Pushpa Virendra Ganediwala | |
---|---|
Additional Judge of Bombay High Court | |
In office 13 February 2019 –11 February 2022 | |
Nominated by | Ranjan Gogoi |
Appointed by | Ram Nath Kovind |
Personal details | |
Born | Paratwada,Maharashtra,India | 11 March 1969
Pushpa Virendra Ganediwala (born 11 March 1969) is an Indian lawyer. She was previously an additional judge of the Bombay High Court,but resigned in 2022,after the Supreme Court of India took the unusual step of refusing to confirm her appointment to the High Court as permanent,after she delivered several controversial judgments concerning cases of sexual assaults against women and children.
Ganediwala was born in 1969 in Paratwada in Amravati District in Maharashtra. She has B.Com.,LL.B,and LL.M degrees. [1]
Ganediwala initially practiced law in Amravati District Court,and also lectured on law at Amravati University. [1] In 2022,she returned to private practice,following her resignation as an additional judge of the Bombay High Court. [2]
Ganediwala was appointed as a District Judge in 2007,and served on the City Civil Court in Mumbai and the District and Family Courts in Nagpur. She later became the Principal District and Sessions Judge in Nagpur,and subsequently was appointed as the Registrar-General of the Bombay High Court. [1]
In 2018,Ganediwala was one of several judges who were considered for appointment to the Bombay High Court,but was not appointed after the Bombay High Court recommended against it. The Supreme Court of India accepted the Bombay High Court's adverse recommendations and decided to defer consideration of her appointment. In 2019,Ganediwala's appointment was reconsidered,and she was appointed as an additional judge in the Bombay High Court. [1] [3] [4]
As Registrar-General of the Bombay High Court,Ganediwala took the widely reported decision of suspending City Civil and Sessions Judge Ajay Dinode,while he was hearing a case relating to an alleged Rs.56,000 million fraud in relation to the National Spot Exchange Limited,causing the case to be delayed further. [5] [6]
Ganediwala has,along with two other judges,commuted death penalty sentences to life imprisonment in two cases while sitting on the Bombay High Court,in 2019. Both cases concerned the offence of murder. [7]
In 2020,Ganediwala heard and passed directions in a number of cases relating to the COVID-19 pandemic in India. In September 2020,Ganediwala and another judge heard a case concerning the shortage of available hospital beds and treatment facilities for patients with COVID-19 in Nagpur,Maharashtra,and directed the State Government of Maharashtra to make available sufficient staff and facilities for treatment. [8] In the same month,Ganediwala rejected a plea to have the Joint Entrance Examination postponed (a national assessment examination held for admission to engineering courses) in light of the COVID-19 pandemic,as well as widespread flooding in parts of Maharashtra,but directed the examining authorities to facilitate re-examinations for those who could not attend the scheduled examination date because of these difficulties. [9] In October 2020,Ganediwala and another judge directed government-run hospitals to constitute a panel and provide treatment to a pregnant woman who had been denied hospital consultations on the grounds that she had tested positive for COVID-19,and compared the treatment of patients with COVID-19 to the generational,social,and public discrimination caused by the practice of untouchability against Dalit communities. [10]
Ganediwala has spoken publicly about the need to reduce pending cases in the family courts in Mumbai, [11] and has criticised Maharashtra Police for failing to conduct investigations sufficiently,linking this to acquittals in criminal cases. [12]
In January 2021,Ganediwala adjudicated an appeal against a trial court that had convicted a 39-year-old man of taking a 12-year-old female child to his home on the pretext of offering her food,and sexually assaulting her. The trial court had sentenced the offender to three years in prison,which is the minimum sentence for sexual assault against children under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act). Ganediwala reduced the three-year sentence to one year,holding that while the man had committed the offense of 'outraging a woman's modesty' under section 354 of the Indian Penal Code,it did not amount to a sexual offense against a child because he had groped her through her clothing. Ganediwala ruled that for an offense to qualify as sexual assault under the POCSO Act,there had to be "...skin to skin contact with sexual intent." The decision was widely reported. [13] [14] [15] [16] She also adjudicated in two more cases concerning sexual assault against minors. In a second case,Ganediwala ruled that the acts of a man who took touched a female child's hand and exposed himself to another five-year-old female child did not constitute offences under POCSO because there was no physical contact between the children and the man. [17] In a third case decided in the same period,Ganediwala acquitted a man convicted of sexual assault against a woman,holding that the survivor's testimony was unreliable,and that the absence of signs of violent struggle indicated it could not have been non-consensual. [18] [19]
Ganediwala attracted wide criticism for the first concerning 'skin to skin' contact,and the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights asked the Maharashtra government to file a letters patent appeal in the Bombay High Court,to have the judgment reversed. [20] The National Commission for Women also expressed their intention to appeal the ruling,noting that it would have "...a cascading effect on various provisions involving safety and security of women in general but also subject all women to ridicule." [21] Several public figures and women's rights activists criticised the interpretation offered by Ganediwala. [22] [23] Retired Judge Ajay Thipsay described the order as "not sound" and "...a little absurd," noting that there was no legal basis for Ganediwala's requirement of 'skin to skin' contact within the Act. [24] Child rights activists noted that the language of POCSO specifically criminalizes attempts at sexual assault as well,and that this had not been considered. [24] Politician Brinda Karat described Ganediwala's reasoning as unacceptable,noting that the case raised "questions of the competence and standards of those mandated to bring justice in sexual assault cases." [25]
On 27 January 2021,the Attorney-General of India mentioned the ruling before the Supreme Court,noting that it warranted the Court's attention and describing it as a "...very disturbing conclusion." The Supreme Court agreed to hear the matter suo motu and temporarily stayed the judgment,allowing the Attorney-General to file a petition for a more detailed consideration. [26] On 29 January,the Supreme Court withdrew a recommendation that they had made on 22 January 2021 to make her appointment permanent,mentioning the three sexual assault rulings above as the reason for questioning her fitness to continue as a High Court judge. [26] [27] Instead,on 13 February 2021 she received a one-year extension on her position as an additional judge. [28] In November 2021,Ganediwala's judgment on the requirement of 'skin to skin' contact was overruled by the Indian Supreme Court,which held that such an interpretation was contrary to the POCSO Act and would subvert its aims. [29]
On 22 January 2021,the Supreme Court confirmed the Bombay High Court's recommendation that Ganediwala's appointment should be made permanent but withdrew that recommendation on 29 January 2021 in light of three rulings that Ganediwala made,all of which involved acquittals or reductions of sentences in cases concerning sexual assault. [30] [31] On 17 December 2021,the Supreme Court confirmed that her appointment to the High Court would not be made permanent,and accordingly,she would be demoted back to the district judiciary once her temporary term at the High Court ended. [32] On 11 February 2022,she resigned two days before her High Court term ended. [2]
The High Court of Bombay is the high court of the states of Maharashtra and Goa in India,and the union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. It is seated primarily at Mumbai,and is one of the oldest high courts in India. The High Court has circuit benches at Nagpur and Aurangabad in Maharashtra and Panaji,the capital of Goa.
Capital punishment in India is a legal penalty for some crimes under the country's main substantive penal legislation,the Indian Penal Code,as well as other laws. Executions are carried out by hanging as the primary method of execution per Section 354(5) of the Criminal Code of Procedure,1973 is "Hanging by the neck until dead",and is imposed only in the 'rarest of cases'.
Section 377 is a British colonial penal code that criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature". The law was used to prosecute people engaging in oral and anal sex along with homosexual activity. As per Supreme Court Judgement since 2018,the Indian Penal Code Section 377 is used to convict non-consensual sexual activities among homosexuals with a minimum of ten years imprisonment extended to life imprisonment. It has been used to criminalize third gender people,such as the apwint in Myanmar. In 2018,then British Prime Minister Theresa May acknowledged how the legacies of such British colonial anti-sodomy laws continues to persist today in the form of discrimination,violence,and even death.
The judiciary of India is a system of courts that interpret and apply the law in the Republic of India. India uses a common law system,first introduced by the British East India Company and with influence from other colonial powers and Indian princely states,as well as practices from ancient and medieval times. The Constitution of India provides concept for a single and unified judiciary in India.
The Mathura rape case was an incident of custodial rape in India on 26 March 1972,wherein Mathura,a young tribal girl,was allegedly raped by two policemen on the compound of Desaiganj Police Station in Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra. After the Supreme Court acquitted the accused,there was public outcry and protests,which eventually led to amendments in the Indian rape law via The Criminal Law Amendment Act 1983.
Asok Kumar Ganguly is an Indian jurist. He served as the chairman of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission and as a judge of the Supreme Court of India who delivered judgements in some high-profile cases like the 2G spectrum case.
Child sexual abuse laws in India have been enacted as part of the child protection policies of India. The Parliament of India passed the 'Protection of Children Against Sexual Offences Bill (POCSO),2011' regarding child sexual abuse on 22 May 2012,making it an Act. A guideline was passed by the Ministry of Women and Child Development,India. The rules formulated by the government in accordance with the law had also been notified on the November 2012 and the law had become ready for implementation. There have been many calls for more stringent laws.
Ranjan Gogoi is an Indian former advocate and judge who served as the 46th Chief Justice of India from 2018 to 2019,having previously served as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India from 2012 to 2018. He is currently a Member of the Rajya Sabha,having been nominated by President Ram Nath Kovind on 16 March 2020. Gogoi served as a judge in the Gauhati High Court from 2001 to 2010,and then was transferred as a judge to the Punjab and Haryana High Court from 2010 to 2011 where he later was the Chief Justice from 2011 to 2012. He is also a member of the Committee on External Affairs in the Rajya Sabha.
Sharad Arvind Bobde is an Indian judge who served as the 47th Chief Justice of India from 18 November 2019 to 23 April 2021.
Justice Gita Mittal is a retired Indian judge. She is the former Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court and the first woman judge to serve in that capacity. She has also served as the Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court while she was serving as a Judge of the Delhi High Court.
Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani is a former Indian judge and prosecutor,who last served as the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court. Previously,as a judge of the Bombay High Court,she notably upheld the conviction of several persons for the rape of a pregnant Muslim woman during the 2002 Gujarat riots,chastising investigative authorities for their inaction in the matter,and also refused parole for those convicted in the 1993 Bombay bombings. She retired in 2019,after refusing to accept a controversial transfer from the Madras High Court to the Meghalaya High Court.
Revati Mohite Dere is a judge in the Bombay High Court,India. She has written a number of significant judgments in relation to criminal procedure and police investigations in India,including cases concerning press freedom to report on criminal trials,death penalty sentences for repeated offences,and accountability within the police for false and improper investigations.
Sadhana Sanjay Jadhav is a judge of the Bombay High Court,in Maharashtra,India. Jadhav has been the judge in a number of notable cases concerning criminal offences,including the death of Sheena Bora,the Adarsh Housing Society scam,the trial of Bollywood actor Sanjay Dutt in relation to the 1993 Bombay bombings,the case concerning the suicide of medical resident Payal Tadvi,and the case concerning the murder of writer Govind Pansare. Jadhav is also responsible for several legally significant interpretations of criminal law and procedure,concerning the right to appeal,and regarding penalties under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Act 1989.
Bharati Harish Dangre is a sitting judge of the Bombay High Court in Maharashtra,India. Dangre has adjudicated in several significant cases concerning constitutional law,including the validity of affirmative action in the form of reservations for the Maratha caste in Maharashtra,the interpretation of child sexual abuse laws in India,and the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax in India.
Anuja Prabhudessai is a judge of the Bombay High Court,in Maharashtra,India. She is the first woman from Goa to be a High Court judge in India.
Swapna Sanjiv Joshi is a sitting judge in the Bombay High Court in Maharashtra,India. Joshi attracted public attention after a fellow judge,Brijgopal Harkishan Loya,died under mysterious circumstances after attending her daughter's wedding in Nagpur. Joshi subsequently recused herself from hearing a case concerning allegations of poisoning in relation to Loya's death.
Mridula Bhatkar is a former judge of the Bombay High Court,in Maharashtra,India,serving on the court between 2009 and 2019. She adjudicated in several notable cases during her tenure as a judge,including the Jalgaon rape case,the 2006 Mumbai train bombings,and the conviction of Gujarat police officers and doctors in the 2002 gangrape of Bilkis Bano.
Roshan Dalvi is a former judge of the Bombay High Court,in Maharashtra,India. She adjudicated a number of widely reported and significant cases during her career as a judge,including the dispute between the children of Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray regarding their inheritance,and the challenge to a Maharashtra law forbidding dancers in bar from carrying on their profession.
Gokarakonda Naga "G. N." Saibaba is an Indian scholar,writer,human rights activist,and former assistant professor.
Geeta Luthra is a Senior Advocate in the Supreme Court of India.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)