Scottish Sentencing Council

Last updated

Scottish Sentencing Council
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Government in Scotland).svg
Agency overview
Formed19 October 2015;7 years ago (19 October 2015)
Type Advisory non-departmental public body
Jurisdiction Scotland
Headquarters Parliament House, Edinburgh, EH1 1RQ
Agency executives
Parent agency Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service
Key document
Website www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk
Map
Scotland in the UK and Europe.svg
Scotland in the UK and Europe

The Scottish Sentencing Council (Scottish Gaelic : Comhairle binn na h-Alba) is an advisory non-departmental public body in Scotland that produces sentencing guidelines for use in the High Court of Justiciary, sheriff courts and justice of the peace courts. Judges, sheriffs, and justices of the peace must use the guidelines to inform the sentence they pronounce against a convict, and they must give reasons for not following the guidelines.

Contents

The Scottish Sentencing Council was established by the Scottish Ministers on 19 October 2015 under powers granted by the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010. All sentencing guidelines are submitted to the High Court of Justiciary for approval, and the High Court may approve, amend, or reject the guidelines produced by the Council.

History

Macfadyen Report

The establishment of the Scottish Sentencing Council was a response to the report The Scope to Improve Consistency in Sentencing, [1] published in 2006 by Lord Macfadyen as part of the Sentencing Commission for Scotland. Lord Macfadyen identified that little research had been done into the consistency of sentencing, but that there was public perception that there is inconsistency. Lord Macfadyen defined consistency in sentencing as:

Sentencing is consistent when offenders committing similar offences are punished with similar penalties by different sentencers, whether those sentencers sit in the same court or different courts.

— Lord Macfadyen, The Scope to Improve Consistency in Sentencing [1] : 9 

In his report Lord Macfadyen did conclude that there was evidence of inconsistency, and did not agree that there should be variation between the sentences given to broadly similar cases. As such, he recommended the creation of the Advisory Panel on Sentencing in Scotland with powers broadly similar to the current Scottish Sentencing Council. [1] : iii 

Scottish Parliament

Lord Macfadyen's report was written following an inquiry by the Justice 1 Committee of the Scottish Parliament in 2002. In its report Public Attitudes Towards Sentencing and Alternatives to Imprisonment, the Committee found that the public had limited knowledge of the sentencing powers of the courts of Scotland, and that the public felt the courts were too lenient. However, they also found that the public were supportive of measures such as Drug and Treatment Orders, and that members of the public gave broadly similar punishments to the courts in real life. Another issue arose was the public demand for truth in sentencing, and that the public were cynical and distrustful because of automatic early release. [2] Truth in sentencing is the belief that when a judge sentences an offender to, say, 3 years in prison that they should spend 3 years in prison. [3]

Proposal for a sentencing council

Scottish Government

In response to Lord Macfadyen's report the Scottish Government proposed the creation of Scottish Sentencing Council, but their initial proposal was not well received by the legal profession or judiciary in Scotland. The Scottish Government's proposal was for the Council's guidelines to be binding on appeals court (the High Court of Justiciary at the time), and the appeal courts only able to request to the Council to revise its guidelines. [4]

The proposed structure of the Council only had 3 judicial members (1 High Court judge, 1 Sheriff, and 1 stipendiary magistrate or justice of the peace) with 5 other members. The other 5 members were proposed to be 1 prosecutor, 1 representative of Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, 1 advocate, 1 solicitor and 1 representative for victims' rights. [5]

Response from Faculty of Advocates

Both the structure and remit of the Council faced opposition from the Faculty of Advocates and the Sheriffs' Association (representing the permanent and salaried sheriffs of Scotland) [6] who both challenged the judicial minority on the Council, and the binding nature of the guidelines. The Faculty of Advocates proposed there should be at least 2 High Court judges, 1 sheriff, and 1 part-time sheriff to increase the judicial membership of the Council. The Faculty also rejected the attendance of an observer from the Scottish Government. [7]

Response from Sheriffs' Association

The Sheriffs' Association asserted that the proposals would erode judicial independence, and by unanimous decision the Council of the Association rejected the entire proposal for a sentencing council. Nonetheless, recognising that such a Sentencing Council would be created the Association asserted that it should have a judicial majority. The Sheriffs' Association asserted that the appeal courts should remain the final arbiter of any sentencing guidelines, and that judges should not be named-and-shamed for deviating from the guidelines. The Sheriffs' Association concurred with the Faculty of Advocates in rejecting an observer from the Scottish Government. [8]

Response from High Court

The High Court of Justiciary was as emphatic in its rejection of the relationship between the proposed Sentencing Council and any appeal court finding the proposals "unsatisfactory, unworkable and unacceptable." Agreeing with both the Faculty of Advocates and Sheriffs' Association that it would erode judicial independence. The High Court concluded it would remove the Court of Criminal Appeal as the final arbiter of sentencing policy, and removing any discretion or ability to direct from the appeal courts. They asserted it remove any separation of powers between the judiciary, executive, and legislature. The response of the High Court called for 2 High Court judges, 2 sheriffs, and possibly a Sheriff Principal. [9]

Response from Scottish Women's Aid

Scottish Women's Aid were deeply concerned about inconsistency in sentencing, highlighting that sheriffs had recognised the problem, and wanted the Sentencing Council to address this. Scottish Women's Aid asserted that there should be more than one victims' right advocate on the Council, but they agreed with the High Court, Sheriffs' Association and Faculty of Advocates that the appeal courts should have the power to vary (dismiss, reduce, or increase) the sentence of convicts. [10]

Judicial independence

England and Wales

In England and Wales the guidelines produced by the Sentencing Council are more prescriptive in nature, with the Courts of England and Wales required to follow the guidelines, as required by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, which states:

Every court—

(a) must, in sentencing an offender, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the offender's case, and

(b) must, in exercising any other function relating to the sentencing of offenders, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the exercise of the function,

unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.

— Section 129, Coroners and Justice Act 2009 [11]

Royal Society of Edinburgh

The Royal Society of Edinburgh in considering the establishment of the Scottish Sentencing Council looked at the example of England and Wales, with the more binding nature of guidelines, and identified that many more crimes in England and Wales have sentences prescribed by statute than is the case in Scotland. It was their assertion that the original proposal, with a predominantly lay Council, and guidelines that were binding on the Appeal Court would:

...be a gross derogation from the independence of the judiciary and entirely unwarranted.

— Royal Society of Edinburgh, Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council [12] : 1 

They went to question if such a situation would allow the Appeal Court to be regarded as independent and impartial tribunal under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [12] : 1  The Royal Society of Edinburgh expressed further concerns that sentencing was to be determined solely by the Council, and not by either the High Court of Justiciary or the Scottish Parliament, and that the direct involvement of the Lord Advocate in sentencing would further erode judicial independence. [12] : 3 

Neil Hutton

Professor Neil Hutton, who could go on to be appointed as a Lay Member of the Council, wrote a research paper on involving the public in sentencing policy, and observed that no judiciary has sole control over sentencing. [13] He stated that,

Sentencing always takes place within a legally authorised structure. Judges make the sentencing decision within the regulatory legal framework although in many jurisdictions, prosecutors, parole officials or others will have made decisions about a case prior to the sentencing decision of the judge.

— Professor Neil Hutton, Institutional mechanisms for incorporating the public in the development of sentencing policy. [13] : 5 

Which addressed both public misconceptions, and assertions around judicial independence. Which highlighted in a report from the Justice Select Committee of the House of Commons in 2009, where it was recognised that Parliament, as a legislature, was responsible for defining the overall framework. [14]

Scottish Government

The Scottish Government affirmed its commitment to judicial independence in both the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 and the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014, and agreed that it was important that there remain judicial discretion in sentencing, stating: [15] [16] [17]

It is for the courts to decide on the most appropriate sentence, within the limits provided by Parliament, in any particular case. Each case is unique and only the court hears all the facts and circumstances surrounding the offence and the offender.

—  Scottish Government, Sentencing and Criminal Penalties in Scotland [15]

The Council as established would have a judicial majority, have its guidelines subject to ratification, rejection, or amendment by the High Court of Justiciary, and the Appeal Court would be able to set aside the guidelines when determining an appeal. [18] [19]

Establishment

The Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 as enacted had the Lord Justice Clerk as chair of the Council ex officio and granted a judicial majority on the Council. The Council was to have as judicial members a judge of the Outer House who sat in the High Court of Jusiciary, a sheriff (who was not sheriff principal), 2 summary sheriffs or justices of the peace, and a sheriff principal. The Council was to have, as legally qualified members a prosecutor from the Crown Office, an advocate, and a solicitor. As lay members the Council was to have a constable, a victims' rights advocate, and a further lay member. [18] : Schedule 1 

The Scottish Sentencing Council was established by the Scottish Ministers on 19 October 2015 under powers granted by the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010. Out-law.com reported on 23 February 2015, that the establishment of the Scottish Sentencing Council had been brought by six months, to expedite the formulation of a more consistent system of sentencing in Scotland, but also creating one that was, in the words of Scottish Government, "less prescriptive" than found in other jurisdictions. [20] [18] [19]

Remit and jurisdiction

Advisory and statutory

The Scottish Sentencing Council is an independent advisory non-departmental public body in Scotland, with that exists to ensure consistency in sentencing in the High Court of Justiciary, sheriff courts, and justice of the peace courts. It has been established to improve public confidence in sentencing in Scotland, and at the same time ensure judicial independence. It is chaired by the Lord Justice Clerk (the second most senior judge in Scotland), and its membership is composed of 5 members of the judiciary, 3 lawyers, and 3 lay members. It has been established to ensure consistency and transparency. [21]

Approval by High Court

The Scottish Sentencing Council has the authority to produce guidelines for approval by the High Court of Justiciary, that will guide judges, sheriffs, and justices of the peace on the sentences they should pass on a convict in Scotland. All sentencing guidelines are submitted to the High Court of Justiciary for approval, and the High Court may approve, amend, or reject the guidelines produced by the Council. Such guidelines are also subject to the authority of the Court of Criminal Appeal or Sheriff Appeal Court who retain the power to issue guideline judgments that are binding on the courts of Scotland, and require the Council to review its guidelines. [18] : Sections 1 to 13  [22] : Sections 118(7) and 189(7)  [17] : Section 48  [23]

Guideline judgments

Guideline judgments can be issued by the High Court of Justiciary (sitting as the Court of Appeal) and the Sheriff Appeal Court. The High Court guideline can issue guideline judgments under powers granted by Sections 118(7) and 189(7) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, [22] : Sections 118(7) and 189(7)  and power to issue guidelines judgments is granted to the Sheriff Appeal Court by Section 48 of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. [17] : Section 48 

In guideline judgments the judges or Appeal Sherrifs can give guidance on how sentencing should be handled in similar cases. Such guidelines are binding on other judges and sheriffs (for High Court guideline judgments) and on other sheriffs (for Sheriff Appeal Court judgments). The Sentencing Council will need to prepare or modify sentencing guidelines in response to such judgments. [24]

However, in 2007 a study by Millie, Tombs and Hough, comparing sentencing decisions between Scotland and England & Wales, noted that Scotland did not have a well developed body of guideline judgments, and that Sheriffs, Senators, and Justices of the Peace tended to consider how a sentenced might be perceived by the Court of Criminal Appeal. The authors also noted that judges in Scotland would welcome more guidance from the Appeal Court. [25] : 250–251  The Scottish Sentencing Council's own website, as of 22 April 2017, only listed 5 guideline judgments for solemn cases, [26] and 1 guideline judgment for summary cases. [27] There were a further 7 cases that the Council regarded as providing guidance, but these were not issued under the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. [28]

Sentencing guidelines

Business Plan 2015 to 2018

The first set of sentencing guidelines the Scottish Sentencing Council will seek to develop are guidelines on wildlife and environmental offences, and causing death by dangerous driving. Both are areas that are seen as complex, and can lead to difficult sentencing decisions. [29]

Death by dangerous driving

The Falkirk Herald ran a campaign piece on 3 December 2016, on causing death by dangerous driving, where it highlighted public discontent with the apparent leniency of sentencing decisions in such cases. The Falkirk Herald stated that despite the maximum penalty for causing death by dangerous driving being 14 years imprisonment, the average sentence between 2005 and 2015 was 4.8 years. It was their hope the Council would address this. [30]

Membership

Categories

The categories of membership for the Scottish Sentencing Council are laid down in Schedule 1 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010. Schedule 1 states that the Lord Justice Clerk is chair of the Council ex officio (by right of office), with 5 other judicial members of appointed by the Lord Justice General after consultation with the Scottish Ministers. The judicial members include a judge of the Outer House who sat in the High Court of Jusiciary, a sheriff (who was not sheriff principal), 2 summary sheriffs or justices of the peace, and a sheriff principal. The remaining members are appointed by the Scottish Minister, who must consult the Lord Justice General. [18] : Schedule 1 

The non-judicial members of the Council include a prosecutor (Advocate Depute or procurator fiscal) from the Crown Office, an advocate, a solicitor, a constable, a victims' rights representative, and one further lay member. [18] : Schedule 1 

Appointment process

Appointment of the judicial and legally qualified members is regulated by The Scottish Sentencing Council (Procedure for Appointment of Members) Regulations 2015, which require the Lord Justice General to convene a panel to hear applications for positions open to sheriffs, summary sheriffs, justices of the peace, advocate, and solicitor. The panel is recommend persons for appointment. At the same time, the Lord Justice General must consult the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates and the President of the Law Society of Scotland before appointing an advocate or solicitor. The prosecutor is nominated by the Lord Advocate, and a Senator and sheriff principal can nominate themselves. [31]

Current Council members

The members of the Scottish Sentencing Council as of 25 September 2021 were:

Members of the Scottish Sentencing Council [32]
NameMembership categoryOther details
Lady Dorrian Lord Justice Clerk ex officio Chair of the Council
Lord Matthews Senator Not specified
Sheriff Iain Fleming Sheriff Principal
Sheriff Craig Turbull Sheriff
Susan Fallone JP Justice of the Peace
Position Vacant Justice of the Peace
Position Vacant Prosecutor
Matt Jackson QC Advocate
Krista Johnston Solicitor
DCC Will Kerr Constable Deputy Chief Constable of Police Scotland
Lesley Weber Victims' expert Head of Effective Practice at the Risk Management Authority (RMA)
Dr Hannah GrahamLay memberSenior Lecturer in Criminology at the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research

Secretariat

The Scottish Sentencing Council is supported by a secretariat which is provided by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, as required by order of the Scottish Ministers in The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (Administrative Support) (Specified Persons) Order 2015, under a power granted by Section 62 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) 2008. [16] : Section 62  [33]

The Secretariat is headed up by Ondine Tennant, who was appointed in October 2014, and holds an LLB (Hons) in Law and Politics from the University of Edinburgh. She previously worked for the Scottish Civil Justice Council. She is supported by various policy, legal, communication, and research officers. [34]

Notes

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial functions of the House of Lords</span> Historical judicial role of the UK House of Lords

    Whilst the House of Lords of the United Kingdom is the upper chamber of Parliament and has government ministers, for many centuries it had a judicial function. It functioned as a court of first instance for the trials of peers and for impeachments, and as a court of last resort in the United Kingdom and prior, the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of England.

    A sheriff is a government official, with varying duties, existing in some countries with historical ties to England where the office originated. There is an analogous, although independently developed, office in Iceland that is commonly translated to English as sherif.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Lord President of the Court of Session</span> Most senior judge in Scotland

    The Lord President of the Court of Session and Lord Justice General is the most senior judge in Scotland, the head of the judiciary, and the presiding judge of the College of Justice, the Court of Session, and the High Court of Justiciary. The Lord President holds the title of Lord Justice General of Scotland and the head of the High Court of Justiciary ex officio, as the two offices were combined in 1836. The Lord President has authority over any court established under Scots law, except for the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Court of the Lord Lyon.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Session</span> Supreme civil court of Scotland

    The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland and constitutes part of the College of Justice; the supreme criminal court of Scotland is the High Court of Justiciary. The Court of Session sits in Parliament House in Edinburgh and is both a trial court and a court of appeal. Decisions of the court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, with the permission of either the Inner House or the Supreme Court. The Court of Session and the local sheriff courts of Scotland have concurrent jurisdiction for all cases with a monetary value in excess of £100,000; the plaintiff is given first choice of court. However, the majority of complex, important, or high value cases are brought in the Court of Session. Cases can be remitted to the Court of Session from the sheriff courts, including the Sheriff Personal Injury Court, at the request of the presiding sheriff. Legal aid, administered by the Scottish Legal Aid Board, is available to persons with little disposable income for cases in the Court of Session.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Justiciary</span> Supreme criminal court in Scotland

    The High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court in Scotland. The High Court is both a trial court and a court of appeal. As a trial court, the High Court sits on circuit at Parliament House or in the adjacent former Sheriff Court building in the Old Town in Edinburgh, or in dedicated buildings in Glasgow and Aberdeen. The High Court sometimes sits in various smaller towns in Scotland, where it uses the local sheriff court building. As an appeal court, the High Court sits only in Edinburgh. On one occasion the High Court of Justiciary sat outside Scotland, at Zeist in the Netherlands during the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial, as the Scottish Court in the Netherlands. At Zeist the High Court sat both as a trial court, and an appeal court for the initial appeal by Abdelbaset al-Megrahi.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheriff court</span>

    A sheriff court is the principal local civil and criminal court in Scotland, with exclusive jurisdiction over all civil cases with a monetary value up to £100,000, and with the jurisdiction to hear any criminal case except treason, murder, and rape, which are in the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court of Justiciary. Though the sheriff courts have concurrent jurisdiction with the High Court over armed robbery, drug trafficking, and sexual offences involving children, the vast majority of these cases are heard by the High Court. Each court serves a sheriff court district within one of the six sheriffdoms of Scotland. Each sheriff court is presided over by a sheriff, who is a legally qualified judge, and part of the judiciary of Scotland.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service</span> Independent public body

    The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) is an independent public body which is responsible for the administration of the courts and tribunals of Scotland. The Service is led by a board which is chaired by the Lord President of the Court of Session, and employs over 1000 staff members in the country's 39 sheriff courts, 34 justice of the peace courts, the Court of Session and the High Court of Justiciary, and at the service's headquarters in Edinburgh. The day-to-day administration of the service is the responsibility of its Chief Executive and Executive Directors. The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service is also responsible for providing administrative services for the Judicial Office for Scotland, the Office of the Public Guardian, the Accountant of Court, the Criminal Courts Rules Council, and the Scottish Civil Justice Council.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of Scotland</span> Administration of justice in Scotland

    The courts of Scotland are responsible for administration of justice in Scotland, under statutory, common law and equitable provisions within Scots law. The courts are presided over by the judiciary of Scotland, who are the various judicial office holders responsible for issuing judgments, ensuring fair trials, and deciding on sentencing. The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland, subject to appeals to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and the High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court, which is only subject to the authority of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on devolution issues and human rights compatibility issues.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United Kingdom</span> Final court of appeal in the United Kingdom

    The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is the final court of appeal in the United Kingdom for all civil cases, and for criminal cases originating in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. As the United Kingdom’s highest appellate court for these matters, it hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheriff principal</span>

    In Scotland a sheriff principal is a judge in charge of a sheriffdom with judicial, quasi-judicial, and administrative responsibilities. Sheriffs principal have been part of the judiciary of Scotland since the 11th century. Sheriffs principal were originally appointed by the monarch of Scotland, and evolved into a heritable jurisdiction before appointment was again vested in the Crown and the monarch of the United Kingdom following the passage of the Heritable Jurisdictions (Scotland) Act 1746.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Senator of the College of Justice</span> Type of judge in Scotland

    The senators of the College of Justice are judges of the College of Justice, a set of legal institutions involved in the administration of justice in Scotland. There are three types of senator: Lords of Session ; Lords Commissioners of Justiciary ; and the Chairman of the Scottish Land Court. Whilst the High Court and Court of Session historically maintained separate judiciary, these are now identical, and the term Senator is almost exclusively used in referring to the judges of these courts.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">College of Justice</span> Supreme courts of Scotland

    The College of Justice includes the Supreme Courts of Scotland, and its associated bodies.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Inner House</span> Senior Scottish court

    The Inner House is the senior part of the Court of Session, the supreme civil court in Scotland; the Outer House forms the junior part of the Court of Session. It is a court of appeal and a court of first instance. The chief justice is the Lord President, with their deputy being the Lord Justice Clerk, and judges of the Inner House are styled Senators of the College of Justice or Lords of Council and Session. Criminal appeals in Scotland are handled by the High Court of Justiciary sitting as the Court of Appeal.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciaries of the United Kingdom</span> Systems of courts of law in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland

    The judiciaries of the United Kingdom are the separate judiciaries of the three legal systems in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. The judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, Employment Tribunals, Employment Appeal Tribunal and the UK tribunals system do have a United Kingdom–wide jurisdiction but judgments only apply directly to the jurisdiction from which a case originates as the same case points and principles do not inevitably apply in the other jurisdictions. In employment law, employment tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal have jurisdiction in the whole of Great Britain.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Scottish Land Court</span>

    The Scottish Land Court is a Scottish court of law based in Edinburgh with subject-matter jurisdiction covering disputes between landlords and tenants relating to agricultural tenancies, and matters related to crofts and crofters. The Scottish Land Court is both a trial court and an appeal court; hearings at first-instance are often heard by a Divisional Court of one of the Agricultural Members advised by the Principal Clerk. Decisions of the Divisional Court can be appealed to the Full Court, which will consist of at least one legally qualified judicial member and the remaining Agricultural Member. Some cases are heard at first-instance by the Full Court, and these cases may be appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session.

    William Austin Nimmo Smith is a former Senator of the College of Justice, a judge of the Supreme Courts of Scotland, sitting in the High Court of Justiciary and the Inner House of the Court of Session. He retired from this position on 30 September 2009.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Act of Sederunt</span> Type of legislation made by the Court of Session in Scotland

    An Act of Sederunt is secondary legislation made by the Court of Session, the supreme civil court of Scotland, to regulate the proceedings of Scottish courts and tribunals hearing civil matters. Originally made under an Act of the Parliament of Scotland of 1532, the modern power to make Acts of Sederunt is largely derived from the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. Since 2013, draft Acts have also been prepared by the Scottish Civil Justice Council and submitted to the Court of Session for approval.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Scots law</span> Legal system of Scotland

    Scots law is the legal system of Scotland. It is a hybrid or mixed legal system containing civil law and common law elements, that traces its roots to a number of different historical sources. Together with English law and Northern Ireland law, it is one of the three legal systems of the United Kingdom.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Scotland</span>

    The judiciary of Scotland are the judicial office holders who sit in the courts of Scotland and make decisions in both civil and criminal cases. Judges make sure that cases and verdicts are within the parameters set by Scots law, and they must hand down appropriate judgments and sentences. Judicial independence is guaranteed in law, with a legal duty on Scottish Ministers, the Lord Advocate and the Members of the Scottish Parliament to uphold judicial independence, and barring them from influencing the judges through any form of special access.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheriff Appeal Court</span>

    The Sheriff Appeal Court is a court in Scotland that hears appeals from summary criminal proceedings in the sheriff courts and justice of the peace courts, and hears appeals on bail decisions made in solemn proceedings in the sheriff court. The Sheriff Appeal Court also hears appeals in civil cases from the sheriff courts, including the Sheriff Personal Injury Court.

    References

    1. 1 2 3 Rt Hon Lord Macfadyen (August 2006). The Scope to Improve Consistency in Sentencing (PDF) (Report). Scottish Government. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    2. ↑ Dr Neil Hutton (2002). Public Attitudes Towards Sentencing and Alternatives to Imprisonment (Report). Scottish Parliament. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    3. ↑ "Truth in Sentencing Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc". definitions.uslegal.com. US Legal, Inc. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    4. ↑ "Proposed Remit and Functions | Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council: Consultation and Proposals". www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. 1 September 2008. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    5. ↑ "Proposed Structure | Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council: Consultation and Proposals". www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. 1 September 2008. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    6. ↑ "Sheriffs Association – Representative Bodies | About the Judiciary | Judiciary of Scotland". www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk. Judicial Office for Scotland. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    7. ↑ "Response 9 | Faculty of Advocates | Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council" (PDF). www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. 26 January 2009. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    8. ↑ "Response 42 | The Sheriffs' Association | Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council" (PDF). www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. 26 January 2009. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    9. ↑ "Response 34 | High Court of Justiciary | Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council" (PDF). www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. 26 January 2009. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    10. ↑ "Response 39 | Scottish Women's Aid | Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council" (PDF). www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. 26 January 2009. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    11. ↑ "Coroners and Justice Act 2009", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 2009 c. 25
    12. 1 2 3 Royal Society of Edinburgh (November 2008). Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council (PDF) (Report). Retrieved 18 April 2017.
    13. 1 2 Hutton, Neil (2007). "Institutional mechanisms for incorporating the public in the development of sentencing policy.". In Gelb, Karen; Freiberg, Arie (eds.). Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy (PDF). Devon, UK: Willan Publishers. ISBN   978-1-84392-277-3.
    14. ↑ "House of Commons – Justice Committee – Sentencing guidelines and Parliament: building a bridge". www.publications.parliament.uk. The Committee Office, House of Commons. 2 July 2009. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
    15. 1 2 Scottish Government (23 June 2008). "Sentencing and Criminal Penalties in Scotland". www.gov.scot. Scottish Government. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    16. 1 2 Scottish Parliament. Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 as amended (see also enacted form ), from legislation.gov.uk .
    17. 1 2 3 Scottish Parliament. Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 as amended (see also enacted form ), from legislation.gov.uk .
    18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scottish Parliament. Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 as amended (see also enacted form ), from legislation.gov.uk .
    19. 1 2 "Creation of Scottish Sentencing Council brought forward to October". www.out-law.com. Pinset Masons. 23 February 2015. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
    20. ↑ Scottish Parliament. The Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 (Commencement No. 13) and the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (Commencement No. 4) Order 2015 as made, from legislation.gov.uk .
    21. ↑ Jamieson, David (20 October 2015). "What is the new Scottish Sentencing Council and what will it mean for our courts?". www.commonspace.scot. CommonSpace. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    22. 1 2 Scottish Parliament. Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 as amended (see also enacted form ), from legislation.gov.uk .
    23. ↑ "About Sentencing Guidelines in Scotland". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    24. ↑ "Guideline judgments | Scottish Sentencing Council". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
    25. ↑ Millie, A.; Tombs, J.; Hough, M. (1 August 2007). "Borderline sentencing: A comparison of sentencers' decision making in England and Wales, and Scotland". Criminology and Criminal Justice. 7 (3): 243–267. doi:10.1177/1748895807078866. S2CID   145638754 . Retrieved 22 April 2017.
    26. ↑ "Scottish Sentencing Council sections 118(7) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 judgments". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
    27. ↑ "Scottish Sentencing Council sections 189(7) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 judgments". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
    28. ↑ "Scottish Sentencing Council useful judgments". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
    29. ↑ Scottish Sentencing Council Business Plan 2015–18 (PDF) (Report). Scottish Sentencing Council. September 2016. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
    30. ↑ "Drive for Justice: Our campaign for stiffer sentences for dangerous drivers". www.falkirkherald.co.uk. Falkirk Herald. 3 December 2016. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
    31. ↑ Scottish Parliament. The Scottish Sentencing Council (Procedure for Appointment of Members) Regulations 2015 as made, from legislation.gov.uk .
    32. ↑ "Scottish Sentencing Council Membership". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
    33. ↑ Scottish Parliament. The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (Administrative Support) (Specified Persons) Order 2015 as made, from legislation.gov.uk .
    34. ↑ "About the Scottish Sentencing Council". www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk. Scottish Sentencing Council. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.