Seton Hall reports

Last updated • 4 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

The Seton Hall reports, also known as the Denbeaux studies, are several studies published by the Center for Policy and Research at Seton Hall University Law School in the United States beginning in 2006, about the detainees and United States government policy related to operations at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp. At a time when the government revealed little about these operations, the reports were based on analysis of data maintained and released by the Department of Defense. The director of the Law School's Center, Mark P. Denbeaux, supervised law student teams in their analysis and writing the studies. [1] The first study was Report on Guantanamo Detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees through Analysis of Department of Defense Data (February 8, 2006).

Contents

By late 2009, Denbeaux had supervised fifteen studies on Guantanamo for the Center for Policy and Research. The studies have been cited in both houses of Congress, for instance, by the Senate Armed Services Committee, and by national and international press.

Denbeaux and his son, Joshua Denbeaux, were listed as the lead names on the first and several succeeding studies. They have a law firm together and are the legal representatives for the Guantanamo detainees Rafiq Bin Bashir Bin Jalud Al Hami and Mohammed Abdul Rahman, both from Tunisia. [2]

Studies

Report on Guantanamo Detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees through Analysis of Department of Defense Data (February 8, 2006)
  • Based on the Summary of Evidence memos prepared for 517 Guantanamo captives' Combatant Status Review Tribunals, first published in the Winter and Spring of 2005. [3]
  • Asserted that about 5% of the detainees had been captured by United States soldiers on a battlefield; 86% were captured by Afghan and Pakistanis or Pakistani border guards. They turned over prisoners to US forces, when the US was widely paying bounties of $5,000 per prisoner. [3]
Inter- and Intra-Departmental Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy (20 March 2006)
  • Based on the CSRT Summary of Evidence memos prepared for 517 Guantanamo captives, published in 2005. [4]
  • Asserted that the continued detention of many captives was based only on allegations of associations with certain organizations, but these were not included among the USA's public lists of those suspected of ties to terrorism. [4]
  • Concluded either that the public lists, such as the "no-fly lists", were permitting individuals to enter the USA who had other meaningful ties to terrorism, or that the organizations cited to justify detention at Guantanamo did not have significant ties to terrorism. [4]
The Guantanamo Detainees During Detention: Data from Department of Defense Records (July 10, 2006)
  • Summarizes the Department of Defense reports of "hanging incidents" and "self-harm" incidents by detainees, and how many times captives were cited for infractions of the camp rules. [5]
June 10th Suicides at Guantanamo (August 21, 2006)
  • Described discrepancies in the public record related to the first three suicides reported in Guantanamo. [6]
No-Hearing Hearings (November 17, 2006)
  • Analyzed compliance of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT) with their own rules and the rule of law. [7]
  • Was the first study to document that new Tribunals were routinely convened to reverse the determinations of Tribunals that had ruled that captives had not been "enemy combatants" . [7]
  • Described incidents when Tribunals broke their own rules. [7]
The 14 Myths of Guantánamo: Senate Armed Services Committee Statement of Mark P. Denbeaux. Denbeaux testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on April 26, 2007
  • Based on the studies done by the Center for Policy and Research, revealed 14 myths which the Bush administration had been saying about Guantanamo detainees and operations. [8]
The Empty Battlefield and the Thirteenth Criterion (November 8, 2007)
  • Students at the West Point Military Academy published an analysis of the documents the Department of Defense published about the captives. [9] The Seton Hall study is a commentary on the West Point report.
The Meaning of "Battlefield": An Analysis of the Government's Representations of 'Battlefield Capture' and 'Recidivism' of the Guantánamo Detainees (12/10/07), Professor Denbeaux's Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on C-SPAN

[10]

Captured on Tape: Interrogation and Videotaping of Detainees in Guantánamo (February 7, 2008) [11]
  • Asserts that, contrary to statements by Bush administration spokesmen, the published record shows that all of the 24,000 interrogations conducted at Guantanamo were videotaped, and that analysts prepared extensive notes.
Justice Scalia, the Department of Defense, and The Perpetuation of an Urban Legend: The Truth about Recidivism of Released Guantánamo Detainees (June 16, 2008) [12]
Profile of Released Guantánamo Detainees: The Government's Story Then and Now (August 4, 2008)
  • This report concludes that the release of captives has depended more on their nationality, than an assessment as to whether they represented a security risk. [13] [14]
Released Guantánamo Detainees and the Department of Defense: Propaganda by the Numbers? (January 15, 2009)
  • This report challenges the assertions of Department of Defense spokesmen that an increasing number of former Guantanamo captives have "returned to supporting terrorism". [15]
Torture: Who Knew -- An Analysis of the FBI and Department of Defense Reactions to Harsh Interrogation Methods at Guantánamo (April 1, 2009)
  • Citing FBI accounts, this report concludes that the various generals assigned to investigate reports of torture at Guantanamo failed to read observations filed by FBI agents about interrogations. [16] [17]
Death in Camp Delta (November 2000)
  • This report analyzes the heavily redacted NCIS report published in August 2008 about the investigation of deaths of three detainees on June 10, 2006, which DOD had said were suicides. [18] [19]

Detainees' profile

The Report on Guantanamo Detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees through Analysis of Department of Defense Data February 8, 2006, also known as the Denbeaux study (2006), was the first study on Guantanamo prepared under the supervision of Professor Mark Denbeaux of Seton Hall University, the director of its Center for Policy and Research. [20] Denbeaux and his son Joshua Denbeaux, an attorney for two Guantánamo detainees, oversaw a statistical analysis by law students of the unclassified information available from the Department of Defense about the Guantánamo Bay detainees. The study was published by Seton Hall University's Center for Policy and Research.

The students analyzed:

  1. Where the documents said the detainees were captured.
  2. Who the documents said captured the detainees.
  3. The relationship the documents alleged existed between the detainee and al Qaeda.
  4. The relationship the documents alleged existed between the detainee and the Taliban.

Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice opined: [21]

Already, however, we now know much more about how "dangerous" they really are because of a stunning, heavily documented investigation by the Seton Hall (New Jersey) School of Law. Titled "Report on Guantánamo Detainees," it profiles 517 of the prisoners at Gitmo entirely based on "analysis of Department of Defense data.

An editorial by the BBC's John Simpson summarized the study: [22]

Flyer reads: "You can receive millions of dollars for helping the Anti-Taliban Force catch Al-Qaeda and Taliban murderers." Taliban bounty 3.jpg
Flyer reads: "You can receive millions of dollars for helping the Anti-Taliban Force catch Al-Qaeda and Taliban murderers."

The study reveals that the 92% of the detainees who were not alleged to be al-Qaeda fighters were alleged to be either al-Qaeda or Taliban members, or members of affiliated hostile groups. Of these "other affiliated groups," a second Center report notes that some of the groups are not included in the government's published lists of terrorist organizations. [23]

The cited primary sources in the study did not include data on actual bounties. One example of a bounty was given in the references: that of Salim Hamdan, who was known to have worked directly for Osama bin Laden. The reference comes from an article in the New York Times Magazine . [24]

The study says:

In a handful of cases the detainee's possession of a Casio watch or the wearing olive-drab clothing is cited as evidence that the detainee is an enemy combatant. No basis is given to explain why such evidence makes the detainee an enemy combatant.

[25]

Several international news sources noticed this use of the possession of a model of watch as evidence against detainees at Guantanamo Bay [26] with detainees "shocked" that wearing a cheap popular watch sold worldwide could be used against them when "millions and millions of people have these types of Casio watches". [27] Abdulla Kamel al Kandari told his tribunal he had no idea that the watch was associated with terrorism, [28] that the four Muslim chaplains at Guantanamo all wore this model of watch [29] and described the features of his watch that signal the call to prayers to a devout Muslim. [30] Salih Uyar told his tribunal: "If it's a crime to carry this watch? Your own military personnel also carry this watch, too. Does that mean that they're just terrorists as well?" [31] [32] [33] Other detainees described how its compass was used to face Mecca, [34] and being waterproof it endured ritual wash up before prayer. [27]

The lead authors are the legal representatives of two Guantánamo Bay detainees: Rafiq Bin Bashir Bin Jalud Al Hami and Mohammed Abdul Rahman [2]

Major Michael Shavers, a Pentagon spokesman, called the 2006 study about the detainees "flawed because its authors didn't have access to classified evidence." [35]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Bumgarner</span> US Army officer (born 1959)

Colonel Michael Bumgarner has been a career officer in the military police of the United States Army. He is most noted for having been the commander of the Joint Detention Group, the guard force component of Joint Task Force Guantanamo, from April 2005 through June 2006, at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp. During this period there was a widespread hunger strike in 2005, which he helped end. On June 10, 2006, three detainees were found dead, in what the United States Department of Defense announced as suicides. Bumgarner had other assignments after Guantanamo and retired from the military in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Faiz Mohammed Ahmed Al Kandari</span> Kuwaiti citizen (born 1975)

Faiz Mohammed Ahmed Al Kandari is a Kuwaiti citizen who was held in extrajudicial detention in the United States' Guantanamo Bay detainment camp in Cuba, from 2002 to 2016. He has never been charged with war crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohamed Atiq Awayd Al Harbi</span> Saudi Arabian Guantanamo detainee

Mohamed Atiq Awayd Al Harbi is a citizen of Saudi Arabia formerly held in extrajudicial detention in the United States's Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba. His Guantanamo Internee Security Number was 333. The US Department of Defense reports that he was born on July 13, 1973, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abdallah Saleh Ali Al Ajmi was a Kuwaiti citizen, who was held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba. His Guantanamo Internment Serial Number was 220. Joint Task Force Guantanamo counter-terrorism analysts reports indicated that he was born on 2 August 1978, in Almadi, Kuwait.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi</span> Yemeni detainee in Guantanamo Bay

Ali Ahmad Muhammad Al Rahizi is a citizen of Yemen who was held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba. His Guantanamo Internment Serial Number is 45. Joint Task Force Guantanamo counter-terrorism analysts reports he was born on October 13, 1979, in Taiz, Yemen.

The United States Department of Defense (DOD) had stopped reporting Guantanamo suicide attempts in 2002. In mid-2002 the DoD changed the way they classified suicide attempts, and enumerated them under other acts of "self-injurious behavior".

Mani Shaman Turki al-Habardi Al-Utaybi (1976 – June 10, 2006) was a citizen of Saudi Arabia, who was arrested in 2001 in Pakistan and held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba from early 2002. Al-Utaybi died in custody on June 10, 2006. The Department of Defense reported his death and those of two other detainees the same day as suicides.

Ali Abdullah Ahmed, also known as Salah Ahmed al-Salami, was a citizen of Yemen who died whilst being held as an enemy combatant in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba. His Guantanamo Internment Serial Number was 693. Joint Task Force Guantanamo counter-terror analysts estimated he was born in 1977, in Ibb, Yemen.

No Longer Enemy Combatant (NLEC) is a term used by the U.S. military for a group of 38 Guantanamo detainees whose Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) determined they were not "enemy combatants". None of them were released right away. Ten of them were allowed to move to the more comfortable Camp Iguana. Others, such as Sami Al Laithi, remained in solitary confinement.

Mark P. Denbeaux is an American attorney, professor, and author. He is a law professor at Seton Hall University School of Law in Newark, New Jersey and the Director of its Center for Policy and Research.

Baher Azmy is an American lawyer and professor of law at Seton Hall University, specializing in constitutional law.

No-Hearing Hearings (2006) is the title of a study published by Professor Mark P. Denbeaux of the Center for Policy and Research at Seton Hall University School of Law, his son Joshua Denbeaux, and prepared under his supervision by research fellows at the center. It was released on October 17, 2006. It is one of a series of studies on the Guantanamo Bay detention center, the detainees, and government operations that the Center for Policy and Research has prepared based on Department of Defense data.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lists of former Guantanamo Bay detainees alleged to have returned to terrorism</span>

Semiannually, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) publishes an unclassified "Summary of the Reengagement of Detainees Formerly Held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba". According to ODNI's most recent Reengagement Report, since 2009, when current rules and processes governing transfer of detainees out of Guantanamo were put in place, ODNI assess that 5.1% of detainees – 10 men total, 2 of whom are deceased – are more likely than not to have reengaged in terrorist activities.

Harakat-e-Mulavi is a militia group that resisted the Soviet Union during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.

<i>Does 1-570 v. Bush</i>

Does 1-570 v. Bush, No. 1:05-cv-00313, is a combined writ of habeas corpus submitted on behalf of detainees held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.

The Center for Policy and Research at Seton Hall University School of Law is a research organization that analyzes national policies and practices. Law students, participating in the Center as Research Fellows, work to identify factual patterns and inconsistencies in areas that help shape the law and public policy.

Daniel Mann is a lawyer in Newark, New Jersey and a fellow of the Seton Hall Center for Policy and Research at Seton Hall University School of Law. He also gained public exposure beyond the legal and academic communities with his co-authorship of "Report on Guantanamo Detainees, A Profile of 517 Detainees through Analysis of Department of Defense Data," co-authored with Professor Mark Denbeaux, son, Joshua Denbeaux, and four credited co-authors, commonly referred to as the "Denbeaux Study." Additional Guantanamo studies were to follow, including:

Guantanamo Bay homicide accusations were made regarding the deaths of three prisoners on June 10, 2006, at the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camp for enemy combatants at its naval base in Cuba. Two of the men had been cleared by the military for release. The United States Department of Defense (DOD) claimed their deaths at the time as suicides, although their families and the Saudi government argued against the findings, and numerous journalists have raised questions then and since. The DOD undertook an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, published in redacted form in 2008.

al-Qaeda safe house

Al-Qaeda is understood to have operated a number of safe houses, some of which were used as training centres.

References

  1. "Center for Policy & Research: Guantánamo Reports". Seton Hall University. Archived from the original on March 27, 2009. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
  2. 1 2 "TD Blog Interview with Joshua Denbeaux". The Talking Dog. April 5, 2006. Archived from the original on June 14, 2008. Retrieved September 1, 2008.
  3. 1 2 Mark Denbeaux; et al. (February 8, 2006). "Report on Guantanamo Detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees through Analysis of Department of Defense Data" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2007. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  4. 1 2 3 Mark Denbeaux; et al. (March 20, 2006). "Second Report on the Guantanamo Detainees: Inter- and Intra-Departmental Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  5. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (July 10, 2006). "The Guantanamo Detainees During Detention Data from Department of Defense Records" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 4, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  6. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (August 21, 2006). "June 10th Suicides at Guantanamo" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 9, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  7. 1 2 3 Mark Denbeaux; et al. (November 17, 2006). "No-Hearing Hearings" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 7, 2009. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  8. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (April 26, 2007). "The 14 Myths of Guantánamo: Senate Armed Services Committee Statement of Mark P. Denbeaux. Professor Mark P. Denbeaux testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2008.
  9. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (November 17, 2006). "The Empty Battlefield and the Thirteenth Criterion" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 28, 2008.
  10. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (December 10, 2007). "The Meaning of "Battlefield": An Analysis of the Government's Representations of 'Battlefield Capture' and 'Recidivism' of the Guantánamo Detainees" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 21, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  11. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (February 7, 2008). "Captured on Tape: Interrogation and Videotaping of Detainees in Guantánamo" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 4, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  12. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (June 16, 2008). "Justice Scalia, the Department of Defense, and The Perpetuation of an Urban Legend: The Truth about Recidivism of Released Guantánamo Detainees" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 9, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  13. Mark Denbeaux (August 4, 2008). "Profile of Released Guantánamo Detaines: The Government's Story Then and Now -- Cover Statement" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 9, 2008. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
  14. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (August 4, 2008). "Profile of Released Guantánamo Detainees: The Government's Story Then and Now" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 9, 2008. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
  15. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (January 15, 2009). "Released Guantánamo Detainees and the Department of Defense: Propaganda by the Numbers?" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
  16. "Seton Hall Law Students Reveal that Generals Knew Guantanamo Detainees Were Tortured". Seton Hall University. April 1, 2009. Archived from the original on April 8, 2009. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
  17. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (April 1, 2009). "Torture: Who Knew -- An Analysis of the FBI and Department of Defense Reactions to Harsh Interrogation Methods at Guantánamo" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 11, 2009. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
  18. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  19. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on January 22, 2019. Retrieved February 10, 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  20. Mark Denbeaux; et al. (February 8, 2006). "Report on Guantanamo detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees" (PDF). Seton Hall University. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2007. Retrieved February 1, 2008.
  21. Hentoff, Nat, " The Worst of the Worst? A report, based entirely on Defense Department documents, exposes the truth about Guantánamo" Archived 2008-10-10 at the Wayback Machine , Village Voice , March 3, 2006
  22. "No surprises in the war on terror" Archived 2006-06-16 at the Wayback Machine , BBC , February 13, 2006
  23. Mark Denbeaux, Joshua Denbeaux (March 20, 2006). "Second report on the Guantanamo detainees: Inter- and Intra-Departmental Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy" (PDF). Seton Hall University School of Law. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 19, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  24. Jonathan Mahler (January 8, 2006). "The Bush Administration vs. Salim Hamdan". New York Times Magazine . Archived from the original on April 13, 2016. Retrieved January 22, 2019.
  25. REPORT ON GUANTANAMO DETAINEES A Profile of 517 Detainees February 8, 2006 Mark Denbeaux, Joshua Denbeaux; et al. (February 8, 2006). "Report on Guantanamo detainees: A Profile of 517 detainees" (PDF). Seton Hall University School of Law. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2007. Retrieved July 29, 2008.
  26. Incoherencies, Eponymies: Proofs of Accusations Often Skimpy [ permanent dead link ], Le Monde , 13 March 2006
  27. 1 2 Fox, Ben (March 9, 2006). "Common Casio watch becomes evidence at Guantanamo". kgw.com. Washington. Associated Press. Archived from the original on March 11, 2007.
  28. Sketches of Guantanamo detainees-Part II, Boston Globe , 15 March 2006
  29. Voices Baffled, Brash and Irate in Guantánamo, New York Times , 6 March 2006
  30. Guantanamo detainee accused of having digital watch Archived 2012-03-28 at the Wayback Machine , Dawn (newspaper) , 8 March 2006
  31. Details of some Guantanamo hearings Archived 2016-03-24 at the Wayback Machine , Center for International Policy , March 5, 2006
  32. Detainees' cases show another side of Gitmo Archived 2011-06-29 at the Wayback Machine , USA Today , 3 November 2004
  33. Details from the Guantanamo Transcripts Archived 2017-02-21 at the Wayback Machine , NPR
  34. US releases more Guantanamo files Archived 2016-08-07 at the Wayback Machine , BBC , 4 April 2006
  35. "The Shame of Guantanamo" Archived November 18, 2008, at the Wayback Machine , Washington Post Writers Group , February 21, 2006