Scar free healing

Last updated

Scar free healing is the process by which significant injuries can heal without permanent damage to the tissue the injury has affected. In most healing, scars form due to the fibrosis and wound contraction, however in scar free healing, tissue is completely regenerated. During the 1990s, published research on the subject increased; it is a relatively recent term in the literature. Scar free healing occurs in foetal life but the ability progressively diminishes into adulthood. In other animals such as amphibians, however, tissue regeneration occurs, for example as skin regeneration in the adult axolotl. [1]

Contents

Scarring versus scar free healing

Scarring takes place in response to damaged or missing tissue following injury due to biological processes or wounding: it is a process that occurs in order to replace the lost tissue. [2] The process of scarring is complex, it involves the inflammatory response and remodelling amongst other cell activities. Many growth factors and cytokines are also involved in the process, as well as extracellular matrix interactions. [2]

Figure 1: A) Collagen fibres in normal skin 'basket weave'. B) Parallel collagen fibres in scar tissue. Collagen structure in scar and scar free.png
Figure 1: A) Collagen fibres in normal skin 'basket weave'. B) Parallel collagen fibres in scar tissue.

Scarring during healing can create both physical and psychological problems, and is a significant clinical burden. Collagen, for instance, is abnormally organised in scar tissue; collagen in scars is arranged in parallel bundles of collagen fibers, whilst healthy scar free tissue has a "basket weave" structure (Figure 1). [2] The difference in collagen arrangement along with a lack of difference in the dermal tissue when healing has taken place with or without scarring is indicative of regenerative failure of normal skin. [2] Severe scarring resulting from these collagen deposits is known as hypertrophic scarring and is of great concern worldwide with an incidence ranging from 32–72%. [3]

Scar free healing in nature

Unlike the limited regeneration seen in adult humans, many animal groups possess an ability to completely regenerate damaged tissue. [4] Full limb regeneration is seen both in invertebrates (e.g. starfish and flatworms which can regenerate fully functioning appendages) and some vertebrates, however in the latter this is almost always confined to the immature members of the species: an example being tadpoles which can regrow their tails and various other body parts, an ability not seen in the mature frogs. [5] The exception to this is the much studied urodele species' of amphibians, also known as salamanders, which carry their ability of complete regeneration into adulthood. [2] These vertebrates possess an exceptional ability to allow regeneration of entire limbs and their tails (as well as a multitude of their internal organs as well, including their spinal cord) [2] through a process known as blastema formation. [6] This involves covering of the wound by a layer of epithelial cells known as the wound cap and subsequent innervation of this area with nerves that give off signals that revert local differentiated cells (such as muscle, cartilage and connective tissue) back to their undifferentiated cell lineage also known as mesenchymal cells. [6] It is this area that is known as the blastema which has the potential to differentiate and proliferate once again allowing regrowth of the limb similar to how it occurs during development. [7] In wound-healing in urodeles it is the quick response of anti-inflammatory macrophages which have been shown to be key to their regeneration capabilities. In one study, it was found that limbs would not regenerate in those urodeles with depleted macrophages and instead would scar with permanent loss of functionality. [8] Knowing how regeneration occurs in animals such as these may have great implications for how wound-healing is tackled in medicine and research has been aimed at this area, as a result.

Fetal vs adult healing in humans

Reparation of tissue in the mammalian fetus is radically different than the healing mechanisms observed in a healthy adult. During early gestation fetal skin wounds have the remarkable ability to heal rapidly and without scar formation. Wound healing itself is a particularly complex process and the mechanisms by which scarring occurs involves inflammation, fibroplasia, the formation of granulation tissue and finally scar maturation. Since the observation of scar free healing was first reported in the early fetus more than three decades ago, research has focused intently on the underlying mechanisms which separate scarless fetal wound repair from normal adult wound healing.

Scar free healing has been documented in fetuses across the animal kingdom, including mice, rats, monkeys, pigs and humans. It is important to note that the ability of fetuses to heal without scarring is wound size dependent and also age-dependent, whereby after a specific gestational age, usually 24 weeks in humans, typical scar formation will occur. While the exact mechanisms of scar free healing in the fetus remain unknown, research has shown that it is thought to be due to the complex interaction of the components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the inflammatory response, cellular mediators and the expression of specific growth factors. [9]

Intrauterine environment

Originally, it was thought that the intrauterine environment, the sterile amniotic fluid surrounding the embryo, was responsible for fetal scar free healing. Reasoning that embryonic wounds healed scarlessly because they were not exposed to the same contaminating agents which normal adult wounds were exposed to such as bacteria and viruses. However this theory was discredited by investigating fetal wound healing in the pouch of a young marsupial. These pouches can often be exposed to maternal faeces and urine, a highly different environment to the sterile intrauterine environment seen in eutherian embryos. Despite these differences skin wounds on the marsupial healed without the formation of a scar, proving the irrelevance of the embryonic environment in scar free healing.[ citation needed ]

Immune system cells and inflammatory response

One of the major differences between embryonic scar-free healing wounds and adult scar-forming wounds is the role played by the cells of the immune system and the inflammatory response.

Table 1: Summary of the major differences identified between fetal and adult wound healing. [10] [11]

Select ComponentFetalAdultRole in Wound Healing
Immune System and InflammationIL-10

IL-6/8

High levels

Low levels

Low levels

High levels

Anti-inflammatory cytokines

Pro-inflammatory cytokines

Extracellular Matrix (ECM)Hyaluronic acid

CD44 (hyaluronic acid receptor

Tenascin

Fibronectin

Decorin

Fibromodulin

Collagen

High levels

High levels

High levels

High levels

Low levels

High levels

Elevated ratio of type 111 to type 1

Low levels

Low levels

Low levels

Low levels

High levels

Low levels

Elevated ratio of type 1 to type 111

Cellular movement, cell-matrix interactions, cell migration

Anti-adhesive, anti-proliferative

Tissue architecture, cell proliferation/migration, cell matrix interactions

Inhibits fibrillogenesis

Tissue architecture, ECM remodeling, tensile strength, cell-matrix interactions

Growth FactorsEGF

PDGF

FGF

TGF-β1

TGF-β2

TGF-β3

VEGF

High levels

Low levels

Low levels

Low levels

Low levels

High levels

Low levels

Decreases with age

High levels

High levels

High levels

High levels

Low levels

High levels

Stimulate fibroblasts to secrete collagen

Fibroplasia

Matrix deposition, fibroblast migration, angiogenesis

Infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, fibroplasia, scarring, fibrosis

Infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, fibroplasia, scarring, fibrosis

Possible role in anti-scarring

Angiogenesis

Wound ClosureActin cableMyofibroblasts

The fetal immune system can be described as 'immunologically immature' due to the marked reduction in neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes and also inflammatory mediators, compared with adult wounds. [12] Physiologically, adult and fetal neutrophils differ, due to the fact that the concentration of neutrophils is higher in the adult than the fetus, this results in phagocytosis of the wound and the recruitment and release of inflammatory cytokines. Leading to the promotion of a more aggressive inflammatory response in adult wound healing. It is also thought that the time in which this inflammatory response occurs, is much shorter in the fetus thus limiting any damage. [13]

Role of the extracellular matrix and its components

Another difference between the healing of embryonic and adult wounds is due to the role of fibroblast cells. Fibroblasts are responsible for the synthesis of the ECM and collagen. In the fetus, fibroblasts are able to migrate at a faster rate than those found in the adult wound. Fetal fibroblasts can also proliferate and synthesize collagen simultaneously, in comparison to adult fibroblasts where collagen synthesis is delayed. It is this delay in both collagen deposition and migration, which is likely to contribute to formation of a scar in the adult.

Proteins and cell surface receptors found in the ECM differ in fetal and adult wound healing. This is due to the early up regulation of cell adhesion proteins such as fibronectin and tenascin in the fetus. During early gestation in the fetal wounds of rabbits, the production of fibronectin occurs around 4 hours after wounding, much faster than in adult wounds where expression of fibronectin does not occur until 12 hours post wounding. The same pattern can be seen in the deposition of tenascin. It is this ability of the fetal fibroblast to quickly express and deposit fibronectin and tenascin, which ultimately allows cell migration and attachment to occur, resulting in an organised matrix with less scarring. [13]

Another major component of the ECM is hyaluronic acid (HA), a glycosaminoglycan. It is known that fetal skin contains more HA than adult skin due to the expression of more HA receptors. The expression of HA is known to down-regulate the recruitment of inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α); since fetal wounds contain a reduced number of pro-inflammatory mediators than adult wounds it is thought that the higher levels of HA in the fetal skin aid in scar free healing.

Analysis using microarrays has also shown that gene expression profiles greatly differ between scar free fetal wounds and postnatal wounds with scar formation. In scarlesss wound healing there is a significant up-regulation in genes associated with cell growth and proliferation, thought to be a major contributing factor to the rapid wound closure seen in the foetus. [9] Whilst wound healing in the fetus has been shown to be completely scarless in an age-dependent manner, adult mammals do not have complete scar free healing but have retained some regenerative properties. Adult regeneration is limited to a number of organs, most notably, the liver.

Continued regeneration in adult humans

There are few examples of regeneration in humans continuing after fetal life in to adulthood. Generally, adult wound healing involves fibrotic processes causing wound contraction which may lead to the formation of scar tissue. [14] In regeneration, however, completely new tissue is synthesized. This can lead to scar free healing where the function and structure of the organ is reinstated. [15] However organ regeneration is not yet fully understood.

Two types of regeneration in human adults are currently recognised; spontaneous and induced. [2]

Spontaneous regeneration occurs in the human body naturally. The most recognised example of this is the regeneration of the liver, [16] which can regenerate up to two thirds of its mass when injured by surgical removal, ischaemia or after exposure to harmful toxins. [16] (Figure 2)

Figure 2: Mechanism of liver regeneration in adult humans Liver regeneration.png
Figure 2: Mechanism of liver regeneration in adult humans

Through this mechanism the liver can be restored to its original state, scar-free. However, despite nearly 80 years of research on liver regeneration much debate still surrounds the exact mechanisms by which the process occurs. [16]

Another example of spontaneous regeneration endometrial lining of the uterus after menses during reproductive years. Endometrial glands from a basal layer of the uterine wall can regenerate the functional layer without fibrosis or scarring. [17]

Most recently, the kidney has been found to have the ability to regenerate. Following removal or incapacitation of one kidney the other may double in size in order to counteract the loss of the other kidney. This is known a compensatory growth. [18]

Induced regeneration stimulated by an outside source of a "non-regenerative" organ. [2] In humans is for therapeutic use. Induced regeneration is currently being trialled to replace organ transplants as issues such as rejection, lack of donors and scarring would be eliminated. [19]

The table below details some of the tissues in which induced regeneration has been attempted;

TissueType of RegenerationMechanisms of Regeneration and current research tools
Heart MuscleInducedUsing differentiation of somatic stem cells into cardiomyocytes. [20]
ThymusInducedUp regulating FOXN1, which causes increased expression of thymic epithelial cell specific receptor, which regenerates an aged thymus. [21]
VaginaInducedReconstruction of vaginal muscle and epithelial cells using biodegradable scaffolds. [22]
SkinInducedUse of a regeneratively active collagen scaffold to prevent wound contraction. [2]
Peripheral NerveInducedUse of a regeneratively active collagen scaffold to prevent wound contraction. [2]

Clinical burden and implications of scarring

Following injury or surgery, a doctor's key aim is to restore full function in a patient and help ensure they return to as close to their original state before their skin trauma or surgery. [23] Ensuring patients return as closely to their original appearance and original function is challenging in the context of scarring. Scar-free healing is yet to be observed in healthy post gestational humans, despite being seen in human embryos. Currently, it is only possible to reduce scar visibility, and the NHS suggests a number of different methods of doing this including corticosteroid injections, skin creams, silicone gels, pressure dressings, dermal fillers, radiotherapy and laser therapy. [24] Although these methods do reduce a scars visible appearance, they do not result in a scar free appearance. Billions of pounds is spent on wound maintenance and healing on the NHS every year. Between 2014 and 2015 in England and Wales, 19,239 people sustained a burn injury which required hospital care. [25] In addition to the significant financial cost, the cost of scars is immense to the patients too. One study into the quality of life of patients with scars found that over half of the participants felt stigmatised by their scars and felt their personal relationships deteriorated. In addition to this, 68% tried to hide their scars, whilst reporting their work life, self-confidence and ability to communicate with others had been negatively affected. [26] Future research and advances in scar-free healing could lessen the cost to the NHS whilst also improving the quality of life to many people affected.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vocal cords</span> Folds of throat tissues that help to create sounds through vocalization

In humans, the vocal cords, also known as vocal folds, are folds of throat tissues that are key in creating sounds through vocalization. The size of vocal cords affects the pitch of voice. Open when breathing and vibrating for speech or singing, the folds are controlled via the recurrent laryngeal branch of the vagus nerve. They are composed of twin infoldings of mucous membrane stretched horizontally, from back to front, across the larynx. They vibrate, modulating the flow of air being expelled from the lungs during phonation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fibroblast</span> Animal connective tissue cell

A fibroblast is a type of biological cell that synthesizes the extracellular matrix and collagen, produces the structural framework (stroma) for animal tissues, and plays a critical role in wound healing. Fibroblasts are the most common cells of connective tissue in animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scar</span> Area of fibrous tissue that replaces normal skin after an injury

A scar is an area of fibrous tissue that replaces normal skin after an injury. Scars result from the biological process of wound repair in the skin, as well as in other organs, and tissues of the body. Thus, scarring is a natural part of the healing process. With the exception of very minor lesions, every wound results in some degree of scarring. An exception to this are animals with complete regeneration, which regrow tissue without scar formation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tendon</span> Type of tissue that connects muscle to bone

A tendon or sinew is a tough band of dense fibrous connective tissue that connects muscle to bone. It sends the mechanical forces of muscle contraction to the skeletal system, while withstanding tension.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healing</span> Process of the restoration of health

With physical trauma or disease suffered by an organism, healing involves the repairing of damaged tissue(s), organs and the biological system as a whole and resumption of (normal) functioning. Medicine includes the process by which the cells in the body regenerate and repair to reduce the size of a damaged or necrotic area and replace it with new living tissue. The replacement can happen in two ways: by regeneration in which the necrotic cells are replaced by new cells that form "like" tissue as was originally there; or by repair in which injured tissue is replaced with scar tissue. Most organs will heal using a mixture of both mechanisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wound healing</span> Series of events that restore integrity to damaged tissue after an injury

Wound healing refers to a living organism's replacement of destroyed or damaged tissue by newly produced tissue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regeneration (biology)</span> Biological process of renewal, restoration, and tissue growth

Regeneration in biology is the process of renewal, restoration, and tissue growth that makes genomes, cells, organisms, and ecosystems resilient to natural fluctuations or events that cause disturbance or damage. Every species is capable of regeneration, from bacteria to humans. Regeneration can either be complete where the new tissue is the same as the lost tissue, or incomplete after which the necrotic tissue becomes fibrotic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fibrosis</span> Excess connective tissue in healing

Fibrosis, also known as fibrotic scarring, is a pathological wound healing in which connective tissue replaces normal parenchymal tissue to the extent that it goes unchecked, leading to considerable tissue remodelling and the formation of permanent scar tissue.

In cell biology, an effector cell is any of various types of cell that actively responds to a stimulus and effects some change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bowed tendon</span>

Tendinitis/tendonitis is inflammation of a tendon, often involving torn collagen fibers. A bowed tendon is a horseman's term for a tendon after a horse has sustained an injury that causes swelling in one or more tendons creating a "bowed" appearance.

A chronic wound is a wound that does not heal in an orderly set of stages and in a predictable amount of time the way most wounds do; wounds that do not heal within three months are often considered chronic. Chronic wounds seem to be detained in one or more of the phases of wound healing. For example, chronic wounds often remain in the inflammatory stage for too long. To overcome that stage and jump-start the healing process, a number of factors need to be addressed such as bacterial burden, necrotic tissue, and moisture balance of the whole wound. In acute wounds, there is a precise balance between production and degradation of molecules such as collagen; in chronic wounds this balance is lost and degradation plays too large a role.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myofibroblast</span>

A myofibroblast is a cell phenotype that was first described as being in a state between a fibroblast and a smooth muscle cell.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PRRX2</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Paired mesoderm homeobox protein 2 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the PRRX2 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial skin</span> Material to regenerate or replace skin

Artificial skin is a collagen scaffold that induces regeneration of skin in mammals such as humans. The term was used in the late 1970s and early 1980s to describe a new treatment for massive burns. It was later discovered that treatment of deep skin wounds in adult animals and humans with this scaffold induces regeneration of the dermis. It has been developed commercially under the name Integra and is used in massively burned patients, during plastic surgery of the skin, and in treatment of chronic skin wounds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desmoplasia</span> Growth of fibrous or connective tissue

In medicine, desmoplasia is the growth of fibrous connective tissue. It is also called a desmoplastic reaction to emphasize that it is secondary to an insult. Desmoplasia may occur around a neoplasm, causing dense fibrosis around the tumor, or scar tissue (adhesions) within the abdomen after abdominal surgery.

Acellular dermis is a type of biomaterial derived from processing human or animal tissues to remove cells and retain portions of the extracellular matrix (ECM). These materials are typically cell-free, distinguishing them from classical allografts and xenografts, can be integrated or incorporated into the body, and have been FDA approved for human use for more than 10 years in a wide range of clinical indications.

The dermal equivalent, also known as dermal replacement or neodermis, is an in vitro model of the dermal layer of skin. There is no specific way of forming a dermal equivalent, however the first dermal equivalent was constructed by seeding dermal fibroblasts into a collagen gel. This gel may then be allowed to contract as a model of wound contraction. This collagen gel contraction assay may be used to screen for treatments which promote or inhibit contraction and thus affect the development of a scar. Other cell types may be incorporated into the dermal equivalent to increase the complexity of the model. For example, keratinocytes may be seeded on the surface to create a skin equivalent, or macrophages may be incorporated to model the inflammatory phase of wound healing.

Dermal fibroblasts are cells within the dermis layer of skin which are responsible for generating connective tissue and allowing the skin to recover from injury. Using organelles, dermal fibroblasts generate and maintain the connective tissue which unites separate cell layers. Furthermore, these dermal fibroblasts produce the protein molecules including laminin and fibronectin which comprise the extracellular matrix. By creating the extracellular matrix between the dermis and epidermis, fibroblasts allow the epithelial cells of the epidermis to affix the matrix, thereby allowing the epidermal cells to effectively join together to form the top layer of the skin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diabetic foot ulcer</span> Medical condition

Diabetic foot ulcer is a breakdown of the skin and sometimes deeper tissues of the foot that leads to sore formation. It may occur due to a variety of mechanisms. It is thought to occur due to abnormal pressure or mechanical stress chronically applied to the foot, usually with concomitant predisposing conditions such as peripheral sensory neuropathy, peripheral motor neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy or peripheral arterial disease. It is a major complication of diabetes mellitus, and it is a type of diabetic foot disease. Secondary complications to the ulcer, such as infection of the skin or subcutaneous tissue, bone infection, gangrene or sepsis are possible, often leading to amputation.

Regeneration in humans is the regrowth of lost tissues or organs in response to injury. This is in contrast to wound healing, or partial regeneration, which involves closing up the injury site with some gradation of scar tissue. Some tissues such as skin, the vas deferens, and large organs including the liver can regrow quite readily, while others have been thought to have little or no capacity for regeneration following an injury.

References

  1. Seifert, Ashley W.; Monaghan, James R.; Voss, S. Randal; Maden, Malcolm (2012-01-01). "Skin regeneration in adult axolotls: a blueprint for scar-free healing in vertebrates". PLOS ONE. 7 (4): e32875. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...732875S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032875 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3317654 . PMID   22485136.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Occleston, Nick L.; Metcalfe, Anthony D.; Boanas, Adam; Burgoyne, Nicholas J.; Nield, Kerry; O'Kane, Sharon; Ferguson, Mark W. J. (2010-01-01). "Therapeutic improvement of scarring: mechanisms of scarless and scar-forming healing and approaches to the discovery of new treatments". Dermatology Research and Practice. 2010: 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2010/405262 . ISSN   1687-6113. PMC   2929503 . PMID   20811598.
  3. Gangemi, Ezio Nicola; Gregori, Dario; Berchialla, Paola; Zingarelli, Enrico; Cairo, Monica; Bollero, Daniele; Ganem, Jamal; Capocelli, Roberto; Cuccuru, Franca (2008-04-01). "Epidemiology and risk factors for pathologic scarring after burn wounds". Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 10 (2): 93–102. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.10.2.93 . ISSN   1521-2491. PMID   18347236.
  4. Bryant, Susan V.; Endo, Tetsuya; Gardiner, David M. (2002-01-01). "Vertebrate limb regeneration and the origin of limb stem cells". The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 46 (7): 887–896. ISSN   0214-6282. PMID   12455626.
  5. Godwin, James W.; Rosenthal, Nadia (2014-01-01). "Scar-free wound healing and regeneration in amphibians: Immunological influences on regenerative success". Differentiation. Exotic Animals in Development. 87 (1–2): 66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2014.02.002 . PMID   24565918.
  6. 1 2 Brockes, Jeremy P.; Kumar, Anoop (2002-08-01). "Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration". Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 3 (8): 566–574. doi:10.1038/nrm881. ISSN   1471-0072. PMID   12154368. S2CID   21409289.
  7. Roy, Stéphane; Lévesque, Mathieu (2006-01-01). "Limb regeneration in axolotl: is it superhealing?". TheScientificWorldJournal. 6 (Suppl 1): 12–25. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.324 . ISSN   1537-744X. PMC   5917365 . PMID   17205184.
  8. Godwin, James W.; Pinto, Alexander R.; Rosenthal, Nadia A. (2013-06-04). "Macrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (23): 9415–9420. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.9415G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300290110 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3677454 . PMID   23690624.
  9. 1 2 Larson, Barrett J.; Longaker, Michael T.; Lorenz, H. Peter (2010). "Scarless Fetal Wound Healing: A Basic Science Review". Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 126 (4): 1172–1180. doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181eae781. PMC   4229131 . PMID   20885241.
  10. Yates, Cecelia C.; Hebda, Patricia; Wells, Alan (2012-12-01). "Skin Wound Healing and Scarring: Fetal Wounds and Regenerative Restitution". Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews. 96 (4): 325–333. doi:10.1002/bdrc.21024. ISSN   1542-9768. PMC   3967791 . PMID   24203921.
  11. Rolfe, K. J.; Grobbelaar, A. O. (2012-05-17). "A Review of Fetal Scarless Healing". ISRN Dermatology. 2012: 698034. doi: 10.5402/2012/698034 . PMC   3362931 . PMID   22675640.
  12. Ferguson, Mark W. J.; O'Kane, Sharon (2004-05-29). "Scar–free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 359 (1445): 839–850. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1475. ISSN   0962-8436. PMC   1693363 . PMID   15293811.
  13. 1 2 Lo, David D.; Zimmermann, Andrew S.; Nauta, Allison; Longaker, Michael T.; Lorenz, H. Peter (2012-09-01). "Scarless fetal skin wound healing update". Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews. 96 (3): 237–247. doi:10.1002/bdrc.21018. ISSN   1542-9768. PMID   23109319.
  14. Gurtner, Geoffrey C.; Werner, Sabine; Barrandon, Yann; Longaker, Michael T. (2008-05-15). "Wound repair and regeneration". Nature. 453 (7193): 314–321. Bibcode:2008Natur.453..314G. doi:10.1038/nature07039. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   18480812. S2CID   205213660.
  15. Tissue and Organ Regeneration in Adults - Extension of the | Ioannis V. Yannas | Springer. Springer. 2015. ISBN   9781493918645.
  16. 1 2 3 "Liver Regeneration - ScienceDirect". www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 2016-09-28.
  17. Gargett, Caroline E.; Nguyen, Hong P. T.; Ye, Louie (2012-12-01). "Endometrial regeneration and endometrial stem/progenitor cells". Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders. 13 (4): 235–251. doi:10.1007/s11154-012-9221-9. ISSN   1573-2606. PMID   22847235. S2CID   2801640.
  18. Fong, Debra; Denton, Kate M.; Moritz, Karen M.; Evans, Roger; Singh, Reetu R. (2014-03-01). "Compensatory responses to nephron deficiency: adaptive or maladaptive?". Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 19 (3): 119–128. doi: 10.1111/nep.12198 . ISSN   1440-1797. PMID   24533732.
  19. Yannas, Ioannis V. (2005-12-22). "Similarities and differences between induced organ regeneration in adults and early foetal regeneration". Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 2 (5): 403–417. doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0062. ISSN   1742-5689. PMC   1618502 . PMID   16849201.
  20. Smits, Anke M.; van Vliet, Patrick; Hassink, Rutger J.; Goumans, Marie-José; Doevendans, Pieter A. (2005-03-01). "The role of stem cells in cardiac regeneration". Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 9 (1): 25–36. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00334.x. ISSN   1582-1838. PMC   6741329 . PMID   15784162.
  21. Bredenkamp, Nicholas; Nowell, Craig S.; Blackburn, C. Clare (2014-04-01). "Regeneration of the aged thymus by a single transcription factor". Development. 141 (8): 1627–1637. doi:10.1242/dev.103614. ISSN   1477-9129. PMC   3978836 . PMID   24715454.
  22. Raya-Rivera, Atlántida M.; Esquiliano, Diego; Fierro-Pastrana, Reyna; López-Bayghen, Esther; Valencia, Pedro; Ordorica-Flores, Ricardo; Soker, Shay; Yoo, James J.; Atala, Anthony (2014-07-26). "Tissue-engineered autologous vaginal organs in patients: a pilot cohort study". Lancet. 384 (9940): 329–336. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60542-0. ISSN   1474-547X. PMID   24726478. S2CID   6296110.
  23. Auger, F. A.; Lacroix, D.; Germain, L. (2009-01-01). "Skin substitutes and wound healing". Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 22 (2): 94–102. doi:10.1159/000178868. ISSN   1660-5535. PMID   19188757. S2CID   1912989.
  24. "Scars - Treatment". NHS Choices. 4 September 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  25. "Imagine A World Without Scars" (PDF). The Scar Free Foundation. 19 July 2016. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  26. Brown, B. C.; McKenna, S. P.; Siddhi, K.; McGrouther, D. A.; Bayat, A. (2008-09-01). "The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring". Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 61 (9): 1049–1058. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.020. ISSN   1878-0539. PMID   18617450.

Further reading