Russell Humphreys

Last updated
Russell Humphreys
Born
David Russell Humphreys

(1942-02-02) February 2, 1942 (age 81)
Wyandotte, Michigan, United States [1]
Alma mater Duke University (B.S.)
Louisiana State University (Ph.D)
Occupation(s)Independent Researcher for Creation Ministries International
(formerly at the Sandia National Laboratories)
Known forAdvocacy of Young Earth Creationism

David Russell Humphreys is an American physicist who advocates for young Earth creationism. He holds a PhD in physics and has proposed a theory for the origin of the universe which allegedly resolves the distant starlight problem that exists in young Earth creationism.

Contents

Education and affiliations

Humphreys graduated with a B.S. from Duke University and was awarded his Ph.D in physics from Louisiana State University in 1972. [1] He has worked for General Electric and Sandia National Laboratories where he received a patent and a science award. [1] [ third-party source needed ] From 2001 to 2008, he was an associate professor at The Institute for Creation Research. [1] He currently works for Creation Ministries International (USA). [1] Humphreys is a board member of both the Creation Research Society and the Creation Science Fellowship of New Mexico. [2] [3]

Planetary magnetism

In an article published in the Creation Research Society Quarterly in December 1984, Humphreys proposed a creationist model for the origin of planetary magnetic fields. [4] According to the model, the planets were initially created as spheres of water, with the polar magnetic moments of the water molecules largely aligned. [4] Lenz's law predicts that the resulting magnetic field would decay exponentially, and Humphreys fits an exponential decay model to recent observations of the Earth's magnetism to conclude that the magnetic field is 6000 years old. As part of his model, he also made predictions about the magnetic fields of Mercury, Mars, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto by using assumed values for their initial magnetic field and decay rates. [4]

In 1990 Humphreys published a follow-up to his predictions as Voyager 2 had now measured Uranus and Neptune's magnetic fields. [5] In an article, Humphreys claimed that his model had an easier time explaining their magnetic fields than the dynamo theory. [6]

According to Humphreys, his model's predictions were again verified when probes in 2008 [7] and 2011 flew past Mercury and measured the magnetic field. Humphreys claimed that the observed decay of Mercury's magnetic field was in line with that predicted by his model.

Cosmology

Humphreys' book Starlight and Time presents his alternative to the Big Bang in an attempt to solve what young Earth creationists call the Distant Starlight Problem. Its thesis is that the Earth and universe are about six thousand years old when measured in Earth's reference frame, whereas the outer edge of an expanding and rotating 3-dimensional universe is billions of years old (as measured from its reference frame). It proposes, using the principles of relativity, to postulate that time ticked at different rates during the universe's origin. [8] In other words, according to his theory, clocks on Earth registered the six days of creation, while those at the edge of the universe counted the approximately 15 billion years needed for light from the most distant galaxies to reach Earth. [8] The model places the Milky Way galaxy relatively near the center of the cosmos. [9]

Humphreys' proposal has been criticized by other scientists and old Earth creationists, such as Hugh Ross and Samuel R. Conner. [10] Humphreys has replied to Ross' and Conner's critiques. [11]

In 1998, physicist Dave Thomas wrote that in Humphreys' thousands-of-years-old universe, he "has his astronomy backwards - the Kuiper Belt contains the remains of the 'volatile' (icy) planetesimals that were left over from the formation of the Solar System - numbering in the hundreds of millions. If anything, it is the Kuiper Belt that supplies the more remote hypothesized Oort Cloud, as some icy chunks are occasionally flung far away by interactions with large planets." [12]

Thomas also criticised Humphreys' idea that there is "not enough sodium in the sea" for a several billion year old sea, writing, "Humphreys finds estimates of oceanic salt accumulation and deposition that provide him the data to 'set' an upper limit of 62 million years. But modern geologists do not use erratic processes like these for clocks. It's like someone noticing that (A) it's snowing at an inch per hour, (B) the snow outside is four feet deep, and then concluding that (C) the Earth is just 48 hours, or two days, in age. Snowfall is erratic; some snow can melt; and so on. The Earth is older than two days, so there must be a flaw with the 'snow' dating method, just as there is with the 'salt' method." [12]

Other criticisms are by Don Page, [13] C. McIntosh (an expert on exact solutions to Einstein's field equations), [14] and John Hartnett. [15] These sources are cited approvingly by astrophysicists L. Barnes and G. Lewis in their book The cosmic revolutionary's handbook. They also stress analysing the idea, not attacking the person. [16]

New Cosmology

In 2008 Humphreys published a new but lesser-known cosmological proposal. [17] In it he seeks to challenge a foundational dogma of general relativity and postulates an additional spacetime dimension, one which grants God ample liberty to hold the Earth in a “timeless” region of suspended animation while the rest of the universe ages for billions of years, thus allowing very old and distant starlight to bathe a young Earth on creation day four. [18] A critic pointed out that the well-known equation for gravitational redshift/blueshift countermands his model's efforts to achieve today's observed redshift from cosmic sources, to which Humphreys countered by terming the gravitational redshift equation a “flawed equation” and became dismissive in his remarks about any potential applicability to his model. [19] Since his new cosmology relies heavily on the observed sunward acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft as a manifestation peculiar to features of his model, his ideas were dealt a significant blow when researchers from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California discovered that the apparent anomaly was due to the thermal recoil force acting on the spacecraft. [20]

Helium Problems

Geologist Kevin Henke has criticised Humphreys for stating that "zircons from the Fenton Hill rock cores... contain too much radiogenic helium to be billions of years old." [21] [22] Henke wrote that the equations in Humphreys' work "are based on many false assumptions (isotropic diffusion, constant temperatures over time, etc.) and the vast majority of Humphreys et al.'s critical a, b, and Q/Q0 values that are used in these 'dating' equations are either missing, poorly defined, improperly measured or inaccurate." [21] Humphreys has replied to Henke's criticisms. [22] [23] Henke subsequently refuted the response. [24]

Earth Cooling Model

Scientists Glenn Morton and George L Murphy have dismissed Humphreys' idea that the Earth is cooling as "wrong" because "it is ineffective, it is falsified by observational data, and it is theologically flawed."

See also

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Bang</span> How the universe expanded from a hot, dense state

The Big Bang event is a physical theory that describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. Various cosmological models of the Big Bang explain the evolution of the observable universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale form. These models offer a comprehensive explanation for a broad range of observed phenomena, including the abundance of light elements, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, and large-scale structure. The overall uniformity of the Universe, known as the flatness problem, is explained through cosmic inflation: a sudden and very rapid expansion of space during the earliest moments. However, physics currently lacks a widely accepted theory of quantum gravity that can successfully model the earliest conditions of the Big Bang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omphalos hypothesis</span> Creationist hypothesis stating that the universe has been created to seem older than it actually was

The Omphalos hypothesis is one attempt to reconcile the scientific evidence that the Earth is billions of years old with a literal interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative, which implies that the Earth is only a few thousand years old. It is based on the religious belief that the universe was created by a divine being, within the past six to ten thousand years, and that the presence of objective, verifiable evidence that the universe is older than approximately ten millennia is due to the creator introducing false evidence that makes the universe appear significantly older.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redshift</span> Change of wavelength in photons during travel

In physics, a redshift is an increase in the wavelength, and corresponding decrease in the frequency and photon energy, of electromagnetic radiation. The opposite change, a decrease in wavelength and simultaneous increase in frequency and energy, is known as a negative redshift, or blueshift. The terms derive from the colours red and blue which form the extremes of the visible light spectrum. The main causes of electromagnetic redshift in astronomy and cosmology are the relative motions of radiation sources, which give rise to the relativistic Doppler effect, and gravitational potentials, which gravitationally redshift escaping radiation. All sufficiently distant light sources show cosmological redshift corresponding to recession speeds proportional to their distances from Earth, a fact known as Hubble's law that implies the universe is expanding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Accelerating expansion of the universe</span> Cosmological phenomenon

Observations show that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, such that the velocity at which a distant galaxy recedes from the observer is continuously increasing with time. The accelerated expansion of the universe was discovered in 1998 by two independent projects, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z Supernova Search Team, which used distant type Ia supernovae to measure the acceleration. The idea was that as type Ia supernovae have almost the same intrinsic brightness, and since objects that are farther away appear dimmer, the observed brightness of these supernovae can be used to measure the distance to them. The distance can then be compared to the supernovae's cosmological redshift, which measures how much the universe has expanded since the supernova occurred; the Hubble law established that the farther away that an object is, the faster it is receding. The unexpected result was that objects in the universe are moving away from one another at an accelerating rate. Cosmologists at the time expected that recession velocity would always be decelerating, due to the gravitational attraction of the matter in the universe. Three members of these two groups have subsequently been awarded Nobel Prizes for their discovery. Confirmatory evidence has been found in baryon acoustic oscillations, and in analyses of the clustering of galaxies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hubble's law</span> Observation in physical cosmology

Hubble's law, also known as the Hubble–Lemaître law, is the observation in physical cosmology that galaxies are moving away from Earth at speeds proportional to their distance. In other words, the farther they are, the faster they are moving away from Earth. The velocity of the galaxies has been determined by their redshift, a shift of the light they emit toward the red end of the visible spectrum.

A non-standard cosmology is any physical cosmological model of the universe that was, or still is, proposed as an alternative to the then-current standard model of cosmology. The term non-standard is applied to any theory that does not conform to the scientific consensus. Because the term depends on the prevailing consensus, the meaning of the term changes over time. For example, hot dark matter would not have been considered non-standard in 1990, but would be in 2010. Conversely, a non-zero cosmological constant resulting in an accelerating universe would have been considered non-standard in 1990, but is part of the standard cosmology in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Observable universe</span> All of space observable from the Earth at the present

The observable universe is a ball-shaped region of the universe comprising all matter that can be observed from Earth or its space-based telescopes and exploratory probes at the present time; the electromagnetic radiation from these objects has had time to reach the Solar System and Earth since the beginning of the cosmological expansion. Initially, it was estimated that there may be 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe, although that number was reduced in 2021 to only several hundred billion based on data from New Horizons. Assuming the universe is isotropic, the distance to the edge of the observable universe is roughly the same in every direction. That is, the observable universe is a spherical region centered on the observer. Every location in the universe has its own observable universe, which may or may not overlap with the one centered on Earth.

Observational cosmology is the study of the structure, the evolution and the origin of the universe through observation, using instruments such as telescopes and cosmic ray detectors.

In physical cosmology, the age of the universe is the time elapsed since the Big Bang. Astronomers have derived two different measurements of the age of the universe: a measurement based on direct observations of an early state of the universe, which indicate an age of 13.787±0.020 billion years as interpreted with the Lambda-CDM concordance model as of 2021; and a measurement based on the observations of the local, modern universe, which suggest a younger age. The uncertainty of the first kind of measurement has been narrowed down to 20 million years, based on a number of studies that all show similar figures for the age. These studies include researches of the microwave background radiation by the Planck spacecraft, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and other space probes. Measurements of the cosmic background radiation give the cooling time of the universe since the Big Bang, and measurements of the expansion rate of the universe can be used to calculate its approximate age by extrapolating backwards in time. The range of the estimate is also within the range of the estimate for the oldest observed star in the universe.

The relative expansion of the universe is parametrized by a dimensionless scale factor. Also known as the cosmic scale factor or sometimes the Robertson Walker scale factor, this is a key parameter of the Friedmann equations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Big Bang theory</span> History of a cosmological theory

The history of the Big Bang theory began with the Big Bang's development from observations and theoretical considerations. Much of the theoretical work in cosmology now involves extensions and refinements to the basic Big Bang model. The theory itself was originally formalised by Georges Lemaître in 1927. Hubble's Law of the expansion of the universe provided foundational support for the theory.

The expansion of the universe is the increase in distance between gravitationally unbound parts of the observable universe with time. It is an intrinsic expansion; the universe does not expand "into" anything and does not require space to exist "outside" it. To any observer in the universe, it appears that all but the nearest galaxies recede at speeds that are proportional to their distance from the observer, on average. While objects cannot move faster than light, this limitation only applies with respect to local reference frames and does not limit the recession rates of cosmologically distant objects.

Distance measures are used in physical cosmology to give a natural notion of the distance between two objects or events in the universe. They are often used to tie some observable quantity to another quantity that is not directly observable, but is more convenient for calculations. The distance measures discussed here all reduce to the common notion of Euclidean distance at low redshift.

An inhomogeneous cosmology is a physical cosmological theory which, unlike the currently widely accepted cosmological concordance model, assumes that inhomogeneities in the distribution of matter across the universe affect local gravitational forces enough to skew our view of the Universe. When the universe began, matter was distributed homogeneously, but over billions of years, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and superclusters have coalesced, and must, according to Einstein's theory of general relativity, warp the space-time around them. While the concordance model acknowledges this fact, it assumes that such inhomogeneities are not sufficient to affect large-scale averages of gravity in our observations. When two separate studies claimed in 1998-1999 that high redshift supernovae were further away than our calculations showed they should be, it was suggested that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, and dark energy, a repulsive energy inherent in space, was proposed to explain the acceleration. Dark energy has since become widely accepted, but it remains unexplained. Accordingly, some scientists continue to work on models that might not require dark energy. Inhomogeneous cosmology falls into this class.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Conference on Creationism</span>

The International Conference on Creationism (ICC) is a conference in support of young earth creationism, sponsored by the Creation Science Fellowship (CSF). The first conference occurred in 1986 at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh. Subsequent conferences have been held in 1990, 1994, 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013 and 2018.

In cosmology, recombination refers to the epoch during which charged electrons and protons first became bound to form electrically neutral hydrogen atoms. Recombination occurred about 378,000 years after the Big Bang. The word "recombination" is misleading, since the Big Bang theory doesn't posit that protons and electrons had been combined before, but the name exists for historical reasons since it was named before the Big Bang hypothesis became the primary theory of the birth of the universe.

John G. Hartnett, is an Australian young Earth creationist and cosmologist. He has been active with Creation Ministries International and is known for his opposition to the Big Bang theory and criticism of the dark matter and dark energy hypotheses.

Kevin R. Henke is an American geochemist and former instructor at the University of Kentucky's department of Geology. He currently works as a senior research scientist at the University of Kentucky's Center for Applied Energy Research. He is well known for his criticism of young earth creationism and the scientific arguments they make for a young earth. In particular, he has been critical of the RATE project's results, which claim to show that zircons contain too much helium to be billions of years old, and has argued that Russell Humphreys, a young-earth creationist who was involved in the project, has made errors in his research. These flaws include that, according to Henke, "The vast majority of Humphreys et al.'s critical a, b, and Q/Q0 values that are used in these "dating" equations are either missing, poorly defined, improperly measured or inaccurate." Henke has also accused Humphreys of misidentifying his specimens, fudging his data, and not considering the possibility of helium contamination in this research. He has also criticized John Woodmorappe for arguing that radiometric dating is unreliable. On one occasion, Henke called Kent Hovind on the phone regarding Hovind's $250,000 challenge to "prove" evolution. Hovind told Henke that in order to win the money he would have to recreate the Big Bang in a laboratory. Henke responded by proposing several alternative "proofs" that pertained to geology, but Hovind refused, saying that the project must be chosen by him and it must not pertain to the area in which Henke has scientific expertise. Hovind therefore required Henke to prove that dogs and bananas had a common ancestor, and lowered the award to only $2,000 should he succeed. Henke accepted the challenge, and later drafted a contract, which was then posted on Talk.origins. However, one of Henke's requirements was that the judges be unbiased, and Hovind rejected the challenge for this reason, insisting that he should be the only one who can choose the judges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Time dilation creationism</span>

Time dilation creationism is a form of young earth creationist interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative which tries to harmonize the existence of distant galaxies with the six days of Creation. The theory proposes that the universe experienced a rapid passage of time, while the earth itself experienced six literal days, because of time dilation. It is asserted that the time dilation mainly happened on the fourth day of creation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Russell Humphreys Biography". Creation Ministries International. 2008. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
  2. ↑ CRS Board of Directors Archived 2008-08-20 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ↑ "Local Divorce Attorney Oklahoma County, OK | Family Lawyer Near Me".
  4. 1 2 3 Humphreys, D. Russell (December 1984). "The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields". Creation Research Society Quarterly. 21 (3). Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  5. ↑ Humphreys, D. Russell. "Good News from Neptune: The Voyager II Magnetic Measurements". Creation Research Society Quarterly. 27 (1).
  6. ↑ Humphreys, D. Russell. "Beyond Neptune: Voyager II Supports Creation". Acts & Facts. 19 (5). Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  7. ↑ Humphreys, D. Russell (2008). "Mercury's magnetic field is young!" (PDF). Journal of Creation. 22 (3): 8–9.
  8. 1 2 Starlight and Time, Russell Humphreys, Chapter 2, p.34, ISBN   0-89051-202-7
  9. ↑ Humphreys, D. Russell. "Our galaxy is the centre of the universe, 'quantized' redshifts show". creation.com.
  10. ↑ Ross, Hugh (March 22, 1999). "Starlight and Time Review". Reasons To Believe . Retrieved 2007-02-19. RNCSE 24 (1): 31-32
  11. ↑ Starlight Wars: Starlight and Time Withstands Attacks, D. Russell Humphreys
  12. 1 2 "Creation Physicist" D. Russell Humphreys, and his Questionable "Evidence for a Young World", Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math Education
  13. ↑ S. Conner & D. Page, "Starlight and Time is the Big Bang", CEN Technical Journal, 1998
  14. ↑ E. Fackerell & C. McIntosh, "Errors in Humphreys' cosmological model", CEN Technical Journal, 2000
  15. ↑ J. Hartnett, "Look-back time in our galactic neighbourhood leads to a new cosmogony", Technical Journal, 2003
  16. ↑ L. Barnes and G. Lewis, The cosmic revolutionary's handbook, Cambridge, 2020, §9
  17. ↑ Humphreys, D.R. (December 2008). "New time dilation helps creation cosmology". Journal of Creation. 22 (3).
  18. ↑ Humphreys, D.R. (August 2007). "Creationist cosmologies explain the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer spacecraft". Journal of Creation. 21 (2).
  19. ↑ Letter to the editor (August 2013). "Russell Humphreys' cosmology". Journal of Creation. 27 (2).{{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  20. ↑ Turyshev, S. G.; Toth, V. T.; Kinsella, G; Lee, S. C.; Lok, S. M.; Ellis, J (June 2012). "Support for the Thermal Origin of the Pioneer Anomaly". Physical Review Letters. 108 (241101): 241101. arXiv: 1204.2507 . Bibcode:2012PhRvL.108x1101T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.241101. PMID   23004253. S2CID   2368665.
  21. 1 2 Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion "Dates", Kevin R. Henke, TalkOrigins Archive
  22. 1 2 Helium Evidence for A Young World Remains Crystal-Clear, D. Russell Humphreys
  23. ↑ Helium Evidence for a Young World Overcomes Pressure, D. Russell Humphreys
  24. ↑ Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion "Dates": Appendix C: Dr. Humphreys Feels the Pressure, Kevin R. Henke, TalkOrigins Archive
  25. ↑ "Flaws in a Young-Earth Cooling Mechanism". National Center for Science Education. 2008. Retrieved 2007-02-19. RNCSE 24 (1): 31-32
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.