Southern Athabascan (also Apachean, Southern Athabaskan) is a subfamily of Athabaskan languages spoken in the North American Southwest. Refer to Southern Athabascan languages for the main article.
Typologically, Southern Athabaskan languages are mostly fusional, polysynthetic, nominative–accusative head-marking languages. These languages are argued to be non-configurational languages. The canonical word order is SOV, as can be seen in Lipan example below:
Southern Athabaskan words are modified primarily by prefixes, which is uncommon for SOV languages (suffixes are expected).
The Southern Athabaskan languages are "verb-heavy" — they have a great ponderance of verbs but relatively few nouns. In addition to verbs and nouns, these languages have other elements such as pronouns, clitics of various functions, demonstratives, numerals, adverbs, and conjunctions, among others. Harry Hoijer grouped most of the above into a word class which he called particle based on the type of inflection that occurs on the word class. This categorization provides three main lexical categories (i.e. parts of speech):
There is nothing that corresponds to what are called adjectives in English. Adjectival notions are provided by verbs; however, these adjectival verb stems do form a distinct sub-class of verb stems which co-occur with adjectival prefixes.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
SA nouns are essentially of the following types (with various subtypes):
The simple nouns can consist of only a noun stem (which are usually only a single syllable long), such as
Other nouns may consist of a noun plus one or more prefixes, such as
or of a noun plus an enclitic or suffix, such as
The added prefixes may be lexical or they may be inflectional prefixes (e.g. personal prefixes indicating possession). SA languages do not have many simple nouns, but these nouns are the most ancient part of the lexicon and thus are essential in making comparisons between Athabascan languages.
Another noun type is a noun compound consisting of more than one noun stem, such as
Other kinds of noun compounds are the following:
Many other various combinations of elements are possible.
The most common type of noun is the deverbal noun (i.e., a noun derived from a verb). Most of these nouns are formed by adding a nominalizing enclitic, such as Mescalero -ń or -í, Western Apache -í and Navajo -í, to the end of the verb phrase. For example, in Mescalero the verb ’ént’į́į́ "he/she bewitches him/her" may become a noun by adding either the enclitic -ń (for people) or -í (for things):
Thus, the word ’ént’į́į́ń "witch" literally means "the one who bewitches him or her". Another example is from Navajo:
Many of these nouns may be quite complex, as in Navajo
Other deverbal nouns do not appear with a nominalizing enclitic, as in Navajo
For a comparison with nouns in a Northern Athabascan language, see Carrier: Nouns
Most nouns can be inflected to show possession. Simple nouns, compound nouns, and some deverbal nouns are inflected by adding a pronominal prefix to the noun base, as in the following Chiricahua possessed noun paradigm (i.e. noun declension):
shibán | "my bread" | (shi- 1st person singular + bán "bread") |
nahibán | "our/your bread" | (nahi- 1st/2nd person dual) |
nibán | "your bread" | (ni- 2nd person singular) |
bibán | "her/his/its/their bread" | (bi- 3rd person) |
gobán | "her/his/their bread" (polite) | (go- 4th/3a. person) |
’ibán | "someone's bread" | (’i- indefinite) |
As seen above, Chiricahua nouns are inflected for number (singular and dual) and person (first, second, third, fourth, and indefinite). In the third and indefinite persons, there is only one pronominal prefix bi- and ’i- (that is, Chiricahua does not have two different prefixes for the third person singular and the third person dual). Additionally, although there is a first person singular shi- and a second person singular ni-, in the plural Chiricahua only has one prefix nahi- for both the first and second persons (that is, nahi- means both first and second person plural). A distributive plural prefix daa- may also be added to possessed nouns in front of the pronominal prefixes:
daanahibán | "our/your bread" | (daa- + nahi- + bán) |
daabibán | "their bread" | (daa- + bi- + bán) |
daagobán | "their bread" | (daa- + go- + bán) |
daa’ibán | "some persons' bread" | (daa- + ’i- + bán) |
The prefix table below shows these relationships:
Person | Singular | Dual | Plural (distrib.) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st | shi- | nahi- | daa-nahi- | |
2nd | ni- | |||
3rd | bi- | daa-bi- | ||
4th | go- | daa-go- | ||
indef. | ’i- | daa-’i- |
A Navajo pronominal prefix paradigm may be compared with the Chiricahua above:
Person | Singular | Dual | Plural (distrib.) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st | shi- | nihi- | da-nihi- | |
2nd | ni- | |||
3rd | bi- | da-bi- | ||
4th | ho-/ha- | da-ha- | ||
indef. | (’)a- | – | – |
Two other pronominal prefixes include the reciprocal prefix as in Mescalero ’ił- and Navajo ał- "each other's" and the reflexive prefix as in Mescalero ’ádi- and Navajo ádi- "one's own".
Larger possessive phrases can be formed like the following Navajo phrases:
John bibááh | "John's bread" | (bi- 3rd person singular, bááh "bread") |
shimá bibááh | "my mother's bread" | (shi- 1st person singular, -má "mother") |
bimá bibááh | "his mother's bread" | |
John bimá bibááh | "John's mother's bread" |
As seen above, the possessor occurs before the possessed noun(s). Thus, in order to say "John's bread", the 3rd person prefix bi- is added to the possessed noun bááh "bread" and the possessor noun John is placed before bibááh "his bread". Usually, in the first and second persons only a pronominal prefix (shi-, ni-, and nihi-) is added to possessed nouns. However, if focusing on the possessor (i.e. a type of emphasis) is needed, an independent personal pronoun may be added to the possessive phrase. Thus, we have the following
shimá bibááh | "my mother's bread" | |
shí shimá bibááh | "MY mother's bread" | (shí 1st person singular pronoun) |
nihitaa’ bibááh | "our father's bread" | (nihi- 1st/2nd person dual prefix, -taa’ "father") |
nihí nihitaa’ bibááh | "OUR father's bread" | (nihí 1st/2nd person dual pronoun) |
By observing these Navajo possessive phrases, it is evident here that Southern Athabascan languages are head-marking in that the possessive prefix is added to the possessed noun, which is the head of the noun phrase (this is unlike the dependent-marking languages of Europe where possessive affixes are added to the possessor).
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
The key element in Southern Athabaskan languages is the verb, and it is notoriously complex. Verbs are composed of a stem to which inflectional and/or derivational prefixes are added. Every verb must have at least one prefix. The prefixes are affixed to the verb in a specified order.
The Southern Athabaskan verb can be sectioned into different morphological components. The verb stem is composed of an abstract root and an often fused suffix. The stem together with a classifier prefix (and sometimes other thematic prefixes) make up the verb theme. The theme is then combined with derivational prefixes which in turn make up the verb base. Finally, inflectional prefixes (which Young & Morgan call "paradigmatic prefixes") are affixed to the base—producing a complete verb. This is represented schematically in the table below:
root | |
stem | = root + suffix |
theme | = stem + classifier (+ thematic prefix(es)) |
base | = theme + derivational prefix(es) |
verb | = base + inflectional prefix(es) |
The prefixes that occur on a verb are added in specified order according to prefix type. This type of morphology is called a position class template (or slot-and-filler template). Below is a table of one proposal of the Navajo verb template (Young & Morgan 1987). Edward Sapir and Harry Hoijer were the first to propose an analysis of this type. A given verb will not have a prefix for every position, in fact most Navajo verbs are not as complex as the template would seem to suggest.
The Navajo verb has 3 main parts:
disjunct prefixes | conjunct prefixes | STEM |
---|
These parts can be subdivided into 11 positions with some of the positions having even further subdivisions:
Disjunct | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1a | 1b | 1c | 1d | 1e | 2 | 3 |
object | null postposition | derivational-thematic | reflexive | reversionary | semeliterative | iterative | distributive plural |
Conjunct | STEM | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 5 | 6a | 6b | 6c | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
direct object | deictic subject | thematic-derivational-aspect | thematic-derivational-aspect | transitional-semelfactive | modal-aspectual | subject | "classifier" | stem |
Although prefixes are generally found in a specific position, some prefixes change order by the process of metathesis. For example, in Navajo prefix ’a- (3i object pronoun) usually occurs before di-, as in
However, when ’a- occurs with the prefixes di- and ni-, the ’a- metathesizes with di-, leading to an order of di- + ’a- + ni-, as in
instead of the expected *adinisbąąs (’a-di-ni-sh-ł-bąąs) (’a- is reduced to ’-). Metathesis is conditioned by phonological environment (Young & Morgan 1987:39).
Verb stems have different forms that alternate according to aspect and tense. The alternation (ablaut) mostly involves vowels (change in vowel, vowel length, or nasality) and tone, but sometimes includes the suffixation of a final consonant. The Chiricahua verb stems below have five different forms that correspond to mode:
stem form | mode | stem form | mode |
---|---|---|---|
-k’áásh | imperfective ('to sharpen') | -ghee | imperfective ('to move quickly') |
-k’aazh | perfective | -ghu | perfective |
-k’ash | progressive | -ghuł | progressive |
-k’ash | iterative | -ghu | iterative |
-k’áásh | optative | -ghee | optative |
Each mode can also occur with different aspects, such as momentaneous, continuative, repetitive, semelfactive, etc. For example, a stem can be momentaneous imperfective, momentaneous perfective, momentaneous optative, etc. The (partial) Navajo verb stem conjugation below illustrates the verb stem -’aah/-’ą́ "to handle a solid roundish object" with the same mode in different aspects:
stem form | mode | aspect | example verb | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-’aah | imperfective | momentaneous | haash’aah | 'I'm extracting it' |
-’á | imperfective | continuative | naash’á | 'I'm carrying it' |
-’a’ | imperfective | distributive | bitaash’a’ | 'I'm passing it out to each one of them' |
-’ááh | imperfective | reversative | náhásh’ááh | 'I'm turning it around' |
This same verb stem -’aah/-’ą́ "to handle a solid round object" has a total of 26 combinations of 5 modes and 6 aspects:
Imperfective | Perfective | Progressive- Future | Usitative- Iterative | Optative | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Momentaneous | ’aah | ’ą́ | ’ááł | ’ááh | ’ááł |
Continuative | ’á | ’ą́ | ’aał | ’aah | ’aał |
Distributive | ’a’ | ’ą́ | ’aał | ’aah | ’a’ |
Reversative | ’ááh | ’ą́ | ’ááł | ’ááh | ’ááł |
Transitional | ’aah | ’a’ | ’aał | ’aah | ’aah |
Conative | ’ááh | - | - | - | - |
Although there are 26 combinations for this verb, there is a high degree of homophony, in that there are only 7 different stem forms (-’aah, -’ááh, -’aał, -’ááł, -’a’, -á, -’ą́). To complicate matters, different verbs have different patterns of homophony: some verbs have only 1 stem form that occurs in all mode-aspect combinations, others have 5 forms, etc., and not all stems occur in the same mode-aspect combinations. Additionally, the different stem forms of different verbs are formed in different ways.
Southern Athabaskan languages have verb stems that classify a particular object by its shape or other physical characteristics in addition to describing the movement or state of the object. These are known in Athabaskan linguistics as classificatory verb stems. These are usually identified by an acronym label. There are 11 primary classificatory "handling" verbs stems in Navajo which are listed below (given in the perfective mode). Other Southern Athabaskan languages have a slightly different set of stems.
Classifier+Stem | Label | Explanation | Examples |
---|---|---|---|
-'ą́ | SRO | Solid Roundish Object | bottle, ball, boot, box, etc. |
-yį́ | LPB | Load, Pack, Burden | backpack, bundle, sack, saddle, etc. |
-ł-jool | NCM | Non-Compact Matter | bunch of hair or grass, cloud, fog, etc. |
-lá | SFO | Slender Flexible Object | rope, mittens, socks, pile of fried onions, etc. |
-tą́ | SSO | Slender Stiff Object | arrow, bracelet, skillet, saw, etc. |
-ł-tsooz | FFO | Flat Flexible Object | blanket, coat, sack of groceries, etc. |
-tłéé' | MM | Mushy Matter | ice cream, mud, slumped-over drunken person, etc. |
-nil | PLO1 | Plural Objects 1 | eggs, balls, animals, coins, etc. |
-jaa' | PLO2 | Plural Objects 2 | marbles, seeds, sugar, bugs, etc. |
-ką́ | OC | Open Container | glass of milk, spoonful of food, handful of flour, etc. |
-ł-tį́ | ANO | Animate Object | microbe, person, corpse, doll, etc. |
To compare with English, Navajo has no single verb that corresponds to the English word give. In order to say the equivalent of Give me some hay! the Navajo verb níłjool (NCM) must be used, while for Give me a cigarette! the verb nítįįh (SSO) must be used. The English verb give is expressed by 11 verbs in Navajo, depending on the characteristics of the given object.
In addition to defining the physical properties of the object, primary classificatory verb stems also can distinguish between the manner of movement of the object. The stems can then be grouped into three categories:
Handling includes actions such as carrying, lowering, and taking. Propelling includes tossing, dropping, and throwing. Free flight includes falling, and flying through space.
Using an example for the SRO category Navajo has
In addition, Southern Athabaskan languages also have other somewhat similar verb stems that Young & Morgan (1987) call secondary classificatory verbs.
(The term classifier is used in Athabaskan linguistics to refer to a prefix that indicates transitivity or acts as a thematic prefix, and as such is somewhat of a misnomer. These transitivity classifiers are not involved in the classificatory verb stems' classification of nouns and are not related in any way to the noun classifiers found in Chinese or Thai).
Like most Athabaskan languages, Southern Athabaskan languages show various levels of animacy in its grammar, with certain nouns taking specific verb forms according to their rank in this animacy hierarchy. For instance, Navajo nouns can be ranked by animacy on a continuum from most animate (a human or lightning) to least animate (an abstraction) (Young & Morgan 1987: 65-66):
humans/lightning → infants/big animals → mid-size animals → small animals → insects → natural forces → inanimate objects/plants → abstractions
Generally, the most animate noun in a sentence must occur first while the noun with lesser animacy occurs second. If both nouns are equal in animacy, then either noun can occur in the first position. So, both example sentences (1) and (2) are correct. The yi- prefix on the verb indicates that the 1st noun is the subject and bi- indicates that the 2nd noun is the subject.
(1) | Ashkii | at'ééd | yiníł'į́. |
boy | girl | yi-look | |
'The boy is looking at the girl.' |
(2) | At'ééd | ashkii | biníł'į́. |
girl | boy | bi-look | |
'The girl is being looked at by the boy.' |
But example sentence (3) sounds wrong to most Navajo speakers because the less animate noun occurs before the more animate noun:
(3) | * Tsídii | at'ééd | yishtąsh. |
bird | girl | yi-pecked | |
'The bird pecked the girl.' |
In order express this idea, the more animate noun must occur first, as in sentence (4):
(4) | At'ééd | tsídii | bishtąsh. |
girl | bird | bi-pecked | |
'The girl was pecked by the bird.' |
Although sentence (4) is translated into English with a passive verb, in Navajo it is not passive. Passive verbs are formed by certain classifier prefixes (i.e. transitivity prefixes) that occur directly before the verb stem in position 9.
In linguistics, a noun class is a particular category of nouns. A noun may belong to a given class because of the characteristic features of its referent, such as gender, animacy, shape, but such designations are often clearly conventional. Some authors use the term "grammatical gender" as a synonym of "noun class", but others consider these different concepts. Noun classes should not be confused with noun classifiers.
Navajo or Navaho is a Southern Athabaskan language of the Na-Dené family, through which it is related to languages spoken across the western areas of North America. Navajo is spoken primarily in the Southwestern United States, especially in the Navajo Nation. It is one of the most widely spoken Native American languages and is most widely spoken north of the Mexico–United States border, with almost 170,000 Americans speaking Navajo at home as of 2011.
Animacy is a grammatical and semantic feature, existing in some languages, expressing how sentient or alive the referent of a noun is. Widely expressed, animacy is one of the most elementary principles in languages around the globe and is a distinction acquired as early as six months of age.
Eyak was a Na-Dené language, historically spoken by the Eyak people, indigenous to south-central Alaska, near the mouth of the Copper River. The name Eyak comes from a Chugach Sugpiaq name (Igya'aq) for an Eyak village at the mouth of the Eyak River.
Denaʼina, also Tanaina, is the Athabaskan language of the region surrounding Cook Inlet. It is geographically unique in Alaska as the only Alaska Athabaskan language to include territory which borders salt water. Four dialects are usually distinguished:
Crow is a Missouri Valley Siouan language spoken primarily by the Crow Nation in present-day southeastern Montana. The word, Apsáalooke, translates to "children of the raven." It is one of the larger populations of American Indian languages with 2,480 speakers according to the 1990 US Census.
The Plains Apache language was a Southern Athabaskan language formerly spoken by the Plains Apache, organized as the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma, living primarily around Anadarko in southwest Oklahoma. The language is extinct as of 2008, when Alfred Chalepah, Jr., the last native speaker, died.
Chiricahua is a Southern Athabaskan language spoken by the Chiricahua people in Chihuahua and Sonora, México and in Oklahoma and New Mexico. It is related to Navajo and Western Apache and has been described in great detail by the anthropological linguist Harry Hoijer (1904–1976), especially in Hoijer & Opler (1938) and Hoijer (1946). Hoijer & Opler's Chiricahua and Mescalero Apache Texts, including a grammatical sketch and traditional religious and secular stories, has been converted into an online "book" available from the University of Virginia.
The Tsuutʼina language, or Tsúùtʼínà Gūnáhà, is spoken by the people of the Tsuutʼina Nation, whose reserve and community is near Calgary, Alberta. It belongs to the Athabaskan language family, which also include the Navajo and Chiricahua of the south, and the Dene Suline and Tłı̨chǫ of the north.
Kathlamet was a Chinookan language that was spoken around the border of Washington and Oregon by the Kathlamet people. The most extensive records of the language were made by Franz Boas, and a grammar was documented in the dissertation of Dell Hymes. It became extinct in the 1930s and there is little text left of it.
East Ambae is an Oceanic language spoken on Ambae, Vanuatu. The data in this article will concern itself with the Lolovoli dialect of the North-East Ambae language.
Ilocano grammar is the study of the morphological and syntactic structures of the Ilocano language, a language spoken in the northern Philippines by ethnic Ilocanos and Ilocano communities in the US, Saudi Arabia and other countries around the globe.
Adang is a Papuan language spoken on the island of Alor in Indonesia. The language is agglutinative. The Hamap dialect is sometimes treated as a separate language; on the other hand, Kabola, which is sociolinguistically distinct, is sometimes included. Adang, Hamap and Kabola are considered a dialect chain. Adang is endangered as fewer speakers raise their children in Adang, instead opting for Indonesian.
This article is about the sound system of the Navajo language. The phonology of Navajo is intimately connected to its morphology. For example, the entire range of contrastive consonants is found only at the beginning of word stems. In stem-final position and in prefixes, the number of contrasts is drastically reduced. Similarly, vowel contrasts found outside of the stem are significantly neutralized. For details about the morphology of Navajo, see Navajo grammar.
Southern Athabaskan is a subfamily of Athabaskan languages spoken primarily in the Southwestern United States with two outliers in Oklahoma and Texas. The languages are spoken in the northern Mexican states of Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila and to a much lesser degree in Durango and Nuevo León. Those languages are spoken by various groups of Apache and Navajo peoples. Elsewhere, Athabaskan is spoken by many indigenous groups of peoples in Alaska, Canada, Oregon and northern California.
Proto-Athabaskan is the reconstructed ancestor of the Athabaskan languages.
Galice, or Galice-Applegate or Upper Rogue River, is an extinct Athabaskan language once spoken by the two Upper Rogue River Athabaskan tribes, the Galice tribe and Applegate tribe of southwestern Oregon. It was spoken on the "Galice Creek and Applegate River, tributaries of the Rogue River in southwestern Oregon. There were at least two distinct dialects the Galice Creek and Applegate, but only the Galice Creek dialect is well documented."
Neve’ei, also known as Vinmavis, is an Oceanic language of central Malekula, Vanuatu. There are around 500 primary speakers of Neve’ei and about 750 speakers in total.
Navajo is a "verb-heavy" language – it has a great preponderance of verbs but relatively few nouns. In addition to verbs and nouns, Navajo has other elements such as pronouns, clitics of various functions, demonstratives, numerals, postpositions, adverbs, and conjunctions, among others. Harry Hoijer grouped all of the above into a word-class he called particles. Navajo has no words that would correspond to adjectives in English grammar: verbs provide the adjectival functionality.
This article describes the grammar of the Old Irish language. The grammar of the language has been described with exhaustive detail by various authors, including Thurneysen, Binchy and Bergin, McCone, O'Connell, Stifter, among many others.
See the Southern Athabaskan languages bibliography for references