Science, Liberty and Peace

Last updated

Science, Liberty and Peace
ScienceLibertyAndPeace.jpg
First edition (US)
Author Aldous Huxley
LanguageEnglish
Published1946, Harper & Brothers, (US)
1947, Chatto & Windus, (UK)
Publication placeUnited Kingdom

Science, Liberty and Peace is an essay written by Aldous Huxley, published in 1946. The essay debates a wide range of subjects reflecting Huxley's views towards the direction of society at that time. He puts forward a number of predictions, many of which resonate far beyond the time when it was written. A consistent theme throughout the essay is Huxley's preference towards a decentralised society.

Contents

Quotes

Centralized media corporations

"The man who pays the piper always calls the tune" [1]

"Today, thanks to applied science, a dictator with the gift of the gab is able to pour his emotionally charged evangel into the ears of tens of millions" [2]

"reading newspapers and listening to the radio are psychological addictions" [3]

"I see the better and I approve; but the worst is what I pursue" [4]

On the gradual removal of civil liberties

"If offered the choice between liberty and security, most people would unhesitatingly vote for security" [5]

Materialism

"the dogma of inevitable progress became an unquestioned article of popular faith" [6]

"the belief in all-round progress is based upon the wishful dream that one can get something for nothing" [7]

History repeating itself

"the most important lesson in history, it has been said, is that nobody ever learns history's lessons" [8]

National pride

"denies the value of a human being as a human being… affirms exclusiveness, encourages vanity, pride and self-satisfaction, stimulates hatred" [9]

"As Athens and Sparta died of idolatry and flag-waving and jingoism" [10]

Modern warfare

"advances in technology" .. "do not abolish the institution of war; they merely modify its manifestations" [11]

"whenever some crisis makes us forget our surface rationality and idealism" [12]

“.. to build enough launching ramps and robot planes..” [13]

"when things go badly at home…. It is always possible…. To shift people's attention away from domestic to foreign and military affairs" [14]

"it becomes unpatriotic for anyone to voice even the most justifiable complaints against mismanagement or oppression" [15]

"armaments are the only goods that are given away without consideration of loss or profits" [16]

"we need not be surprised if the plans for an international inspectorate and the pooling of scientific knowledge should fail in practice to produce the good results expected of them". [17]

De-centralization

"the Emersonian doctrine of Self-Reliance [18]

"mechanical techniques for the production of many consumer goods for a local market" [19]

"financial techniques … by which individuals can borrow money without increasing the power of the state or of commercial banks" [20]

Banking

"legal techniques, through which a community can protect itself against the profiteer who speculates in land values, which he has done nothing whatever to increase" [21]

"in the eyes of medieval Catholic theologians .. the profession of a moneylender or a speculator was beyond the pale" [22]

The rise of China

"what will happen when India and China are as highly industrialized as pre-war Japan and seek to exchange their low-priced manufactured goods for food, in competition with Western powers, whose standard of living is a great deal higher than theirs?” [23]

Exploiting Arctic resources

"the Russian power system and the Anglo-American power system" [24]

Helpful technologies

"organized science could diminish these temptations to armed conflict by finding means for providing all countries, whatever their natural resources, with a sufficiency of power" [25]

"the use of large-scale wind turbines is still, strangely enough, only in the experimental stage" [26]

"One of the most urgent tasks before applied science is the development of some portable source of power to replace petroleum – a most undesirable fuel from a political point of view" [27]

Science, technology, and freedom

Is there any way in which material advantages of progressive technology can be combined not only with security, but also with freedom? My own view, which is essentially that of the Decentralists, is that, so long as the results of pure science are applied for the purpose of mass-producing and mass-distributing industry more expensively elaborate and more highly specialized, there can be nothing but even greater centralization of power in even fewer hands. And the corollary of this centralization of economic and political power is the progressive loss by the masses of their civil liberties, their personal independence and their opportunities for self-government. [28]

As theory, pure science is concerned with the reduction of diversity to identity. As a praxis, scientific research proceeds by simplification. These habits of scientific thought and action have, to a certain extent, been carried over into the theory and practice of contemporary politics. Where a centralized authority undertakes to make plans for an entire society, it is compelled by the bewildering complexity of the given facts to follow the example of the scientific experimenter, who arbitrarily simplifies his problem in order to make it manageable. In the laboratory this is a sound and entirely justifiable procedure. But when applied to the problems of human society, the process of simplification is a process, inevitably, of restraint and regimentation, of curtailment of liberty and denial of individual rights....Philosophically, this ironing out of individual idiosyncrasies is held to be respectable, because it is analogous to what is done by scientists, when they arbitrarily simplify an all too complex reality, so as to make nature comprehensible in terms of a few general laws. [29]

Confronted by the data of experience, men of science begin by leaving out of account all those aspects of the facts which do not lend themselves to measurement and to explanation in terms of antecedent causes rather than of purpose, intention and values. Pragmatically they are justified in acting in this odd and extremely arbitrary way; for by concentrating exclusively on the measurable aspects of such elements of experience as can be explained in terms of a causal system they have been able to achieve a great and ever increasing control over the energies of nature. But power is not the same thing as insight and, as a representation of reality, the scientific picture of the world is inadequate, for the simple reason that science does not even profess to deal with experience as a whole, but only with certain aspects of it in certain contexts. All this is quite clearly understood by the more philosophically minded men of science. But unfortunately some scientists, many technicians and most consumers of gadgets have lacked the time and the inclination to examine the philosophical foundations and background of the sciences. Consequently they tend to accept the world picture implicit in the theories of science as a complete and exhaustive account of reality; they tend to regard those aspects of experience which scientists leave out of the account, because they are incompetent to deal with them, as being somehow less real than the aspects which science has arbitrarily chosen to abstract from out of the infinitely rich totality of given facts. Because of the prestige of science as a source of power, and because of the general neglect of philosophy, the popular Weltanschauung of our times contains a large element of what may be called 'nothing-but' thinking. Human beings, it is more or less tacitly assumed, are nothing but bodies, animals, even machines; the only really real elements of reality are matter and energy in their measurable aspects; values are nothing but illusions that have somehow got themselves mixed up with our experience of the world...The political consequences of this 'nothing-but' philosophy are clearly apparent in that widespread indifference to the values of human personality and human life which are so characteristic of the present age. Within the past thirty years, this indifference has expressed itself in a number of dangerous and disquieting ways. We have witnessed, first of all, the wholesale revival of slavery in its worst and most inhumane forms.... [30]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aldous Huxley</span> English writer and philosopher (1894–1963)

Aldous Leonard Huxley was an English writer and philosopher. His bibliography spans nearly 50 books, including non-fiction works, as well as essays, narratives, and poems.

Agnosticism is the view or belief that the existence of God, the divine, or the supernatural is either unknowable in principle or unknown in fact. It can also mean an apathy towards such religious belief and refer to personal limitations rather than a worldview. Another definition is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."

<i>The Doors of Perception</i> 1954 book by Aldous Huxley

The Doors of Perception is an autobiographical book written by Aldous Huxley. Published in 1954, it elaborates on his psychedelic experience under the influence of mescaline in May 1953. Huxley recalls the insights he experienced, ranging from the "purely aesthetic" to "sacramental vision", and reflects on their philosophical and psychological implications. In 1956, he published Heaven and Hell, another essay which elaborates these reflections further. The two works have since often been published together as one book; the title of both comes from William Blake's 1793 book The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.

Relativism is a family of philosophical views which deny claims to objectivity within a particular domain and assert that valuations in that domain are relative to the perspective of an observer or the context in which they are assessed. There are many different forms of relativism, with a great deal of variation in scope and differing degrees of controversy among them. Moral relativism encompasses the differences in moral judgments among people and cultures. Epistemic relativism holds that there are no absolute principles regarding normative belief, justification, or rationality, and that there are only relative ones. Alethic relativism is the doctrine that there are no absolute truths, i.e., that truth is always relative to some particular frame of reference, such as a language or a culture, while linguistic relativism asserts that a language's structures influence a speaker's perceptions. Some forms of relativism also bear a resemblance to philosophical skepticism. Descriptive relativism seeks to describe the differences among cultures and people without evaluation, while normative relativism evaluates the word truthfulness of views within a given framework.

Solipsism is the philosophical idea that only one's mind is sure to exist. As an epistemological position, solipsism holds that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure; the external world and other minds cannot be known and might not exist outside the mind.

Scientism is the belief that science and the scientific method are the best or only way to render truth about the world and reality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perennial philosophy</span> Idea that all religions share a single truth

The perennial philosophy, also referred to as perennialism and perennial wisdom, is a school of thought in philosophy and spirituality that posits that the recurrence of common themes across world religions illuminates universal truths about the nature of reality, humanity, ethics, and consciousness. Some perennialists emphasize common themes in religious experiences and mystical traditions across time and cultures; others argue that religious traditions share a single metaphysical truth or origin from which all esoteric and exoteric knowledge and doctrine have developed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Absurdism</span> Theory that life in general is meaningless

Absurdism is the philosophical theory that the universe is irrational and meaningless. It states that trying to find meaning leads people into conflict with a seemingly meaningless world. This conflict can be between rational man and an irrational universe, between intention and outcome, or between subjective assessment and objective worth, but the precise definition of the term is disputed. Absurdism claims that, due to one or more of these conflicts, existence as a whole is absurd. It differs in this regard from the less global thesis that some particular situations, persons, or phases in life are absurd.

In philosophy of science and in epistemology, instrumentalism is a methodological view that ideas are useful instruments, and that the worth of an idea is based on how effective it is in explaining and predicting natural phenomena. According to instrumentalists, a successful scientific theory reveals nothing known either true or false about nature's unobservable objects, properties or processes. Scientific theory is merely a tool whereby humans predict observations in a particular domain of nature by formulating laws, which state or summarize regularities, while theories themselves do not reveal supposedly hidden aspects of nature that somehow explain these laws. Instrumentalism is a perspective originally introduced by Pierre Duhem in 1906.

<i>Island</i> (Huxley novel) 1962 novel by Aldous Huxley

Island is a 1962 utopian manifesto and novel by English writer Aldous Huxley, the author's final work before his death in 1963. Although it has a plot, the plot largely serves to further conceptual explorations rather than setting up and resolving conventional narrative tension.

<i>Point Counter Point</i> Novel by Aldous Huxley

Point Counter Point is a novel by Aldous Huxley, first published in 1928. It is Huxley's longest novel, and was notably more complex and serious than his earlier fiction.

New mysterianism, or commonly just mysterianism, is a philosophical position proposing that the hard problem of consciousness cannot be resolved by humans. The unresolvable problem is how to explain the existence of qualia. In terms of the various schools of philosophy of mind, mysterianism is a form of nonreductive physicalism. Some "mysterians" state their case uncompromisingly ; others take a "pseudo-mysterian" stance, being of the belief that consciousness is not within the grasp of present human understanding, but may be comprehensible to future advances of science and technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. D. Broad</span> English philosopher (1887–1971)

Charlie Dunbar Broad, usually cited as C. D. Broad, was an English epistemologist, historian of philosophy, philosopher of science, moral philosopher, and writer on the philosophical aspects of psychical research. He was known for his thorough and dispassionate examinations of arguments in such works as Scientific Thought (1923), The Mind and Its Place in Nature (1925), and Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerald Heard</span> British-born American historian, science writer, lecturer, educator and philosopher

Henry FitzGerald Heard, commonly called Gerald Heard, was a British-born American historian, science writer and broadcaster, public lecturer, educator, and philosopher. He wrote many articles and over 35 books.

<i>The Perennial Philosophy</i> 1945 book by Aldous Huxley

The Perennial Philosophy is a comparative study of mysticism by the British writer and novelist Aldous Huxley. Its title derives from the theological tradition of perennial philosophy.

<i>Literature and Science</i> 1963 essay collection by Aldous Huxley

Literature and Science, published in September 1963, was Aldous Huxley's last book - he died two months after it was published. In it, he strives to harmonize the scientific and artistic realms. He argues that language is what divides the two realms and makes communication between them difficult. He analyzes the ways in which scientists and fiction writers use language differently to achieve their desired effects. Although he concedes that many differences in language use are inevitable, he urges both camps to seek mutual understanding and appreciation. He directs his argument primarily to fiction writers: "Whether we like it or not,” he tells them, “ours is the Age of Science."

This glossary of philosophy is a list of definitions of terms and concepts relevant to philosophy and related disciplines, including logic, ethics, and theology.

<i>After Many a Summer</i> 1939 novel by Aldous Huxley

After Many a Summer (1939) is a novel by Aldous Huxley that tells the story of a Hollywood millionaire who fears his impending death. It was published in the United States as After Many a Summer Dies the Swan. Written soon after Huxley left England and settled in California, the novel is Huxley's examination of American culture, particularly what he saw as its narcissism, superficiality, and obsession with youth. This satire also raises philosophical and social issues, some of which would later take the forefront in Huxley's final novel Island. The novel's title is taken from Tennyson's poem Tithonus, about a figure in Greek mythology to whom Aurora gave eternal life but not eternal youth. The book was awarded the 1939 James Tait Black Memorial Prize for fiction.

<i>The Art of Seeing</i> Book by Aldous Huxley

The Art of Seeing: An Adventure in Re-education is a 1942 book by Aldous Huxley, which details his experience with and views on the discredited Bates method, which according to Huxley improved his eyesight.

Mind at Large is a concept proposed by Aldous Huxley to help interpret psychedelic experience. He maintained that the human mind filters reality under normal circumstances and that psychedelic drugs remove the filter, exposing the user to a Mind at Large.

References

  1. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  2. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  3. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  4. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  5. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  6. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  7. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  8. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  9. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  10. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  11. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  12. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  13. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  14. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  15. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  16. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  17. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  18. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  19. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  20. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  21. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  22. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  23. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  24. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  25. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  26. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  27. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  28. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  29. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'
  30. Huxley, Aldous (1946), 'Science, Liberty and Peace'