Together these feelings may promote further procrastination and for some individuals procrastination becomes almost chronic. Such procrastinators may have difficulties seeking support due to procrastination itself, but also social stigmas and the belief that task-aversion is caused by laziness, lack of willpower or low ambition. In some cases, problematic procrastination might be a sign of some underlying psychological disorder. [15]

Research on the physiological roots of procrastination have been concerned with the role of the prefrontal cortex, [30] the area of the brain that is responsible for executive brain functions such as impulse control, attention and planning. This is consistent with the notion that procrastination is strongly related to such functions, or a lack thereof. The prefrontal cortex also acts as a filter, decreasing distracting stimuli from other brain regions. Damage or low activation in this area can reduce one's ability to avert diversions, which results in poorer organization, a loss of attention, and increased procrastination. This is similar to the prefrontal lobe's role in ADHD, where it is commonly under-activated. [31]

In a 2014 U.S. study surveying procrastination and impulsiveness in fraternal and identical twin pairs, both traits were found to be "moderately heritable". The two traits were not separable at the genetic level (rgenetic = 1.0), meaning no unique genetic influences of either trait alone was found. [32] The authors confirmed three constructs developed from the evolutionary hypothesis that procrastination arose as a by-product of impulsivity: "(a) Procrastination is heritable, (b) the two traits share considerable genetic variation, and (c) goal-management ability is an important component of this shared variation." [32]

In culture

Portrait of Pato Peter Pal (1795 jun. 7 - 1855 apr. 28), a Hungarian judge from Muzsla, who inspired the personification. Patopal2.jpg
Portrait of Pató Péter Pál (1795 jun. 7 - 1855 ápr. 28), a Hungarian judge from Muzsla, who inspired the personification.

In Hungary, Pató Pál is known to be the personification of procrastination, portrayed as a pipe-smoking gentleman. The character appears in the poem of Sándor Petőfi, one of the most well known Hungarian poets. A real judge is accredited as the inspiration for the character. He is often referred to and his famous saying, "Ej, ráérünk arra még!" (from old Hungarian, meaning "Oh, we've got time for that!") is used as a catchphrase.

The character has become very popular over the years, and also the eponym of the Paul Pato Party, who advocate for idleness as a basic human right.

Correlates

Procrastination has been linked to the complex arrangement of cognitive, affective and behavioral relationships from task desirability to low self esteem and anxiety to depression. [9] A study found that procrastinators were less future-oriented than their non-procrastinator counterparts. This result was hypothesized to be in association with hedonistic perspectives on the present; instead it was found procrastination was better predicted by a fatalistic and hopeless attitude towards life. [33]

A correlation between procrastination and eveningness was observed where individuals who had later sleeping and waking patterns were more likely to procrastinate. [34] Smartphone addiction is an important factor that interferes with sleep, and it is characterized by compulsive behavior patterns that cause people to malfunction. When smartphone use is suspended, withdrawal reactions may occur, seriously affecting sleep. [35] It has been shown that morningness increases across lifespan and procrastination decreases with age. [15] [36]

Perfectionism

Traditionally, procrastination has been associated with perfectionism: a tendency to negatively evaluate outcomes and one's own performance, intense fear and avoidance of evaluation of one's abilities by others, heightened social self-consciousness and anxiety, recurrent low mood, and "workaholism". However, adaptive perfectionists—egosyntonic perfectionism—were less likely to procrastinate than non-perfectionists, while maladaptive perfectionists, who saw their perfectionism as a problem—egodystonic perfectionism—had high levels of procrastination and anxiety. [37] In a regression analysis study from 2007, it was found that mild to moderate perfectionists typically procrastinate slightly less than others, with "the exception being perfectionists who were also seeking clinical counseling". [15]

Perfectionism is a common cause for procrastination because pursuing unattainable goals (perfection) usually results in failure. [38] Unrealistic expectations destroy self-esteem and lead to self-repudiation, self-contempt, and widespread unhappiness. To overcome procrastination, it is essential to recognize and accept the power of failure without condemning, [39] [ better source needed ] to stop focusing on faults and flaws and to set goals that are easier to achieve.

Academic

According to an Educational Science Professor, Hatice Odaci, academic procrastination is a significant problem during college years in part because many college students lack efficient time management skills in using the Internet. Also, Odaci notes that most colleges provide free and fast twenty-four-hour Internet service which some students are not usually accustomed to, and as a result of irresponsible use or lack of firewalls these students become engulfed in distractions, and thus in procrastination. [40] Psychologist William J. Knaus estimated that more than 90% of college students procrastinate. Of these students, 25% are chronic procrastinators and typically abandon higher education. [41]

Student syndrome is the phenomenon where a student will begin to fully apply themselves to a task only immediately before a deadline. This negates the usefulness of any buffers built into individual task duration estimates. Results from a 2002 study indicate that many students are aware of procrastination and accordingly set binding deadlines long before the date for which a task is due. These self-imposed binding deadlines are correlated with a better performance than without binding deadlines though performance is best for evenly spaced external binding deadlines. Finally, students have difficulties optimally setting self-imposed deadlines, with results suggesting a lack of spacing before the date at which results are due. [42] In one experiment, participation in online exercises was found to be five times higher in the final week before a deadline than in the summed total of the first three weeks for which the exercises were available. Procrastinators end up being the ones doing most of the work in the final week before a deadline. [27] Additionally, students can delay making important decisions such as "I'll get my degree out of the way first then worry about jobs and careers when I finish University". [43]

Other reasons cited on why students procrastinate include fear of failure and success, perfectionist expectations, as well as legitimate activities that may take precedence over school work, such as a job. [44]

Procrastinators have been found to receive worse grades than non-procrastinators. Tice et al. (1997) report that more than one-third of the variation in final exam scores could be attributed to procrastination. The negative association between procrastination and academic performance is recurring and consistent. The students in the study not only received poor academic grades, but they also reported high levels of stress and poor self-health. Howell et al. (2006) found that, though scores on two widely used procrastination scales [9] [45] were not significantly associated with the grade received for an assignment, self-report measures of procrastination on the assessment itself were negatively associated with grade. [46]

In 2005, a study conducted by Angela Chu and Jin Nam Choi and published in The Journal of Social Psychology intended to understand task performance among procrastinators with the definition of procrastination as the absence of self-regulated performance, from the 1977 work of Ellis & Knaus. In their study they identified two types of procrastination: the traditional procrastination which they denote as passive, and active procrastination where the person finds enjoyment of a goal-oriented activity only under pressure. The study calls this active procrastination positive procrastination, as it is a functioning state in a self-handicapping environment. In addition, it was observed that active procrastinators have more realistic perceptions of time and perceive more control over their time than passive procrastinators, which is considered a major differentiator between the two types. Due to this observation, active procrastinators are much more similar to non-procrastinators as they have a better sense of purpose in their time use and possess efficient time-structuring behaviors. But surprisingly, active and passive procrastinators showed similar levels of academic performance. The population of the study was college students and the majority of the sample size were women and Asian in origin. Comparisons with chronic pathological procrastination traits were avoided. [47]

Different findings emerge when observed and self-reported procrastination are compared. Steel et al. constructed their own scales based on Silver and Sabini's "irrational" and "postponement" criteria. They also sought to measure this behavior objectively. [27] During a course, students could complete exam practice computer exercises at their own pace, and during the supervised class time could also complete chapter quizzes. A weighted average of the times at which each chapter quiz was finished formed the measure of observed procrastination, whilst observed irrationality was quantified with the number of practice exercises that were left uncompleted. Researchers found that there was only a moderate correlation between observed and self-reported procrastination (r = 0.35). There was a very strong inverse relationship between the number of exercises completed and the measure of postponement (r = −0.78). Observed procrastination was very strongly negatively correlated with course grade (r = −0.87), as was self-reported procrastination (though less so, r = −0.36). As such, self-reported measures of procrastination, on which the majority of the literature is based, may not be the most appropriate measure to use in all cases. It was also found that procrastination itself may not have contributed significantly to poorer grades. Steel et al. noted that those students who completed all of the practice exercises "tended to perform well on the final exam no matter how much they delayed."[ citation needed ]

Procrastination is considerably more widespread in students than in the general population, with over 70 percent of students reporting procrastination for assignments at some point. [48] A 2014 panel study from Germany among several thousand university students found that increasing academic procrastination increases the frequency of seven different forms of academic misconduct, i.e., using fraudulent excuses, plagiarism, copying from someone else in exams, using forbidden means in exams, carrying forbidden means into exams, copying parts of homework from others, fabrication or falsification of data and the variety of academic misconduct. This study argues that academic misconduct can be seen as a means to cope with the negative consequences of academic procrastination such as performance impairment. [49]

Theoretical framings

Procrastination has been framed as an error in self-regulation. Kuhl distinguished conscious and subconscious regulation. It is often distinguished from strategic delay where tasks are deliberately delayed and the individual positively acknowledges that the benefit of delay exceed the long term benefits. [45] :6

Management

Psychological interventions for procrastination include self-regulation approaches, cognitive behavioural therapy, coherence therapy, commitment therapy and acceptance therapy. [50] :15 Cognitive behavioural therapy approaches on average have the largest effects on average substantial reduction in procrastination is possible. [50] :27Cognitive behavioural therapy identifies thoughts surrounding activities, labels some of them as dysfunctional, and corrects them, and then seeks to associate these corrected thoughts with actions. [50] :16

One form of self-regulation is time management, which does not normally address emotional issues related to procrastination so interventions are often combined with other approaches. Coherence therapy seeks to understand an underlying emotional truth behind procrastination, acceptance therapy focuses on viewing emotional responses as to be expected and transitory. Strength-based approaches aims to foster self-efficacy (an individual's knowledge of and therefore application of their capabilities) by making individuals aware of their strengths. [50] :17

Behaviors and practices that reduce procrastination: [51]

Making a plan to complete tasks in a rigid schedule format might not work for everyone. There is no hard-and-fast rule to follow such a process if it turns out to be counter-productive. Instead of scheduling, it may be better to execute tasks in a flexible, unstructured schedule which has time slots for only necessary activities. [54]

Piers Steel suggests [55] that better time management is a key to overcoming procrastination, including being aware of and using one's "power hours" (being a "morning person" or "night owl"). A good approach is to creatively utilize one's internal circadian rhythms that are best suited for the most challenging and productive work. Steel states that it is essential to have realistic goals, to tackle one problem at a time and to cherish the "small successes". Brian O'Leary supports that "finding a work-life balance...may actually help us find ways to be more productive", suggesting that dedicating leisure activities as motivation can increase one's efficiency at handling tasks. [56] Procrastination is not a lifelong trait. Those likely to worry can learn to let go, those who procrastinate can find different methods and strategies to help focus and avoid impulses. [57]

After contemplating his own procrastination habits, philosopher John Perry authored an essay entitled "Structured Procrastination", [58] wherein he proposes a "cheat" method as a safer approach for tackling procrastination: using a pyramid scheme to reinforce the unpleasant tasks needed to be completed in a quasi-prioritized order.

Severe and negative impact

For some people, procrastination can be persistent and tremendously disruptive to everyday life. For these individuals, procrastination may reveal psychiatric disorders. Procrastination has been linked to a number of negative associations, such as depression, irrational behavior, low self-esteem, anxiety and neurological disorders such as ADHD or perfectionism OCD. Others have found relationships with guilt [59] and stress. [29] Therefore, it is important for people whose procrastination has become chronic and is perceived to be debilitating to seek out a trained therapist or psychiatrist to investigate whether an underlying mental health issue may be present. [60]

With a distant deadline, procrastinators report significantly less stress and physical illness than do non-procrastinators. However, as the deadline approaches, this relationship is reversed. Procrastinators report more stress, more symptoms of physical illness, and more medical visits, [29] to the extent that, overall, procrastinators experience more stress and health problems. This can cause quality of life to decrease significantly along with overall happiness. Procrastination also has the ability to increase perfectionism and neuroticism, while decreasing conscientiousness and optimism. [11]

Procrastination can also lead to insomnia, Alisa Hrustic said in Men's Health that "The procrastinators—people who scored above the median on the survey—were 1.5 to 3 times more likely to have symptoms of insomnia, like severe difficulty falling asleep, than those who scored lower on the test." [61] Insomnia can even add more problems as a severe and negative impact.

See also

Illustration by David Revoy of the metaphor yak shaving. The character Pepper is depicted literally shaving a yak. Yak shaving.jpg
Illustration by David Revoy of the metaphor yak shaving. The character Pepper is depicted literally shaving a yak.

Related Research Articles

Discipline is the self-control that is gained by requiring that rules or orders be obeyed, and the ability to keep working at something that is difficult. Disciplinarians believe that such self-control is of the utmost importance and enforce a set of rules that aim to develop such behavior. Such enforcement is sometimes based on punishment, although there is a clear difference between the two. One way to convey such differences is through the root meaning of each word: discipline means “to teach”, while punishment means “to correct or cause pain”. While punishment might extinguish unwanted behavior in the moment, it is rarely effective long-term, while discipline usually is.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder</span> Personality disorder involving orderliness

Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is a cluster C personality disorder marked by a spectrum of obsessions with rules, lists, schedules, and order, among other things. Symptoms are usually present by the time a person reaches adulthood, and are visible in a variety of situations. The cause of OCPD is thought to involve a combination of genetic and environmental factors, namely problems with attachment.

Conscientiousness is the personality trait of being responsible, careful, or diligent. Conscientiousness implies a desire to do a task well, and to take obligations to others seriously. Conscientious people tend to be efficient and organized as opposed to easy-going and disorderly. They tend to show self-discipline, act dutifully, and aim for achievement; they display planned rather than spontaneous behavior; and they are generally dependable. Conscientiousness manifests in characteristic behaviors such as being neat, systematic, careful, thorough, and deliberate.

Perfectionism, in psychology, is a broad personality trait characterized by a person's concern with striving for flawlessness and perfection and is accompanied by critical self-evaluations and concerns regarding others' evaluations. It is best conceptualized as a multidimensional and multilayered personality characteristic, and initially some psychologists thought that there were many positive and negative aspects.

Content theory is a subset of motivational theories that try to define what motivates people. Content theories of motivation often describe a system of needs that motivate peoples' actions. While process theories of motivation attempt to explain how and why our motivations affect our behaviors, content theories of motivation attempt to define what those motives or needs are. Content theory includes the work of David McClelland, Abraham Maslow and other psychologists.

Goal setting involves the development of an action plan designed in order to motivate and guide a person or group toward a goal. Goals are more deliberate than desires and momentary intentions. Therefore, setting goals means that a person has committed thought, emotion, and behavior towards attaining the goal. In doing so, the goal setter has established a desired future state which differs from their current state thus creating a mismatch which in turn spurs future actions. Goal setting can be guided by goal-setting criteria such as SMART criteria. Goal setting is a major component of personal-development and management literature. Studies by Edwin A. Locke and his colleagues, most notably, Gary Latham have shown that more specific and ambitious goals lead to more performance improvement than easy or general goals. Difficult goals should be set ideally at the 90th percentile of performance, assuming that motivation and not ability is limiting attainment of that level of performance. As long as the person accepts the goal, has the ability to attain it, and does not have conflicting goals, there is a positive linear relationship between goal difficulty and task performance.

Student syndrome refers to planned procrastination, when a student will begin to substantially apply themselves to an assignment or task at the last moment before its deadline. For a person experiencing student syndrome, they only begin to make significant progress when there is a sense of urgency that causes the person to put the proper amount of effort into their task. This eliminates any potential safety margins and puts the person under stress and pressure. An estimated 80 to 95 percent of college students engage in some form of procrastination.

Self-control is an aspect of inhibitory control, one of the core executive functions. Executive functions are cognitive processes that are necessary for regulating one's behavior in order to achieve specific goals. Defined more independently, self-control is the ability to regulate one's emotions, thoughts, and behavior in the face of temptations and impulses. Thought to be like a muscle, acts of self-control expend a limited resource. In the short term, overuse of self-control leads to the depletion of that resource. However, in the long term, the use of self-control can strengthen and improve the ability to control oneself over time.

Delayed gratification, or deferred gratification, is the ability to resist the temptation of an immediate reward in favor of a more valuable and long-lasting reward later. It involves forgoing a smaller, immediate pleasure to achieve a larger or more enduring benefit in the future. A growing body of literature has linked the ability to delay gratification to a host of other positive outcomes, including academic success, physical health, psychological health, and social competence.

The term eustress means "beneficial stress"—either psychological, physical, or biochemical/radiological (hormesis).

Neuroticism is a personality trait associated with negative emotions. It is one of the Big Five traits. Individuals with high scores on neuroticism are more likely than average to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, pessimism, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness. Such people are thought to respond worse to stressors and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations, such as minor frustrations, as appearing hopelessly difficult. Their behavioral responses may include procrastination, substance use, and other maladaptive behaviors, which may temporarily aid in relieving negative emotions and generating positive ones.

Test anxiety is a combination of physiological over-arousal, tension and somatic symptoms, along with worry, dread, fear of failure, and catastrophizing, that occur before or during test situations. It is a psychological condition in which people experience extreme stress, anxiety, and discomfort during and/or before taking a test. This anxiety creates significant barriers to learning and performance. Research suggests that high levels of emotional distress have a direct correlation to reduced academic performance and higher overall student drop-out rates. Test anxiety can have broader consequences, negatively affecting a student's social, emotional and behavioural development, as well as their feelings about themselves and school.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affective events theory</span> Psychological model

Affective events theory (AET) is an industrial and organizational psychology model developed by organizational psychologists Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano to explain how emotions and moods influence job performance and job satisfaction. The model explains the linkages between employees' internal influences and their reactions to incidents that occur in their work environment that affect their performance, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction. The theory proposes that affective work behaviors are explained by employee mood and emotions, while cognitive-based behaviors are the best predictors of job satisfaction. The theory proposes that positive-inducing as well as negative-inducing emotional incidents at work are distinguishable and have a significant psychological impact upon workers' job satisfaction. This results in lasting internal and external affective reactions exhibited through job performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impulsivity</span> Tendency to act on a whim without considering consequences

In psychology, impulsivity is a tendency to act on a whim, displaying behavior characterized by little or no forethought, reflection, or consideration of the consequences. Impulsive actions are typically "poorly conceived, prematurely expressed, unduly risky, or inappropriate to the situation that often result in undesirable consequences," which imperil long-term goals and strategies for success. Impulsivity can be classified as a multifactorial construct. A functional variety of impulsivity has also been suggested, which involves action without much forethought in appropriate situations that can and does result in desirable consequences. "When such actions have positive outcomes, they tend not to be seen as signs of impulsivity, but as indicators of boldness, quickness, spontaneity, courageousness, or unconventionality." Thus, the construct of impulsivity includes at least two independent components: first, acting without an appropriate amount of deliberation, which may or may not be functional; and second, choosing short-term gains over long-term ones.

Sport psychology is defined as the study of the psychological basis, processes, and effects of sport. Sport is defined as any physical activity where the individuals engage for competition and health. Sport psychology is recognized as an interdisciplinary science that draws on knowledge from many related fields including biomechanics, physiology, kinesiology and psychology. It involves the study of how psychological factors affect performance and how participation in sport and exercise affect psychological and physical factors. Sport psychologists teach cognitive and behavioral strategies to athletes in order to improve their experience and performance in sports.

Goal orientation, or achievement orientation, is an "individual disposition towards developing or validating one's ability in achievement settings". In general, an individual can be said to be mastery or performance oriented, based on whether one's goal is to develop one's ability or to demonstrate one's ability, respectively. A mastery orientation is also sometimes referred to as a learning orientation.

Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) proposes three brain-behavioral systems that underlie individual differences in sensitivity to reward, punishment, and motivation. While not originally defined as a theory of personality, the RST has been used to study and predict anxiety, impulsivity, and extraversion. The theory evolved from Gray's biopsychological theory of personality to incorporate findings from a number of areas in psychology and neuroscience, culminating in a major revision in 2000. The revised theory distinguishes between fear and anxiety and proposes functionally related subsystems. Measures of RST have not been widely adapted to reflect the revised theory due to disagreement over related versus independent subsystems. Despite this controversy, RST informed the study of anxiety disorders in clinical settings and continues to be used today to study and predict work performance. RST, built upon Gray's behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral activation system (BAS) understanding, also may help to suggest predispositions to and predict alcohol and drug abuse. RST, a continuously evolving paradigm, is the subject of multiple areas of contemporary psychological enquiry.

Temporal motivation theory (TMT) is an integrative motivational theory developed by Piers Steel and Cornelius J. König. The theory emphasizes time as a critical and motivational factor. The argument for a broad, integrative theory stems from the absence of a single theory that can address motivation in its entirety. Thus, it incorporates primary aspects of multiple major theories, including expectancy theory, hyperbolic discounting, need theory and cumulative prospect theory. According to Schmidt, Dolis, and Tolli, Temporal Motivation Theory "may help further the understanding of the impact of time, and particularly deadlines, on dynamic attention allocation." The Temporal Motivation Theory formula can be applied to human behaviour, procrastination and to goal setting. According to Lord, Diefendorff, Schmidt, and Hall, the theory "models the motivating power of approaching deadlines, arguing that the perceived utility of a given activity increases exponentially as the deadline nears. These and similar ideas have been applied to the pervasive phenomenon of procrastination".

Present bias is the tendency to settle for a smaller present reward rather than wait for a larger future reward, in a trade-off situation. It describes the trend of overvaluing immediate rewards, while putting less worth in long-term consequences. The present bias can be used as a measure for self-control, which is a trait related to the prediction of secure life outcomes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bedtime procrastination</span> Psychological phenomenon

Bedtime procrastination is a psychological phenomenon that involves needlessly and voluntarily delaying going to bed, despite foreseeably being worse off as a result. Bedtime procrastination can occur due to losing track of time, or as an attempt to enjoy control over the nighttime due to a perceived lack of control over the events of the daytime; this latter phenomenon has recently been called revenge bedtime procrastination, a term which originated on the Chinese social media platform Weibo in 2014.

References

  1. Duru, Erdinç; Balkis, Murat (June 2017) [31 May 2017]. "Procrastination, Self-Esteem, Academic Performance, and Well-Being: A Moderated Mediation Model". International Journal of Educational Psychology. 6 (2): 97–119. doi: 10.17583/ijep.2017.2584 . Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 16 May 2018 via ed.gov.
  2. Bernstein, Peter (1996). Against the Gods: The remarkable story of risk . John Wiley & Sons. pp.  15. ISBN   9780471121046.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ganesan; et al. (2014). "Procrastination and the 2 x 2 achievement goal framework in Malaysian undergraduate students" (PDF). Psychology in the Schools. 51 (5): 506–516. doi:10.1002/pits.21760.[ dead link ]
  4. Lewis, Richard. "How Different Cultures Understand Time". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2014-06-03. Retrieved 2018-12-05.
  5. Mazur, James (1998). "Procrastination by Pigeons with Fixed-Interval Response Requirements". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 69 (2): 185–197. doi:10.1901/jeab.1998.69-185. PMC   1284653 . PMID   9540230.
  6. Mazur, J E (January 1996). "Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 65 (1): 159–171. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-159. ISSN   0022-5002. PMC   1350069 . PMID   8583195.
  7. Surowiecki, James (2010-10-04). "Later". The New Yorker. ISSN   0028-792X. Archived from the original on 2023-07-22. Retrieved 2023-07-22.
  8. Karen K. Kirst-Ashman; Grafton H. Hull Jr. (2016). Empowerment Series: Generalist Practice with Organizations and Communities. Cengage Learning. p. 67. ISBN   978-1-305-94329-2.
  9. 1 2 3 Solomon, LJ; Rothblum (1984). "Academic Procrastination: Frequency and Cognitive-Behavioural Correlates" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-07-29.
  10. Gallagher, Robert P.; Golin, Anne; Kelleher, Kathleen (1992). "The Personal, Career, and Learning Skills Needs of College Students". Journal of College Student Development. 33 (4): 301–10. Archived from the original on 2022-02-14. Retrieved 2018-11-03.
  11. 1 2 Klingsieck, Katrin B. (January 2013). "Procrastination". European Psychologist. 18 (1): 24–34. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000138. ISSN   1016-9040.
  12. Norman A. Milgram; Barry Sroloff; Michael Rosenbaum (June 1988). "The Procrastination of Everyday Life". Journal of Research in Personality. 22 (2): 197–212. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(88)90015-3.
  13. Barabanshchikova, Valentina V.; Ivanova, Svetlana A.; Klimova, Oxana A. (2018). "The Impact of Organizational and Personal Factors on Procrastination in Employees of a Modern Russian Industrial Enterprise". Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 11 (3): 69–85. doi: 10.11621/pir.2018.0305 .
  14. Schraw, Gregory; Wadkins, Theresa; Olafson, Lori (2007). "Doing the Things We Do: A Grounded Theory of Academic Procrastination". Journal of Educational Psychology. 99: 12–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Steel, Piers (2007). "The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure" (PDF). Psychological Bulletin. 133 (1): 65–94. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.335.2796 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65. PMID   17201571. S2CID   1066615. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-04-01.
  16. Sabini, J.; Silver, M. (1982). Moralities of everyday life. p. 128.
  17. Pogorskiy, Eduard; Beckmann, Jens F. (2022). "Learners' web navigation behaviour beyond learning management systems: A way into addressing procrastination in online learning?". Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 3: 100094. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100094 . S2CID   252131969.
  18. Rinaldi, Anthony Robert; Roper, Carrie Lurie; Mehm, John (2019). "Procrastination as evidence of executive functioning impairment in college students" . Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. 28 (6): 697–706. doi:10.1080/23279095.2019.1684293. ISSN   2327-9095. PMID   31679406. S2CID   207897153. Archived from the original on 2022-04-08. Retrieved 2022-04-08.
  19. Pychyl, T. (20 February 2012). "The real reasons you procrastinate — and how to stop". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 24 August 2023. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
  20. Fiore, Neil A (2006). The Now Habit: A Strategic Program for Overcoming Procrastination and Enjoying Guilt-Free Play. New York: Penguin Group. p.  5. ISBN   978-1-58542-552-5.
  21. Steel, Piers (2011). The procrastination equation: how to stop putting things off and start getting stuff done. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN   978-0-06-170362-1. OCLC   754770758.
  22. Gendler, Tamar Szabó (2007). "Self-Deception As Pretense". Philosophical Perspectives. 21: 231–58. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00127.x.
  23. Gosling, J. (1990). Weakness of the Will. New York: Routledge.
  24. Rahimi, Sonia; Hall, Nathan C.; Sticca, Fabio (2023-03-27). "Understanding academic procrastination: A Longitudinal analysis of procrastination and emotions in undergraduate and graduate students". Motivation and Emotion. 47 (4): 554–574. doi:10.1007/s11031-023-10010-9. ISSN   0146-7239. S2CID   257793609. Archived from the original on 2023-09-19. Retrieved 2023-09-14.
  25. Lee, Dong-gwi; Kelly, Kevin R.; Edwards, Jodie K. (2006). "A Closer Look at the Relationships Among Trait Procrastination, Neuroticism, and Conscientiousness". Personality and Individual Differences. 40: 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.010.
  26. Sabini, J. & Silver, M. (1982) Moralities of everyday life, p. 128
  27. 1 2 3 Steel, P.; Brothen, T.; Wambach, C. (2001). "Procrastination and Personality, Performance and Mood". Personality and Individual Differences. 30: 95–106. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00013-1.
  28. Pavlina, Steve (2010-06-10). "How to Fall in Love with Procrastination". Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
  29. 1 2 3 Tice, DM; Baumeister, RF (1997). "Longitudinal Study of Procrastination, Performance, Stress, and Health: The Costs and Benefits of Dawdling". Psychological Science. 8 (6): 454–58. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.461.1149 . doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x. JSTOR   40063233. S2CID   15851848.
  30. Evans, James R. (8 August 2007). Handbook of Neurofeedback: Dynamics and Clinical Applications. Psychology Press. p. 293. ISBN   978-0-7890-3360-4. Archived from the original on 1 June 2012. Retrieved 8 October 2010.
  31. Strub, RL (1989). "Frontal Lobe Syndrome in a Patient with Bilateral Globus Pallidus Lesions". Archives of Neurology. 46 (9): 1024–27. doi:10.1001/archneur.1989.00520450096027. PMID   2775008.
  32. 1 2 Gustavson, Daniel E; Miyake A; Hewitt JK; Friedman NP (4 April 2014). "Genetic Relations Among Procrastination, Impulsivity, and Goal-Management Ability Implications for the Evolutionary Origin of Procrastination". Psychological Science. 25 (6): 1178–88. doi:10.1177/0956797614526260. PMC   4185275 . PMID   24705635.
  33. Jackson, T.; Fritch, A.; Nagasaka, T.; Pope, L. (2003). "Procrastination and Perceptions of Past, Present, and Future". Individual Differences Research. 1: 17–28. Archived from the original on 2023-04-17. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  34. Digdon, Nancy; Howell, Andrew (2008-12-01). "College Students Who Have an Eveningness Preference Report Lower Self-Control and Greater Procrastination". Chronobiology International. 25 (6): 1029–46. doi:10.1080/07420520802553671. PMID   19005903. S2CID   32980851 via ResearchGate.
  35. Hamvai, Csaba; Kiss, Hedvig; Vörös, Henrietta; Fitzpatrick, Kevin M.; Vargha, András; Pikó, Bettina F. (2023-07-27). "Association between impulsivity and cognitive capacity decrease is mediated by smartphone addiction, academic procrastination, bedtime procrastination, sleep insufficiency and daytime fatigue among medical students: a path analysis". BMC Medical Education. 23 (1): 537. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04522-8 . ISSN   1472-6920. PMC   10375684 . PMID   37501113.
  36. Duffy, JF; Czeisler, CA (2002). "Age-Related Change in the Relationship Between Circadian Period, Circadian Phase, and Diurnal Preference in Humans". Neuroscience Letters. 318 (3): 117–120. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02427-2. PMID   11803113. S2CID   43152568.
  37. McGarvey, Jason A. (1996). "The Almost Perfect Definition". Archived from the original on 2006-03-13.
  38. Hillary Rettig (2011). The 7 Secrets of the Prolific: The Definitive Guide to Overcoming Procrastination, Perfectionism, and Writer's Block
  39. James Prochaska, 1995
  40. Odaci, Hatice (2011). "Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students". Computers & Education. 57 (1). Elsevier BV: 1109–1113. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.005. ISSN   0360-1315. Archived from the original on 2018-11-03. Retrieved 2018-11-03.
  41. Ellis and Knaus, 1977
  42. Ariely, Dan; Wertenbroch, Klaus (2002). "Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment" (PDF). Psychological Science. 13 (3): 219–224. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00441. PMID   12009041. S2CID   3025329. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2010-02-15.
  43. "Procrastinating on your graduate job search? | Careers Perspectives from the University of Bath Careers Service". Archived from the original on 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2021-06-09.
  44. "Procrastination". writingcenter.unc.edu. The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill. Archived from the original on 2012-03-18. Retrieved 2012-03-10.
  45. 1 2 Tuckman, Bruce W. (1991). "The Development and Concurrent Validity of the Procrastination Scale". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 51 (2). SAGE Publications: 473–480. doi:10.1177/0013164491512022. ISSN   0013-1644. S2CID   145707625.
  46. Howell, AJ; Watson, DC; Powell, RA; Buro, K (2006). "Academic Procrastination: The Pattern and Correlates of Behavioral Postponement". Personality and Individual Differences. 40 (8): 1519–30. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.023.
  47. Hsin Chun Chu, Angela; Nam Choi, Jin (2005). "Rethinking Procrastination: Positive Effects of "Active" Procrastination Behavior on Attitudes and Performance". The Journal of Social Psychology. 145 (3): 245–64. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.502.2444 . doi:10.3200/socp.145.3.245-264. PMID   15959999. S2CID   2705082.
  48. "Getting Around to Procrastination" . Retrieved 10 October 2014.
  49. Patrzek, J.; Sattler, S.; van Veen, F.; Grunschel, C.; Fries, S. (2014). "Investigating the Effect of Academic Procrastination on the Frequency and Variety of Academic Misconduct: A Panel Study". Studies in Higher Education. 40 (6): 1–16. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.854765. S2CID   144324180.
  50. 1 2 3 4 Eerde, Wendelien van; Klingsieck, Katrin B. Klingsieck. "Overcoming Procrastination? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies". Educational Research Review .
  51. Tuckman, Bruce W.; Schouwenburg, Henri C. (2004), "Behavioral Interventions for Reducing Procrastination Among University Students.", Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings., Washington: American Psychological Association, pp. 91–103, doi:10.1037/10808-007, ISBN   1-59147-107-9, archived from the original on 2024-02-24, retrieved 2023-06-29
  52. 1 2 "How I Miraculously Overcame Procrastination By Applying These 6 Steps". Dating Reporter's Blog. Archived from the original on 2021-03-01. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
  53. 1 2 3 4 Macan, Therese Hoff (1994). "Time management: Test of a process model". Journal of Applied Psychology. 79 (3): 381–391. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.455.4283 . doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.381. ISSN   0021-9010. S2CID   15311869.
  54. Burka, J.; Yuen, L.M. (2007). Procrastination: Why You Do It, What to Do About It Now. Hachette Books. ISBN   978-0-7382-1130-5. Archived from the original on 2024-02-24. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  55. The Procrastination Equation, 2012
  56. "Work-Life: Is Productivity in the Balance?". HBS Working Knowledge. 2004-07-05. Archived from the original on 2017-12-12. Retrieved 2018-08-24.
  57. "5 Ways to Finally Stop Procrastinating". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on 2024-02-24. Retrieved 2019-02-27.
  58. Perry, John (February 23, 1996). "How to Procrastinate and Still Get Things Done". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Archived from the original on February 18, 2017. Retrieved February 18, 2017.
  59. Pychyl, TA; Lee, JM; Thibodeau, R; Blunt, A (2000). "Five Days of Emotion: An Experience Sampling Study of Undergraduate Student Procrastination (special issue)". Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 15: 239–254. Archived from the original on 2023-02-13. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  60. Lay, CH; Schouwenburg, HC (1993). "Trait procrastination, time management, and academic behavior". Trait Procrastination, Time Management, and Academic Behavior. 8 (4): 647–62. Archived from the original on 2024-02-24. Retrieved 2018-09-29.
  61. Hrustic, Alisa (2016-07-13). "How Procrastination Literally Keeps You Up At Night". Men's Health. Archived from the original on 2020-06-04. Retrieved 2020-06-04.

Further reading

Procrastination

Impulse control

Motivation