Satoshi Kanazawa

Last updated

Satoshi Kanazawa
Born1962 [1]
United States [2]
Alma mater University of Arizona
Scientific career
Fields Evolutionary psychology
Institutions London School of Economics

Satoshi Kanazawa (born 1962 [1] ) is an American-born British evolutionary psychologist and writer. [3] He is currently Reader in Management at the London School of Economics. Kanazawa's comments and research on race and intelligence, health and intelligence, multiculturalism, and the relationship between physical attractiveness and intelligence have led to condemnation from observers and colleagues. Critics have described his claims as pseudoscientific [4] [3] and racist. [5] [6]

Contents

In response to ongoing controversies over his stated views, such as that Sub-Saharan Black African countries suffer from chronic poverty and disease because their people have lower IQs, and that black women are objectively less attractive than women of other races, he was dismissed from writing for Psychology Today , and his employer, the London School of Economics, prohibited him from publishing in non-peer-reviewed outlets for 12 months. [7] A group of 68 evolutionary psychologists issued an open letter titled "Kanazawa's bad science does not represent evolutionary psychology" rejecting his views, [8] and an article on the same theme was published by 35 academics in American Psychologist. [9]

Life and career

Kanazawa received his PhD in 1994 from the University of Arizona. [10]

Kanazawa began working at the London School of Economics in 2003. [11]

Views, publications and controversies

General

Kanazawa has co-written three books with Alan Miller:

He also wrote a blog, The Scientific Fundamentalist, for Psychology Today until his dismissal in 2011. [12]

In 2003, in an article in the Journal of Research in Personality , he claimed to show that scientists generally made their biggest discoveries before their mid-30s, and compared this productivity curve to that of criminals. [13] [ non-primary source needed ]

Attractiveness and sex of offspring

In 2006, he published an article in the Journal of Theoretical Biology , claiming that attractive people are 26% less likely to have male offspring. [14] [15] In a letter to the editors regarding Kanazawa's claim that attractive people are more likely to have daughters, [16] Columbia statistician Andrew Gelman points out that a correct interpretation of the regression coefficients in Kanazawa's analysis is that attractive people are 8% more likely to have girls, an error that Kanazawa acknowledges. [17] Gelman argues that Kanazawa's analysis does not convincingly show causality, because of possible endogeneity as well as problematic interpretations of statistical significance in multiple comparisons. While Kanazawa claims that the former error is "merely linguistic" and that he addressed the latter two in his initial article, [15] Gelman maintains that his original criticism remains valid. [18]

Race and attractiveness

In May 2011, he published an article in Psychology Today that explored why black women had been rated less attractive than women of other races in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Subsequent critical independent analysis of the results showed that the difference in assessed attractiveness held for three of the four data sets in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and that there was only a statistically significant race difference in younger women and that it disappeared by early adulthood. [19] Applying his same reasoning to males, Kanazawa also concluded in his article that black men would generally be considered more attractive than black women. Kanazawa was also criticised for arguing that the common factor of subjective interviewer ratings of attractiveness used in his analysis constitutes an objective scale of attractiveness. [3]

The article caused outrage and was widely criticised. The first criticisms were published in the blogosphere leading to the creation of petitions on Change.org and Facebook to have Kanazawa fired. [20] Also other scientists, including a group of evolutionary psychologists publishing a joint statement published criticisms, distancing the discipline of evolutionary psychology from Kanazawa's research. [8] Psychology Today pulled the article and on 27 May 2011, issued an apology to anyone who had been offended and stated that they had not reviewed Kanazawa's article before its publication, [21] and stated that they would police more strictly for controversial content in the future. [12]

In September 2011, Kanazawa apologised to LSE director Judith Rees, saying he "deeply regrets" the "unintended consequences" of the blog and accepting that "some of [his] arguments may have been flawed and not supported by the available evidence". An internal LSE investigation found that Kanazawa had brought the school into disrepute and prohibited him from publishing in non-peer-reviewed outlets for a year. [22] Following the controversy, an open letter was signed by 68 evolutionary psychologists distancing themselves from Kanazawa and defending evolutionary psychology, writing "The principle of applying evolutionary theory to the study of human psychology and behaviour is sound, and there is a great deal of high-quality, nuanced, culturally-sensitive evolutionary research ongoing in the UK and elsewhere today". [8] In response, 23 scientists published a letter in Times Higher Education defending Kanazawa's work. [23]

Correlation of health and intelligence

Kanazawa has used the term Savanna principle to denote his hypothesis that societal difficulties exist because "the human brain" evolved in Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago, a drastically different environment from today's urban, industrial society. [24] In 2006, Kanazawa used this principle to explain the correlation of health and IQ vs. health and wealth. He argued that IQ is a better predictor for health than wealth or inequality in most regions of the world, except in Sub-Saharan Africa, where health is more strongly correlated to wealth than to IQ. He claimed that this was because Sub-Saharan Africa represents an "evolutionarily familiar" environment with lesser selection pressure on IQ than elsewhere. [25] In a criticism of the paper, George Ellison (2007) argued that the conclusion was based on "flawed assumptions, questionable data, inappropriate analysis and biased interpretations". [26]

Homosexuality and intelligence

According to neuroscientist Simon LeVay, an early review in academic literature suggested that gays and lesbians were more intelligent than their peers, although this may have suffered from volunteer bias. In 2012, however, Kanazawa published an analysis of three large-scale randomly sampled studies from the U.S. and U.K., and found that in both males and females, homosexuals scored higher for intelligence. LeVay writes that these findings are "suggestive" of a link between homosexuality and intelligence, but notes that smarter people may be more likely to be open about their sexuality than less intelligent people, so these results may also suffer from bias. [27]

Muslims, terrorism and Psychology Today

In his blog The Scientific Fundamentalist, hosted by Psychology Today , Kanazawa published often on Muslims, Islam and the Middle East. The publication Psychology Today later received a significant amount of negative but constructive feedback and criticism following some of Kanazawa's more controversial articles.

On 6 March 2008, in the article subtitled "All you need is hate", he suggested a "little thought experiment", asking his readers to "(i)magine that, on September 11, 2001, when the Twin Towers came down, the President of the United States was not George W. Bush, but Ann Coulter. What would have happened then? On September 12, President Coulter would have ordered the US military forces to drop 35 nuclear bombs throughout the Middle East, killing all of our actual and potential enemy combatants, and their wives and children. On September 13, the war would have been over and won, without a single American life lost". He concludes, "(y)es, we need a woman in the White House, but not the one who's running", suggesting that in his opinion someone like Ann Coulter is preferable. [28]

On 10 January 2010, he posted an article titled "What's Wrong with Muslims?" In it, he claims that Muslims "are all united in their values and goals by their singular identity of being Muslims", and that although it may be "tempting to dismiss these observations", and "politically correct and comforting" to say that terrorists are 'extremists' or 'jihadists', that would be "factually inaccurate", he claims. [29] He further elaborated on his views seven days later, on 17 January, in another article on the same website. In its intro he claims that "Racial profiling works and saves lives". Although, at some point through this article, he dismisses an Islamophobic stereotype expressed through the media trope "Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims", but follows it with one of his own, writing: "half of Muslims worldwide are terrorists or active supporters of terrorism, who would encourage their sons, brothers, and nephews to blow themselves up." [30]

In the article titled "Is Your Professor an Islamophobe?", at the time Columbia University epidemiologist and HuffPost contributor, Abdul El-Sayed, quoted Kanazawa's articles, along with some other authors', when he discussed the phenomenon of "a growing number of academics using (their) intellectual identity to promote intolerance and xenophobia against Islam and Muslims". El-Sayed expressed concern that, as he writes, "the fundamental messages portrayed in the public musings of academics are no different from the crude ramblings of a Glenn Beck or a Rush Limbaugh, they are many times more damaging". He explains how "PhD's and daunting lists of academic publications to their names, academics are perceived to carry the weighty, objective backing of "knowledge" and "science" by the lay-public, so bigoted, ignorant opinions on their parts are taken as justification to those who already hold skewed perspectives and hateful opinions about Islam and Muslims". He points out that "these academic dogmatists cloak (perhaps under their PhD hoods) the fire of Islamophobia with the cool, measured tones of objectivity". [31]

Nanjala Nyabola, writing in The Guardian , dismissed Kanazawa's claims as "racist nonsense". She also warned of growing concern over Psychology Today's position, at the time, regarding issue, also expressed by various academics and numerous public intellectuals, [9] among them the publication's own authors, [5] such as Mikhail Lyubansky, who criticized the publication, noting that "extraordinary claims (especially those that hurt and damage marginalized groups) require extraordinary evidence and editorial oversight". [32] Similarly, Christopher Ryan criticized Kanazawa's views and writings, calling him the "Rush Limbaugh of Evolutionary Psychology", noting that "if Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, or Ann Coulter had studied science, they'd be penning articles like some of Kanazawa's." [33] [34]

Universities and engagements controversies

A group of 68 evolutionary psychologists issued an open letter titled "Kanazawa's bad science does not represent evolutionary psychology" rejecting his views, [8] and an article on the same theme was published by 35 academics in American Psychologist. [9]

See also

Related Research Articles

Evolutionary psychology is a theoretical approach in psychology that examines cognition and behavior from a modern evolutionary perspective. It seeks to identify human psychological adaptations with regards to the ancestral problems they evolved to solve. In this framework, psychological traits and mechanisms are either functional products of natural and sexual selection or non-adaptive by-products of other adaptive traits.

John Philippe Rushton was a Canadian psychologist and author. He taught at the University of Western Ontario until the early 1990s, and became known to the general public during the 1980s and 1990s for research on race and intelligence, race and crime, and other purported racial correlations.

Discussions of race and intelligence – specifically regarding claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines – have appeared in both popular science and academic research since the modern concept of race was first introduced. With the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups have been observed, though these differences have fluctuated and in many cases steadily decreased over time. Complicating the issue, modern science has concluded that race is a socially constructed phenomenon rather than a biological reality, and there exist various conflicting definitions of intelligence. In particular, the validity of IQ testing as a metric for human intelligence is disputed. Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin.

Emotional intelligence (EI), also known as emotional quotient (EQ), is the ability to perceive, use, understand, manage, and handle emotions. High emotional intelligence includes emotional recognition of emotions of the self and others, using emotional information to guide thinking and behavior, discerning between and labeling of different feelings, and adjusting emotions to adapt to environments.

The g factor is a construct developed in psychometric investigations of cognitive abilities and human intelligence. It is a variable that summarizes positive correlations among different cognitive tasks, reflecting the assertion that an individual's performance on one type of cognitive task tends to be comparable to that person's performance on other kinds of cognitive tasks. The g factor typically accounts for 40 to 50 percent of the between-individual performance differences on a given cognitive test, and composite scores based on many tests are frequently regarded as estimates of individuals' standing on the g factor. The terms IQ, general intelligence, general cognitive ability, general mental ability, and simply intelligence are often used interchangeably to refer to this common core shared by cognitive tests. However, the g factor itself is a mathematical construct indicating the level of observed correlation between cognitive tasks. The measured value of this construct depends on the cognitive tasks that are used, and little is known about the underlying causes of the observed correlations.

The halo effect is the proclivity for positive impressions of a person, company, country, brand, or product in one area to positively influence one's opinion or feelings. The halo effect is "the name given to the phenomenon whereby evaluators tend to be influenced by their previous judgments of performance or personality." The halo effect is a cognitive bias which can prevent someone from forming an image of a person, a product or a brand based on the sum of all objective circumstances at hand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Lynn</span> British psychologist noted for his views on race and intelligence (1930–2023)

Richard Lynn was a controversial English psychologist and self-described "scientific racist" who advocated for a genetic relationship between race and intelligence. He was the editor-in-chief of Mankind Quarterly, a white supremacist journal. He was lecturer in psychology at the University of Exeter and professor of psychology at the Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, and at the University of Ulster at Coleraine. Lynn was a professor emeritus of psychology at Ulster University, but had the title withdrawn by the university in 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wason selection task</span> Test in the study of deductive reasoning

The Wason selection task is a logic puzzle devised by Peter Cathcart Wason in 1966. It is one of the most famous tasks in the study of deductive reasoning. An example of the puzzle is:

You are shown a set of four cards placed on a table, each of which has a number on one side and a color on the other. The visible faces of the cards show 3, 8, blue and red. Which card(s) must you turn over in order to test that if a card shows an even number on one face, then its opposite face is blue?

Evolutionary educational psychology is the study of the relation between inherent folk knowledge and abilities and accompanying inferential and attributional biases as these influence academic learning in evolutionarily novel cultural contexts, such as schools and the industrial workplace. The fundamental premises and principles of this discipline are presented below.

<i>The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy</i> 1988 book by Stanley Rothman and Mark Snyderman

The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy is a book published by Smith College professor emeritus Stanley Rothman and Harvard researcher Mark Snyderman in 1988. Claiming to document liberal bias in media coverage of scientific findings regarding intelligence quotient (IQ), the book builds on a survey of the opinions of hundreds of North American psychologists, sociologists and educationalists conducted by the authors in 1984. The book also includes an analysis of the reporting on intelligence testing by the press and television in the US for the period 1969–1983, as well as an opinion poll of 207 journalists and 86 science editors about IQ testing.

<i>IQ and Global Inequality</i> 2006 book by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen

IQ and Global Inequality is a 2006 book by psychologist Richard Lynn and political scientist Tatu Vanhanen. IQ and Global Inequality is follow-up to their 2002 book IQ and the Wealth of Nations, an expansion of the argument that international differences in current economic development are due in part to differences in average national intelligence as indicated by national IQ estimates, and a response to critics. The book was published by Washington Summit Publishers, a white nationalist and eugenicist publishing group.

Evolutionary psychology seeks to identify and understand human psychological traits that have evolved in much the same way as biological traits, through adaptation to environmental cues. Furthermore, it tends toward viewing the vast majority of psychological traits, certainly the most important ones, as the result of past adaptions, which has generated significant controversy and criticism from competing fields. These criticisms include disputes about the testability of evolutionary hypotheses, cognitive assumptions such as massive modularity, vagueness stemming from assumptions about the environment that leads to evolutionary adaptation, the importance of non-genetic and non-adaptive explanations, as well as political and ethical issues in the field itself.

Dylan Evans is a British former academic and author who has written books on emotion and the placebo effect as well as the theories of Jacques Lacan.

The relationship between fertility and intelligence has been investigated in many demographic studies. There is evidence that, on a population level, measures of intelligence such as educational attainment and literacy are negatively correlated with fertility rate in some contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interest (emotion)</span> Feeling that causes attention to focus on an object, event or process

Interest is a feeling or emotion that causes attention to focus on an object, event, or process. In contemporary psychology of interest, the term is used as a general concept that may encompass other more specific psychological terms, such as curiosity and to a much lesser degree surprise.

Douglas T. Kenrick is professor of psychology at Arizona State University. His research and writing integrate three scientific syntheses of the last few decades: evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, and dynamical systems theory. He is author of over 170 scientific articles, books, and book chapters, the majority applying evolutionary ideas to human cognition and behavior.

The history of evolutionary psychology began with Charles Darwin, who said that humans have social instincts that evolved by natural selection. Darwin's work inspired later psychologists such as William James and Sigmund Freud but for most of the 20th century psychologists focused more on behaviorism and proximate explanations for human behavior. E. O. Wilson's landmark 1975 book, Sociobiology, synthesized recent theoretical advances in evolutionary theory to explain social behavior in animals, including humans. Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides and John Tooby popularized the term "evolutionary psychology" in their 1992 book The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and The Generation of Culture. Like sociobiology before it, evolutionary psychology has been embroiled in controversy, but evolutionary psychologists see their field as gaining increased acceptance overall.

Mate preferences in humans refers to why one human chooses or chooses not to mate with another human and their reasoning why. Men and women have been observed having different criteria as what makes a good or ideal mate. A potential mate's socioeconomic status has also been seen important, especially in developing areas where social status is more emphasized.

Sex differences in human intelligence have long been a topic of debate among researchers and scholars. It is now recognized that there are no significant sex differences in average IQ, though particular subtypes of intelligence vary somewhat between sexes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Walker (scientist)</span> British author, neuroscientist and psychologist

Matthew Walker is a British author, scientist and professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.

References

  1. 1 2 Kanazawa, Satoshi. "Satoshi Kanazawa's intellectual lineage". The London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved 29 December 2022.
  2. ↑ Kanazawa, Satoshi (2012). The Intelligence Paradox: Why the Intelligent Choice Isn't Always the Smart One. ISBN   978-0-470-58695-2.[ page needed ]
  3. 1 2 3 Khadijah, Britton (23 May 2011). "The Data Are In Regarding Satoshi Kanazawa". Scientific American . Retrieved 1 May 2020. Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist associated with the London School of Economics . . . is a repeat offender, with years of roundly criticized and heartily debunked pseudoscience-based shock-jockery under his belt.
  4. 1 2 "The bad science of Satoshi Kanazawa". Big Think. 26 March 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  5. 1 2 Nyabola, Nanjala (18 May 2011). "Satoshi Kanazawa's racist nonsense should not be tolerated". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  6. ↑ Lee, Adam (12 September 2012). "Doesn't This Place Have Standards?". Big Think. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
  7. ↑ "LSE lecturer Dr Satoshi Kanazawa tells of race blog 'regret'" "BBC, 16 September 2011"
  8. 1 2 3 4 "Kanazawa Statement | Academia | Science". Scribd.com. 29 March 2016. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  9. 1 2 3 Scott Barry Kaufman (18 May 2011). "Satoshi Kanazawa Does Not Speak for All of Evolutionary Psychology". HuffPost. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  10. ↑ http://kanazawa.socialpsychology.org/ [ bare URL ]
  11. ↑ "Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa". personal.lse.ac.uk. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  12. 1 2 "Psychology Today Agrees to remove Controversial Author Satoshi Kanazawa from Website; Implements New Policies to Prevent Inflammatory Content". Color of Change. 1 June 2011.
  13. ↑ Kanazawa, Satoshi (2003). "Why productivity fades with age: The crime–genius connection". Journal of Research in Personality. 37 (4): 257–272. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00538-X.
  14. ↑ "Beautiful people have girls" John Von Radowitz, News.com.au, 2 August 2006
  15. 1 2 Kanazawa, Satoshi (2007). "Beautiful parents have more daughters: A further implication of the generalized Trivers–Willard hypothesis (gTWH)". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 244 (1): 133–140. Bibcode:2007JThBi.244..133K. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.017. PMID   16949101.
  16. ↑ Gelman, Andrew (2007). "Letter to the editors regarding some papers of Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 245 (3): 597–599. Bibcode:2007JThBi.245..597G. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.11.005. PMID   17184794.
  17. ↑ Kanazawa, Satoshi; Reyniers, Diane J. (2009). "The role of height in the sex difference in intelligence". The American Journal of Psychology. 122 (4): 527–536. doi:10.2307/27784427. JSTOR   27784427. PMID   20066931. S2CID   992966.
  18. ↑ Gelman, Andrew; Weakliem, David (2009). "Of Beauty, Sex and Power". American Scientist. 97 (4): 310. doi:10.1511/2009.79.310.
  19. ↑ Kaufman, Scott Barry; Wicherts, Jelte (21 May 2011). "Black Women Are Not (Rated) Less Attractive! Our Independent Analysis of the Add Health Dataset". Psychology Today. Retrieved 26 December 2024.
  20. ↑ Angus Hutchison. "'Black women less attractive' blogpost: Anger grows". International Business Times , 20 May 2011.
  21. ↑ Perina, Kaja (27 May 2011). "An Apology from Psychology Today". Psychology Today.
  22. ↑ Jack Grove (15 September 2011). "LSE scholar admits race analysis was 'flawed'". Times Higher Education. Archived from the original on 27 October 2012.
  23. ↑ "Sinned against, not sinning" 16 June 2011, Times Higher Education
  24. ↑ Kanazawa, Satoshi (2004) The Savanna principle. Managerial and decision economics, 25 (1). pp. 41–54. ISSN   0143-6570
  25. ↑ Kanazawa, Satoshi (2006). "Mind the gap…in intelligence: Re-examining the relationship between inequality and health". British Journal of Health Psychology. 11 (4): 623–642. doi:10.1348/135910705X69842. PMID   17032488.
  26. ↑ Ellison, George T. H. (2007). "Health, wealth and IQ in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges facing the Savanna Principle as an explanation for global inequalities in health". British Journal of Health Psychology. 12 (2): 191–227. doi:10.1348/135910707X180972. PMID   17456282.
  27. ↑ LeVay, Simon (2017). Gay, Straight, and the Reason why: The Science of Sexual Orientation. Oxford University Press. p. 58. ISBN   978-0-19-029737-4.
  28. ↑ "Why we are losing this war". Psychology Today. 6 March 2008. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  29. ↑ Satoshi Kanazawa (10 January 2010). "What's Wrong with Muslims?". Psychology Today. The Scientific Fundamentalist blog. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  30. ↑ Satoshi Kanazawa (17 January 2010). "Naked Air". Psychology Today. The Scientific Fundamentalist blog. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  31. ↑ El-Sayed, Abdulrahman (4 April 2010). "Is Your Professor an Islamophobe?". HuffPost. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  32. ↑ Mikhail Lyubansky Ph.D. (16 May 2011). "Beauty May Be in Eye of Beholder but Eyes See What Culture Socializes". Psychology Today. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  33. ↑ Christopher Ryan Ph.D. (18 May 2011). "Satoshi Kanazawa Is the Rush Limbaugh of Evolutionary Psychology". Psychology Today. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  34. ↑ Christopher Ryan Ph.D. (10 November 2008). "Is Evolutionary Psychology a Used Car?". Psychology Today. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  35. ↑ Sample, Ian; correspondent, science (19 May 2011). "LSE academic's claim 'black women less attractive' triggers race row". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 May 2019.{{cite web}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  36. ↑ "Psychologist Fired For "Why Black Women Are Unattractive" Study". News One. 6 June 2011. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  37. ↑ "Dr Satoshi Kanazawa - findings of internal review and disciplinary hearing". London School of Economics and Political Science. Archived from the original on 10 April 2016. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  38. ↑ "Times Higher Education - LSE scholar admits race analysis was 'flawed'". 27 October 2012. Archived from the original on 27 October 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  39. ↑ Hopkins, Phillip (29 March 2013). "The End of a Bold Experiment: Big Think and Satoshi Kanazawa". Big Think.
  40. 1 2 3 "Controversial Professor Credited For Bringing Controversial Scholar To Northwestern". CBS News. 17 December 2018. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
  41. ↑ Colleen Flaherty (19 December 2018). "Northwestern students want a controversial scholar off their campus". www.insidehighered.com. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.