Rio Protocol (1934)

Last updated
Rio Protocol
Protocol of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation and Additional Act Between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru
Mapa de la frontera Colombia-Peru.svg
Peru–Colombia border
TypeBilateral treaty
Signed24 May 1934 (1934-05-24)
Location Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Negotiators Flag of Brazil.svg Afrânio de Melo  [ pt ]
Signatories
Parties
Languages Spanish
Full text
Wikisource-logo.svg es:Protocolo de Amistad y Cooperación entre la República de Colombia y la República del Perú at Wikisource

The Protocol of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation and Additional Act Between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru, [1] also known simply as the Rio Protocol, was an international agreement signed in Rio de Janeiro between Colombia and Peru on May 24, 1934.

Contents

The Protocol was intended to finally resolve the long-running territorial dispute between the two countries, and brought about the official end of the Colombia–Peru War.

Background

The dispute between Colombia and Peru over the sovereignty of the Amazon basin dates back to the aftermath of the wars of independence. Gran Colombia fought a war with Peru over a border dispute in the area of Tumbes, Jaén and Maynas. The Treaty of Guayaquil put an end to the military campaign but problems arose due to the subsequent dissolution of Gran Colombia, among them the continuity of the border issue. [2]

Direct and continuous negotiations between Colombia and Peru only began in 1894. Until then, the discussion only concerned the latter and Ecuador. That year, tripartite negotiations began, which did not produce results. [3] The areas in dispute between Colombia and Peru were mainly the Caquetá and Putumayo basins. The colonization attempts of both countries led to armed clashes, most notably that of La Pedrera in 1911. [4] [5] [6] The two countries tried arbitration, without reaching an agreement on who would fulfill that role. [7]

Salomón–Lozano Treaty

Once the negotiations were restarted, on March 24, 1922, a direct agreement was reached in Lima, the work of the plenipotentiaries Fabio Lozano Torrijos (representing Colombia) and Alberto Salomón Osorio (representing Peru). The Putumayo River was designated as the limit, except in a strip known as the Amazonian trapeze, under the sovereignty of Colombia. [8]

The border line between the Peruvian Republic and the Republic of Colombia is agreed, agreed and fixed in the terms that are expressed below: From the point where the meridian of the mouth of the Cuhimbé River in Putumayo intersects the San Miguel River or Sucumbíos, go up that same meridian to said mouth of the Cuhimbé; from there by the Putumayo River to the confluence of the Yaguas River; follows a straight line that from this confluence goes to the Atacuari River in the Amazon and from there through the Amazon River to the border between Peru and Brazil established in the Peru-Brazilian Treaty of October 23, 1851.

Colombia–Peru War

On September 1, 1932, a group of 48 Peruvian citizens from Loreto stormed the small town of Leticia to claim it as Peruvian, expelling the Colombian authorities and sending them to Brazil. [9] This act, initially considered a domestic problem, was the one that gave rise to the Colombian–Peruvian war. The clashes took place along the Putumayo River and the Amazon trapeze, recalling clashes such as the Battle of Tarapacá on February 14 and the Battle of Güepí on March 26, 1933, already on May 23, 1933, the diplomatic agreement ending the military actions was signed in Geneva. The Peruvian army vacated Leticia a month later just as the Colombian army returned Güepí to Peru. [10]

Negotiations (1933–1934)

First stage

On October 24, 1933, the commission destined to settle the dispute met, which was installed by the Brazilian Foreign Minister Afrânio de Melo Franco. The Peruvian part was made up of Víctor Maúrtua, Víctor Andrés Belaúnde, Alberto Ulloa Sotomayor and Raúl Porras Barrenechea. The Colombian delegation, by Roberto Urdaneta Arbeláez, Luis Cano Villegas and Guillermo Valencia Castillo.

On October 31, the second meeting between the Peruvian and Colombian delegations took place. In it, the method to be adopted in the negotiations was discussed, since the Colombian representation maintained that it was up to the Peruvian to present what it considered to be pending problems in order to study possible solutions. On the contrary, the Peruvian commission stated that both parties should present memorandums expressing their points of view. The heads of both representations were appointed to seek a solution, in addition to agreeing on a series of informative communications, until another procedure was necessary to record the points of agreement and divergence. In the heads' talks, it was agreed to adopt a common agenda, for which the two delegations would present memorandums. However, given the irreconcilable differences between the two notes, it was decided to dispense with them.

Both parties would meet again on November 28 and December 1, 4 and 18. In the sessions, the Peruvian delegation spoke of Colombia's noncompliance with the Salomón-Lozano treaty, by not delivering the Sucumbíos Triangle to Peru (which had been ceded in exchange for the Leticia trapeze); the impracticability of the treaty; and the economic, geographical and historical inconveniences of the line drawn by the 1922 treaty. Finally, the Peruvian side concluded that the only possible solution was to change the border, with the luck that the triangle would return to Colombia and the trapeze to Peru.

The Peruvian conclusion was rejected by the Colombian commission, indicating that the Conference held did not discuss the Salomón-Lozano Treaty and that there was no territorial question for the change of border. In addition, he pointed out that the solution to the observations made by Peru was to sign a series of navigation and trade agreements in the Putumayo and the Amazon. The Peruvian delegation rejected these agreements which were, in their opinion, unimportant.

Faced with Colombia's refusal to discuss the Sucumbíos issue, the Peruvian side suggested that the discussions result in an equity arbitration constituted ad hoc. Once again, the Peruvian proposal was rejected, with the Colombians suggesting that, for any legal problem, it was necessary to resort to the Permanent Court of International Justice in The Hague. The Peruvian side rejected that idea, stating that a court was inadequate to solve the problem, insisting on arbitration.

Second stage

On February 20, 1934, Brazilian Foreign Minister Melo Franco returned to Rio de Janeiro and met with the heads of both parties to seek a solution due to the negotiations being stalled. Both parties formally submitted memorandums, illustrating their positions at the time.

The negotiations continued, insisting on the Peruvian position in several exchanges of territories, all of which were rejected by the Colombian delegation. At that time, the deadline for the administration of Leticia by the League of Nations was about to expire, so the Peruvian side requested an extension, a request that was also rejected by the Colombian delegation. Given this, the Peruvian position proposed a mixed commission for the administration of Leticia, a proposal also rejected.

Third stage

The Peruvian delegation continued to insist on a mixed commission for Leticia, slowly putting aside the territorial issue. The mediation of the Brazilian foreign minister was essential for both parties to reach an agreement in Rio de Janeiro. The divergent points between the two parties were liquidated, until in May 1934 a definitive agreement was reached.

The Protocol

The Protocol of Friendship and Cooperation between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru was signed on May 24, 1934, ratifying the Salomón–Lozano Treaty, still in force today and accepted by both parties.

The Peruvian-Ecuadorian issue

Peru invited Ecuador to begin negotiations in order to settle the question of pending limits between the two countries, which it refused. The country was an interested party in the dispute between Colombia and Peru, not only because of territorial contiguity, but also because there was an area that the three countries claimed. The Ecuadorian Congress declared that it would not recognize the validity of the arrangements between its two neighbors.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leticia, Amazonas</span> Place in Department of Amazonas, Colombia

Leticia is the southernmost city in the Republic of Colombia, capital of the department of Amazonas, Colombia's southernmost town and one of the major ports on the Amazon river. It has an elevation of 96 meters (315') above sea level and an average temperature of 27 °C (80.6 °F). Leticia has long been Colombia's shipping point for tropical fish for the aquarium trade. Leticia has a population of 33,503 located on the left bank of the Amazon river at the point where the borders of Colombia, Brazil and Peru meet in an area called Tres Fronteras.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecuadorian–Peruvian War</span> 1941 South American border conflict

The Second Ecuadorian–Peruvian War, known locally as the War of '41, was a South American border war fought between 5–31 July 1941. It was the first of three military conflicts between Ecuador and Peru during the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miguel Abadía Méndez</span>

Miguel Abadía Méndez was the 12th President of Colombia (1926–1930). A Conservative party politician, Abadía was the last president of the period known as the Conservative Hegemony, running unopposed and forming a one party Cabinet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luis Miguel Sánchez Cerro</span> Peruvian politician (1889–1933)

Luis Miguel Sánchez Cerro was a high-ranking Peruvian army officer who served as the 41st President of Peru, from 1931 to 1933 as well as Interim President of Peru, officially as the President of the Provisional Government Junta, from 1930 to 1931. On August 22, 1930, as a lieutenant-colonel, he overturned the eleven-year dictatorship of Augusto B. Leguía after a coup d'état in Arequipa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecuadorian–Peruvian territorial dispute</span>

The Ecuadorian–Peruvian territorial dispute was a territorial dispute between Ecuador and Peru, which, until 1928, also included Colombia. The dispute had its origins on each country's interpretation of what Real Cedulas Spain used to precisely define its colonial territories in the Americas. After independence, all of Spain's colonial territories signed and agreed to proclaim their limits in the basis of the principle of uti possidetis juris, which regarded the Spanish borders of 1810 as the borders of the new republics. However, conflicting claims and disagreements between the newly formed countries eventually escalated to the point of armed conflicts on several occasions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">El Encanto</span> Municipality and town in Amazonas Department, Colombia

El Encanto is a town and municipality in the Amazonas Department of Colombia. It is located in the mouth of the Caraparaná River, a tributary of the Putumayo River (Içá). El Encanto can be reached by air or river. The local navy base has a runway available only to military and official planes, established during the Colombia-Peru War. By river the closest towns with airport access are Puerto Arturo, Peru from downstream, and Puerto Leguízamo upstream.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colombia–Peru War</span> 1932–33 border conflict

The Colombia–Peru War, also called the Leticia War, was a short-lived armed conflict between Colombia and Peru over territory in the Amazon rainforest that lasted from September 1, 1932, to May 24, 1933. In the end, an agreement was reached to divide the disputed area between both countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tarapacá, Amazonas</span> Municipality and town in Amazonas Department, Colombia

Tarapacá is a town and municipality in the Colombian Department of Amazonas. As of 2015, the population comprised 4,195 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salomón–Lozano Treaty</span> 1922 treaty between Colombia and Peru

The Salomón–Lozano Treaty was signed in July 1922 by representatives Fabio Lozano Torrijos, of Colombia and Alberto Salomón Osorio of Peru. The fourth in a succession of treaties on the Colombian-Peruvian disputes over land in the upper Amazon region, it was intended to be a comprehensive settlement of the long border dispute between the two countries.

Nuevo Tarapacá is a Peruvian town, belonging to the Maynas Province in the Fernando Lores District, which is in the Loreto Department on the banks of the Tamshiyacu River, near the district capital of Tamshiyacu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colombianization of Leticia, Putumayo and Caquetá</span> History of Colombia

The Colombianization of Leticia, Putumayo and Caquetá is the name used to designate a process of transculturation or acculturation of the areas recognized under the sovereignty of Colombia, with the purpose of transplanting Colombian cultural traditions, in replacement of those cultivated in Peru.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sucumbíos Triangle</span> Region of Ecuador

The Sucumbíos Triangle is a territorial zone in Ecuador, located between the Putumayo river to the north and San Miguel river to the south. It belonged to Peru as a de jure international exclave between 1922 and 1942, until it was ceded to Ecuador after the Rio de Janeiro Protocol of 1942, forming today part of its border with Colombia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Guayaquil</span> 1829 treaty between Colombia and Peru

The Treaty of Guayaquil, officially the Treaty of Peace Between Colombia and Peru, and also known as the Larrea–Gual Treaty after its signatories, was a peace treaty signed between Gran Colombia and Peru in 1829 that officially put an end to the Gran Colombia–Peru War. The treaty called for the removal of troops and the restoration of the status quo ante bellum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of La Pedrera</span> Battle during the border conflict between Peru and Colombia

The Battle of La Pedrera was a conflict between Peru and Colombia that took place from 10–12 July 1911 in a disputed area surrounding the Putumayo River as part of a larger territorial dispute between both countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Tarapacá (1933)</span> Battle of the Colombia–Peru War

The Battle of Tarapacá, also known as the Battle of Nuevo Tarapacá or the Defense of the Lower Putumayo took place during the Colombia–Peru War on February 14, 1933.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amazon Trapeze</span> Region in Amazonas Department, Colombia

The Amazonian Trapeze or Leticia Trapeze is a geographical corridor located in the extreme south of the Amazonas Department of Colombia, which constitutes the southernmost part of the country and allows it to have banks on the Amazon River. At this end of the department, which extends like a peninsula between Brazil and Peru, is the departmental capital of Leticia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colombian–Peruvian territorial dispute</span>

The Colombian–Peruvian territorial dispute was a territorial dispute between Colombia and Peru, which, until 1916, also included Ecuador. The dispute had its origins on each country's interpretation of what Real Cedulas Spain used to precisely define its possessions in the Americas. After independence, all of Spain's former territories signed and agreed to proclaim their limits in the basis of the principle of uti possidetis juris, which regarded the Spanish borders of 1810 as the borders of the new republics. However, conflicting claims and disagreements between the newly formed countries eventually escalated to the point of armed conflicts on several occasions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bolivian–Peruvian territorial dispute</span> Territorial dispute from 1825 to 1909

The Bolivian–Peruvian territorial dispute was a territorial dispute between Bolivia and Peru that lasted from the former's independence in 1825 to the signing of the Polo–Bustamante Treaty in 1909.

The South American territorial disputes are the territorial disputes and litigations that have developed in South America since the aftermath of the continent's wars of independence, which have shaped the current political geography of the region. These conflicts have been resolved through both military and diplomatic means. The most recent conflict in the Americas of this nature was the Cenepa War in 1995, between Ecuador and Peru.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alberto Salomón Osorio</span> Peruvian diplomat and politician

Alberto Salomón Osorio was a Peruvian diplomat and politician.

References

  1. "FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC PAPERS, 1934, THE AMERICAN REPUBLICS, VOLUME IV". Office of the Historian .
  2. Basadre 2005, Vol. 2, p. 12–13
  3. Porras Barrenechea 1926, p. 46–48.
  4. Bustillo 1916, p. 72.
  5. Porras Barrenechea 1926, p. 52-53.
  6. Basadre 2005, Vol. 12, p. 265.
  7. Porras Barrenechea 1926, p. 54.
  8. Basadre 2005, Vol. 14, p. 123—125.
  9. Basadre 2005, Vol. 16, p. 15–16.
  10. "El combate de Güepí y los cañoneros Cartagena y Santa Marta". Pañol de la Historia.

Bibliography