Slater-type orbital

Last updated December 12, 2022

Slater-type orbitals (STOs) are functions used as atomic orbitals in the linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method. They are named after the physicist John C. Slater, who introduced them in 1930.^[1]

They possess exponential decay at long range and Kato's cusp condition at short range (when combined as hydrogen-like atom functions, i.e. the analytical solutions of the stationary Schrödinger equation for one electron atoms). Unlike the hydrogen-like ("hydrogenic") Schrödinger orbitals, STOs have no radial nodes (neither do Gaussian-type orbitals).

Definition

STOs have the following radial part:

R(r)=Nr^{n-1}e^{-\zeta r}\,

where

$n$ is a natural number that plays the role of principal quantum number, $n$ = 1,2,...,
$N$ is a normalizing constant,
$r$ is the distance of the electron from the atomic nucleus, and
$\zeta$ is a constant related to the effective charge of the nucleus, the nuclear charge being partly shielded by electrons. Historically, the effective nuclear charge was estimated by Slater's rules.

The normalization constant is computed from the integral

\int _{0}^{\infty }x^{n}e^{-\alpha x}\,\mathrm {d} x={\frac {n!}{~\alpha ^{n+1}\,}}~.

Hence

N^{2}\int _{0}^{\infty }\left(r^{n-1}e^{-\zeta r}\right)^{2}r^{2}\,\mathrm {d} r=1\Longrightarrow N=(2\zeta )^{n}{\sqrt {\frac {2\zeta }{(2n)!}}}~.

It is common to use the spherical harmonics $Y_{l}^{m}(\mathbf {r} )$ depending on the polar coordinates of the position vector $\mathbf {r}$ as the angular part of the Slater orbital.

Derivatives

The first radial derivative of the radial part of a Slater-type orbital is

{\partial R(r) \over \partial r}=\left[{\frac {(n-1)}{r}}-\zeta \right]R(r)

The radial Laplace operator is split in two differential operators

\nabla ^{2}={1 \over r^{2}}{\partial  \over \partial r}\left(r^{2}{\partial  \over \partial r}\right)

The first differential operator of the Laplace operator yields

\left(r^{2}{\partial  \over \partial r}\right)R(r)=\left[(n-1)r-\zeta r^{2}\right]R(r)

The total Laplace operator yields after applying the second differential operator

\nabla ^{2}R(r)=\left({1 \over r^{2}}{\partial  \over \partial r}\right)\left[(n-1)r-\zeta r^{2}\right]R(r)

the result

\nabla ^{2}R(r)=\left[{n(n-1) \over r^{2}}-{2n\zeta  \over r}+\zeta ^{2}\right]R(r)

Angular dependent derivatives of the spherical harmonics don't depend on the radial function and have to be evaluated separately.

Integrals

The fundamental mathematical properties are those associated with the kinetic energy, nuclear attraction and Coulomb repulsion integrals for placement of the orbital at the center of a single nucleus. Dropping the normalization factor $N$ , the representation of the orbitals below is

\chi _{n\ell m}({\mathbf {r} })=r^{n-1}~e^{-\zeta \,r}~Y_{\ell }^{m}({\mathbf {r} })~.

The Fourier transform is^[2]

{\begin{aligned}\chi _{n\ell m}({\mathbf {k} })&=\int e^{i{\mathbf {k} }\cdot {\mathbf {r} }}~\chi _{n\ell m}({\mathbf {r} })~\mathrm {d} ^{3}r\\&=4\pi ~(n-\ell )!~(2\zeta )^{n}~(ik/\zeta )^{\ell }~Y_{\ell }^{m}({\mathbf {k} })\sum _{s=0}^{\lfloor (n-\ell )/2\rfloor }{\frac {\omega _{s}^{n\ell }}{~(k^{2}+\zeta ^{2})^{n+1-s}}},\end{aligned}}

where the $\omega$ are defined by

\omega _{s}^{n\ell }\equiv \left(-{\frac {1}{4\zeta ^{2}}}\right)^{s}\,{\frac {(n-s)!}{~s!~(n-\ell -2s)!~}}.

The overlap integral is

\int \chi _{n\ell m}^{*}(r)~\chi _{n'\ell 'm'}(r)~\mathrm {d} ^{3}r=\delta _{\ell \ell '}\,\delta _{mm'}\,{\frac {(n+n')!}{~(\zeta +\zeta ')^{n+n'+1}}}

of which the normalization integral is a special case. The superscript star denotes complex-conjugation.

The kinetic energy integral is

{\begin{aligned}&\int \chi _{n\ell m}^{*}(r)~\left(-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\nabla ^{2}\right)\,\chi _{n'\ell 'm'}(r)~\mathrm {d} ^{3}r\\&={\frac {1}{2}}\delta _{\ell \ell '}\,\delta _{mm'}\,\int _{0}^{\infty }e^{-(\zeta +\zeta ')\,r}\left[[\ell '(\ell '+1)-n'(n'-1)]\,r^{n+n'-2}+2\zeta 'n'\,r^{n+n'-1}-\zeta '^{2}\,r^{n+n'}\right]~\mathrm {d} r~,\end{aligned}}

a sum over three overlap integrals already computed above.

The Coulomb repulsion integral can be evaluated using the Fourier representation (see above)

\chi _{n\ell m}^{*}({\mathbf {r} })=\int {\frac {~e^{i\mathbf {k} \cdot \mathbf {r} }~}{(2\pi )^{3}}}~\chi _{n\ell m}^{*}({\mathbf {k} })~\mathrm {d} ^{3}k

which yields

{\begin{aligned}\int \chi _{n\ell m}^{*}(\mathbf {r} ){\frac {1}{\left|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '\right|}}~\chi _{n'\ell 'm'}(\mathbf {r} ')~\mathrm {d} ^{3}r&=4\pi \int {\frac {1}{(2\pi )^{3}}}~\chi _{n\ell m}^{*}(\mathbf {k} )~{\frac {1}{k^{2}}}~\chi _{n'\ell 'm'}(\mathbf {k} )~\mathrm {d} ^{3}k\\&=8\,\delta _{\ell \ell '}\,\delta _{mm'}~(n-\ell )!~(n'-\ell )!~{\frac {\,(2\zeta )^{n}\,}{\zeta ^{\ell }}}{\frac {\,(2\zeta ')^{n'}\,}{\zeta '^{\ell }}}\int _{0}^{\infty }k^{2\ell }\left[\sum _{s=0}^{\lfloor (n-\ell )/2\rfloor }{\frac {\omega _{s}^{n\ell }}{(k^{2}+\zeta ^{2})^{n+1-s}}}\sum _{s'=0}^{\lfloor (n'-\ell )/2\rfloor }{\frac {\omega _{s'}^{n'\ell '}}{~~(k^{2}+\zeta '^{2})^{n'+1-s'}~}}\right]\mathrm {d} k\end{aligned}}

These are either individually calculated with the law of residues or recursively as proposed by Cruz et al. (1978).^[3]

STO software

Some quantum chemistry software uses sets of Slater-type functions (STF) analogous to Slater type orbitals, but with variable exponents chosen to minimize the total molecular energy (rather than by Slater's rules as above). The fact that products of two STOs on distinct atoms are more difficult to express than those of Gaussian functions (which give a displaced Gaussian) has led many to expand them in terms of Gaussians.^[4]

Analytical ab initio software for polyatomic molecules has been developed, e.g., STOP: a Slater Type Orbital Package in 1996.^[5]

SMILES uses analytical expressions when available and Gaussian expansions otherwise. It was first released in 2000.

Various grid integration schemes have been developed, sometimes after analytical work for quadrature (Scrocco), most famously in the ADF suite of DFT codes.

After the work of John Pople, Warren. J. Hehre and Robert F. Stewart, a least squares representation of the Slater atomic orbitals as a sum of Gaussian-type orbitals is used. In their 1969 paper, the fundamentals of this principle are discussed and then further improved and used in the GAUSSIAN DFT code. ^[6]

Related Research Articles

In quantum chemistry and molecular physics, the Born–Oppenheimer (BO) approximation is the best-known mathematical approximation in molecular dynamics. Specifically, it is the assumption that the wave functions of atomic nuclei and electrons in a molecule can be treated separately, based on the fact that the nuclei are much heavier than the electrons. Due to the larger relative mass of a nucleus compared to an electron, the coordinates of the nuclei in a system are approximated as fixed, while the coordinates of the electrons are dynamic. The approach is named after Max Born and J. Robert Oppenheimer who proposed it in 1927, in the early period of quantum mechanics.

In computational chemistry and molecular physics, Gaussian orbitals are functions used as atomic orbitals in the LCAO method for the representation of electron orbitals in molecules and numerous properties that depend on these.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hurwitz zeta function</span> Special function in mathematics

In mathematics, the Hurwitz zeta function is one of the many zeta functions. It is formally defined for complex variables $s$ with $Re(s) > 1$ and $a \neq 0, -1, -2, \dots$ by

In mathematics, in the area of number theory, a Gaussian period is a certain kind of sum of roots of unity. The periods permit explicit calculations in cyclotomic fields connected with Galois theory and with harmonic analysis. They are basic in the classical theory called cyclotomy. Closely related is the Gauss sum, a type of exponential sum which is a linear combination of periods.

In quantum mechanics, a Slater determinant is an expression that describes the wave function of a multi-fermionic system. It satisfies anti-symmetry requirements, and consequently the Pauli principle, by changing sign upon exchange of two electrons. Only a small subset of all possible fermionic wave functions can be written as a single Slater determinant, but those form an important and useful subset because of their simplicity.

In classical electromagnetism, polarization density is the vector field that expresses the density of permanent or induced electric dipole moments in a dielectric material. When a dielectric is placed in an external electric field, its molecules gain electric dipole moment and the dielectric is said to be polarized. The electric dipole moment induced per unit volume of the dielectric material is called the electric polarization of the dielectric.

In physics, a squeezed coherent state is a quantum state that is usually described by two non-commuting observables having continuous spectra of eigenvalues. Examples are position $and momentum of a particle, and the (dimension-less) electric field in the amplitude and in the mode of a light wave. The product of the standard deviations of two such operators obeys the uncertainty principle:$

In quantum physics, the spin–orbit interaction is a relativistic interaction of a particle's spin with its motion inside a potential. A key example of this phenomenon is the spin–orbit interaction leading to shifts in an electron's atomic energy levels, due to electromagnetic interaction between the electron's magnetic dipole, its orbital motion, and the electrostatic field of the positively charged nucleus. This phenomenon is detectable as a splitting of spectral lines, which can be thought of as a Zeeman effect product of two relativistic effects: the apparent magnetic field seen from the electron perspective and the magnetic moment of the electron associated with its intrinsic spin. A similar effect, due to the relationship between angular momentum and the strong nuclear force, occurs for protons and neutrons moving inside the nucleus, leading to a shift in their energy levels in the nucleus shell model. In the field of spintronics, spin–orbit effects for electrons in semiconductors and other materials are explored for technological applications. The spin–orbit interaction is at the origin of magnetocrystalline anisotropy and the spin Hall effect.

One of the guiding principles in modern chemical dynamics and spectroscopy is that the motion of the nuclei in a molecule is slow compared to that of its electrons. This is justified by the large disparity between the mass of an electron and the typical mass of a nucleus and leads to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and the idea that the structure and dynamics of a chemical species are largely determined by nuclear motion on potential energy surfaces. The potential energy surfaces are obtained within the adiabatic or Born–Oppenheimer approximation. This corresponds to a representation of the molecular wave function where the variables corresponding to the molecular geometry and the electronic degrees of freedom are separated. The non separable terms are due to the nuclear kinetic energy terms in the molecular Hamiltonian and are said to couple the potential energy surfaces. In the neighbourhood of an avoided crossing or conical intersection, these terms cannot be neglected. One therefore usually performs one unitary transformation from the adiabatic representation to the so-called diabatic representation in which the nuclear kinetic energy operator is diagonal. In this representation, the coupling is due to the electronic energy and is a scalar quantity that is significantly easier to estimate numerically.

In classical electromagnetism, magnetization is the vector field that expresses the density of permanent or induced magnetic dipole moments in a magnetic material. Movement within this field is described by direction and is either Axial or Diametric. The origin of the magnetic moments responsible for magnetization can be either microscopic electric currents resulting from the motion of electrons in atoms, or the spin of the electrons or the nuclei. Net magnetization results from the response of a material to an external magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials have a weak induced magnetization in a magnetic field, which disappears when the magnetic field is removed. Ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials have strong magnetization in a magnetic field, and can be magnetized to have magnetization in the absence of an external field, becoming a permanent magnet. Magnetization is not necessarily uniform within a material, but may vary between different points. Magnetization also describes how a material responds to an applied magnetic field as well as the way the material changes the magnetic field, and can be used to calculate the forces that result from those interactions. It can be compared to electric polarization, which is the measure of the corresponding response of a material to an electric field in electrostatics. Physicists and engineers usually define magnetization as the quantity of magnetic moment per unit volume. It is represented by a pseudovector M.

In solid-state physics, the tight-binding model is an approach to the calculation of electronic band structure using an approximate set of wave functions based upon superposition of wave functions for isolated atoms located at each atomic site. The method is closely related to the LCAO method used in chemistry. Tight-binding models are applied to a wide variety of solids. The model gives good qualitative results in many cases and can be combined with other models that give better results where the tight-binding model fails. Though the tight-binding model is a one-electron model, the model also provides a basis for more advanced calculations like the calculation of surface states and application to various kinds of many-body problem and quasiparticle calculations.

In quantum mechanics, the Pauli equation or Schrödinger–Pauli equation is the formulation of the Schrödinger equation for spin-½ particles, which takes into account the interaction of the particle's spin with an external electromagnetic field. It is the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and can be used where particles are moving at speeds much less than the speed of light, so that relativistic effects can be neglected. It was formulated by Wolfgang Pauli in 1927.

STO-nG basis sets are minimal basis sets, where $primitive Gaussian orbitals are fitted to a single Slater-type orbital (STO). originally took the values 2 - 6. They were first proposed by John Pople. A minimum basis set is where only sufficient orbitals are used to contain all the electrons in the neutral atom. Thus for the hydrogen atom, only a single 1s orbital is needed, while for a carbon atom, 1s, 2s and three 2p orbitals are needed. The core and valence orbitals are represented by the same number of primitive Gaussian functions . For example, an STO-3G basis set for the 1s, 2s and 2p orbital of the carbon atom are all linear combination of 3 primitive Gaussian functions. For example, a STO-3G s orbital is given by:$

A normalized 1s Slater-type function is a function which is used in the descriptions of atoms and in a broader way in the description of atoms in molecules. It is particularly important as the accurate quantum theory description of the smallest free atom, hydrogen. It has the form

In number theory, a cyclotomic character is a character of a Galois group giving the Galois action on a group of roots of unity. As a one-dimensional representation over a ring $R$ , its representation space is generally denoted by $R (1)$ .

Within computational chemistry, the Slater–Condon rules express integrals of one- and two-body operators over wavefunctions constructed as Slater determinants of orthonormal orbitals in terms of the individual orbitals. In doing so, the original integrals involving N-electron wavefunctions are reduced to sums over integrals involving at most two molecular orbitals, or in other words, the original 3N dimensional integral is expressed in terms of many three- and six-dimensional integrals.

Learning with errors (LWE) is the computational problem of inferring a linear $-ary function over a finite ring from given samples some of which may be erroneous. The LWE problem is conjectured to be hard to solve, and thus to be useful in cryptography.$

In quantum mechanics, orbital magnetization, M_orb, refers to the magnetization induced by orbital motion of charged particles, usually electrons in solids. The term "orbital" distinguishes it from the contribution of spin degrees of freedom, M_spin, to the total magnetization. A nonzero orbital magnetization requires broken time-reversal symmetry, which can occur spontaneously in ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials, or can be induced in a non-magnetic material by an applied magnetic field.

In physics, particularly in quantum field theory, the Weyl equation is a relativistic wave equation for describing massless spin-1/2 particles called Weyl fermions. The equation is named after Hermann Weyl. The Weyl fermions are one of the three possible types of elementary fermions, the other two being the Dirac and the Majorana fermions.

In condensed matter and atomic physics, Van Vleck paramagnetism refers to a positive and temperature-independent contribution to the magnetic susceptibility of a material, derived from second order corrections to the Zeeman interaction. The quantum mechanical theory was developed by John Hasbrouck Van Vleck between the 1920s and the 1930s to explain the magnetic response of gaseous nitric oxide and of rare-earth salts. Alongside other magnetic effects like Paul Langevin's formulas for paramagnetism and diamagnetism, Van Vleck discovered an additional paramagnetic contribution of the same order as Langevin's diamagnetism. Van Vleck contribution is usually important for systems with one electron short of being half filled and this contribution vanishes for elements with closed shells.

References

↑ Slater, J. C. (1930). "Atomic Shielding Constants". Physical Review . 36 (1): 57. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36...57S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.57.
↑ Belkic, D.; Taylor, H. S. (1989). "A unified formula for the Fourier transform of Slater-type orbitals". Physica Scripta . 39 (2): 226–229. Bibcode:1989PhyS...39..226B. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/39/2/004. S2CID 250815940.
↑ Cruz, S. A.; Cisneros, C.; Alvarez, I. (1978). "Individual orbit contribution to the electron stopping cross section in the low-velocity region". Physical Review A . 17 (1): 132–140. Bibcode:1978PhRvA..17..132C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.17.132.
↑ Guseinov, I. I. (2002). "New complete orthonormal sets of exponential-type orbitals and their application to translation of Slater Orbitals". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 90 (1): 114–118. doi:10.1002/qua.927.
↑ Bouferguene, A.; Fares, M.; Hoggan, P. E. (1996). "STOP: Slater Type Orbital Package for general molecular electronic structure calculations". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 57 (4): 801–810. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1996)57:4<801::AID-QUA27>3.0.CO;2-0.
↑ Hehre, W. J.; Stewart, R. F.; Pople, J. A. (1969-09-15). "Self‐Consistent Molecular‐Orbital Methods. I. Use of Gaussian Expansions of Slater‐Type Atomic Orbitals". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 51 (6): 2657–2664. Bibcode:1969JChPh..51.2657H. doi:10.1063/1.1672392. ISSN 0021-9606.

Harris, F. E.; Michels, H. H. (1966). "Multicenter integrals in quantum mechanics. 2. Evaluation of electron-repulsion integrals for Slater-type orbitals". Journal of Chemical Physics . 45 (1): 116. Bibcode:1966JChPh..45..116H. doi:10.1063/1.1727293.
Filter, E.; Steinborn, E. O. (1978). "Extremely compact formulas for molecular two-center and one-electron integrals and Coulomb integrals over Slater-type atomic orbitals". Physical Review A . 18 (1): 1–11. Bibcode:1978PhRvA..18....1F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.18.1.
McLean, A. D.; McLean, R. S. (1981). "Roothaan-Hartree-Fock Atomic Wave Functions, Slater Basis-Set Expansions for Z = 55–92". Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables . 26 (3–4): 197–381. Bibcode:1981ADNDT..26..197M. doi:10.1016/0092-640X(81)90012-7.
Datta, S. (1985). "Evaluation of Coulomb integrals with hydrogenic and Slater-type orbitals". Journal of Physics B . 18 (5): 853–857. Bibcode:1985JPhB...18..853D. doi:10.1088/0022-3700/18/5/006.
Grotendorst, J.; Steinborn, E. O. (1985). "The Fourier transform of a two-center product of exponential-type functions and its efficient evaluation". Journal of Computational Physics . 61 (2): 195–217. Bibcode:1985JCoPh..61..195G. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(85)90082-8.
Tai, H. (1986). "Analytic evaluation of two-center molecular integrals". Physical Review A . 33 (6): 3657–3666. Bibcode:1986PhRvA..33.3657T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3657. PMID 9897107.
Grotendorst, J.; Weniger, E. J.; Steinborn, E. O. (1986). "Efficient evaluation of infinite-series representations for overlap, two-center nuclear attraction, and Coulomb integrals using nonlinear convergence accelerators". Physical Review A . 33 (6): 3706–3726. Bibcode:1986PhRvA..33.3706G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3706. PMID 9897112.
Grotendorst, J.; Steinborn, E. O. (1988). "Numerical evaluation of molecular one- and two-electron multicenter integrals with exponential-type orbitals via the Fourier-transform method". Physical Review A . 38 (8): 3857–3876. Bibcode:1988PhRvA..38.3857G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3857. PMID 9900838.
Bunge, C. F.; Barrientos, J. A.; Bunge, A. V. (1993). "Roothaan-Hartree-Fock Ground-State Atomic Wave Functions: Slater-Type Orbital Expansions and Expectation Values for Z=2–54". Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables . 53 (1): 113–162. Bibcode:1993ADNDT..53..113B. doi:10.1006/adnd.1993.1003.
Harris, F. E. (1997). "Analytic evaluation of three-electron atomic integrals with Slater wave functions". Physical Review A . 55 (3): 1820–1831. Bibcode:1997PhRvA..55.1820H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.55.1820.
Ema, I.; García de La Vega, J. M.; Miguel, B.; Dotterweich, J.; Meißner, H.; Steinborn, E. O. (1999). "Exponential-type basis functions: single- and double-zeta B function basis sets for the ground states of neutral atoms from Z=2 to Z=36". Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables . 72 (1): 57–99. Bibcode:1999ADNDT..72...57E. doi:10.1006/adnd.1999.0809.
Fernández Rico, J.; Fernández, J. J.; Ema, I.; López, R.; Ramírez, G. (2001). "Four-center integrals for Gaussian and Exponential Functions". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 81 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1002/1097-461X(2001)81:1<16::AID-QUA5>3.0.CO;2-A.
Guseinov, I. I.; Mamedov, B. A. (2001). "On the calculation of arbitrary multielectron molecular integrals over Slater-Type Orbitals using recurrence relations for overlap integrals: II. Two-center expansion method". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 81 (2): 117–125. doi:10.1002/1097-461X(2001)81:2<117::AID-QUA1>3.0.CO;2-L.
Guseinov, I. I. (2001). "Evaluation of expansion coefficients for translation of Slater-Type orbitals using complete orthonormal sets of Exponential-Type functions". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 81 (2): 126–129. doi:10.1002/1097-461X(2001)81:2<126::AID-QUA2>3.0.CO;2-K.
Guseinov, I. I.; Mamedov, B. A. (2002). "On the calculation of arbitrary multielectron molecular integrals over Slater-Type Orbitals using recurrence relations for overlap integrals: III. auxiliary functions Q¹_nn' and G^q_−nn". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 86 (5): 440–449. doi:10.1002/qua.10045.
Guseinov, I. I.; Mamedov, B. A. (2002). "On the calculation of arbitrary multielectron molecular integrals over Slater-Type Orbitals using recurrence relations for overlap integrals: IV. Use of recurrence relations for basic two-center overlap and hybrid integrals". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 86 (5): 450–455. doi:10.1002/qua.10044.
Özdogan, T.; Orbay, M. (2002). "Evaluation of two-center overlap and nuclear attraction integrals over Slater-type orbitals with integer and non-integer principal quantum numbers". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 87 (1): 15–22. doi:10.1002/qua.10052.
Harris, F. E. (2003). "Comment on Computation of Two-Center Coulomb integrals over Slater-Type orbitals using elliptical coordinates". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 93 (5): 332–334. doi:10.1002/qua.10567.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Slater, J. C. (1930). "Atomic Shielding Constants". Physical Review . 36 (1): 57. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36...57S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.57.

[2] Belkic, D.; Taylor, H. S. (1989). "A unified formula for the Fourier transform of Slater-type orbitals". Physica Scripta . 39 (2): 226–229. Bibcode:1989PhyS...39..226B. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/39/2/004. S2CID 250815940.

[3] Cruz, S. A.; Cisneros, C.; Alvarez, I. (1978). "Individual orbit contribution to the electron stopping cross section in the low-velocity region". Physical Review A . 17 (1): 132–140. Bibcode:1978PhRvA..17..132C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.17.132.

[4] Guseinov, I. I. (2002). "New complete orthonormal sets of exponential-type orbitals and their application to translation of Slater Orbitals". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 90 (1): 114–118. doi:10.1002/qua.927.

[5] Bouferguene, A.; Fares, M.; Hoggan, P. E. (1996). "STOP: Slater Type Orbital Package for general molecular electronic structure calculations". International Journal of Quantum Chemistry . 57 (4): 801–810. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1996)57:4<801::AID-QUA27>3.0.CO;2-0.

[6] Hehre, W. J.; Stewart, R. F.; Pople, J. A. (1969-09-15). "Self‐Consistent Molecular‐Orbital Methods. I. Use of Gaussian Expansions of Slater‐Type Atomic Orbitals". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 51 (6): 2657–2664. Bibcode:1969JChPh..51.2657H. doi:10.1063/1.1672392. ISSN 0021-9606.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]