Purchasing cooperative

Last updated

A "purchasing cooperative" is a type of cooperative arrangement, often among businesses, to agree to aggregate demand to get lower prices from selected suppliers. Retailers' cooperatives are a form of purchasing cooperative. Cooperatives are often used by government agencies to reduce costs of procurement. Purchasing Cooperatives are used frequently by governmental entities, since they are required to follow laws requiring competitive bidding above certain thresholds. In the United States, counties, municipalities, schools, colleges and universities in the majority of states can sign interlocal agreements or cooperative contracts that allow them to legally use contracts that were procured by another governmental entity. The National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) reported increasing use of cooperative purchasing practices in its 2016 survey of state procurement.

Contents

According to the National Cooperative Business Association (NCBA) website, there are approximately 250 purchasing cooperatives in the United States. [1] The NCBA, a trusted organization promoting cooperative businesses, provides valuable resources and information on various cooperative sectors, including purchasing cooperatives. These cooperatives play a significant role in aggregating the purchasing power of businesses across different industries to achieve cost savings and other benefits. The National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) reported increasing use of cooperative purchasing practices in its 2016 survey of state procurement. [2] NASPO has noted the increasing popularity of cooperative purchasing but also recognises that, like any practice, "it can be done well - or poorly". [3]

Benefits of Purchasing Cooperatives

  1. Cost Savings: The most significant advantage of joining a purchasing cooperative is the potential for cost savings. By leveraging the collective buying power of its members, the cooperative can negotiate better pricing, terms, and conditions with suppliers. These savings can be substantial, allowing members to reduce their procurement costs and improve their bottom line.
  2. Increased Efficiency: Purchasing cooperatives streamline the procurement process by centralizing purchasing activities. This centralized approach eliminates redundancy and administrative burdens for individual members, allowing them to focus on their core competencies and strategic objectives. Additionally, cooperatives often provide tools and resources to facilitate purchasing, such as online catalogs, order management systems, and supply chain analytics.
  3. Access to Quality Suppliers: Cooperatives often have extensive networks and established relationships with reputable suppliers. By joining a cooperative, members gain access to a pre-vetted pool of suppliers that have been evaluated for quality, reliability, and competitive pricing. This helps ensure that members can procure goods and services from trusted sources, reducing the risk of dealing with unreliable or subpar vendors.
  4. Collective Influence: As a collective entity, purchasing cooperatives wield significant purchasing power in the market. This influence allows them to negotiate favorable terms, influence product development, and shape industry standards. By working together, members can have a stronger voice and greater leverage to shape their respective industries.
  5. Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration: Purchasing cooperatives often foster a culture of knowledge sharing and collaboration among their members. Members can exchange best practices, industry insights, and market intelligence, enabling them to stay informed about industry trends and make informed purchasing decisions. This collaborative environment can lead to improved operational efficiencies and competitive advantages.

Purchasing Cooperatives vs RFPs

Purchasing cooperatives are increasingly being used as an alternative to the traditional process of responding to individual Requests for Proposals (RFPs) in various industries. Rather than engaging in the time-consuming and resource-intensive task of preparing individual RFP responses, businesses are leveraging the benefits of purchasing cooperatives to streamline their procurement processes.

Purchasing cooperatives bring together multiple organizations, such as government entities, educational institutions, and non-profit organizations, to collectively pool their purchasing power. These cooperatives negotiate and establish pre-negotiated contracts with suppliers, covering a wide range of products and services. By joining a purchasing cooperative, businesses can access these pre-negotiated contracts without the need to go through the lengthy and often competitive RFP process.

One of the key advantages of purchasing cooperatives is the streamlined procurement process they offer. Instead of investing significant time and resources in preparing RFP responses for individual procurement opportunities, businesses can tap into the cooperative's established procurement framework. They can quickly access the contracts and pricing already negotiated by the cooperative, saving administrative effort and expediting the contracting process.

Working with a purchasing cooperative also increases efficiency for businesses. The cooperative aggregates the purchasing needs of multiple organizations, providing businesses with access to a larger customer base. This eliminates the need for businesses to individually market themselves to potential clients, as the cooperative's membership already represents a diverse customer network. Consequently, businesses can efficiently reach a wider audience and potentially secure more sales and revenue opportunities.

Cost savings is another significant benefit of using purchasing cooperatives. These cooperatives leverage the collective buying power of their members to negotiate favorable pricing and terms with suppliers. Businesses that obtain contracts through a cooperative can take advantage of these pre-negotiated rates, resulting in cost savings on goods, services, or equipment. This is particularly advantageous for smaller businesses that may not have the same negotiating leverage or purchasing volume as larger organizations.

In addition to cost savings, purchasing cooperatives provide businesses with established supplier relationships. The cooperatives have nurtured relationships with a network of reliable suppliers over time. By obtaining contracts through the cooperative, businesses can benefit from these existing relationships, reducing the effort and risk associated with identifying and vetting suppliers individually. This streamlines the supplier selection process and ensures businesses receive quality products and services.

Purchasing cooperatives also offer expertise and support to businesses throughout the procurement cycle. These cooperatives possess industry knowledge and experience in navigating complex procurement processes. They can provide guidance, support, and insights to businesses, helping them make informed decisions, adhere to procurement regulations, and mitigate risks. The expertise and support from purchasing cooperatives can significantly enhance businesses' procurement capabilities.

Moreover, partnering with a purchasing cooperative encourages long-term collaboration. Cooperative members often engage in multiple contracts and projects over time, fostering ongoing partnerships. This can lead to additional business opportunities, repeat contracts, and a more stable revenue stream for businesses. The cooperative environment encourages relationship-building and the cultivation of sustainable business connections.

Overall, purchasing cooperatives offer businesses a compelling alternative to traditional RFP processes. By joining a cooperative, businesses can benefit from streamlined procurement, increased efficiency, access to a broader customer base, cost savings, established supplier relationships, expertise and support, and the potential for long-term collaboration. Embracing purchasing cooperatives enables businesses to optimize their procurement efforts, focus on building relationships, and drive sustainable growth.

Examples

An example of a purchasing cooperative is Harris County's Department of Education (HCDE) in Texas, which has created three procurement cooperatives:

Various schools, colleges and universities, municipalities, counties, municipal utility districts and other governmental entities sign an interlocal contract with HCDE, thus becoming members that can access any of the multitude of competitively bid and legally awarded contracts available through their cooperatives. To optimize processes, these three cooperatives were combined into Choice Partners national cooperative in 2012. Through use of Choice Partners, HCDE generates revenues to support the school districts within Harris County. [4]

In a similar way, Catholic parishes in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, Ohio, have established a cooperative purchasing process to combine buying power and reduce costs. [6]

Missouri State Statutes (Chapter 34, Chapter 37 and Chapter 67) authorize the State's Division of Purchasing to conduct a cooperative purchasing program, and allow eligible local governments, political subdivisions, and quasi-public governmental bodies to participate in the program. [7]

Costs

Many cooperative purchasing programs levy charges for usage and access. Fees may be assessed as an annual enrolment fee or a transaction fee such as a levy of 1% or 2% on the value of every purchase. [3]

Purchasing cooperatives typically generate revenue to sustain their operations and cover administrative costs by charging fees to vendors or suppliers. These fees are designed to compensate the cooperative for the services it provides in facilitating transactions and managing the procurement process on behalf of its members. The specific fee structure may vary depending on the cooperative and the industry it operates in, but some common methods of fee collection include:

  1. Membership Fees: Purchasing cooperatives may require vendors to become members and pay an annual membership fee. This fee grants vendors access to the cooperative's network of members and the opportunity to bid on contracts or supply goods and services to the cooperative's members. Membership fees often vary based on the size and scope of the vendor's business.
  2. Rebates or Commissions: In addition to membership fees, purchasing cooperatives may negotiate rebates or commissions with vendors based on the volume of purchases made by cooperative members. These rebates or commissions are typically a percentage of the total sales generated by the cooperative's members for a particular vendor. They provide an incentive for vendors to offer competitive pricing and preferential terms to the cooperative's members.
  3. Administrative Fees: Purchasing cooperatives may impose administrative fees on vendors to cover the costs associated with managing contracts, coordinating procurement activities, and providing support services. These fees help offset the expenses incurred by the cooperative in maintaining systems, personnel, and infrastructure required for efficient procurement operations. Administrative fees can be structured as a flat fee per transaction or as a percentage of the value of each transaction.
  4. Marketing or Advertising Fees: Some purchasing cooperatives may charge vendors marketing or advertising fees to promote their products or services within the cooperative's network. These fees are typically used to fund marketing campaigns, trade shows, or promotional activities that increase the visibility of vendors and drive sales. Marketing fees can be based on the vendor's participation level or tied to specific marketing initiatives.

It's important to note that while these fees contribute to the financial sustainability of purchasing cooperatives, they are generally intended to be fair and reasonable. The cooperative's goal is to create a mutually beneficial relationship between vendors and members, ensuring competitive pricing, quality products, and efficient procurement processes. The fees collected from vendors are often reinvested in the cooperative's operations, allowing it to continue providing value to its members and supporting their collective purchasing needs.

Related Research Articles

A request for proposal (RFP) is a document that solicits a proposal, often made through a bidding process, by an agency or company interested in procurement of a commodity, service, or valuable asset, to potential suppliers to submit business proposals.

Procurement is the method of discovering and agreeing to terms and purchasing goods, services, or other works from an external source, often with the use of a tendering or competitive bidding process. The term may also refer to a contractual obligation to "procure", i.e. to "ensure" that something is done. When a government agency buys goods or services through this practice, it is referred to as government procurement or public procurement.

A business proposal is a written offer from a seller to a prospective sponsor. Business proposals are often a key step in the complex sales process—i.e., whenever a buyer considers more than price in a purchase. When one person signifies to another their willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything with a view to obtaining the assent of the other to such act or abstinence, they are said to make a proposal.

E-procurement is the business-to-business or business-to-consumer or business-to-government purchase and sale of supplies, work, and services through the Internet as well as other information and networking systems, such as electronic data interchange and enterprise resource planning.

In the United States, a group purchasing organization (GPO) is an entity that is created to leverage the purchasing power of a group of businesses to obtain discounts from vendors based on the collective buying power of the GPO members.

Strategic sourcing is the process of developing channels of supply at the lowest total cost, not just the lowest purchase price. It expands upon traditional organisational purchasing activities to embrace all activities within the procurement cycle, from specification to receipt, payment for goods and services to sourcing production lines where the labor market would increase firms' ROI. Strategic sourcing processes aim for continuous improvement and re-evaluation of the purchasing activities of an organisation.

Supplier relationship management (SRM) is the systematic, enterprise-wide assessment of suppliers’ strengths, performance and capabilities with respect to overall business strategy, determination of what activities to engage in with different suppliers, and planning and execution of all interactions with suppliers, in a coordinated fashion across the relationship life cycle, to maximize the value realized through those interactions. The focus of SRM is to develop two-way, mutually beneficial relationships with strategic supply partners to deliver greater levels of innovation and competitive advantage than could be achieved by operating independently or through a traditional, transaction purchasing arrangement. Underpinning disciplines which support effective SRM includes supplier information management, compliance, risk management and performance management.

In the United States, the processes of government procurement enable federal, state and local government bodies in the country to acquire goods, services, and interests in real property.

Government procurement or public procurement is undertaken by the public authorities of the European Union (EU) and its member states in order to award contracts for public works and for the purchase of goods and services in accordance with principles derived from the Treaties of the European Union. Such procurement represents 13.6% of EU GDP as of 2018, and has been the subject of increasing European regulation since the 1970s because of its importance to the European single market.

A request for quotation (RfQ) is a business process in which a company or public entity requests a quote from a supplier for the purchase of specific products or services. RfQ generally means the same thing as Call for bids (CfB) and Invitation for bid (IfB).

A chief procurement officer (CPO) undertakes an executive role within an enterprise, focusing on sourcing, procurement, and supply management.

A vendor management system (VMS) is an Internet-enabled, often Web-based application that acts as a mechanism for business to manage and procure staffing services – temporary, and, in some cases, permanent placement services – as well as outside contract or contingent labor. Typical features of a VMS application include order distribution, consolidated billing and significant enhancements in reporting capability that outperforms manual systems and processes.

Supplier evaluation and supplier appraisal are terms used in business and refer to the process of evaluating and approving potential suppliers by quantitative assessment. The aim of the process is to ensure a portfolio of best-in-class suppliers is available for use, thus, it can be an effective tool to select suppliers in the awarding stage of an auction. Supplier evaluation can also be applied to current suppliers in order to measure and monitor their performance for the purposes of ensuring contract compliance, reducing costs, mitigating risk and driving continuous improvement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vendor</span> Supplier of goods or services

In a supply chain, a vendor, supplier, provider or a seller, is an enterprise that contributes goods or services. Generally, a supply chain vendor manufactures inventory/stock items and sells them to the next link in the chain. Today, these terms refer to a supplier of any goods or service.

Spend analysis or spend analytics is the process of collecting, cleansing, classifying and analyzing expenditure data with the purpose of decreasing procurement costs, improving efficiency, and monitoring controls and compliance. It can also be leveraged in other areas of business such as inventory management, contract management, complex sourcing, supplier management, budgeting, planning, and product development.

Corporate travel management is the function of managing a company’s strategic approach to travel, the negotiations with all vendors, day-to-day operation of the corporate travel program, traveler safety and security, credit-card management and travel and expenses ('T&E') data management.

The Florida Department of Management Services (DMS) is the business arm of Florida government with the primary mission to support sister agencies and current and former state employees with workforce- and business-related functions so they can focus on their core missions as defined in law. The agency's motto is We Serve Those Who Serve Florida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reverse auction</span>

A reverse auction is a type of auction in which the traditional roles of buyer and seller are reversed. Thus, there is one buyer and many potential sellers. In an ordinary auction also known as a forward auction, buyers compete to obtain goods or services by offering increasingly higher prices. In contrast, in a reverse auction, the sellers compete to obtain business from the buyer and prices will typically decrease as the sellers underbid each other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Invitation to tender</span> Business process

An invitation to tender is a formal, structured procedure for generating competing offers from different potential suppliers or contractors looking to obtain an award of business activity in works, supply, or service contracts, often from companies who have been previously assessed for suitability by means of a supplier questionnaire (SQ) or pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ebidding</span>

An ‘‘‘electronic bidding system ‘‘‘ is an electronic bidding event according to defined negotiation rules (eAgreement). A buyer and two or more suppliers take part in this online event.

References

  1. ↑ "Purchasing Co-ops". NCBA CLUSA. Retrieved 2023-06-06.
  2. ↑ NASPO, Survey of State Procurement Practices, 2016, accessed 24 March 2022
  3. 1 2 NASPO, Strength in Numbers: An Introduction to Cooperative Procurements, first published February 2006, updated 2010, accessed 24 March 2022
  4. 1 2 Harris County Department of Education, About HCDE, accessed 24 March 2022
  5. ↑ Harris County Department of Education
  6. ↑ Parish Business Managers Association, PBMA - Cooperative Purchasing Effort (COPE) Formally Initiated, published June 2013, accessed 23 December 2020
  7. ↑ State of Missouri, Office of Administration, Division of Purchasing, Cooperative Procurement Program, accessed 23 December 2020
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.