Rasga-listas

Last updated

The rasga-listas (English: list tearers or list rippers) were resistance movements to the 1874 lottery law for compulsory military service in the Empire of Brazil. In 1875, when enlistment for the lottery was due to begin, the rebels managed to turn the law into a "dead charter", postponing the lottery indefinitely. The law abolished the forced recruitment practiced by the Armed Forces until then. The old model, known as "blood tribute", was violently conducted by a State with limited administrative and extractive capacity over the population, being a cause of popular rejection of military service. A balance between the State, local authorities and free workers protected workers inserted in patronage networks from recruitment, restricting military service to the "rabble" of society. The system captured few recruits and proved ineffective during the Paraguayan War (1864–1870). The lottery was a European-inspired modernizing reform intended to make recruitment more rational and egalitarian. A large part of the population did not consider equality in the lottery to be fair and did not trust its directors. The lottery did not change the exempt position of the rich, but it tightened the state's demands on the poor population, removing patronage protection. Its beneficiaries, both landowners and workers, did not accept the threat to their way of living with the old recruitment system.

Contents

Armed mobs of rebels stormed the draft boards and tore up their lists to stop the process. The rebels exhibited great capacity for collective action and were limited in their use of violence. The movement was popular, with support from local elites and prominent female participation (as in the Women's Mutiny  [ pt ]). Its geographic reach was vast, occurring in ten provinces of the current Southeast and Northeast regions, with the greatest strength in Minas Gerais and in the northeastern agreste . Its character was legitimist and reactive, defending established rights and the "natural order" against the threat of the new law. It was typical of the interior revolts that took place in Brazil from 1870 onwards, reacting to modernizing reforms. In the Northeast, it was contemporary and had a similar geography to the Quebra-Quilos Revolt. A new Lottery Law, passed in 1908, was finally implemented in 1916.

The 1874 Sortition Law

Soldiers in 19th century Brazil were recruited voluntarily or by force. Recruitment focused on "vagrants, ex-slaves, orphans, criminals, migrants, unskilled workers and the unemployed". Military service was considered degrading by the free poor population. [1] Recruitment, called "blood tribute" at the time, was violent and followed by a life of punishment and low pay. [2] It managed to attract few recruits, as it was carried out by a weak state (police, civil service and civil registry) in a resistant population. [3] The Paraguayan War strained the system and was time-consuming in part due to inefficient mobilization. [4] In Europe, a reference for the Brazilian elite, the period after the Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871) was marked by industrialization, states with greater control over their populations and conscript armies, which, after 1–3 years of service, followed into a growing reserve. [5] Brazil was very far from this model. [6]

Recruitment reform was demanded by military officers and discussed by parliamentarians for decades. [7] [8] It was finally implemented with Law No. 2,556 of 1874, inspired by the French recruitment system. Parish boards composed of the justice of the peace, vicar, and the most senior police officer would hold a first lottery of free men aged 19 to 30 for six years of service. The following lotteries, held annually, would choose between 19-year-old men. The lottery would only take place if there were no volunteers to fill the ranks. [9] [10] The reformers thus intended to modernize the Army in the European model, replacing the "human hunt" with a more rational and fair system. For them, the law was a major institutional advance. [11] The Army's manpower, and thus its capacity for national defense, would be improved. [12] The government was then surprised by a negative popular reaction, [13] from almost all social strata. [14]

The social status of draftees would be higher than former forced recruits, and thus, the service was made more attractive with a ban on corporal punishments and preferences for veterans in admission to public employment. [15] The distribution of the military burden would be through a theoretically blind, equiprobable and impersonal lottery. [16] The rich would remain exempt, however, [17] while the free poor would be hardest hit. [18] Rural workers would lose their traditional paternal protection from landowners. [19] This clientelistic protection was accepted by the "honored poor", small farmers who fulfilled their family and National Guard obligations, for whom forced recruitment was a natural way of differentiating themselves from the lower strata of the population. [20] Traditional recruits were considered riffraff. [21] Equality with them, as would happen in the lottery, would be an odious situation. The protégés considered the inequality in recruitment fair. Society knew how to live with forced recruitment. It fulfilled a moral function, punishing "robust individuals, petty criminals, unfaithful husbands, ungrateful children, less diligent workers." [22] [23]

Populations hitherto invisible to the state and hostile to the 1872 Demographic Census would be enlisted. The drawing would not really be equiprobable and impersonal, as the honesty of the recruiters was not relied on. The difference would be that the exemption, previously regulated by law, would be hidden, becoming a market object. The absence of the traditional exemption for married men created resistance to the law among women, [22] although the number of married people until then exempt was not so great, as there were a large number of illegitimate unions and concubinage relationships among the poor. [24] The first lottery would likely be the one with many married couples. [9] Landowners also had a conflict of interest with reformers and the Armed Forces over access to workers. [19] The law could mean the loss of workforce in the fields [25] [26] and the ability to protect workers, children and relatives. [23] Another problem in implementing the law would be the weakness of the state bureaucracy. [26]

Seditions against the law

The enlistment boards were supposed to meet in the churches (centers of public activities) on 1 August 1875. With the news spread, tensions already arose in the preceding months. The malcontents had a simple solution: destroy the drafts. On the day of the meeting, mobs in ten provinces stormed the churches, impeded the work of the boards, and tore up the lists. The rebels could be unarmed or carry sticks, sickles or firearms. The use of violence was regulated, and the reports from the boards often took the form of dialogues between the recruiters and the population. Where there was resistance from the police, the raids resulted in some deaths and injuries. The collective action was well structured and the movements sometimes went beyond the limits of the parishes. Many boards did not meet due to the absence of their members, intimidated by threats made by the rasga-listas or in agreement with them. There was a special absence of parish priests due to the Religious Issue. There are even records of the authorities participating in the crowds. The activity of the rebels continued throughout the months of joint work and reappeared whenever the government tried to implement the law. The targets were expanded to Masonic lodges, collectors and municipal taxes. Attacks on conscription work continued for years, such as in Serro, Minas Gerais, in 1881, [27] and in Conceição das Alagoas in 1884. [26]

The historical subjects of the movement were anonymous, and many facts were not recorded. [28] The movement was popular, but it had the connivance or support from local elites. [25] [29] Due to the outstanding female participation, the movement was also called “Women's War”. [30] In Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, the organization and execution were exclusively led by women, in the so-called "Women's Mutiny". [31] The geographic distribution was wide, occurring in numerous parishes in Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraíba, Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará. In Rio Grande do Sul the greater presence of troops prevented riots, but the enlistment suffered many manipulations. The rebel concentrations were in Minas Gerais and in the northeastern agreste, both marked by the greater importance of free work. Minas Gerais also had a population too dispersed for troops to defend the recruitment boards, and a traditional aversion to military service. In August, the board was attacked in 78 localities in the province by mobs of 30 to 500 people, with further fighting continuing until April 1876. The destruction of the lists was accompanied by festive celebrations in the cities. Seditions in São Paulo were limited to regions bordering Minas Gerais. [27] In Ceará, a poor and populous province with a heavy recruitment burden, the revolt was a consequence of the Paraguayan War [32] and rumors circulated of recruitment for a new conflict in Paraguay. [33]

At the time, the rebels were accused of fanaticism, misunderstanding and especially ignorance. [13] Part of the historiography considers the rasga-listas as "pre-political" social movements of the sertão , associating them with cangaço and messianism. [34] But the free population had its reasons. The movement was reactive and legitimist, defending established rights and the "natural order of things" against what was considered an unwarranted expansion of government demands. Thus, it was typical of pre-industrial revolts in Europe, [35] a Brazilian vendée [36] or jacquerie. [37] The reform hurt the sertanejos' sense of justice, based more on customs than on the laws of a distant state. [38] In the Northeast, the rasga-listas had a geography similar to that of the Quebra-Quilos revolt, a movement contrary to the implementation of the metric system, but also to the new recruitment law, and the Ronco da Abelha Revolt and the "Marimbondos", years earlier. They had in common the fears of the sertanejos with the secularization and rationalization imposed by the Europeanizing elites. This unrest would begin in the 1870s, with the Muckers and the Vintém revols, ending with the Canudos and Contestado Wars, decades later. [39]

The crowds cheered the monarchy, the Catholic Church and the old law, presenting themselves as restorers of order. [40] The new law was called "barbaric", having come to "enslave the people". [32] The rasga-listas claimed to be defenders of religion and were hostile to Freemasonry, [41] reflecting the rupture between State and Church that occurred with the Religious Issue. [42] In some places they were in favor of the Liberal Party due to some of this party's leadership that was against the law. However, the discontent went beyond religious and partisan issues. [43]

Results

The 1874 law became a "dead charter". Resistance in the elite and popular groups was very strong. The lottery in the Army was delayed thanks to a slight increase in the number of volunteers in 1875–1876 and cuts in personnel in 1877–1880. Forced conscription was formally abolished, but the police compelled prisoners to enlist as volunteers. The political elite, which also benefited from patronage, knew how to retreat. Consensus grew around forced recruitment, rather than drawing lots in the balance between the state, local elites and the honorable poor. [44] In 1903, an attempt to sort maritime workers for the Navy was abandoned after it was met with a strike by dockers. [45] The old system lasted until a new lottery law. [46] The demand for military modernization remained, and the lottery was approved in 1908, but it also encountered difficulties. The first lottery under the new law was not held until 1916. [47]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Afonso Pena</span> President of Brazil from 1906 to 1909

Afonso Augusto Moreira Pena, often referred to as Afonso Pena, was a Brazilian lawyer, professor, and politician who served as the 6th president of Brazil, from 1906 until his death in 1909. Pena was elected in 1906, the chosen successor of president Rodrigues Alves. Pena was the first politician from Minas Gerais to win the presidency, ending the series of politicians from São Paulo who had held the presidency since 1894. Before his presidency, he served as the 4th vice president of Brazil, under Rodrigues Alves (1903–1906) after the death of Silviano Brandão. Pena was a monarchist. He was the only member of Emperor Pedro II's cabinet to become president of Brazil and the first Brazilian president to die in office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artur Bernardes</span> President of Brazil from 1922 to 1926

Artur da Silva Bernardes was a Brazilian lawyer and politician who served the 12th president of Brazil from 1922 to 1926. Bernades' presidency was marked by the crisis of the First Brazilian Republic and the almost uninterrupted duration of a state of emergency. During his long political career, from 1905 until his death, he was the main leader of the Republican Party of Minas Gerais (PRM) from 1918–1922 until the party's closure in 1937, and founder and leader of the Republican Party (PR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1964 Brazilian coup d'état</span> Coup détat in Brazil that ousted President João Goulart

The 1964 Brazilian coup d'état was the overthrow of Brazilian president João Goulart by a military coup from March 31 to April 1, 1964, ending the Fourth Brazilian Republic (1946–1964) and initiating the Brazilian military dictatorship (1964–1985). The coup took the form of a military rebellion, the declaration of vacancy in the presidency by the National Congress on April 2, the formation of a military junta and the exile of the president on April 4. In his place, Ranieri Mazzilli, the president of the Chamber of Deputies, took over until the election by Congress of general Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, one of the main leaders of the coup.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Catholic Archdiocese of São Paulo</span> Catholic ecclesiastical territory

The Archdiocese of São Paulo is a Latin Metropolitan Archbishopric of the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copacabana Fort revolt</span> 1922 Brazilian revolt

The Copacabana Fort revolt, also known as the 18 of the Fort revolt, was one of several movements coordinated by rebel factions of the Brazilian Army against the president of Brazil, Epitácio Pessoa, and the winner of the 1922 presidential election, Artur Bernardes. Acting under the figure of marshal Hermes da Fonseca and supporting the defeated faction, the Republican Reaction, the rebels tried a wide revolt in Rio de Janeiro on 5 July 1922, but only managed to control Fort Copacabana and the Military School of Realengo, in addition to, outside the city, a focus in Niterói and the 1st Military Circumscription, in Mato Grosso. They were defeated, but the revolt marks the beginning of tenentism and the events that led to the end of the First Brazilian Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Mariana</span> Catholic ecclesiastical territory

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Mariana is an archdiocese based in the city of Mariana in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberal rebellions of 1842</span>

The Liberal Rebellions of 1842 were a series of rebellions that took place in the Brazilian provinces of Minas Gerais and São Paulo in response to actions taken by emperor Dom Pedro II to unify power under the central government and limit the powers of the provinces. These rebellions were poorly coordinated and were put down by the central government to little effect. Along with the rebellions in Rio Grande do Sul, the Liberal Rebellions marked the end of a series of province-level rebellions that threatened the Empire of Brazil's stability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1988 in Brazil</span>

Events in the year 1988 in Brazil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperial Brazilian Army</span> 1822–1889 land warfare branch of the Brazilian military

The Imperial Brazilian Army was the name given to the land force of the Empire of Brazil. The Brazilian Army was formed after the independence of the country from Portugal in 1822 and reformed in 1889, after the republican coup d'état that created the First Brazilian Republic, a dictatorship headed by the army.

The knockout stages of the 2017 Copa do Brasil were played from April 26 to September 27, 2017. A total of 16 teams competed in the knockout stages.

The 2019 Copa do Brasil second stage was the second stage of the 2019 Copa do Brasil football competition. It was played from 19 February to 10 April 2019. A total of 40 teams competed in the second stage to decide 20 places in the third stage of the 2019 Copa do Brasil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">São Paulo Revolt of 1924</span> Rebellion in Brazil

The São Paulo Revolt of 1924, also called the Revolution of 1924, Movement of 1924 or Second 5th of July was a Brazilian conflict with characteristics of a civil war, initiated by tenentist rebels to overthrow the government of president Artur Bernardes. From the city of São Paulo on 5 July, the revolt expanded to the interior of the state and inspired other uprisings across Brazil. The urban combat ended in a loyalist victory on 28 July. The rebels' withdrawal, until September, prolonged the rebellion into the Paraná Campaign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blood tribute</span> Historical army recruitment method

The so-called "blood tribute" was how forced recruitment into the Brazilian Armed Forces was known until the introduction of mandatory military service based on the Sortition Law in 1916. An older law had already established conscription by sortition in 1874, but popular resistance from the "list rippers" prevented its implementation, and forced recruitment continued to exist in practice. In this model, incorporated contingents were small. Soldiers were professionals, sometimes serving for up to 20 years, and were not sent into reserve at the end of their service. Not all soldiers and sailors were forced into service, as there were volunteers. The state had a low degree of bureaucratization and grasp over the population, leaving the administration of recruitment to the influence of local elites. The Imperial Brazilian Army had little control over the process. Impressment of recruits was carried out by police and military detachments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sortition Law</span>

The Sortition Law, officially Law No. 1,860 of 4 January 1908, introduced compulsory military service for the Brazilian Armed Forces. It was approved in 1906 but only de facto implemented in 1916, replacing forced recruitment - the antiquated "blood tribute" - and allowing the formation of a reserve. Sortition or draft lottery was the mechanism used for recruiting soldiers from 1916 to 1945, when it was replaced by general class call, which is the mandatory military service system in 21st century-Brazil. An earlier law of 1874 had already introduced the lottery, but it was not applied due to popular resistance. Also controversial, the 1908 law was one of the major military reforms of the First Brazilian Republic and had lasting effects on the Brazilian Army's relationship with the country's politics and society. The arguments advanced by lottery advocates in 1908–1916 remain the official justifications for conscription a century later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vila Rica Revolt</span> Rebellion in colonial Minas Gerais, Brazil

The Vila Rica Revolt, also known as Vila Rica Sedition, was a colonial revolt against the Portuguese crown. It took place between June 28 and July 19, 1720, in Vila Rica, a city in the Royal Captaincy of Minas de Ouro and Campos Gerais dos Cataguases, in Colonial Brazil. It is traditionally considered a nativist movement by Brazilian historiography, and one of the precursors of the so-called Minas Gerais Conspiracy. Recent reviews show that it was part of a cycle of local contestations that sought to correct errors of the administration. It is also commonly referred to as Filipe dos Santos Revolt, after one of its leaders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public Forces (Brazil)</span>

The Public Forces of the states of Brazil were already called "small state armies" in the First Brazilian Republic (1889–1930) due to their martial character. They took part in the various struggles and rebellions of the period alongside, and sometimes against, the Brazilian Army. Their character was hybrid, police and warfare. They emerged in the federalism of the First Republic as shields of state power against central power, represented by the Army, and were dismantled by the federal government in the Vargas Era (1930–1945) onwards, losing their conventional warfare capabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">São Paulo Revolt of 1924 in the interior</span>

The interior of São Paulo was the scene of the São Paulo Revolt of 1924 from July, parallel to the battle for the city of São Paulo, until August and September, when the rebels left the capital and headed for the state border, first to the south of Mato Grosso and then to Paraná. There is record of revolt in 87 municipalities and support for the revolt in another 32. Local political factions joined one side or the other in the conflict, the impact of which was felt even in municipalities never traversed by the revolutionary army.

The Battle of Três Lagoas was an offensive by tenentist rebels against Brazilian government forces on 17–18 August 1924, extending the São Paulo Revolt into southern Mato Grosso. Led by Juarez Távora, the rebels suffered heavy losses to loyalist troops from Minas Gerais, under the command of colonel Malan d'Angrogne, in the town of Campo Japonês. This defeat frustrated the rebels' ambition to settle in Mato Grosso, forcing them to start the Paraná Campaign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patriotic Battalions</span> Paramilitary forces in Brasil

In Brazil's military history, Patriotic Battalions were irregular paramilitary forces, usually made up of civilian volunteers, mobilized in times of crisis. They were created by local chiefs and could be paid by the chiefs or by the government. Their combat effectiveness was variable. The battalions of the countryside colonels were not adapted to conventional warfare, artillery and, outside of the Pampas, cavalry. On the other hand, they were effective in a typically Brazilian and hinterland guerrilla.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Gonzales 2008, p. 103.
  2. ↑ Santos 2020, p. 447.
  3. ↑ Mendes 1999, pp. 5–11.
  4. ↑ Guarese 2017, p. 24-26.
  5. ↑ Ferreira 2014, p. 52-57.
  6. ↑ Kraay 1999, p. 134.
  7. ↑ Santos 2020, p. 448.
  8. ↑ Guarese 2017, p. 35.
  9. 1 2 Kraay 1999, p. 137.
  10. ↑ Souza 2014, p. 238.
  11. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 267-268.
  12. ↑ Guarese 2017, p. 86.
  13. 1 2 Mendes 1999, p. 269.
  14. ↑ Souza 2014, p. 246.
  15. ↑ Kraay 1999, p. 138.
  16. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 271.
  17. ↑ Gonzales 2008, p. 106.
  18. ↑ Guarese 2017, p. 87.
  19. 1 2 Cândido 2008, p. 28-29.
  20. ↑ Rocha 2016, p. 36.
  21. ↑ Rocha 2016, p. 39.
  22. 1 2 Mendes 1999, p. 270-275.
  23. 1 2 Souza 2014, p. 246-248.
  24. ↑ Rocha 2016, p. 30.
  25. 1 2 Santos 2017, p. 150-151.
  26. 1 2 3 Castro 2012, p. 54-55.
  27. 1 2 Mendes 1999.
  28. ↑ Cândido 2008, p. 26.
  29. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 279-280.
  30. ↑ Cândido 2008, p. 41.
  31. ↑ Alves 2020, p. 31-34.
  32. 1 2 Cândido 2008, p. 28.
  33. ↑ Souza 2014.
  34. ↑ Cândido 2008, p. 27.
  35. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 270-271.
  36. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 290.
  37. ↑ Kraay 1999, p. 139.
  38. ↑ Cândido 2008, p. 45-46.
  39. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 268 e 277-278.
  40. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 288-289.
  41. ↑ Cândido 2008, p. 43-45.
  42. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 289-290.
  43. ↑ Mendes 1999, p. 269-270.
  44. ↑ Kraay 1999, p. 130 e 140-143.
  45. ↑ Almeida 2010, p. 156.
  46. ↑ Kraay 1999, p. 142.
  47. ↑ Gonzales 2008, p. 107.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.