Re Loubie

Last updated

Re Loubie
Coat of Arms of Queensland.svg
Court Supreme Court of Queensland
Citation(s)[1986] 1 Qd R 272
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Justice Dowsett

Re Loubie, [1] was a 1986 case involving a breach of section 117 of the Australian constitution by legislation of the state of Queensland. S. 117 provides protection from discrimination on the basis of inter-state residence:

Contents

A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.

Case facts

Loubie was a resident of the state of New South Wales. In Sydney he bought five bags of heroin weighing 138.14 grams for $25,000. He was intending to sell the drugs in Brisbane for a personal profit of around $5,000 to $7,500. After the purchase of the heroin he bought three plane tickets, under false names, to travel to Brisbane with two accomplices, one of whom was a woman who carried the drugs. All three were apprehended by police after they left Brisbane airport. Both accomplices admitted their involvement in the intended sale of the drugs; Loubie denied involvement. However, when presented with evidence of his involvement by his accomplices he admitted involvement and offered the police officer $10,000 cash as well as the $11,000 worth of jewelry he was wearing, as a bribe to avoid prosecution. Loubie stated to the officer:

Look what can I do. The drug is mine. I got five kids. Can we do something. I can get money. I ring my nephew in Sydney. He will get $10,000.00 on his house. I give it to you. Maybe I can get some of the drug back, soon as I sell it I give you the money. Please can I go. What about my 5 kids.

He was charged under the Health Act (1937) (Qld) of possession of dangerous drugs, in this case heroin, for the purpose of sale. He was also charged under s. 121 of the Criminal Code (Qld) for corruptly offering a police officer a sum of money and a quantity of jewellery in order to obtain protection from prosecution.

He was denied bail under the Bail Act 1980 (Qld), [2] in which at that time s. 16(3)(b) stated: "it is prohibited granting bail to a person ordinarily residing outside Queensland, unless cause was shown why it should be granted". Loubie was unable to show cause and bail was denied.

However under the Act a resident of Queensland who had been charged with the same offences as Loubie would not have had to show cause for bail and therefore would have been more likely to be granted it. Loubie believed that this provision in s. 16 discriminated against him based on his residence in another state, in conflict with s. 117 of the federal constitution, and he appealed to the Supreme Court of Queensland to dispute the ruling on bail.

Justice Dowsett in the Supreme Court found that s. 16(3)(b) of the Queensland Bail Act conflicted with s. 117 of the federal constitution: “by selecting residence as the criterion for applying the statutory disadvantage, the legislation chooses the exact standard prohibited by s. 117”. S.16(3)(b) was therefore invalid.. [1] Consequently, Loubie did not have to show cause to be granted bail, and it was granted. [3]

Significance

The Loubie case started a ripple effect with many other cases regarding bail to people from out of state. After Loubie there was the Fitzgerald case, and after that many others.[ citation needed ] In all these cases it was determined that the accused did not have to show cause to be granted bail, whatever their state of residence.

As a result of the Loubie case, the Queensland Bail Act was amended, so that any person apprehended in Queensland who was from out of state no longer needed to show cause to be granted bail. [4] [5]

On a national level, the Loubie case forced all states to check whether their bail laws similarly conflicted with Constitution s. 117. [6] [7] The Victorian Bail Act (1977) was also amended.

The ultimate outcome of the Loubie case was a strengthening of Australians' right not to be discriminated against on the basis of inter-state residence. [8]

Subsequent events

After being granted bail, Loubie fled to Lebanon, until 1999 when he surrendered at the Australian Embassy at Beirut and voluntarily returned to Australia. He pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. [9]

Related Research Articles

In jurisprudence, double jeopardy is a procedural defence that prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same charges following an acquittal or conviction and in rare cases prosecutorial and/or judge misconduct in the same jurisdiction. Double jeopardy is a common concept in criminal law. In civil law, a similar concept is that of res judicata. Variation in common law countries is the peremptory plea, which may take the specific forms of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict. These doctrines appear to have originated in ancient Roman law, in the broader principle non bis in idem.

Justice of the peace Judicial officer elected or appointed to keep the peace and perform minor civic jobs

A justice of the peace (JP) is a judicial officer of a lower or puisne court, elected or appointed by means of a commission to keep the peace. In past centuries the term commissioner of the peace was often used with the same meaning. Depending on the jurisdiction, such justices dispense summary justice or merely deal with local administrative applications in common law jurisdictions. Justices of the peace are appointed or elected from the citizens of the jurisdiction in which they serve, and are usually not required to have any formal legal education in order to qualify for the office. Some jurisdictions have varying forms of training for JPs.

Ian Callinan

Ian David Francis Callinan AC QC is a former Justice of the High Court of Australia, the highest court in the Australian court hierarchy.

Jayant Patel Indian-born American surgeon (born 1950)

Jayant Mukundray Patel is an Indian-born American surgeon who was accused of gross negligence whilst working at Bundaberg Base Hospital in Queensland, Australia. Deaths of some of Patel's patients led to widespread publicity in 2005. In June 2010, he was convicted of three counts of manslaughter and one case of grievous bodily harm, and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment. In August 2012, all convictions were quashed by the full bench of the High Court of Australia and a retrial was ordered due to "highly emotive and prejudicial evidence that was irrelevant to the case" laid before the jury. A retrial for one of the manslaughter counts resulted in acquittal and led to a plea deal where Patel pleaded guilty to fraud and the remaining charges were dropped. On May 15, 2015, he was barred from practising medicine in Australia.

The judiciary of Australia comprises judges who sit in federal courts and courts of the States and Territories of Australia. The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law.

Supreme Court of Queensland

The Supreme Court of Queensland is the highest court in the Australian State of Queensland. It was formerly the Brisbane Supreme Court, in the colony of Queensland.

Criminal law of Australia

The criminal law of Australia is the body of law in Australia that relates to crime.

<i>Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld)</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld) (2004) 223 CLR 575 was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the separation of powers in Australia.

Julian Ronald Moti QC CSI was the Attorney General of the Solomon Islands. He was born in Fiji and educated in Australia.

Pope Alexander Cooper Australian politician

Sir Pope Alexander Cooper was an attorney-general and a chief judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia.

Mohamed Haneef is an Indian born doctor who was falsely accused of aiding terrorists, and left Australia upon cancellation of his visa amid great political controversy. His visa was later reinstated and he was given some compensation.

Thomas McCawley

Thomas William McCawley was a chief justice of Queensland.

The trial of Lex Wotton relates to the events surrounding the Townsville, Queensland proceedings in the Federal Magistrates Court concerning the actions taken by Palm Island Aboriginal Shire Council member Wotton during the 26 November 2004 Palm Island riots.

Lieutenant Colonel Justice John Harris Byrne, is the former Senior Judge Administrator of the Supreme Court of Queensland. Having been a judge of that court since 1989, he was one of the court's most experienced judges. He was also Chair of the National Judicial College of Australia, a body which provides programs and professional development resources to judicial officers in Australia. He is now a private Commercial Arbitrator.

Charles E. Chubb

Charles Edward Chubb was a judge in the Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia. He was also a Member of the Queensland Legislative Assembly and an Attorney-General of Queensland.

Justice Henry George Fryberg was a Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia.

The Constitution of Queensland is the constitution of the Australian state of Queensland. As with the other constitutions of Australian states and territories, it is a written constitution influenced by the Westminster system and Australia's federal system of government. It defines Queensland as a state under a constitutional monarchy and outlines the structure and powers of the Queensland government's three constituent parts, the executive, legislature, and judiciary.

Timothy Francis Carmody is an Australian judge who was the Chief Justice of Queensland between 8 July 2014 and 1 July 2015. His previous roles include work as a police officer, barrister, Queensland Crime Commissioner, Family Court of Australia judge, and Chief Magistrate of the Magistrates Court of Queensland. He also presided over the 2013 Child Protection Commission of Inquiry.

Section 117 of the Constitution of Australia provides protection against discrimination on the basis of State of residence.

References

  1. 1 2 Re Loubie [1986] 1 Qd R 272, Supreme Court (Qld).
  2. ↑ Bail Act 1980 (Qld).
  3. ↑ Garth Thompson (1991). "Bail for Serious Offenders" (PDF). In Dennis Challinger (ed.). Bail or Remand? Proceedings of a conference held 29 November-1 December 1988. Australian Institute of Criminology. pp. 107, 108. Retrieved 3 November 2017.
  4. ↑ Bail Act and other Acts Amendment Act 1988 (Qld), s.12C.
  5. ↑ McDonald, Leighton (2004). "Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review". Federal Law Review. 32: 1–28. doi:10.1177/0067205X0403200101. S2CID   155416630. (2004) 32(1) Federal Law Review 1 p 9 n49.
  6. ↑ Director of Public Prosecutions v Spiridon [1989] VicRp 31 , [1989] VR 352, Supreme Court (Vic).
  7. ↑ Shaw v The State of Western Australia [2004] WASC 144 , Supreme Court (WA).
  8. ↑ Ebbeck, Genevieve, Section 117: The Obscure Provision (PDF) (1991) 13(1) Adelaide Law Review 23.
  9. ↑ R v Loubie [2000] QCA 317 , Court of Appeal (Qld).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.