Reasons to Believe

Last updated

Reasons to Believe
Formation1986
Founder Hugh Ross
TypeReligious ministry
Legal statusNon-profit
Purpose"Revealing God in science"
Headquarters Covina, California, United States
President
Fazale Rana
Staff
5 Scholars and 65 Staff
Website reasons.org OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg

Reasons to Believe (RTB) is an American nonprofit organization that promotes day-age forms of old Earth creationism. [1] It was founded in 1986 by Hugh Ross, a Canadian-born astrophysicist and creationist Christian apologist. [2] [3] Former Vice-President of Research and Apologetics, Fazale Rana, was named President and CEO in July 2022.

Contents

About

Reasons to Believe aims to use science as a means of evangelism. [4] The organization publishes articles, books, and audio programs about topics related to science and Christianity. [5] [6] [7] It also produces video and multimedia content and hosts events where RTB speakers discuss science and apologetics. [8]

The organization integrates science, theology, and philosophy to address topics such as the existence of God and the Bible’s reliability. [1] Reasons to Believe is a member of the Evangelical Council of Financial Accountability and the Independent Charities of America. [9]

RTB uses the words of 1 Peter 3:15-16 as the organization’s core values and ministry goal. [10]

Reasons Institute

Through its Reasons Institute program, Reasons to Believe offers courses in science apologetics at educational institutions such as Biola University, Northern California Bible College, and Erskine Theological Seminary. [11] [12]

RTB Press

Reasons to Believe founded RTB Press in 2013 to be an in-house publisher of books by RTB scholars. More than 25 books have been published through RTB Press. [13] The organization previously published twelve books through Baker Publishing Group. [14]

Scholars and Scholar Community

RTB has five in-house research scholars: Hugh Ross, Fazale Rana, Jeff Zweerink, Kenneth Samples and George Haraksin. [14] RTB also organizes a scholar community with 250 members that studies various topics, including apologetics, earth sciences, and theology and participates in workshops organized by RTB. [9] [14] [14] [15]

Reasons to Believe staff scholars Dr. Jeff Zweerink, George Haraksin, Fazale Rana and Hugh Ross speak during a conference at Grace Church St. Louis in November 2022 Reasons To Believe staff.jpg
Reasons to Believe staff scholars Dr. Jeff Zweerink, George Haraksin, Fazale Rana and Hugh Ross speak during a conference at Grace Church St. Louis in November 2022

Views

RTB offers a scientific model predicting an increase in astronomical evidence that Earth resides at the ideal location in the cosmos for both harboring advanced civilization and technology and making the universe observable. [16] Nontheistic models predict that astronomical discoveries will show that Earth is unremarkable for both habitability and observation. [17]

The RTB model predicts that future anthropological and genetic research will increasingly confirm that humans are biologically distinct rather than descended from a hominid species. It predicts stronger evidence for humanity's genetic, anatomical, and behavioral uniqueness. It places the earliest hominids (bipedal primates) at 6.5 million years ago and the first humans at around fifty thousand years ago. [18]

RTB predicts that the flood of Noah was a local event. There is some evidence for a large flood in modern day Iraq around 2900 BCE. [19]

Awards

Reasons to Believe has been certified four times as a “Best Christian Workplace” for 2016, 2018, 2020 and 2022. [20]

Media

Reasons to Believe hosts, produces and distributes several podcasts and also has a Youtube channel. [21]

Criticism

Scientific models help researchers organize information into a conceptual structure to understand and interpret data, ask good questions, and identify anomalies. Famous scientific models include Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity and the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution. Writers such as Robert Pennock and Steven Novella have claimed RTB's testable creation model fails to meet the modern qualifications for a scientific theory or model and looks at known things and claims them as predictions. [22] [23]

In a review of an updated edition of Who Was Adam: A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Humanity (2015) by Hugh Ross and Fazale Rana, research psychologist Brian Bolton argues against the scientific status of the RTB model. Bolton sees violations of scientific logic in the form of immunity to falsification, the assumption of supernatural causation, a lack of independent evaluations of evidence, circular reasoning, and the false equivalence of biblical creationism (faith-based) and human evolution (evidence-based) as scientific explanations. [24]

RTB claims that all current humans are descended from a specially created couple (that lived about 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, at the time of the explosion of music, art, and jewelry. They also believe there is no common ancestor between humans and other primates) which is disputed in a scholarly essay by evangelical geneticist Dennis Venema. [18] There is strong genetic and fossil evidence suggesting a common ape-man ancestor as well. [25] [26]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creationism</span> Belief that nature originated through supernatural acts

Creationism is the religious belief that nature, and aspects such as the universe, Earth, life, and humans, originated with supernatural acts of divine creation. In its broadest sense, creationism includes a continuum of religious views, which vary in their acceptance or rejection of scientific explanations such as evolution that describe the origin and development of natural phenomena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creation science</span> Pseudoscientific form of Young Earth creationism

Creation science or scientific creationism is a pseudoscientific form of Young Earth creationism which claims to offer scientific arguments for certain literalist and inerrantist interpretations of the Bible. It is often presented without overt faith-based language, but instead relies on reinterpreting scientific results to argue that various myths in the Book of Genesis and other select biblical passages are scientifically valid. The most commonly advanced ideas of creation science include special creation based on the Genesis creation narrative and flood geology based on the Genesis flood narrative. Creationists also claim they can disprove or reexplain a variety of scientific facts, theories and paradigms of geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archaeology, history, and linguistics using creation science. Creation science was foundational to intelligent design.

Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins". Proponents claim that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." ID is a form of creationism that lacks empirical support and offers no testable or tenable hypotheses, and is therefore not science. The leading proponents of ID are associated with the Discovery Institute, a Christian, politically conservative think tank based in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ken Ham</span> Australian Christian fundamentalist

Kenneth Alfred Ham is an Australian Christian fundamentalist, young Earth creationist, apologist and former science teacher, living in the United States. He is the founder, CEO, and former president of Answers in Genesis (AiG), a Christian apologetics organisation that operates the Creation Museum and the Ark Encounter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Young Earth creationism</span> Form of creationism

Young Earth creationism (YEC) is a form of creationism which holds as a central tenet that the Earth and its lifeforms were created by supernatural acts of the Abrahamic God between about 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. In its most widespread version, YEC is based on the religious belief in the inerrancy of certain literal interpretations of the Book of Genesis. Its primary adherents are Christians and Jews who believe that God created the Earth in six literal days. This is in contrast with old Earth creationism (OEC), which holds literal interpretations of Genesis that are compatible with the scientifically determined ages of the Earth and universe. It is also in contrast to theistic evolution, which posits that the scientific principles of evolution, the Big Bang, abiogenesis, solar nebular theory, age of the universe, and age of Earth are compatible with a metaphorical interpretation of the Genesis creation account.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Earth creationism</span> Form of creationism

Old Earth creationism (OEC) is an umbrella of theological views encompassing certain varieties of creationism which may or can include day-age creationism, gap creationism, progressive creationism, and sometimes theistic evolutionism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Day-age creationism</span> Metaphorical interpretation of the creation accounts in Genesis.

Day-age creationism, a type of old Earth creationism, is an interpretation of the creation accounts in Genesis. It holds that the six days referred to in the Genesis account of creation are not literal 24-hour days, but are much longer periods. The Genesis account is then reconciled with the age of the Earth. Proponents of the day-age theory can be found among both theistic evolutionists, who accept the scientific consensus on evolution, and progressive creationists, who reject it. The theories are said to be built on the understanding that the Hebrew word yom is also used to refer to a time period, with a beginning and an end and not necessarily that of a 24-hour day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Answers in Genesis</span> Nonprofit promoting Young Earth creationism

Answers in Genesis (AiG) is an American fundamentalist Christian apologetics parachurch organization. It advocates Young Earth creationism on the basis of its literal, historical-grammatical interpretation of the Book of Genesis and the Bible as a whole. Out of belief in biblical inerrancy, it rejects the results of scientific investigations that contradict their view of the Genesis creation narrative and instead supports pseudoscientific creation science. The organization sees evolution as incompatible with the Bible and believes anything other than the young Earth view is a compromise on the principle of biblical inerrancy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive creationism</span> Belief that God created life gradually

Progressive creationism is the religious belief that God created new forms of life gradually over a period of hundreds of millions of years. As a form of old Earth creationism, it accepts mainstream geological and cosmological estimates for the age of the Earth, some tenets of biology such as microevolution as well as archaeology to make its case. In this view creation occurred in rapid bursts in which all "kinds" of plants and animals appear in stages lasting millions of years. The bursts are followed by periods of stasis or equilibrium to accommodate new arrivals. These bursts represent instances of God creating new types of organisms by divine intervention. As viewed from the archaeological record, progressive creationism holds that "species do not gradually appear by the steady transformation of its ancestors; [but] appear all at once and "fully formed."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institute for Creation Research</span> Creationist organization

The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is a creationist apologetics institute in Dallas, Texas, that specializes in media promotion of pseudoscientific creation science and interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative as a historical event. The ICR adopts the Bible as an inerrant and literal documentary of scientific and historical fact as well as religious and moral truths, and espouses a Young Earth creationist worldview. It rejects evolutionary biology, which it views as a corrupting moral and social influence and threat to religious belief. The ICR was formed by Henry M. Morris in 1972 following an organizational split with the Creation Science Research Center (CSRC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creation Museum</span> Museum in Kentucky promoting a pseudoscientific creationist point of view

The Creation Museum, located in Petersburg, Kentucky, United States, is a museum that promotes the pseudoscientific young Earth creationist (YEC) explanation of the origin of the universe and life on Earth based on a literal interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative of the Bible. It is operated by the Christian creation apologetics organization Answers in Genesis (AiG).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pre-Adamite</span> Belief that humans existed before the biblical character Adam

The pre-Adamite hypothesis or pre-Adamism is the theological belief that humans existed before the biblical character Adam. Pre-Adamism is therefore distinct from the conventional Abrahamic belief that Adam was the first human. "Pre-Adamite" is used as a term, both for those humans believed to exist before Adam, and for believers or proponents of this hypothesis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Sarfati</span> Australian young earth creationist and chess player

Jonathan David Sarfati is a young Earth creationist who writes articles for Creation Ministries International (CMI), a non-profit Christian apologetics ministry. Sarfati has a PhD in chemistry, and was New Zealand national chess champion in 1987 and 1988.

Walter T. Brown is a young Earth creationist, who is the director of his own ministry called the Center for Scientific Creation. The Skeptic's Dictionary considers him to be one of the leaders of the creation science movement. He proposes a specific version of flood geology called the Hydroplate Theory. He is a retired army officer with a degree in mechanical engineering.

Christian apologetics is a branch of Christian theology that defends Christianity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh Ross (astrophysicist)</span> Canadian astrophysicist

Hugh Norman Ross is a Christian apologist, and old-Earth creationist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerry Coyne</span> American biologist

Jerry Allen Coyne is an American biologist and skeptic known for his work on speciation and his commentary on intelligent design. A professor emeritus at the University of Chicago in the Department of Ecology and Evolution, he has published numerous papers on the theory of evolution. His concentration is speciation and ecological and evolutionary genetics, particularly as they involve the fruit fly, Drosophila. In 2023 he became a fellow with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill Nye–Ken Ham debate</span> 2014 debate on the origins of the universe

The debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham on the question "Is Creation A Viable Model of Origins?" was held February 4, 2014, at the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Local flood theory</span> Theory concerning Genesis flood narrative

The Local flood theory or a limited flood theory is an interpretation of the Genesis flood narrative, where the flood of Noah is interpreted as a local event, generally located in Mesopotamia, instead of a global event.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fazale Rana</span> Author and non-profit executive

Fazale “Fuz” Rana is an American biochemist, Christian Apologist, author, and science lecturer. Since July 2022, he has advanced from the position of Vice President to become the President and CEO of Reasons to Believe, a nonprofit organization that promotes day-age forms of old Earth creationism. He writes and speaks extensively about evidence for creation emerging from biochemistry, genetics, human origins, and synthetic biology.

References

  1. 1 2 Butcher, Andy (June 1, 2003). "He Sees God in the Stars" . Retrieved April 14, 2024.
  2. Van Bebber, Mark; Taylor, Paul S. ""Progressive Creationist" Hugh Ross, who is he and what does he believe?". Christian Answers. Retrieved May 1, 2018.
  3. reasons.org, About Hugh Ross
  4. Butcher, Andy (June 1, 2003). "He Sees God in the Stars - Charisma Magazine" . Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  5. "Publisher: RTB Press | Open Library". openlibrary.org. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  6. "Articles Archives". Reasons to Believe. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  7. "Reasons to Believe : Audio". support.reasons.org. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  8. "Reasons to Believe : Multimedia". Reasons to Believe. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  9. 1 2 "REASONS TO BELIEVE - GuideStar Profile". www.guidestar.org. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  10. "Hugh Ross". Reasons to Believe. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  11. "Reasons To Believe". ncbc.net. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  12. "Diploma and Certificate Programs". Erskine Seminary. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  13. "Publisher: RTB Press | Open Library". openlibrary.org. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  14. 1 2 3 4 "Reasons to Believe | Inters.org". inters.org. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  15. "Chapters Archive". Reasons to Believe. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  16. Brayton, Ed. "RTB's "Testable Creation Model"". scienceblogs.com. Retrieved May 1, 2018.
  17. "Earth Not Center Of The Universe, Surrounded By 'Dark Energy'". sciencedaily.com. Retrieved May 1, 2018.
  18. 1 2 Venema, Dennis. "An Evangelical Geneticist's Critique of Reasons to Believe's Testable Creation Model: RTB and Human-Ape Common Ancestry". biologos.org. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  19. Collins, Lorence G. (September–October 2009). "Yes, Noah's Flood May Have Happened, But Not Over the Whole Earth". Reports of the National Center for Science Education. 29 (5). Retrieved May 1, 2018.
  20. "Certification | Best Christian Workplaces". workplaces.org. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  21. Writer, Guest (July 28, 2022). "Cumulative Cases Make the Strongest Arguments". Reasons to Believe. Retrieved April 14, 2024.
  22. Novella, Steven (April 11, 2007). "Hugh Ross's Testable Creation Model". theness.com. Retrieved May 3, 2018.
  23. Pennock, Robert (February 28, 2008). Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism. MIT Press. ISBN   9780262264051 . Retrieved May 3, 2018.
  24. Bolton, Brian (2018). "Sorry, 'Theistic Science' Is Not Science". Skeptical Inquirer. 42 (3): 50–53.
  25. Choi, Charles Q. "Fossil Reveals What Last Common Ancestor of Humans and Apes Looked Liked". Scientific American. Retrieved May 1, 2018.
  26. Hasagawa, Masami; Kishino, Hirohisa; Yano, Taka-aki (October 1985). "Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 22 (2): 160–174. Bibcode:1985JMolE..22..160H. doi:10.1007/BF02101694. PMID   3934395. S2CID   25554168.