Public interest technology

Last updated

Public interest technology (PIT) is an approach to the use of technology to promote "the development and realization of socially responsible solutions to the challenges in a technology-driven world." [1] It has been characterized as "people-centered problem solving." [2] PIT emerged as a field of academic research and action in higher education in 2019 with the establishment of the Public Interest Technology University Network (PIT-UN) by New America.

Contents

PIT applies technological expertise in an effort to advance the public interest and promote the public good. These goals are centered around the intentional inclusion of a collective need for justice, dignity and autonomy. PIT strives to encourage interoperability between technology, policy and society. PIT puts people at the center of policy making and improving community-driven problem-solving through the use of design, data and delivery skills and draws from technical fields like computer science, data science, and engineering, along with law, public policy, movement-building, philosophy, the social sciences, the arts and humanities, and more. [3] PIT aims to improve "user experience" through the assessment of practices in an "iterative manner continuously learning, improving, and aiming to deliver better outcomes to the public." [4]

The PIT ecosystem requires the cultivation of partnerships with a range of organizations, advocacy groups, policy makers, academic institutions, community groups and strategic partners. Most definitions of PIT emphasize that the development of these partnerships is critical and that the growth of the PIT ecosystem needs to be one that is inclusive, equitable, diverse, accessible, ethical and effective. In addition, while public interest technology can be developed and delivered by multinationals within an international business context, the emphasis is generally on the national or local context, such as the civic context. [5]

History

The general concept underlying PIT can be traced back to the end of the 20th century. For instance, using technology for the broad public interest was part of Tim Berners-Lee's original vision for the World Wide Web (WWW). He recalled "my growing realization that there was a power in arranging ideas in an unconstrained, weblike way." [6] The field of PIT proper emerged from a collaboration of educational institutions, nonprofit organizations and the investment of philanthropic entities like the Ford Foundation and the MacArthur Foundation. [7] PIT drew on existing concerns over technology's use. For instance, in 2001 Harvard University's Data Privacy Lab, founded by Dr. Latanya Sweeney, established the Technology Science Research Collaboration Network to "engage a network of scholars and students across the country to explore and scientifically investigate the unforeseen consequences of technology." [8]

In February 2015, the NetGain Partnership [9] [10] brought together leaders in government, philanthropy, business, and the tech world to begin strategizing around the shared principles of building a stronger digital society focused on social change and progress. This gathering included discussions led by Ethan Zuckerman on the dangers of the WWW, [10] Emily Bell on the shifting landscape of the news media landscape, [11] Alicia Garza on the role of technology in activism and the dangers of increased surveillance, [12] and Sunil Abraham on the digital divide and barriers to accessing technology from a global perspective. [13]

This led to the investment in 2015 of over $18 million, in programs and initiatives aimed at a year long exploration of public interest technology. [14] The initial grants were awarded to the Open Technology Institute of New America (known at the time as the New America Foundation), centering on open-source innovations and the development of open technology as central to the definition of PIT. A grant provided by New America to TechCongress assisted with the creation of the TechCongress Congressional Innovation Fellowship program, which aims to promote better technology policy making and leadership, another important tenet in the definition of PIT. [15]

Professional pathways into public interest technology began with projects from Code for America. New Venture Fund's Media Democracy Fund created a university fellowship program to encourage students' interest in technology and public policy. The success of these projects set the stage for the development of the Public Interest Technology University Network in 2019. [16]

Examples of technology investigated by PIT researchers include AI, [17] council information systems, [18] drones, [19] government form submission systems, [2] and platforms in cities. [5]

Origin of the term and definition

Public interest technology (PIT) is an umbrella term used to describe an emergent discipline consisting of skilled technologists responsible for guaranteeing that all new technology is manufactured, disseminated, and enjoyed responsibly. [20] [21] One definition is that "Public interest technology refers to the study and application of technology expertise to advance the public interest/generate public benefits/promote the public good," [22] while another states that it is "the application of design, data, and delivery to advance the public interest and promote the public good in the digital age." [23] The term "public interest technology" was chosen because it contained an allusion to "public interest law" another field that was generated through philanthropic impetus. [24] Fashioned using a similar framework to that of public interest law, PIT is intended to ensure that technology is created and shared in an inclusive and accountable way that protects or improves the lives of all people. [21] Consequently, public interest technologists are "technology practitioners who focus on social justice, the common good, and/or the public interest." [25]

Career paths

Public interest technologists are people from a variety of disciplines who share a passion, perspective or expertise related to the conception, governance and presentation of technology. There is not currently a typical career-path for individuals interested in working in public interest, as a technologist. Public interest technologists may be, but are certainly not limited to, professionals from the following vocations: artists, designers, engineers, lawyers, lobbyists, policy makers, scientists. [26] [21]

Futurism

Futurism relates closely to the development of public interest technology. [27] Public interest technology is situated at the intersection of technological development and societal impact. The development of public interest technology has benefited from the application of systems thinking models. [27] Futurism models allow for non-linear development of solutions to complex problems, a critical public interest technology lens. As Jenny Toomey and Latanya Sweeney point out: "As technology expands its reach everywhere, to meet the challenges of our day, we need the vision of public interest tech everywhere as well, in every sector, and through the many lenses it takes, be it civic tech, community tech, tech for good." [28] A futurism frame allows for the building of collaborations across sectors that historically have not interacted: scientists, community organizers, developers, artists, designers, writers, social theorists and activists. [28] As Chuck Robbins and Darren Walker state:"By fostering a new vanguard of cross-disciplinary experts to work across sectors and empowering them with the resources they need to succeed, we can bridge the gaps between the public interest and technology to power a more just and inclusive future for all." [29]

See also

Further reading

Related Research Articles

The Ford Foundation is an American private foundation with the stated goal of advancing human welfare. Created in 1936 by Edsel Ford and his father Henry Ford, it was originally funded by a US$25,000 gift from Edsel Ford. By 1947, after the death of the two founders, the foundation owned 90% of the non-voting shares of the Ford Motor Company. Between 1955 and 1974, the foundation sold its Ford Motor Company holdings and now plays no role in the automobile company.

Philanthropy is a form of altruism that consists of "private initiatives for the public good, focusing on quality of life". Philanthropy contrasts with business initiatives, which are private initiatives for private good, focusing on material gain; and with government endeavors that are public initiatives for public good, such as those that focus on the provision of public services. A person who practices philanthropy is a philanthropist.

In social science and economics, public interest is "the welfare or well-being of the general public" and society. While it has earlier philosophical roots and is considered to be at the core of democratic theories of government, often paired with two other concepts, convenience and necessity, it first became explicitly integrated into governance instruments in the early part of the 20th century. The public interest was rapidly adopted and popularised by human rights lawyers in the 1960s and has since been incorporated into other fields such as journalism and technology.

Roger Carl Schank was an American artificial intelligence theorist, cognitive psychologist, learning scientist, educational reformer, and entrepreneur. Beginning in the late 1960s, he pioneered conceptual dependency theory and case-based reasoning, both of which challenged cognitivist views of memory and reasoning. He began his career teaching at Yale University and Stanford University. In 1989, Schank was granted $30 million in a ten-year commitment to his research and development by Andersen Consulting, through which he founded the Institute for the Learning Sciences (ILS) at Northwestern University in Chicago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yochai Benkler</span> Israeli-American technology law expert, political economist, and author

Yochai Benkler is an Israeli-American author and the Berkman Professor of Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School. He is also a faculty co-director of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. In academia he is best known for coining the term commons-based peer production and his widely cited 2006 book The Wealth of Networks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heather Ford</span> Researcher, blogger, journalist, social entrepreneur, open source activist

Heather Ford is a South African researcher, blogger, journalist, social entrepreneur and open source activist who has worked in the field of Internet policy, law and management in South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States. She is the founder of Creative Commons South Africa. She has studied the nature of power within Wikipedia and is a researcher at the University of Leeds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lorrie Cranor</span> American academic

Lorrie Faith Cranor, D.Sc. is the FORE Systems Professor of Computer Science and Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University and is the director of the Carnegie Mellon Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory. She has served as Chief Technologist of the Federal Trade Commission, and she was formerly a member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation Board of Directors. Previously she was a researcher at AT&T Labs-Research and taught in the Stern School of Business at New York University. She has authored over 110 research papers on online privacy, phishing and semantic attacks, spam, electronic voting, anonymous publishing, usable access control, and other topics.

Public Knowledge is a non-profit Washington, D.C.–based public interest group. Founded in 2001 by David Bollier, Gigi Sohn, and Laurie Racine, Public Knowledge is primarily involved in the fields of intellectual property law, competition and choice in the digital marketplace, and an open standards/end-to-end internet.

The Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation was an office new to the Obama Administration, created within the White House, to catalyze new and innovative ways of encouraging government to do business differently. Its first director was the economist Sonal Shah. The final director was David Wilkinson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alondra Nelson</span> American sociologist, policy advisor and author (born 1968)

Alondra Nelson is an American academic, policy advisor, non-profit administrator, and writer. She is the Harold F. Linder chair and professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study, an independent research center in Princeton, New Jersey. From 2021 to 2023, Nelson was deputy assistant to President Joe Biden and principal deputy director for science and society of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), where she performed the duties of the director from February to October 2022. She was the first African American and first woman of color to lead OSTP. Prior to her role in the Biden Administration, she served for four years as president and CEO of the Social Science Research Council, an independent, nonpartisan international nonprofit organization. Nelson was previously professor of sociology at Columbia University, where she served as the inaugural Dean of Social Science, as well as director of the Institute for Research on Women and Gender. She began her academic career on the faculty of Yale University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christopher Fabian</span> Polish-American technologist

Christopher Fabian is a technologist who works for UNICEF. He founded technology and finance initiatives in both the public and private sector, including the creation in 2006, of UNICEF's Innovation Unit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles R. Conn</span> CEO, Investor, Author

Charles R. Conn is a Canadian and American CEO, conservationist and author. In 2021 he co-founded and is partner of Monograph, a life sciences venture firm. In 2019 he was the CEO of Oxford Sciences Innovation. Previously, he was the warden and global CEO of Rhodes House and the Rhodes Trust, the organization responsible for administering the Rhodes Scholarship from 2013 to 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latanya Sweeney</span> Computer scientist

Latanya Arvette Sweeney is an American computer scientist. She is the Daniel Paul Professor of the Practice of Government and Technology at the Harvard Kennedy School and in the Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard University. She is the founder and director of the Public Interest Tech Lab, founded in 2021 with a $3 million grant from the Ford Foundation as well as the Data Privacy Lab. She is the current Faculty Dean in Currier House at Harvard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mustafa Suleyman</span> British entrepreneur and activist

Mustafa Suleyman is a British artificial intelligence researcher and entrepreneur who is the co-founder and former head of applied AI at DeepMind, an artificial intelligence company acquired by Google and now owned by Alphabet. His current venture is Inflection AI.

Civic technology, or civic tech, enhances the relationship between the people and government with software for communications, decision-making, service delivery, and political process. It includes information and communications technology supporting government with software built by community-led teams of volunteers, nonprofits, consultants, and private companies as well as embedded tech teams working within government.

Ann Mei Chang is the CEO of non-profit organization Candid. She is a technology expert, global development advocate, author, and public speaker.

The Public Interest Technology University Network (PIT-UN) is a consortium of universities and foundations that collaborate to develop the field of public interest technology. It was formed in March 2019.

Andrea M. Matwyshyn is an American law professor and engineering professor at The Pennsylvania State University. She is known as a scholar of technology policy, particularly as an expert at the intersection of law and computer security and for her work with government. She is credited with originating the legal and policy concept of the Internet of Bodies.

Afua Bruce is an American engineer, data executive, professor, and former U.S. government official who has held appointments at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and on President Joe Biden’s transition agency review team at the Department of Justice. In 2021, a statue was erected in Bruce's honor in Dallas, Texas by the American Association for Advancement of Science. Bruce is a public interest technologist.

Shobita Parthasarathy is an American academic, author, and contributor to the field of Science and Technology Studies based at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. She is the director of the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, a research, education, and policy engagement center concerned with questions at the intersection of science, technology, policy, and society. She has received numerous prominent awards and grants for her work and has provided expert advice on technology, equity, and policy to civil society groups, international organizations, and governments around the world, including testimony to the U.S. Congress.

References

  1. ↑ "Public Interest Technology Faculty Fellowship CY2023 – Public Interest Technology Initiative" . Retrieved 2023-02-18.
  2. 1 2 3 McGuinness, Tara Dawson (2021). Power to the public : the promise of public interest technology. Hana Schank. Princeton. ISBN   978-0-691-21663-8. OCLC   1231610050.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ↑ "About Us - PIT-UN". PITcases. Retrieved 2023-04-25.
  4. ↑ "Public Interest Technology". New America. Retrieved 2023-02-24.
  5. 1 2 Ranchordas, Sofia; Goanta, Catalina (2019). "The New City Regulators: Platform and Public Values in Smart and Sharing Cities". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3468194. ISSN   1556-5068. S2CID   209095416.
  6. ↑ Berners-Lee, Tim (2004). Weaving the web: the original design and ultimate destiny of the world wide web. o. O.: Demco Media. ISBN   978-0-606-30358-3.
  7. ↑ Singer, Natasha (2019-03-11). "Top Universities Join to Push 'Public Interest Technology'". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  8. ↑ "Latanya Sweeney's Technology Science Research Collaboration Network". www.iq.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2023-02-24.
  9. ↑ "NetGain Partnership". NetGain Partnership. Retrieved 2023-03-09.
  10. 1 2 Foundation, Ford (2015-02-11), The NetGain Challenge: Ethan Zuckerman in NetGain , retrieved 2023-02-23
  11. ↑ Foundation, Ford (2015-02-11), The New Journalism: Emily Bell in NetGain , retrieved 2023-02-23
  12. ↑ Foundation, Ford (2015-02-11), The Activist Web: Alicia Garza in NetGain , retrieved 2023-02-23
  13. ↑ Foundation, Ford (2015-02-12), The (Almost) World Wide Web: Sunil Abraham in NetGain , retrieved 2023-02-23
  14. ↑ "Five Foundations Award $18 Million to Strengthen Public Interest Tech".
  15. ↑ "TechCongress: A Congressional Innovation Fellowship". TechCongress. Retrieved 2023-03-09.
  16. ↑ "Public Interest Technology University Network Receives $3.1 Million".
  17. ↑ Zicari, Roberto V.; Brodersen, John; Brusseau, James; Dudder, Boris; Eichhorn, Timo; Ivanov, Todor; Kararigas, Georgios; Kringen, Pedro; McCullough, Melissa; Moslein, Florian; Mushtaq, Naveed; Roig, Gemma; Sturtz, Norman; Tolle, Karsten; Tithi, Jesmin Jahan (2021). "Z-Inspection®: A Process to Assess Trustworthy AI". IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society. 2 (2): 83–97. doi: 10.1109/tts.2021.3066209 . ISSN   2637-6415. S2CID   234802665.
  18. ↑ Maxfield Brown, Eva; Weber, Nicholas (2022). "Councils in Action: Automating the Curation of Municipal Governance Data for Research". Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 59 (1): 23–31. arXiv: 2204.09110 . doi:10.1002/pra2.601. ISSN   2373-9231. S2CID   248266768.
  19. ↑ Wang, Ning (2020-11-12). ""Killing Two Birds with One Stone"? A Case Study of Development Use of Drones". 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (PDF). IEEE. pp. 339–345. doi:10.1109/istas50296.2020.9462187. ISBN   978-1-6654-1507-1. S2CID   236189505.
  20. ↑ "Public-Interest Technology Resources" . Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  21. 1 2 3 "Public interest technology and its origins". Ford Foundation. 3 June 2022. Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  22. ↑ "Defining Public Interest Technology". New America. Retrieved 2023-04-20.
  23. ↑ HANA., McGuinness, Tara Dawson. Schank (2023). Power to the Public: The Promise of Public Interest Technology. Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-21664-5. OCLC   1347363673.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ↑ Freedman Consulting (November 7, 2018). "Here to There: Lessons Learned from Public Interest Law" (PDF). tfreedmanconsulting.com. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
  25. ↑ "5 reasons you might be a Public Interest Technologist". Ford Foundation. 23 October 2018. Retrieved 2023-04-20.
  26. ↑ Rinberg, Roy (2021-09-09). "Resources for Working in Public-Interest Technology". Medium. Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  27. 1 2 "A sci-fi fan's journey into public interest tech". Ford Foundation. 19 June 2018. Retrieved 2023-02-25.
  28. 1 2 "Building the Public Interest Technology Infrastructure of the Future (SSIR)". ssir.org. Retrieved 2023-02-25.
  29. ↑ "Public Interest Technology: Bridge to the Future (SSIR)". ssir.org. Retrieved 2023-02-25.
  30. ↑ Ward, Amy Sample (2022). The tech that comes next : how changemakers, philanthropists, and technologists can build an equitable world. Afua Bruce. Hoboken, New Jersey. ISBN   978-1-119-85982-6. OCLC   1296688835.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  31. ↑ Sun, Haochen (2022). Technology and the Public Interest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108255905. ISBN   978-1-108-41696-2. S2CID   248355402.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.