Six forces model

Last updated October 30, 2024

The six forces model is an analysis model used to give a holistic assessment of any given industry and identify the structural underlining drivers of profitability and competition.^[1]^[2] The model is an extension of the Porter's five forces model proposed by Michael Porter in his 1979 article published in the Harvard Business Review "How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy". The sixth force was proposed in the mid-1990s.^[3] The model provides a framework of six key forces that should be considered when defining corporate strategy to determine the overall attractiveness of an industry.

Competition – assessment of the direct competitors in a given market
New Entrants – assessment in the potential competitors and barriers to entry in a given market
End Users/ Buyers – assessment regarding the bargaining power of buyers that includes considering the cost of switching
Suppliers – assessment regarding the bargaining power of suppliers
Substitutes – assessment regarding the availability of alternatives
Complementary Products – assessment of the impact of related products and services within a given market

Although there are a number of factors that can impact profitability in the short term – weather, the business cycle – an assessment of the competitive forces in a given market provides a framework for anticipating and influencing competitiveness and profitability in the medium and long term.^[4]^[5]

The Six Forces Model expands the Five Forces Model based on market changes. It adapts well to the technological business world. It can analyse whether the company can enter the market complementary to other products or services and act as a long-term substitute for a particular product or service.^[6]

History

The model is an extension of Porter's five forces model (1979). The extended model including the sixth force, complementary products, and was proposed in the 1990s.^[3]

Six forces

Competition

There are several dimensions that rivals within an industry can compete on – price discounting (cost leadership strategy), introduction of new services/ products (innovation strategy), improvement of service quality (customer-orientation strategy) etc. High competition between rivals can stifle an industry's profitability.

Intensity of competition is highest if:

Competitors are equal in size and power as poaching business is hard to avoid
Industry growth is slow. This causes competing organisations to fight for market share
Exit barriers are high (e.g. highly specialised assets and management devotion). This can cause companies making low or negative returns to stay in the market leading to excess capacity meaning that healthy competitors' profitability will suffer.
Competitors are competing on price. Price competition is particularly destructive to profitability as it is easy to identify price competition meaning other competitors can retaliate. This can lead to a vicious cycle of price reductions, reducing profitability and training customers to overlook service/product quality in favour of the cheapest option available to them

While non-price based competition can sometimes escalate to a level at which it starts to undermine industry profitability, it is less likely to happen than price rivalry and can also be valuable to a given industry. Competing in areas such as product features, customer support, delivery time, and brand image isn't likely to be as damaging to profits because it will increase customer value in the product or service and may help establish customer loyalty. This in turn can improve industry profitability through increasing value relative to substitutes and raising the barriers of entry for new potential competitors.^[4]^[5]^[7]

New entrants

New entrants put pressure on current organisations within an industry through their desire to gain market share. This in turn puts pressure on prices, costs and the rate of investment needed to sustain a business within the industry. The threat of new entrants is particularly intense if they are diversifying from another market as they can leverage existing expertise, cash flow and brand identity as it puts a strain on existing companies profitability.

Barriers to entry restrict the threat of new entrants. If the barriers are high, the threat of new entrants is reduced and conversely if the barriers are low, the risk of new companies venturing into a given market is high. Barriers to entry are advantages that existing, established companies have over new entrants.^[4]^[5]^[7]

According to Porter, there are 7 major barriers:^[4]

Supply-side economies of scale – spreading the fixed costs over a larger volume of units thus reducing the cost per unit. This can discourage new entrant because they either have to start trading at a smaller volume of unit and accept a price disadvantage over larger companies or risk coming into the market on a large scale in an attempt to displace the existing market leader.
Demand-side economies of scale – this occurs when a buyers willingness to purchase a particular product or service increases with other people's willingness to purchase it. Also known as network effect, people tend to value being in a 'network' with a larger number of people who use the same company.
Capital requirements – the amount of capital needed to start up within an industry can be a deterrent to new entrants as they will have to self-fund the venture or convince investors that their business model is good enough for an investment.
Incumbency advantages independent of size – No matter the size of an existing business within an industry they always tend to have certain advantages over new entrants. They are more established so will tend to have better access to raw materials, established connections with suppliers, brand identity, cumulative experience about best working practices etc.
Unequal access to distribution channels – if there are a limited number of distribution channels for a certain product/ service new entrants may struggle to find a retail or wholesale channel to sell through as existing competitors will have a claim on them.
Restrictive government policies – policies set out by the government can help or hinder new entrants. Through licensing requirements and restriction on foreign investment the government can regulate industries aiding or preventing new entrant from gain access to a particular market.^[4]^[7]

End users/buyers

Powerful customers can play different companies off against each other in order to drive price down or demand a high quality of service. Bargaining power is high in a customer group if:

Limited number of buyers/one buyer who buys in a large volume – large volume buyers tend to be powerful because they bring a lot of revenue into the company
Products are not unique – if customers feel that they can get the same product elsewhere they have high bargaining power and will tend to play one vendor off against the other
Switching costs are low – if customers do not lose anything by switching, they are more likely to switch between vendors^[4]^[5]^[7]

Suppliers

Powerful suppliers (e.g. labour suppliers) can influence profitability of an industry though charging higher prices, limiting service quality or by shifting costs to the industry participants. A supplier group is powerful if:

It is more concentrated than the industry it is selling to
It doesn't heavily rely on the industry to gain revenue
Switching costs are high for the industry members
Suppliers produce unique products that have no substitutes
Can legitimately threaten forward integration – if the industry itself is making a higher amount of money in relation to the supplier, it may provoke them to enter the market. This limits the profitability of an industry as there is not only the threat of a new entrant, there is also the threat of losing the supplier.^[4]^[5]^[7]

Substitutes

A substitute good can be described as a good that can be used in place of another, to fulfil the same need or want.^[8] There are 3 main factors that determine the degree of substitutability of any two given products:^[9]

The purpose of the product
The occasion for using the product
The geographical area

The purpose of the products refers to how consumers use the product to satisfy their wants or needs. Products that are close substitutes will fulfil the same or a similar function. As an example, a clothesline and a clothes dryer machine have almost identical purpose

The occasion of the product refers to when, where and how it is used. Products that are used in similar occasions will have a higher degree of substitutability. As an example, orange juice and coffee can be used for the same occasion (i.e. breakfast).

Geographic area refers to the availability of the two products in a given region. Products that are sold in different areas will have a lower degree of substitution, due to the additional costs associated with transporting or travelling to purchase the goods.^[9]

Substitute products or services can limit an industries profitability by putting a cap on prices. If an industry fails to differentiate from substitutes through one of the 3 above factors, substitutes will threaten profitability.^[4]

Factors influencing the threat of substitutes include:

Switching costs – if customers do not lose anything by switching then the threat of substitution increases
Price-performance trade off – if the substitute offers an attractive trade off between price and performance in relation to the industry product. The better the relative value of the substitute the stronger the negative impact it will have on profitability ^[4]^[7]
Buyers propensity to substitute – how willing the consumer is to use a substitute. Can incorporate both intangible and tangible factors such as brand loyalty and contractual agreements
Perceived level of product differentiation - how unique the product or service is
Ease of substitution
Availability of close substitutes^[10]

When the threat of substitutes is high, industry profitability suffers.^[5]^[7]

Complementary products

This force was the sixth force, added in the revised 1990s model. It refers to products or services that are compatible with what a particular industry sells. The effect of complementary goods on an industry's profitability generally depends on how reliant the product or service is on the compatible product. If one cannot function without the other, the impact is high. The impact of complementary products can be good or bad for industry profitability. If the complementary good is doing well within its industry this can have a positive effect on the profitability of a given company. Adversely, if performance is bad or prices rise within the complementary product's market it can negatively impact upon the level of profit that the industry can obtain. For example, when petrol costs rise the public transport industry may suffer reduced profits or be forced increase prices which may cause customers to look for alternatives, e.g. walking and car sharing, again reducing overall profitability of an industry.^[11]^[12]

Examples of complementary products - The Sixth Forces

A complementary product is a segment added to the six forces model compared to the five forces model. Two products are complementary when one product or service provides a complementary function. They usually serve the user simultaneously, so they exist as the sixth force of Porter's model.

Examples include tourism & aviation,^[13] hot dogs & hot dog buns,^[13] and iPhone cases & iPhones.

Tourism & aviation are often tied together - travel to destinations by air and spending money, thus stimulating tourism.^[13]

Hot dogs & hot dog buns - are not usually purchased separately but are sold as a bundle and come in the form of a hot dog sandwiched between a bun.^[13]

iPhone cases & iPhones – often, people buy cases to protect their phones from accidental damage after they have purchased them, and if the iPhone declines, so does the iPhone case industry.

Comparison of the six forces model and Porter's five forces model

	Six Forces Model	Porter's Five Forces Model
Force one	New entrants	Threat of new entrants
Force two	Substitutes	Threat of substitutes
Force three	End user/buyers	Bargaining power of customers
Force four	Suppliers	Bargaining power of suppliers
Force five	Competition	Competitive rivalry
Force six	Complementary products

The relationship between the actors in the Six Forces model is no longer abstractly competitive, as in the five forces model, but emphasizes an investment relationship or supply and demand relationship between the actors for common development. Therefore, the six forces model emphasises the cooperation between the various actors to achieve common development. It is, therefore, not a strategy of mutual suppression but a multi-win strategy that focuses on long-term benefits.^[14]

Usage

The model is used to identify a firm's strategic position through looking holistically at the forces that effect the industry. It is a framework that helps companies identify threats and evaluate the best strategy to move forward with to increase profitability and competitiveness.^[4]^[7]

Criticisms

The addition of the 6th force, complementary products, has been contentious. Michael Porter, the originator of the five forces analysis has suggested that complementary products are not an additional force that determine the competitive intensity or profitability of an industry, but rather can be seen as a factor that influences the other five forces.^[4] In addition, the revised framework has been challenged by academics and strategists such as Kevin P. Coyne and Somu Subramaniam who have stated that three dubious assumptions underlie the forces:

That buyers, competitors, and suppliers are unrelated and do not interact and collude
That the source of value is structural advantage (creating barriers to entry)
That uncertainty is low, allowing participants in a market to plan for and respond to competitive behaviour.

Other criticisms include:

It places too much weight on the macro-environment and doesn't assess more specific areas of the business that also impact competitiveness and profitability^[15]
It does not provide any actions to help deal with high or low force threats (e.g., what should management do if there is a high threat of substitution?)^[15]

Related Research Articles

A monopoly, as described by Irving Fisher, is a market with the "absence of competition", creating a situation where a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular thing. This contrasts with a monopsony which relates to a single entity's control of a market to purchase a good or service, and with oligopoly and duopoly which consists of a few sellers dominating a market. Monopolies are thus characterised by a lack of economic competition to produce the good or service, a lack of viable substitute goods, and the possibility of a high monopoly price well above the seller's marginal cost that leads to a high monopoly profit. The verb monopolise or monopolize refers to the process by which a company gains the ability to raise prices or exclude competitors. In economics, a monopoly is a single seller. In law, a monopoly is a business entity that has significant market power, that is, the power to charge overly high prices, which is associated with unfair price raises. Although monopolies may be big businesses, size is not a characteristic of a monopoly. A small business may still have the power to raise prices in a small industry.

In microeconomics, management and international political economy, vertical integration, also referred to as vertical consolidation, is an arrangement in which the supply chain of a company is integrated and owned by that company. Usually each member of the supply chain produces a different product or (market-specific) service, and the products combine to satisfy a common need. It contrasts with horizontal integration, wherein a company produces several items that are related to one another. Vertical integration has also described management styles that bring large portions of the supply chain not only under a common ownership but also into one corporation.

In the field of management, strategic management involves the formulation and implementation of the major goals and initiatives taken by an organization's managers on behalf of stakeholders, based on consideration of resources and an assessment of the internal and external environments in which the organization operates. Strategic management provides overall direction to an enterprise and involves specifying the organization's objectives, developing policies and plans to achieve those objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the plans. Academics and practicing managers have developed numerous models and frameworks to assist in strategic decision-making in the context of complex environments and competitive dynamics. Strategic management is not static in nature; the models can include a feedback loop to monitor execution and to inform the next round of planning.

Pricing is the process whereby a business sets the price at which it will sell its products and services and may be part of the business's marketing plan. In setting prices, the business will take into account the price at which it could acquire the goods, the manufacturing cost, the marketplace, competition, market condition, brand, and quality of the product.

Marketing management is the strategic organizational discipline that focuses on the practical application of marketing orientation, techniques and methods inside enterprises and organizations and on the management of marketing resources and activities. Compare marketology, which Aghazadeh defines in terms of "recognizing, generating and disseminating market insight to ensure better market-related decisions".

Competitive analysis in marketing and strategic management is an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of current and potential competitors. This analysis provides both an offensive and defensive strategic context to identify opportunities and threats. Profiling combines all of the relevant sources of competitor analysis into one framework in the support of efficient and effective strategy formulation, implementation, monitoring and adjustment.

Porter's Five Forces Framework is a method of analysing the competitive environment of a business. It draws from industrial organization (IO) economics to derive five forces that determine the competitive intensity and, therefore, the attractiveness of an industry in terms of its profitability. An "unattractive" industry is one in which the effect of these five forces reduces overall profitability. The most unattractive industry would be one approaching "pure competition", in which available profits for all firms are driven to normal profit levels. The five-forces perspective is associated with its originator, Michael E. Porter of Harvard University. This framework was first published in Harvard Business Review in 1979.

Porter's generic strategies describe how a company pursues competitive advantage across its chosen market scope. There are three/four generic strategies, either lower cost, differentiated, or focus. A company chooses to pursue one of two types of competitive advantage, either via lower costs than its competition or by differentiating itself along dimensions valued by customers to command a higher price. A company also chooses one of two types of scope, either focus or industry-wide, offering its product across many market segments. The generic strategy reflects the choices made regarding both the type of competitive advantage and the scope. The concept was described by Michael Porter in 1980.

Anti-competitive practices are business or government practices that prevent or reduce competition in a market. Antitrust laws ensure businesses do not engage in competitive practices that harm other, usually smaller, businesses or consumers. These laws are formed to promote healthy competition within a free market by limiting the abuse of monopoly power. Competition allows companies to compete in order for products and services to improve; promote innovation; and provide more choices for consumers. In order to obtain greater profits, some large enterprises take advantage of market power to hinder survival of new entrants. Anti-competitive behavior can undermine the efficiency and fairness of the market, leaving consumers with little choice to obtain a reasonable quality of service.

In theories of competition in economics, a barrier to entry, or an economic barrier to entry, is a fixed cost that must be incurred by a new entrant, regardless of production or sales activities, into a market that incumbents do not have or have not had to incur. Because barriers to entry protect incumbent firms and restrict competition in a market, they can contribute to distortionary prices and are therefore most important when discussing antitrust policy. Barriers to entry often cause or aid the existence of monopolies and oligopolies, or give companies market power. Barriers of entry also have an importance in industries. First of all it is important to identify that some exist naturally, such as brand loyalty. Governments can also create barriers to entry to meet consumer protection laws, protecting the public. In other cases it can also be due to inherent scarcity of public resources needed to enter a market.

In microeconomics, substitute goods are two goods that can be used for the same purpose by consumers. That is, a consumer perceives both goods as similar or comparable, so that having more of one good causes the consumer to desire less of the other good. Contrary to complementary goods and independent goods, substitute goods may replace each other in use due to changing economic conditions. An example of substitute goods is Coca-Cola and Pepsi; the interchangeable aspect of these goods is due to the similarity of the purpose they serve, i.e. fulfilling customers' desire for a soft drink. These types of substitutes can be referred to as close substitutes.

In strategic management, situation analysis refers to a collection of methods that managers use to analyze an organization's internal and external environment to understand the organization's capabilities, customers, and business environment. The situation analysis can include several methods of analysis such as the 5C analysis, SWOT analysis and Porter's five forces analysis.

In Economics and Law, exclusive dealing arises when a supplier entails the buyer by placing limitations on the rights of the buyer to choose what, who and where they deal. This is against the law in most countries which include the USA, Australia and Europe when it has a significant impact of substantially lessening the competition in an industry. When the sales outlets are owned by the supplier, exclusive dealing is because of vertical integration, where the outlets are independent exclusive dealing is illegal due to the Restrictive Trade Practices Act, however, if it is registered and approved it is allowed. While primarily those agreements imposed by sellers are concerned with the comprehensive literature on exclusive dealing, some exclusive dealing arrangements are imposed by buyers instead of sellers.

Market structure, in economics, depicts how firms are differentiated and categorised based on the types of goods they sell (homogeneous/heterogeneous) and how their operations are affected by external factors and elements. Market structure makes it easier to understand the characteristics of diverse markets.

A business can use a variety of pricing strategies when selling a product or service. To determine the most effective pricing strategy for a company, senior executives need to first identify the company's pricing position, pricing segment, pricing capability and their competitive pricing reaction strategy. Pricing strategies and tactics vary from company to company, and also differ across countries, cultures, industries and over time, with the maturing of industries and markets and changes in wider economic conditions.

Context analysis is a method to analyze the environment in which a business operates. Environmental scanning mainly focuses on the macro environment of a business. But context analysis considers the entire environment of a business, its internal and external environment. This is an important aspect of business planning. One kind of context analysis, called SWOT analysis, allows the business to gain an insight into their strengths and weaknesses and also the opportunities and threats posed by the market within which they operate. The main goal of a context analysis, SWOT or otherwise, is to analyze the environment in order to develop a strategic plan of action for the business.

Market dominance is the control of a economic market by a firm. A dominant firm possesses the power to affect competition and influence market price. A firms' dominance is a measure of the power of a brand, product, service, or firm, relative to competitive offerings, whereby a dominant firm can behave independent of their competitors or consumers, and without concern for resource allocation. Dominant positioning is both a legal concept and an economic concept and the distinction between the two is important when determining whether a firm's market position is dominant.

Aftermarket in economic literature refers to a secondary market for the goods and services that are complementary or related to the primary market goods, also known as original equipment). In many industries, the primary market consists of durable goods, whereas the aftermarket consists of consumable or non-durable products or services.

Hypercompetition, a term first coined in business strategy by Richard D’Aveni, describes a dynamic competitive world in which no action or advantage can be sustained for long. Hypercompetition is a key feature of the new global digital economy. Not only is there more competition, there is also tougher and smarter competition. It is a state in which the rate of change in the competitive rules of the game are in such flux that only the most adaptive, fleet, and nimble organizations will survive. Hypercompetitive markets are also characterized by a “quick-strike mentality” to disrupt, neutralize, or moot the competitive advantage of market leaders and important rivals.

Product development in the context of textiles means developing and manufacturing new products that meet the requirements of serviceability as per user and target market while taking care of timelines, sell-ability, and profitability. It could be a new product altogether or an improvement or modification to an existing company's or a competitor's product. Product development involves many experts with specialist skills, from identifying product attributes to knowing how to make the product to fulfil consumer expectations.

References

↑ "Tom Stewart interviewing Michael Porter". YouTube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-13. Retrieved 12 October 2014.
↑ "Corporate Strategy - Porter's Five Forces Model". Cleverism. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
1 2 "Six Forces Model Definition". Investopedia. Retrieved 10 October 2014.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Forces that Shape Strategy". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 12 October 2014.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Riley, Jim. "Porter's Five Forces Model". tutor2u. Retrieved 12 October 2014.
↑ Cuofano, Gennaro (2023-01-26). "Six Forces Model And Why It Matters In Business". FourWeekMBA. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rainer, R.Kelly; Cegielski, Casey.G (20 April 2012). Introduction to Information Systems (4th Edition International Student Version ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 48–50. ISBN 978-1118092309.
↑ Nicholson, Walter; Christopher Snyder (2008). Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions (10th ed.). Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western. ISBN 978-0-324-58507-0. OCLC 173377241.
1 2 David Besanko; David Dranove; Mark Shanley; Scott Schaefer (2013). Economics of strategy (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-27363-0. OCLC 712124604.
↑ Porter, Michael E. (1989), "How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy", Readings in Strategic Management, London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 133–143, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_10, ISBN 978-0-333-51809-0 , retrieved 2022-05-02
↑ Kassera, Nicky. "Six Forces Critique". Scribd. Retrieved 12 October 2014.
↑ Grant, Robert M. (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis and cases: text & cases (7th ed.). John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0470747094.
1 2 3 4 "Complementors (Sixth Force of Porter's Five Forces) - The Strategic CFO". strategiccfo.com/. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
↑ "六力互动模型 - MBA智库百科". wiki.mbalib.com. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
1 2 Grundy, Tom. "Rethinking and Reinventing Porter's Five Forces Model" (PDF). Wiley InterScience. Retrieved 15 October 2014.

Andrew S. Grove, Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Point That Challenge Every Company and Career, 1996
Nalebuff and Brandenburger, Co-opetition , 1997
McAfee, R. Preston, Competitive Solutions, Princeton University Press, 2002

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Michael_Porter_Interview-1] "Tom Stewart interviewing Michael Porter". YouTube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-13. Retrieved 12 October 2014.

[Corporate_Strategy-2] "Corporate Strategy - Porter's Five Forces Model". Cleverism. Retrieved 27 December 2015.

[Six_Forces_Model_Definition-3] 1 2 "Six Forces Model Definition". Investopedia. Retrieved 10 October 2014.

[HBR_Article-4] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Forces that Shape Strategy". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 12 October 2014.

[tutortwou_Porter's_Forces_Model-5] 1 2 3 4 5 6 Riley, Jim. "Porter's Five Forces Model". tutor2u. Retrieved 12 October 2014.

[6] Cuofano, Gennaro (2023-01-26). "Six Forces Model And Why It Matters In Business". FourWeekMBA. Retrieved 2023-04-23.

[Introduction_to_Information_Systems-7] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rainer, R.Kelly; Cegielski, Casey.G (20 April 2012). Introduction to Information Systems (4th Edition International Student Version ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 48–50. ISBN 978-1118092309.

[8] Nicholson, Walter; Christopher Snyder (2008). Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions (10th ed.). Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western. ISBN 978-0-324-58507-0. OCLC 173377241.

[:0-9] 1 2 David Besanko; David Dranove; Mark Shanley; Scott Schaefer (2013). Economics of strategy (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-27363-0. OCLC 712124604.

[10] Porter, Michael E. (1989), "How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy", Readings in Strategic Management, London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 133–143, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_10, ISBN 978-0-333-51809-0 , retrieved 2022-05-02

[Six_Forces_Critque-11] Kassera, Nicky. "Six Forces Critique". Scribd. Retrieved 12 October 2014.

[Contemporary_Stategy_Analysis_and_Cases-12] Grant, Robert M. (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis and cases: text & cases (7th ed.). John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0470747094.

[:1-13] 1 2 3 4 "Complementors (Sixth Force of Porter's Five Forces) - The Strategic CFO". strategiccfo.com/. Retrieved 2023-04-23.

[14] "六力互动模型 - MBA智库百科". wiki.mbalib.com. Retrieved 2023-04-23.

[Reinventing_Porter's_Five_Forces-15] 1 2 Grundy, Tom. "Rethinking and Reinventing Porter's Five Forces Model" (PDF). Wiley InterScience. Retrieved 15 October 2014.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]