Solicitors Regulation Authority

Last updated
Solicitors Regulation Authority
AbbreviationSRA
FormationJanuary 29, 2007;17 years ago (2007-01-29)
Type Professional body
Headquarters Birmingham, England
Region served
England and Wales
Paul Philip
Main organ
Board
Affiliations Chartered Institute of Legal Executives
Website www.sra.org.uk

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales.

Contents

It is responsible for regulating the professional conduct of more than 125,000 solicitors and other authorised individuals at more than 11,000 firms, as well as those working in-house at private and public sector organisations.

The SRA, based in Birmingham with offices in London and Cardiff, is led operationally by a Chief Executive and Senior Management Team, [1] with a Board [2] and Board Sub-Committees [3] providing strategic direction. [4]

The SRA was formed in January 2007 by the Legal Services Act 2007 to act as the independent regulator of solicitors. While formally an arm of the Law Society, the SRA is a statutory creation and operationally independent of the Law Society. In a report by Sir David Clementi [5] of all legal services in England and Wales, he recommended that professional bodies holding both regulatory and representative responsibilities should separate those roles. The government adopted this recommendation.

The Law Society remains the representative body for solicitors.

In October 2024, an investigation conducted by Carson McDowell LLP concluded that the SRA failed to act adequately, effectively and efficiently with regard to its investigation of Axiom Ince: a law firm which subsequently collapsed in 2023, with the loss of 1,400 jobs and over £60 million in client money. [6] Insurance contributions on solicitors firms have risen by 270% to meet the costs of the resulting shortfall. The LSB has confirmed that it will initiate enforcement action against the SRA to ensure that the SRA learn appropriate lessons from this grotesque incompetence, and that such a disaster will never be repeated. [7] [ full citation needed ] Unfortunately, rather than display contrition and humility, the SRA's chair and chief executive, Anna Bradley and Paul Philip respectively, have responded with arrogance and contempt, each refusing to accept the outcome of the independent investigation. [8] [ full citation needed ] Accordingly, calls are growing on these individuals to resign immediately. [9] [ full citation needed ]

Background

The profession of solicitor has been self-regulated for centuries. The Law Society acquired its first Royal Charter in 1831 [10] and the new Charter in 1845 defined the Society as an independent, private body servicing the affairs of the profession like other professional, literary and scientific bodies. In 1834, the Society first initiated proceedings against dishonest practitioners. By 1907, the Society possessed a statutory disciplinary committee, and was empowered to investigate solicitors' accounts and to issue annual practising certificates. In 1983, the Society established the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors to deal with complaints about solicitors.

Following the Clementi review, the SRA was formed as a Board of The Law Society, but it regulates and enforces regulation completely independently of the Law Society. It is not representative of, or responsive to, the profession, and it is headed by non-lawyers. The current Chief Executive, Paul Philip, is a career regulator who previously served the General Medical Council. This arrangement has produced the anomaly that in England and Wales, unlike most common law jurisdictions, solicitors are admitted by non-lawyers and receive admission certificates signed by a regulatory bureaucrat who is not a lawyer or a judge. The Law Society remains the approved regulator, although following the Legal Services Act 2007 a new body, the Legal Services Board (chaired by Sir Michael Pitt, a government appointee) oversees all the approved regulators including the Bar Council, which has also divested its regulatory functions into the Bar Standards Board.

Function

The SRA regulates solicitors, other authorised professionals and the firms they work in throughout England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate legal jurisdictions and have their own regulatory regimes.

A solicitor is someone who carries out specific legal activities, having undergone specialist studies and training. These specific services are called reserved legal activities. In England and Wales, the current reserved legal activities are:

There are other regulators within England and Wales, who regulate other providers of legal services. The Bar Standards Board regulates barristers, for example, while the other regulators are:

All regulators report to the overarching Legal Services Board. Regulatory work is designed to ensure all work in legal services achieves the eight regulatory outcomes. [16]

These are:

The SRA carries out its function by:

Regulating in the public interest

The SRA regulates firms and individuals in the public interest. This means setting the minimum professional standards that solicitors should adhere to so their clients - as consumers - get the service they expect. When these standards are not met, professional sanctions are taken to act as a deterrent.

However, the SRA is not a prescribed person or statutory regulator for the purposes of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (for whistleblowing purposes). [20]

What regulating in the public interest does not mean, however, is acting as means of recourse for individuals that are unhappy with the actions of their solicitor or firm. While the SRA will deal with complaints brought to it by dissatisfied clients as necessary, it does not offer a compensation scheme. This can be achieved through the Legal Ombudsman.

Activity

Enforcement

In 2012, the SRA's Supervision function handled a total of 6,289 issues, while the Forensic Investigations Unit began work on 530 new cases.

The number of interventions, which involves the SRA closing down a firm because it poses risks to clients, was 37. The number of referrals to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal was 289, which resulted in 77 strike-offs, 94 fines and 56 suspensions, among other sanctions.

The Solicitors Compensation Fund accepted 1,321 claims and paid out £18.54 million for those which were successful.

Further information on the SRA's enforcement activity can be found on its Reports and Research pages [21]

Outcomes-focused regulation

In 2011, the SRA moved from a rules-based tick-box approach to regulation and introduced an outcomes-focused regime. [22] This involved creating a whole new Handbook to create a regulatory framework [23] in which law firms could deliver the best outcomes for their clients using a business model adapted specifically for their situation.

Research [24] conducted at the end of 2012 showed that while the number of firms comfortable with the concept of outcomes-focused regulation had increased, the SRA still had work to do to demonstrate the flexibilities offered by the new way of working.

Alternative business structures

The Legal Services Act also allowed for law firms to adopt management models that moved away from the traditional all-partner model. Alternative Business Structures (ABSs) [25] were introduced on 6 October 2011, and the SRA began accepting applications for licences on 3 January 2012. The first licences [26] were awarded on 28 March 2012.

The SRA, in conjunction with the BSB and IPS, has delivered the Legal Education Training Review (LETR), the most comprehensive study on training for legal services in a generation. Each of the regulators will be producing their own response to the findings of the review.

Referral fees in personal injury cases

As part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the Government introduced a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases. [27] Solicitors could no longer pay firms that passed them details of those who had suffered injuries as the Government felt this played a significant part in creating and maintaining the alleged compensation culture. The SRA was tasked with drawing up the rules to outlaw the payments [28] and police the profession in conjunction with the Ministry of Justice and Financial Conduct Authority.

Despite the ban on referral fees, the practice of Claims Management Companies introducing injured clients to solicitors in exchange for a fee remains prevalent in the UK.

A matter of concern with regards to solicitors making payments in exchange for these introductions is the fact that, in many cases, the fee paid is in excess of the costs a solicitor can be paid by the losing party for the work done on some claims. This inevitability of this is that a solicitor must take up the option of deducting up to 25% from the customers compensation in order to cover costs and maintain profitability.

It is of note that the initial ability of solicitors to claim referral fees in personal injury cases was itself introduced by Government in order the ameliorate the effect of removal of access to Legal Aid for personal injury claims.

Financial stability

The difficult economic climate brought about by the 2008 recession affected the legal sector in the same way that it affected all others. While some firms found new ways of working or cut their cloth accordingly, others failed to adapt to tighter financial constraints. This was brought into focus early in 2013 with a number of high-profile failures at large practices. [29] The SRA started a programme of work to discover how deeply the financial difficulties lie, and help firms [30] in trouble.

News International

In July 2011 the SRA announced that it would be launching a formal inquiry into the role played by solicitors in the News International phone hacking scandal. [31] [32] The SRA confirmed that its investigation would consider the concerns of Labour MP Tom Watson, who had called upon the SRA to investigate News International's former legal adviser Harbottle & Lewis. [31] [32]

Incompetence

In August 2023, the SRA was fined £75,000 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for bringing a speculative prosecution against a solicitor without a proper basis in law. The SDT further found that the SRA had delayed inordinately in bringing the case. [33]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrister</span> Lawyer specialised in court representation in certain jurisdictions

A barrister is a type of lawyer in common law jurisdictions. Barristers mostly specialize in courtroom advocacy and litigation. Their tasks include arguing cases in courts and tribunals, drafting legal pleadings, researching the law and giving legal opinions.

A solicitor is a legal practitioner who traditionally deals with most of the legal matters in some jurisdictions. A person must have legally defined qualifications, which vary from one jurisdiction to another, to be described as a solicitor and enabled to practise there as such. For example, in England and Wales a solicitor is admitted to practise under the provisions of the Solicitors Act 1974. With some exceptions, practising solicitors must possess a practising certificate. There are many more solicitors than barristers in England; they undertake the general aspects of giving legal advice and conducting legal proceedings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paralegal</span> Paraprofessional who assists qualified lawyers in their legal work

A paralegal, also known as a legal assistant, or paralegal specialist is a legal professional who performs tasks that require knowledge of legal concepts but not the full expertise of a lawyer with an admission to practice law. The market for paralegals is broad, including consultancies, companies that have legal departments or that perform legislative and regulatory compliance activities in areas such as environment, labor, intellectual property, zoning, and tax. Legal offices and public bodies also have many paralegals in support activities using other titles outside of the standard titles used in the profession. There is a diverse array of work experiences attainable within the paralegal field, ranging between internship, entry-level, associate, junior, mid-senior, and senior level positions.

Legal ethics are principles of conduct that members of the legal profession are expected to observe in their practice. They are an outgrowth of the development of the legal profession itself.

The Legal Practice Course (LPC) – also known as the Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice – is a postgraduate course and the final educational stage for becoming a solicitor in England, Wales and Australia. The course is designed to provide a bridge between academic study and training in a law firm. It is a one-year, full-time course, and tuition fees range from £8,000-£17,300 a year. A small proportion of students may have their fees and some living expenses paid for by future employers under a training contract.

A licensed conveyancer is a specialist legal professional in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia or South Africa who has been trained to deal with all aspects of property law.

In England and Wales, the Legal Complaints Service was a body that formally investigated complaints about solicitors, which was superseded by the Legal Ombudsman in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law Society of British Columbia</span>

The Law Society of British Columbia is the regulatory body for lawyers in British Columbia, Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal Services Act 2007</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Legal Services Act 2007 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that seeks to liberalise and regulate the market for legal services in England and Wales, to encourage more competition and to provide a new route for consumer complaints. It also makes provisions about the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ince & Co</span> International commercial law firm

Ince & Co was a United Kingdom-based holding company with a core business in legal services, which was listed on the London Stock Exchange. The company also offered complementary services in accounting, financial services, consulting, and pensions advice. It was previously known as Ince Gordon Dadds LLP, following the acquisition of Ince & Co by Gordon Dadds Group LLP, and rebranded as The Ince Group in August 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal Services Board</span>

The Legal Services Board is an independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales. It is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Ministry of Justice, created through the Legal Services Act of 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts and Legal Services Act 1990</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that reformed the legal profession and courts of England and Wales. The Act was the culmination of a series of reports and reforms that started with the Benson Commission in the 1970s, and significantly changed the way that the legal profession and court system worked.

The Glanville Davies affair was a scandal in the English legal profession which resulted in greater reform of the regulatory processes for solicitors and was one of the justifications for the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. Glanville Davies was a well-respected solicitor and a member of the Council of the Law Society of England and Wales who massively overcharged his client, Leslie Persons, sending him a bill for £197,000 that was reduced on taxation to £67,000. Davies was not punished by the Law Society's internal regulatory committees, which allowed him to resign from the council on the grounds of ill-health with his reputation intact. Following litigation and public criticism, the Law Society commissioned an internal report that found "administrative failures, wrong decisions, mistakes, errors of judgement, failures in communication and insensitivity". A private member's bill reformed the way in which the Law Society investigated disciplinary complaints, although not to the extent initially proposed, and paved the way for the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 that created an independent disciplinary body.

Lexcel is an accreditation indicating quality in relation to legal practice management standards. It was introduced by The Law Society of England and Wales in 1998. Until 2010, the Lexcel standard was attainable by law firms and in-house legal departments in England and Wales. A separate franchised scheme was available for practices in Northern Ireland. Since September 2010, Lexcel accreditation has been attainable by any law firm or in-house legal department in any jurisdiction in the world. The worldwide scheme continues to be administered by the Law Society of England and Wales.


In Australia, trust money in the legal industry is the money a law practice holds on behalf of a client or other people in the course of, or in connection with, the provision of legal services. Trust money is required to be held by a law firm on a client's behalf in a trust account with a bank and is highly regulated. A lawyer or law firm should not appropriate a client's trust money until certain regulations are met, which are different for each state in Australia. The Australian system regulating lawyers and their trust accounts has been labeled by the Rudd Government as an "unwieldy monster".

The legal services sector of the United Kingdom is a significant part of the national economy; it had a total output of £22.6 billion in 2013, up from 10.6 billion in 2001, and is equivalent to 1.6% of the country's gross domestic product for that year. The sector has a trade surplus is £3.1 billion in 2013 and directly employees 316,000 people, two-thirds of whom are located outside London. The UK is the world's most international market for legal services. It allows virtually unrestricted access for foreign firms, resulting in over 200 foreign law firms with offices in London and other cities in the UK. Around half of these are US firms, with the remainder mainly from Europe, Australia and Canada. The UK legal market has a strong global position due to the popularity of English law. Some 27% of the world's 320 legal jurisdictions use English Common law.

A sole practitioner or solo practitioner is a professional, such as a lawyer or an architect, who practices independently. For instance a sole practitioner's law firm may include non-lawyer support personnel but does not include any other lawyers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Association of Costs Lawyers</span>

The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) is a professional association that represents costs lawyers in England and Wales. It was originally established in 1977 as the Association of Law Costs Draftsmen, but the name was changed in January 2011.

The Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) is the main process of qualifying as a solicitor in England and Wales as of 2021. In order to be admitted to the roll of solicitors, a candidate must have tertiary education in any subject, pass two SQE assessments, complete qualifying work experience (QWE) for two years full-time and meet the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)'s requirements for character and suitability. It is the solicitors' equivalent of the Bar Professional Training Course.

References

  1. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, How We Work
  2. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Our Board
  3. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Our Committees
  4. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Our Strategy
  5. ↑ National Archives, Clementi Report
  6. ↑ "Axiom Ince - SRA faces enforcement action".
  7. ↑ "Axiom Ince - SRA faces enforcement action".
  8. ↑ https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news-focus/in-depth-sra-compliance-conference-was-exquisitely-timed/5121480.article
  9. ↑ https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/solicitors-regulator-chiefs-must-resign-after-damning-axiom-report-7p9h9nlrr
  10. ↑ Law Society Royal Charters Archived 2008-11-21 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ↑ Chartered Institute of Legal Executives
  12. ↑ The Faculty Office of the Archbishop of Canterbury
  13. ↑ Council for Licensed Conveyancers
  14. ↑ Intellectual Property Regulation Board
  15. ↑ Costs Lawyer Standards Board
  16. ↑ "Legal Services Board, Regulatory Outcomes". Archived from the original on 2013-10-05. Retrieved 2013-10-02.
  17. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority Handbook, 2011
  18. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Sanctions
  19. ↑ Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
  20. ↑ "Whistleblowing: List of prescribed people and bodies".
  21. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Quarterly Regulatory Outcomes Reports
  22. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Outcomes-focused Regulation Archived 2013-10-05 at the Wayback Machine
  23. ↑ Legal Futures article, OFR Goes Live
  24. ↑ "Solicitors Regulation Authority, The Impact of OFR, one year on". Archived from the original on 2013-10-04. Retrieved 2013-10-02.
  25. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, ABSs
  26. ↑ Legal Week article, SRA Confirms Debut Trio of ABSs
  27. ↑ Solicitors Journal article, Onus on Firms to Show No Referral Fee Being Paid
  28. ↑ Solicitors Regulation Authority, Referral Fee Ban Archived 2013-10-04 at the Wayback Machine
  29. ↑ Legal Futures article, Financial Instability Among Law Firms
  30. ↑ "Code of Conduct - You and your business - Management of your business". SRA Handbook. 10 May 2013.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) The SRA Handbook is no longer in effect. It was replaced by the SRA Standards and Regulations on 25 November 2019.
  31. 1 2 "SRA probes solicitors' handling of Hackgate". The Lawyer. 22 July 2011. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
  32. 1 2 "SRA to investigate lawyers' role in phone-hacking as Yates drafts in Carter-Ruck for libel action". Legal Week. 22 July 2011. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
  33. ↑ "SRA hit with £75,000 costs bill for 'speculative' prosecution".
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.