Project Timberwind

Last updated

Project Timberwind aimed to develop nuclear thermal rockets. Initial funding by the Strategic Defense Initiative from 1987 through 1991 totaled $139 million (then-year). [1] The proposed rocket was later expanded into a larger design after the project was transferred to the Air Force Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) program.

Contents

The program underwent an audit in 1992 due to security concerns raised by Steven Aftergood. [1] This highly classified program provided the motivation for starting the FAS Government Secrecy project. Convicted spy Stewart Nozette was found to be on the master access list for the TIMBER WIND project. [2]

Advances in high-temperature metals, computer modelling and nuclear engineering in general resulted in dramatically improved performance. Whereas the NERVA engine was projected to weigh about 6803 kg, the final SNTP offered just over 1/3 the thrust from an engine of only 1650 kg, while further improving the specific impulse from 930 to 1000 seconds.[ citation needed ]

History

In 1983, the Strategic Defense Initiative ("Star Wars") identified missions that could benefit from rockets that are more powerful than chemical rockets, and some that could only be undertaken by more powerful rockets. [3] A nuclear propulsion project, SP-100, was created in February 1983 with the aim of developing a 100 KW nuclear rocket system. The concept incorporated a particle/pebble-bed reactor, a concept developed by James R. Powell at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, which promised a specific impulse of up to 1,000 seconds (9.8 km/s) and a thrust to weight ratio of between 25 and 35 for thrust levels greater than 89,000 newtons (20,000 lbf). [4]

From 1987 to 1991 it was funded as a secret project codenamed Project Timberwind, which spent $139 million. [5] The proposed rocket project was transferred to the Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) program at the Air Force Phillips Laboratory in October 1991. [6] NASA conducted studies as part of its 1992 Space Exploration Initiative (SEI) but felt that SNTP offered insufficient improvement over NERVA, and was not required by any SEI missions. The SNTP program was terminated in January 1994, [4] [7] after $200 million was spent. [8]

Timberwind Specifications

Timberwind 45 on Timberwind Centaur

Timberwind 75 on Timberwind Titan

Timberwind 250 stage and engine

Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Program

SNTP Engine SNTP Engine.png
SNTP Engine
Baseline Fuel Particle SNTP Fuel Particle.png
Baseline Fuel Particle
Typical Reactor Assembly SNTP Reactor Assembly.png
Typical Reactor Assembly
Graphite Turbine Wheel SNTP Graphite Turbine Wheel.png
Graphite Turbine Wheel
Integrated C-C Pressure Vessel & Nozzle SNTP CC PV Nozzle.png
Integrated C-C Pressure Vessel & Nozzle
PBR Upper Stage Applications SNTP Upper Stage Applications.png
PBR Upper Stage Applications
PBR Design Methodology PBR Design Methodology SNTP.png
PBR Design Methodology

In contrast to the TIMBER WIND project, the Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) program was intended to develop upper-stages for space-lift which would not operate within the Earth's atmosphere. SNTP failed to achieve its objective of flight testing a nuclear thermal upper-stage, and was terminated in January 1994. [13] The program involved coordinating efforts across the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, and their contractors from operating sites across the U.S. A major accomplishment of the program was to coordinate Environmental Protection Agency approvals for ground testing at two possible sites. [14]

Participating or Cooperating Agencies [14]
NameLocationResponsibilities
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NYReactor materials and components testing; thermal-hydraulic, and neutronic analysis; reactor design studies [12]
Babcock & Wilcox Lynchburg, VAReactor design testing, fabrication and assembly
Sandia National Labs Albuquerque, NMNuclear safety, nuclear instrumentation and operation, reactor control system modeling, nuclear testing
Aerojet Propulsion Division Sacramento, CAFuel element alternate materials development
Hercules Aerospace Corporation Magna, UTDesign and fabrication of engine lower structure and nozzle
Garrett Fluid Systems Division Tempe, AZ and San Tan, AZDesign and fabrication of attitude control system, propellant flow control system and turbopump assembly
AiResearch Los Angeles Division of Allied Signal Torrance, CATurbine wheel testing
Grumman Space Electronics Division Bethpage, NYVehicle design and fabrication, systems integration
Raytheon Services Nevada Las Vegas, NVFacility and Coolant Supply System (CSS) engineering, facility construction management
Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company, IncLas Vegas, NVFacility construction
Fluor-Daniel, Inc.Irvine, CAEffluent Treatment System (ETS) engineering
Sandia National Labs Saddle Mountain Test Site or QUEST or LOFT SitesTest site preparation, planning and performance of engine ground tests, nuclear component testing
[REDACTED]Washington, DCProgram management
DoE Headquarters Washington, DCProgram management, nuclear safety assurance
DoE Nevada Test Site Las Vegas, NVGround testing
DoE Idaho National Engineering Lab Idaho Falls, IDGround testing
U.S. Air Force Phillips Lab Albuquerque, NMProgram management
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Huntsville, ALETS engineering management
Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NMFuels and materials testing
Marshall Space Flight Center (NASA)Huntsville, ALMaterial and component simulation/testing
Western Test Range/Western Space & Missile Center (USAF) Vandenberg AFB, CAProgram review
Arnold Engineering Development Center Manchester, TNHydrogen flow testing
UNC Manufacturing CompanyUncasville, CTMaterials manufacturing
Grumman Corporation - Calverton Facility Long Island, NYHydrogen testing

The planned ground test facilities were estimated to cost $400M of additional funding to complete in 1992. [15] Fewer than 50 sub-scale tests were planned over three to four years, followed by facility expansions to accommodate five to 25 1000 second full-scale tests of a 2000MW engine. [14]

Initially, PIPET [Particle Bed Reactor Integral Performance Element Tester] was envisioned as a small, low-cost, SNTP-specific experiment for testing and qualifying PBR fuel and fuel elements. The demands by other agencies, DOE and NASA, resulted in a national test facility for NTP fuel, fuel elements, and engines. Its size out grew the SNTP Program's ability to secure the funds for such a large construction project. Though the demands were placed upon the SNTP Program to expand the facility's scope and the SNTP Program's management tried to coordinate tri-agency, DoD-DOE-NASA, support and funding, adequate funding support for the national ground test facility was not obtained.

— SNTP Final Report, [13]

The program had technical achievements as well, such as developing high-strength fibers, and carbide coatings for Carbon-Carbon composites. The hot-section design evolved to use all Carbon-Carbon to maximize turbine inlet temperature and minimize weight. Carbon-Carbon has much lower nuclear heating than other candidate materials, so thermal stresses were minimized as well. Prototype turbine components employing a 2-D polar reinforcement weave were fabricated for use in the corrosive, high-temperature hydrogen environment found in the proposed particle bed reactor (PBR)-powered engine. [13] The particle bed reactor concept required significant radiation shielding, not only for the payload, electronics and structure of the vehicle, but also to prevent unacceptable boil-off of the cryogenic propellant. A propellant-cooled, composite shield of Tungsten, which attenuates gamma rays and absorbs thermal neutrons, and Lithium Hydride, which has a large scattering cross section for fast and thermal neutrons was found to perform well with low mass compared to older Boron Aluminum Titanium Hydride (BATH) shields. [16]

Sandia National Labs was responsible for qualification of the coated particle fuel for use in the SNTP nuclear thermal propulsion concept. [15]

SNTP Comparison of Bleed and Expander Cycles
ProCon
Bleed Cycle
  1. Lowest system complexity
  2. Minimum reactor internal plumbing & manifolding
  3. Development of reactor and balance of plant (BOP) is uncoupled
  4. Fast startup easily achieved
Development of high temp turbine and feed lines required
Partial Flow Expander Cycle
  1. State of the art turbine technology can be used
  2. Higher Isp (~0.5%)
  1. Coupled reactor and BOP development increases programmatic risk
  2. Dedicated fuel elements to supply energy to drive the turbine are of unique design and require additional development

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear thermal rocket</span> Rocket engine that uses a nuclear reactor to generate thrust

A nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) is a type of thermal rocket where the heat from a nuclear reaction replaces the chemical energy of the propellants in a chemical rocket. In an NTR, a working fluid, usually liquid hydrogen, is heated to a high temperature in a nuclear reactor and then expands through a rocket nozzle to create thrust. The external nuclear heat source theoretically allows a higher effective exhaust velocity and is expected to double or triple payload capacity compared to chemical propellants that store energy internally.

A nuclear electric rocket is a type of spacecraft propulsion system where thermal energy from a nuclear reactor is converted to electrical energy, which is used to drive an ion thruster or other electrical spacecraft propulsion technology. The nuclear electric rocket terminology is slightly inconsistent, as technically the "rocket" part of the propulsion system is non-nuclear and could also be driven by solar panels. This is in contrast with a nuclear thermal rocket, which directly uses reactor heat to add energy to a working fluid, which is then expelled out of a rocket nozzle.

Beam-powered propulsion, also known as directed energy propulsion, is a class of aircraft or spacecraft propulsion that uses energy beamed to the spacecraft from a remote power plant to provide energy. The beam is typically either a microwave or a laser beam and it is either pulsed or continuous. A continuous beam lends itself to thermal rockets, photonic thrusters and light sails, whereas a pulsed beam lends itself to ablative thrusters and pulse detonation engines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antimatter rocket</span> Rockets using antimatter as their power source

An antimatter rocket is a proposed class of rockets that use antimatter as their power source. There are several designs that attempt to accomplish this goal. The advantage to this class of rocket is that a large fraction of the rest mass of a matter/antimatter mixture may be converted to energy, allowing antimatter rockets to have a far higher energy density and specific impulse than any other proposed class of rocket.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket</span> Electrothermal thruster in development

The Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) is an electrothermal thruster under development for possible use in spacecraft propulsion. It uses radio waves to ionize and heat an inert propellant, forming a plasma, then a magnetic field to confine and accelerate the expanding plasma, generating thrust. It is a plasma propulsion engine, one of several types of spacecraft electric propulsion systems.

Specific impulse is a measure of how efficiently a reaction mass engine, such as a rocket using propellant or a jet engine using fuel, generates thrust. For engines like cold gas thrusters whose reaction mass is only the fuel they carry, specific impulse is exactly proportional to the effective exhaust gas velocity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NERVA</span> US Nuclear thermal rocket engine project (1956–1973)

The Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application was a nuclear thermal rocket engine development program that ran for roughly two decades. Its principal objective was to "establish a technology base for nuclear rocket engine systems to be utilized in the design and development of propulsion systems for space mission application". It was a joint effort of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and was managed by the Space Nuclear Propulsion Office (SNPO) until the program ended in January 1973. SNPO was led by NASA's Harold Finger and AEC's Milton Klein.

A radioisotope rocket or radioisotope thermal rocket is a type of thermal rocket engine that uses the heat generated by the decay of radioactive elements to heat a working fluid, which is then exhausted through a rocket nozzle to produce thrust. They are similar in nature to nuclear thermal rockets such as NERVA, but are considerably simpler and often have no moving parts. Alternatively, radioisotopes may be used in a radioisotope electric rocket, in which energy from nuclear decay is used to generate the electricity used to power an electric propulsion system.

The fission-fragment rocket is a rocket engine design that directly harnesses hot nuclear fission products for thrust, as opposed to using a separate fluid as working mass. The design can, in theory, produce very high specific impulse while still being well within the abilities of current technologies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RS-68</span> A large hydrogen-oxygen rocket engine that powers the Delta IV rocket

The Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-68 is a liquid-fuel rocket engine that uses liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX) as propellants in a gas-generator power cycle. It is the largest hydrogen-fueled rocket engine ever flown.

The Saturn C-5N was a conceptual successor to the Saturn V launch vehicle which would have had a nuclear thermal third stage instead of the S-IVB used on the Saturn V. This one change would have increased the payload of the standard Saturn V to Low Earth orbit from 118,000 kg to 155,000 kg.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space Launch Initiative</span> US NASA & DOD program 2000-2002

The Space Launch Initiative (SLI) was a NASA and U.S. Department of Defense joint research and technology project to determine the requirements to meet all the nation's hypersonics, space launch and space technology needs. It was also known as the second generation Reusable Launch Vehicle program, after the failure of the first. The program began with the award of RLV study contracts in 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LE-7</span> Japanese hydrolox staged combustion rocket engine

The LE-7 and its succeeding upgrade model the LE-7A are staged combustion cycle LH2/LOX liquid rocket engines produced in Japan for the H-II series of launch vehicles. Design and production work was all done domestically in Japan, the first major (main/first-stage) liquid rocket engine with that claim, in a collaborative effort from the National Space Development Agency (NASDA), Aerospace Engineering Laboratory (NAL), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and Ishikawajima-Harima. NASDA and NAL have since been integrated into JAXA. However, a large part of the work was contracted to Mitsubishi, with Ishikawajima-Harima providing turbomachinery, and the engine is often referred to as the Mitsubishi LE-7(A).

The RL60 was a planned liquid-fuel cryogenic rocket engine designed in the United States by Pratt & Whitney, burning cryogenic liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants. The engine runs on an expander cycle, running the turbopumps with waste heat absorbed from the main combustion process. This high-efficiency, waste heat based combustion cycle combined with the high-performance liquid hydrogen fuel enables the engine to reach a very high specific impulse of up to 465 seconds in a vacuum. The engine was planned to be a more capable successor to the Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10, providing improved performance and efficiency while maintaining the installation envelope of the RL10.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Project Rover</span> U.S. project to build a nuclear thermal rocket

Project Rover was a United States project to develop a nuclear-thermal rocket that ran from 1955 to 1973 at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL). It began as a United States Air Force project to develop a nuclear-powered upper stage for an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). The project was transferred to NASA in 1958 after the Sputnik crisis triggered the Space Race. It was managed by the Space Nuclear Propulsion Office (SNPO), a joint agency of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and NASA. Project Rover became part of NASA's Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application (NERVA) project and henceforth dealt with the research into nuclear rocket reactor design, while NERVA involved the overall development and deployment of nuclear rocket engines, and the planning for space missions.

Fastrac was a turbo pump-fed, liquid rocket engine. The engine was designed by NASA as part of the low cost X-34 Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) and as part of the Low Cost Booster Technology project. This engine was later known as the MC-1 engine when it was merged into the X-34 project.

Nuclear gas-core-reactor rockets can provide much higher specific impulse than solid core nuclear rockets because their temperature limitations are in the nozzle and core wall structural temperatures, which are distanced from the hottest regions of the gas core. Consequently, nuclear gas core reactors can provide much higher temperatures to the propellant. Solid core nuclear thermal rockets can develop higher specific impulse than conventional chemical rockets due to the low molecular weight of a hydrogen propellant, but their operating temperatures are limited by the maximum temperature of the solid core because the reactor's temperatures cannot rise above its components' lowest melting temperature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rocket propellant</span> Chemical or mixture used as fuel for a rocket engine

Rocket propellant is the reaction mass of a rocket. This reaction mass is ejected at the highest achievable velocity from a rocket engine to produce thrust. The energy required can either come from the propellants themselves, as with a chemical rocket, or from an external source, as with ion engines.

A thermal rocket is a rocket engine that uses a propellant that is externally heated before being passed through a nozzle to produce thrust, as opposed to being internally heated by a redox (combustion) reaction as in a chemical rocket.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SpaceX rocket engines</span> Rocket engines developed by SpaceX

Since the founding of SpaceX in 2002, the company has developed four families of rocket engines — Merlin, Kestrel, Draco and SuperDraco — and is currently developing another rocket engine: Raptor, and after 2020, a new line of methalox thrusters.

References

  1. 1 2 Lieberman, Robert (December 1992). "Audit Report on the TIMBER WIND Special Access Program" (PDF). Department of Defense. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 May 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2012.
  2. ↑ Aftergood, Steven (October 2009). "Nozette and Nuclear Rocketry". Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2012.
  3. ↑ Haslett 1995, p. 3-1.
  4. 1 2 Haslett 1995, pp. 1–1, 2-1–2-5.
  5. ↑ Lieberman 1992, pp. 3–4.
  6. ↑ Haslett 1995, p. 2-4.
  7. ↑ Miller, Thomas J.; Bennett, Gary L. (1993). "Nuclear propulsion for space exploration". Acta Astronautica. 30: 143–149. Bibcode:1993AcAau..30..143M. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(93)90106-7. ISSN   0094-5765.
  8. ↑ Haslett 1995, p. 3-7.
  9. ↑ Timberwind Centaur
  10. 1 2 Timberwin Titan
  11. ↑ Timberwind rocket
  12. 1 2 Ludewig, H. (1996), "Design of particle bed reactors for the space nuclear thermal propulsion program", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 30 (1): 1–65, doi:10.1016/0149-1970(95)00080-4
  13. 1 2 3 Haslett, R.A. (1995), Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Program Final Report, archived from the original on 2013-04-08, retrieved 2012-07-28
  14. 1 2 3 "Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) Program". U.S. Defense Technical Information Center. September 1991. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 7 Aug 2012.
  15. 1 2 Kingsbury, Nancy (October 1992). "Space Nuclear Propulsion: History, Cost, and Status of Programs" (PDF). U.S. Government Accountability Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2014. Retrieved 4 Aug 2012.
  16. ↑ Gruneisen, S.J. (1991), Shielding Requirements for Particle Bed Propulsion Systems, archived from the original on 2013-04-08, retrieved 2012-08-19
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.