 | |
| Discipline | Cultural studies |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | Jonathan Beller, Jayna Brown, David Sartorius |
| Publication details | |
| History | 1979–present |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (United States) |
| Frequency | Quarterly |
| Standard abbreviations | |
| ISO 4 | Soc. Text |
| Indexing | |
| ISSN | 0164-2472 (print) 1527-1951 (web) |
| LCCN | 79644624 |
| JSTOR | 01642472 |
| OCLC no. | 423561805 |
| Links | |
Social Text is a peer-reviewed [1] academic journal published by Duke University Press. Since its inception by an independent editorial collective in 1979, Social Text has addressed a wide range of social and cultural phenomena, covering questions of gender, sexuality, race, and the environment. Each issue covers subjects in the debates around feminism, Marxism, neoliberalism, postcolonialism, postmodernism, queer theory, and popular culture. The journal has since been run by different collectives over the years, mostly based at New York City universities. It has maintained an avowedly progressive political orientation and scholarship over these years, if also a less Marxist one. Since 1992, it is published by Duke University Press. [2]
Contents
The journal gained notoriety in 1996 for the Sokal affair, when it published a nonsensical article that physicist Alan Sokal had deliberately written as a hoax. The editorial board, according to Editor Andrew Ross, published the article as a good faith attempt by Sokal, a well-known physicist, to develop a social theory of his field. [3] Ross claims that the editorial board asked Sokal to revise and resubmit his article, but Sokal refused, and so the editors decided to publish the paper as a prominent physicist’s best attempt to develop theory. [4]
The editors of the journal were awarded the 1996 Ig Nobel Prize for literature by "eagerly publishing research that they could not understand, that the author said was meaningless, and which claimed that reality does not exist". [5] The journal did not [6] practice academic peer review, and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist. [7] [2] The Sokal article has never been retracted by the journal.
